Fridays

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is some times said that the countryside offers a high quality of life, specially for families. What are the arguments for and against families choosing to live and work in the countryside. For example farmers? What is your own view about this? living countrysides based on numerous advantages which are available for humans can be worth while. Yet there remains some arguments as to whether such a place for living should be considerd in an optimictic or a pessimistic approach. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I personally believe that the benefits of living out of cities far outweigh its drawbacks. First of all, it is indisputable fact that living in rurall areas revolutionized the way we resid. It is undeniable that little matchs the peace and tranquility of living in villages. Being surrounded by water bodies and wildlife, country dwellers find it enjoyable to do some related jobs such as forestry and animal husbandry and farming. What is really significant in this regard is relaxtion and a healthy lifestyle as opposed to hectic pace life and anxiety which are widespread among cities. Admitedly, living in a backwater and being deprived of cutting-edge facilities and amenities, youths in rural areas move to big cities in search of greater job opportunities and higher qualiy of life, hence, rural unimployment and depopulation. Despite some problems such as the scarsity of employment opportunities and even rural poverty, an abundance of organic foods and fresh air can be influential as to why people choose villages for their living. Raised environmental awareness, some groups of individuals would like to focus on environmentally friendly issues and allocate a major part of their lives to support animals and nature. Meanwhile they use fresh vegetables and fruits and are more phisically active which ends up in guaranteed healthy status. Equally importantly, though, thanks to breakthrough of the internet it can be possible for some people such as managers to live in countrysides and use the advantages available for them while they use some method such as remote viewing to control their workplace, so their material considerations can partly disappear. However, problems related to the pace of the internet and the technology particularly in developing countries can pose problems to live in far-flung vilages and supervise workforces in cities. Nonetheless, the feeling of self-sufficiency and resistance which are exemplified in farmers' lives can be regarded as as possitive approach. A case in point is in spite of some pressing difficulties and limitations, subsistence farmers use some methods such as crop rotation to overcome some limitations in order to keep the soil healthy. By way of conclusion, I reaffirm that living in the rarual areas can be looked optimistically because of its influence on healthy issuse and focusing on ever-growing population of cities as deterrent factor. vahidl