Fridays

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think the most efficient way to reduce the industrial pollution is to tax the companies which cause the pollution. Others think that there are better ways to reduce the pollution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. In this rapidly changing world, with regard to the increasinge rate of industrial pollution throughout the world, a certain percentage of individuals are of this opinion that imposing tax to on companies which cause industrial pollution would be effective to in dwindlinge pollution. However, others opine that some new techniques should be taken to tackle this issue. In this essay, I will attempt to elaborate on both standpoints together with expressing my own stance on this argument. On the one hand, there is no doubt that pollution is becoming more and more widespread,. Therefore, the best deterring factor so as toin diminishing industrial pollution is to impose super taxes on defective enterprises, meaning that they are obliged not to use their previous improper methods in their production lines which will be conducivee to air, water or even soil pollution. This opinion can be adequate in to some extent, but without providing its prerequisites to producet goods in a healthy conditions, such companies become unable to proceed their business activities, that which leads to decreasinge job opportunities. On the other hand, there are a multitude of measures that ought to be used to reduce industrial pollution. Firstly, using alternative energy such as solar or wind energy can be really workable because not only are they clean energy, but also they can be renewablereversible. Besides, providing effective infrastructure for companies, for example an effective sewage system, can control water and soil pollution which are completely hazardous for wildlife. Last but not least, some practical devices can be applied in factories to reduce pollution. Companies are able to deploy air filters which can be attached into exhaust fans to absorb harmful gasses which can be totally fruitful. Personally, were I to comment on this debate, I would vote for using new methods to reduce pollution owing to the aforementioned justifications. Furthermore, introducing new ways in order to decrease pollution can encourage other people to use them in their daily affairsbasis.To sum up, despite the fact that imposing tax to on companies creating industrial pollution may be a simple solution, utilizing new procedures such as alternative energy and standard sewerage systems can be more viable than super taxes.Some people think the most efficient way to reduce the industrial pollution is to tax the companies which cause the pollution. Others think that there are better ways to reduce the pollution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. In this rapidly changing world, with regard to the increasinge rate of industrial pollution throughout the world, a certain percentage of individuals are of this opinion that imposing tax to on companies which cause industrial pollution would be effective to in dwindlinge pollution. However, others opine that some new techniques should be taken to tackle this issue. In this essay, I will attempt to elaborate on both standpoints together with expressing my own stance on this argument. On the one hand, there is no doubt that pollution is becoming more and more widespread,. Therefore, the best deterring factor so as toin diminishing industrial pollution is to impose super taxes on defective enterprises, meaning that they are obliged not to use their previous improper methods in their production lines which will be conducivee to air, water or even soil pollution. This opinion can be adequate in to some extent, but without providing its prerequisites to producet goods in a healthy conditions, such companies become unable to proceed their business activities, that which leads to decreasinge job opportunities. On the other hand, there are a multitude of measures that ought to be used to reduce industrial pollution. Firstly, using alternative energy such as solar or wind energy can be really workable because not only are they clean energy, but also they can be renewablereversible. Besides, providing effective infrastructure for companies, for example an effective sewage system, can control water and soil pollution which are completely hazardous for wildlife. Last but not least, some practical devices can be applied in factories to reduce pollution. Companies are able to deploy air filters which can be attached into exhaust fans to absorb harmful gasses which can be totally fruitful. Personally, were I to comment on this debate, I would vote for using new methods to reduce pollution owing to the aforementioned justifications. Furthermore, introducing new ways in order to decrease pollution can encourage other people to use them in their daily affairsbasis.To sum up, despite the fact that imposing tax to on companies creating industrial pollution may be a simple solution, utilizing new procedures such as alternative energy and standard sewerage systems can be more viable than super taxes.