Mondays

Azam Rostami, School

2019-02-19T03:54:05+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many graduated graduates pupils from secondary schools choose to spend the year before entering university on travelling abroad or getting a job. In this essay I intend to identify the privileges and demerits of this decision, though I personally believe its advantages are far greater than the negatives. To begin with, youngsters who do not travel or work in this year off, might not use their time productively and spend it on a spree on streets which might put them in at the risk of negative influence of peers/peer pressure. Therefore, travelling to a completely new country in instead, whit with quite a different culture and history could not only broaden their prospect perspective toward life, also they would learn a variety of things from the destination country ( customs, art, language and extetc). Traveling, moreover, would probably develop their creativity and discover other aspects of themselves which could be beneficial for their life and work later on. We all have heard that travelling have has countless life lessons in itself which is not a part of any school’s curriculum. Working, similarly, would provide the opportunity to make enjoy practical experience and financial independency. Since most of the youngsters after completing high school move out to far away cities in which their university is in, they mostly require to get a part-time job to meet accommodation fees and daily expenses. Thus this year could act as a warm up. Although the sweetness of travelling and earning money might stimulate students to leave studying all together , it is frequently a temporary persuasion. To conclude, spending the a year off before beginning of universities year on travelling and working could assist students in transmitting transitioning properly from adolescent adolescence to maturity.

Forough, The Best Way to Overcome The Stress

2019-02-19T03:53:52+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some psychologists think that the best way to overcome the stress of everyday life is to spend a portion of the day doing absolutely nothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? In the modern world, not surprisingly, stress is the byproduct of a high-pressure and fast-paced lifestyle. Although freeing up a daily program is believed to be the best approach to curb stress, I am not in complete accord with this view idling cannot be the solution. The cogent argument will be presented in details. To begin with, it is undeniable that daily activities expose humans' body and his their brain under extreme pressures and tensions but being idle cannot be a practical remedy to this issue. To illustrate more, we might be able to get rid of our activities sometimes in a day, but the distractive and stressful thoughts target our brain all the times. For instance, even when we are lying down in our bed and resting, loads of negative thoughts attack to our mind, increase our anxiety and prohibit us from having a peaceful sleep. Moreover, it has been observed that the majority of employees who are having a regular break during a day, when facing to a tough situation, lose their coolness, patience and display anger and stressful behavior totheir clients. As a result, stress is not a phenomenon that can be simply overcome by just relaxation. On the other hand, if we dig a little deeper in order to determine the reason for stress, we need to have more personal growth and change, especially in our daily schedules. In other words, instead of doing absolutely nothing, it is better to take part in pleasant and cheerful programs and experience other fruitful alternatives. We could go to music classes for example and learn to play a musical instrument or playing exercise a specific sport. These activities not only could mitigate our stress but they ultimately bring joy, pleasure, and inspiration to lives. They also could give us adequate mental and physical energy to encounter problems in life and resolve them in a rational way far from anxiety and stress. To sum up, I tend to agree that the aforementioned method offered by some psychologists is an inefficient way to relieve our stress. Other alternatives such as music classes and playing sports are more practical in achieving this goal.

Hamidreza Ghanbari, University Students

2019-02-19T03:53:39+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give you own opinion. At this point in time, it has been indicated observed in numerous countries that authorities prohibit universities to narrow the choices of studying especial subjects. Although, it has been mentioned that this practice, gives the impression of a mature investment, this interference has not been approved by a large number of experts. Some educationalists claim that should university pupils decide for their subject area, it they will stand a higher chance to attain more outstanding achievements. That is to say, they will energetically attend the university courses, and profoundly grasp whatever they will be taught. Hence, this could lay a basic groundwork for the development in their perception about a specific science, given that, the success in a particular sphere is intricately connected to the one’s affinity toward it, and eventually, it may serve as a springboard to acquire an appropriate position in their future profession. On the opposite side of the coin, there are is an array of psychologists who cite that it there must be an intervene intervention to some extent, in order to receive quite a more beneficial result for society across the board. Understanding more vital requirements of the country, the states could lead universities to a route, in which the public interest exists. As far as computer science is concernsconcerned, for instance, in a developed nation, there should be a vaster number of experts to satisfy the all citizens’ needs. Under this circumstance, the science which seems surplus unnecessary forthe nation, should be excluded, no matter a range of individuals are earnestly partial to that. All in all, from my point of view, this policy might impede the way of success, and set stumbling blocks for these this upcoming workforce. Moreover, they may encounter social ills, since they were not free to opt for their subject areas.

Mahsa Molaei, Hobby

2019-02-19T03:53:28+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that in order for a hobby to be enjoyable, it needs to be difficult in some way. Do you agree or disagree? As a pace of life has increased beyond our wildest expectation, the importance of people’s hobbies are more obvious than every time in past. Some people point out that a significant factor for a hobby to be joyful is having some level of difficulties, whilst others frown upon this statement. I, personally, have a firm conviction that there is a more to hobbies in order to be considered as an enjoyable leisure pursuit than merely being hard to operate. Both conflicting notions will be considered in this essay. Some individuals assert that a hobby need to be hard enough, otherwise it cannot appeal to public. They believe that people who almost all of them is adhering to routine lifestyle, really deserve to participate in an activity which is hard to operate and cause their body to release thrill’s hormones. In that, this hormones contribute to sense of glee which can allow people to allocate sometime to be away from work, family or other life responsibilities. Moreover, difficult sport such as rock climbing, provide people with some new experiences, pushing them out of their comfort zone. Excitement and experiencing unpredictable things causes that thisthese groups of people to think difficulty would played a pivotal role to make a hobby enjoyable. However, others reckon that the criteria which make a hobby interesting, not only are not limited to only one or two items but also it is synthetic factors which is not ease to generalize for all walks of people. Some people tend to opt for relaxing hobbies like Yoga, as it helps them to ease their mind as well as making them fine and fit. In the other words, they need to have a hobby which relax them after a hectic days. Besides, they think taking part in a relatively difficult activity need some level of physical abilities which make that not very desirable work after a work time. Therefore, the preponderance of people, I included, believe that the parameters which are making an activity attractive, are desperate from one to another and it directly depends on individual’s personality and attitudes. Although it is likelythat some people consider difficulty as a factor, there is no doubt that it cannot be the main factor which is acceptable by fellow human being. To conclude, some members of society mention that an enjoyable hobby need to offer a levels of difficulty which challenge people whilst others claim that for some others it is counter-productive and the more a hobby is difficult, the more people tend to be not decisive to choose it in their life timetable. As human being is the complex creatures with the different mindsets, we cannot generalize a statement to all without having enough proofs and this subject is not exception too.

Mojtaba Raznahan, Punishment

2019-02-19T03:53:16+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

topic: It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children? It is true that some social and fundamental skills such as morality and ethics shall be taught at a very young age., how you achieve this, is of high importance. Therefore, I to some degree, concur that penalties need to be accounted for a better upbringing. On the one hand, disciplining children is not a straightforward task for parents to undertake and a variety of educational techniques should be applied while doing this duty and one such method is incorporating some sort of punishment during the process. Kids are by no means capable of conceiving right and wrong by their own since this is something acquired through nurture. Using penalties when encountering a child’s misbehave misbehavior, could potentially alleviate the problem, whether that being at school or home. Leaving the misconduct with no consequence would probably lead to a rebellious offspring. Having said that, the way we impose punishment is vital and any forms of corporal punishment must be averted, as shown by the plethora of scientific findings. I believe that taking away the privileges is by far one of the best ways for parents and teachers to put into practice, e.g. not allowing the kids to watch their desired TV Programs or reducing the leisure time activities at schools, in the event of any wrongdoing. On the other hand, In consideration of recent psychological studies indicating the potential adverse effects of punishments exercised by unknowing parents and teachers, as they are a delicate skill, I am drawn to the thought that positive reinforcement is another alternate technique that could be promoted. That means, encouraging good behavior while neglecting undesirable demeanor. For instance, it would be better for teachers to just let the pupils notice of their mistakes in their homework rather than practicing any verbal punishment. Praising students when doing an impressive job in the assignments, is yet another example of this method. Moreover, this way not only teaches children that it is sometimes acceptable for humans not to be correct, but it also shows them that compassion is a great stimulant for good behavior. In conclusion, while penalties are occasionally a useful tool to develop morality in children, I believe there are better and innocent ways of achieving this through approaches like positive reinforcement.

Mosadegh, Age of Retirement Should be Raised

2019-02-19T03:53:02+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Today, the modernized lifestyle and the presence of technology have changed the way of human living. In the ancient times, people were working until they were not able to move physically. With the passage of time the rate of rough work has declined and now people do some office work or maybe work with some special machines in factories. Moreover, an extremely important factor to have a long life span is rooted in hygiene. Although through development of the hygiene, the individuals’ life span is lasted that means there are more workforce today, but as a result of hardscrabble life which they have confronted, there is also a necessity to have a long term rest time for them. One reason for those who claim that individuals should also work after their retirement period is that there is a need for all walks of life society to contribute to society all walks of life to work well at old ages too. There is a fact that the old generation burden huge responsibilities on governments such as health insurance services, different convenient facilities in the city and some consulting social courses to prevent them from depression. Most of the time, retires still have a lot of energy to work and also have much more experience to cooperate to society and in their specific field, it is true society should not miss them after thirty years of work. It takes much time and many expenses to form such individuals for a community. Cleary, in some poor countries which are almost located in Far East, Middle East or Africa in which some of population of retires work again to fulfill their needs due to recession of economy. Without a doubt, they have no other choices to live a life and this situation will become worst after a certain time when they will suffer from specific diseases in the future. Obviously, through such a hectic lifestyle which human beings have faced, it is not acceptable that they have to choose other jobs for the rest of their life. It is undeniable not only should they need to rest and have a stress-relief life after a while, but also they will need some special treatment as they will get old. No matter how they work hard or earn somewhat money, they desire to have a long day-off for the rest of their living. Unlike our ancestors who almost were farmer or probably miner and had a rough and physical duty, it may illustrate that they needed more time for resting, but we as new generations who struggle with AI and the difficulties of modern world need more rest time than those. Overall, I have to say that because of the speed of our age and life, there must be an optional choice for everyone to select what is suit their situation. Sometimes, rules make people’s life more complicated and different too. It is a direct responsibility for governments of countries to find a feasible solution for this issue.

Mostafa Esmaielee, Society

2019-02-19T03:52:50+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people therefore think that government should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding Today, all societies need any type of jobs that can help people in order to suppling supply their requirements for a better life. some specific jobs need to gain universal education for achievement certification and also there are typical jobs such as chefs cooking and sales and salesmen which they just need experience for the start. there are is an attitude that says legal the government should support and pay universe university cost of sensitive and important jobs in order to in prevent of lace lack of specialists. Obviously, some intelligent students who can go on study at university in there their career because of foundational financial situations such as students in deprivation areas that has have talent for to preform difficult jobs. Furthermore, we constantly need employees for sensitive and significent significant jobs which government are worried of their decline in demand of studying them, such as, nurses and mine engineers. on another hand, some believe that, a lot of education garduates intend to go out into abroad board after ending their study and help to them is useless foe for society, moreover they can gain huge salary after finishing study at university and that is enough for their motivation. They also propose to that the government spend that money in order to try for improve university. All in all, we need to decide which one is so important for our society, training students with legal support legal for competition sensitive jobs or accepting the risk of lack of that. In from my point view it is obvious that damaging this risk in society is more bigger than the benefit of save saving money. And the government hat had better support creative students for helping to society requiermetsrequiremets.

Mostafa Radmehr, Fossil Fuels

2019-02-19T03:52:37+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Nowadays, allocating and discovering the well-protected places for discarding fossil fuels is one of the most essential inevitable issues that should be considered by countries. I completely agree that governments should take (adopt) an appropriate measure to dispose of this these waste disposals. On the one hand, there are strong reasons that fossil fuels should be dumped in suitable and secured safe places. The first devastating effects might be that disposing of mass toxic substances such as fossil fuels in a place which is directly in touch with soil could cause big trouble for the characteristics of soil structures. This would mean that fossil fuels having a lot of poisonous chemical materials might change of soil properties, so inwithin a specific radius farming in this these kinds of lands which has have been poisoned by harmful materials would be impossible. An additional downside could be that waste disposal might be mixed by with rainwater: therefore, it may run into rivers, oceans, and underwater. Then this water will inevitably be treated as potable water. On the other hand, a safe place for discarding fossil fuels could play an important role in protecting our environment. It is essential that authorities spend more budget on preserving ecology because in the remote future with the increase in this kind of hazardous substances we might put the majority of habitats on unprecedented strain, so choosing suitable places which are far from animals’ natural surroundings should be in the main priority of the organizations having this responsibility. In addition, governments should allocate more money to university so that not only do scientists be able to carry out practical research to detect the accurate places of harmful material but also they can discover that how this toxic waste should be dumped. To sum up, my point of view governments should put a ban on this method of producing energy and also should use the latest techniques for dumping these existing poisonous materials.

Beheshteh, Road Offenders

2019-02-19T03:52:24+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Is These days, regrettably, headlines of newspapers are occupied by the saddening issue of road tolls. This very dire state of affairs has turned into a considerable debate. Seeking out a solution as to how ameliorate the situation, some might opine that only if the consequence of traffic- law breaking grows stricter could we expect safer roads, while I assume that other factors indeed must accompany as well. Experience in every corner of the globe has proven that enacting tough rules in a society bring fewer offences in its wake. In the other word, the sterner the controls on the driving behavior applied, the fewer disobedience is witnessed, hence thanks to the constant threat of being punished, citizens are less likely tempted to go wrong, albeit this does not lay claim that it the would be the only treatment contributed to having safe roads. Along with seriously implemented penalties, other measures could be exerted to guarantee the responsibility of lessening the road fatalities, if not entirely annihilating them. Improving infrastructure by way of allocating reasonable amount of the local budget on designing safer roads in term of appropriately planned intersections and accurately improved signage. Besides, applying constant observation on qualified maintenance and repairing the surface out of potholes. Secondly, social media would play pivotal roles in educating drivers as would advertising campaigns, thereby broadening their vision as to road hazards. Finally, spurring companies to design cars which withstand side impacts as well as rear and front. Desiring adequate safety for the roads, some might vote for stricter punishments to be the only effective way. However, from my point of view, in the absence of other factor reaching the ultimate purpose would be virtually next to impossible.

Saeid MH, Safety Standards

2019-02-19T03:52:03+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Safety standards are important when building people’s homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes – the government or the people who build the homes? Nowadays, the safety standards checklist based on which that the a specific accommodation is builthas passed, is a vital factor for the buyers. There are a group of people who believe that it is one of the the responsibility responsibilities of the government to avoid construction of unsafe buildings whereas there are another group who think that the constructors should obey the standards themselves. While both views make sense, I would argue that governments’ responsibilities are more important in constructing sturdier buildings. It is crystal clear that if the constructors follow an ethic code and take a thorough responsibility for what they build, then it is not necessary for governments to take any steps toward observing safety of the homes being built. For example, the constructors could come to an agreement about following a specific standard which could be managed through their cartel guild and applying those standards, then there will be no worries about buildings’ safeness, but nevertheless with all respect to these people, I believe that when it comes to making more money they will forget about following the codes and try to finish the job by reducing as much expenses as possible. On the other hand, governments have the power of imposing strict rules on construction, hence they will feel more responsibilities responsibewill entail on them. For instance, the government could fine the companies for not carrying out the safety basics,. Therefore, the constructors will be forced to follow the safety codes and not to overlook them. Although most governments implement such laws very strictly, there are few that are acting very lenient and will recompense avoiding safety rules by monetary penalties which I believe should be stopped. To conclude, whereas people who build homes are responsible for the life of the prospective inhabitants of those buildings, the government plays a more significant role in this case and I believe that it is the main entity responsible for the safety of the constructions.