جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Task: In some countries, people who are unemployed receive a sum of money each week in the form of a benefit. While some support this, other people believe that this money should not be given. Discuss both points of view and give your own point of view. Paying money to the jobless is a controversial issue among the experts. While there are persuasive arguments in favor of that, others believe that it is not a proper policy, inasmuch as this attitude creates a huge amount number of problems. My personal conviction in this regard is not different from the second group. Advocates claim that in many countries the high rate of the unemployment is a consequence of wrong political decisions among the governments who are generally responsible for creating a job opportunitiesy, so it is incumbent on the politicians to financially support the out- of- work individuals. Moreover, in some countries recession is a pivotal key in causing job losses.making individuals to be jobless. In these countries companies are forced to cutbacks the number of (employees who are responsible for) breadwinners(families’ expenditure(expenses)). Thus, from proponents’ perspective, support from governments is a must to prevent families from breaking. Opponents, on the other hand, assert that such policies would lead to laziness(paying a sum of money has many drawbacks. They believe that this attitude can make many jobless people lazy, )for they do not feel any financial pressure/problems, so they will shirk responsibility regarding finding a job. In addition, critics claim that this policy/practice can create a considerable amount number of dissatisfaction among both employers and employees who believe that they pay taxes in order to enhance the quality of facilities in society. however, their taxes support the jobless who are not applying for a job since they earn an easy money. In conclusion, I firmly hold the opinion that governments who support this idea should strike a balance in this case. Simply put, they should restrict their help in order to encourage the jobless to look for a job as well as having them not relying on this income as a life- time warranty.

Go to top