Thursdays

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. It is needless to say that education is a very important part of every society for development whether in science, technology or art. Also, People these days are more prone to pursue their education to higher ranks. Meanwhile, although some believe that individuals should be free to find their study fields, others speculate that the individuals should be forced to select their study subjects based on whatever is useful in the future including science and technology. Firstly, let’s look at the advantages and disadvantages of the first standpoint above‐mentioned. Individuals have the right to find their way according to their interests, but they also might be guided to find the suitable fitted study subject based on their aptitudes. Nonetheless, to my knowledge, many pupils select their field emotionally and after a while will figure out that they have no interest in on the field and give it up. Therefore, this viewpoint is not applicable for all. the second viewpoint argues that individuals must be forced to select some limited study subjects only appertaining to science and technology. The foible of this viewpoint is that not all people are not good at science and technology. They cannot accomplish their study because they have not been built for mathematical calculation though they might be are really good at art. Nevertheless, I strongly believe that no one can force another to select a study subject against their will. To sum up, as I discussed above, both standpoints have pros and cons. I am more inclined to the first because I believe that individuals are responsible for their decisions whether these decisions are to the detriment of their future or benefit them.