Mondays

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this? The idea of preserving undeveloped land around large cities is not so new. In fact, we mainly use these green areas for leisure activities. That these lands benefit both nature and people is an undeniable fact accepted by most environmentalists. However, many people have the opposite viewpoint opining one of the best options for constructions are those area where the price of land is much lesser (lower) than inside cities. In fact they believe this is a feasible solution to lowering the price of housing in big cities resulting in helping a majority of citizens who cannot afford high prices of housing in big cities. First and for mostforemost, tired and ill-tempered of the hectic pace of life, humans today looks for wild nature to spend his their leisure time to relieve emit the stress and tiredness (which) they have has gotten from heavy work. Based on a research done by the faculty of civil engineering at UCLA, the statistics showed that an achievable destination for the majority of people who do cannot not afford long journeys are is greenbelts near metropolitan areas. I believe not only do are the greenbelts a suitable place for people in all social levels but it they also has have an important role in improving the quality of polluted weather in large cities. In other words, those preserved areas act as active lungs for polluted cities. On the other hand, some others claim the construction should be expanded to the outskirts, so that the price of accommodation will be reduced in highly expensive urban areas. Although I completely agree with lowering housing prices by constructing more buildings, I am extremely against losing green areas to achieveing reasonable prices for housing. I think this is a short-term solution leading to more inflations within a short period of time. My suggestion is to speed up constructions, but in minor cities and this not only does this encouragevillagers not to immigrate to big cities, but also can result in creating jobs in small cities. In addition to this, the greenbelt remainsed untouched. In conclusion, as an environmentally friendly person I think we are not allowed to destruct/destroy the greenbelt unless it is under a severely tough condition. Thanks to the modern urban design there are some practical solutions to stop thatthat the destruction of ruining wild life around big cities. I hold the idea that the green areas near big cities have (play) a critical point part in health and wellbeing of citizens.