Mondays

Car Ownership, Ali Khaleghifard

2018-02-27T12:16:42+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now "one big traffic jam". How true do you think this statement? What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? Over the last decades, traffic congestion has been one of the major issues in many big cities. Although this problem is a confluence of various matters such as poor road conditions, overpopulation and inadequate commute facilities, the pace of the increase in the number of the personal cars is considereds the main culprit of this situation. Thus, some urgent proceedings by officials to address this issue are seemingly are unavoidable like convincing people to use public transportation rather than their own cars. Firstly, as the obviously important measure, rising investments in common commute can be taken into consideration to provide the high-quality services with the persuasive fairs fares to encourage people to use them and leave their cars at their garage. Moreover, promoting society's awareness can be the next step which should be about the benefits of public transportation and how it can lead to decreasing the volume of traffic, thereby reducing air pollution. Another extremely effective initiative is encouraging employees to carpool. This approach can be achieved by media and advertisements. Therefore, it can cause to the reduction of car users. Furthermore, corporate conveyance facility can be an eminently reasonable procedure. For example, by dispensing some practical incentives to the corporations like subsidies to buy appropriate vehicle for this purpose, not only can it cut traffic jams, but also, no longer do workers waste their time in clogged streets, so they can have more time to spend with their family. Consequently, whereas the traffic situation needs collective action from individuals, companies and governments, the authorities' contribution is markedly high to convince people to alternate the use of personal cars with public transportation by provision of mass transit. Subsequently, inter-urban travels will less likely occur, if they ascertain fairs fares are suitable.

Children and Their Decisions, Mahta

2018-02-27T12:16:09+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. The question of how much freedom should be given to the children (children should be given) is one of the most old-age controversial debates facing humans in twenty-first century. Some people feel that letting children to do whatever they want, could ruined their future life by making them selfish, unbearable individuals. While the others express that, any society needs strong and independence independent citizens which would not come true unless with nurturing their self-reliance in their childhood. In this essay, I will explore both points of view before giving my own opinion of each. On the one hand, some scientists opine that when parents give their offspring a boundless liberty, he/she would become a self-centered person who cannot accept any other opinion other than his/hers. This characteristic would encounter many problems as a member of family or even as a citizen of any society. On the other hand, some psychological researches reveal that if you want to raise a well-behavedior child, you must let him/her to decide for at least his/her daily basis matters., this attitude would help youngsters to learn how to make a choice for more important decisions in their life. In other words, this could be a simple practice for their further adulthood issues. Furthermore, this viewpoint states that if parents always decide for children and deter them from taking responsibility of for their own possible mistakes, they would become a weakly fragile-minded persons. At last, in my opinion, the main conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is that there must be a balance. Helping children to make their own decision not only would not spoiled them, but also could help to foster a creative responsible generation. However, parents must take some boundaries into consideration to prevent such mentioned upcoming problems.

Interaction, Sahar Farjoudi

2018-02-27T12:15:55+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? with the gradual advent of technology, tremendous horizons of insights have been enlightened. Health, transportation, business and roughly every existent branch of life have faced the changes brought by this phenomenon. Despite all the above-mentioned issues, here this essay is going to discuss the impacts of technology on communications and its pros and cons. Firstly, it is better to imagine life regardless of currently invented communication devices and networks. What is the obvious corollary is would be the previous exhausting interaction ways/styles. Days in which people could become informed of each other only through letters or at face times. The Latest achievements of technology in the field of telecommunication have resulted in the occurrence of worldwide networks. For instance, Facebook, Instagram and such cyber spaces are a number of prominent networks and have great benefits to both owners and users. Although the demerits of these advanced communication tools are undeniable, the benefits overweight outweigh the disadvantages. For example, before the arrival of first apps, my uncle could not get in touch with his family from China, his work place. Not only did he have to travel to see his family several times a year but also he spent a great deal of money on his journeys. Now he can see and talk to them from a large distance only via Skype or such programs and feel less homesick. Besides, handling huge expensive and time- and cost consuming processes have become easier. One of my friends applying for a PhD position in Canada, conducted all the registration procedure through the Internet, Email and Skype. If these technological advancements had not been achieved, he would have lost his educational progress opportunity. To sum up, even though some claim the addiction to the results of communicational technology is threatening, I opine that we can remove the troubles by enough awareness. In my idea, the more developed technologicaly achievements, the more welfare and unstressed life.

Large Cities Problems, Hamidreza Ghanbari

2018-02-27T12:15:42+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays, people living in large cities face many problems in their daily lives. What are these problems? Do you think the government should encourage people to move to smaller towns? At this point in time, almost all of the masses who live in the metropolises have encountered substantial woes, some of which accompany these citizens from dawn to dusk. This area, hence, is one of the prominent subjects where the authorities should intervene. The predominant issue which large cities have been coping with in recent years is most certainly population growth. Since a vast majority of the facilities have been served in these cities, people have a pronounced tendency, slowly but surely, to emigrate from small towns, suburban and rural areas to the metropolises. This phenomenon has brought an array of serious impediments. Traffic jams, boundless construction growth, and above all, all kinds of pollutions are the noticeable cases in point. These mentioned ills have led people to a grave situation. By a way of an example, they mostly live in cramped residences or they struggle with fewer job vacancies, and shortage of the prosperities, such as supplies, and medical care. When these obstacles come to the crunch, the government must enter the equation. The vital practice would be the decentralization from large cities by fulfilling attraction in small ones. Individuals practically settle in zones where their welfares are decently ensured. Thereby therefore, allocating adequate facilities for each province is not only will absorb numerous crowds, but it will be in all the citizens' interest. To sum up, daily troubles in large cities is hastening as the time goes by. People from all walks of life are being suffering suffered by overcrowding as well as less welfare coverage. Had governments implemented more effective policies, now people would be living have lived in better conditions; even for those who live in smaller towns or the countryside.

Life on Other Planet, Meraj Meshkat

2018-02-27T12:15:28+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people want the government to spend money on researching life on other planets. Others, however, think it is a waste of public funds and there are too many problems on our planet to be fixed first. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. In today's world, a certain percentage of individuals are of this opinion that more and more budgets should be spent on other planets exploration. However, a considerable number of issues ought to be addressed in the globe prior to any researching on other strange planets. In this essay, I will attempt to elaborate on both standpoints together with expressing my stances on this argument. On the one hand, it is obvious that researching on the Milky Way of galaxy and strange planets enjoys its favorable merits. Firstly, it paves the way for scientists to find a proper place for human beings to live in years to come due to the fact that there are is not enough space on the earth regarding the population explosion. Besides, this process not only does broadens the space experts' ` horizons about their surroundings, but also can teach them vitally important information to improve their experience and skills in order to enhance the standard of living. On the other hand, searching on other planets has imposed astronomical expenses on the government which contributes to numerous problems for them to manage their financial issues in their country. Furthermore, a wide range of plights such as educational, as well as social problems that should be tackled first on the earth. Needless to say that more and more people are residing in poor countries who have no limited access to health centers, schools and other prerequisites of their lives. Therefore, resolving these complexities seems to be more crucial than other procedures, even space exploration. Personally, were I to comment on this essaytopic, I would vote for tackling people's `s predicaments on the earth, although researching in the space involves numerous plus points that should be taken into account. To conclude, governments can draw up an effective plan to perform both solving individuals ` problems and exploring on the other planets, albeit it could be so extremely cumbersome to control their expenses on in this method.

Other Planet, Amir G

2018-02-27T12:15:14+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people want the government to spend money on researching life on other planets. Others, however, think it is a waste of public funds and there are too many problems on our own planet to be fixed first. Discuss both views and give you own opinion. While many ask the government to dedicate a specific financiale resource for the studies about the existence of existing life on other planets, others are strongly against this, reasoning we have so many life-threatening problems here on earth, though thus this is a waste of time and budget. When it comes to this notion, I hold the idea that research intoon space, serves as a double-edged sword, I mean while there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, there are surely benefits of spending on space science. On the one hand, through researches (that have been) done on space science, we have reached many solutions that have eased our lives. These innovations are mainly in mining, security and health. It goes without saying that our mineral resources have dramatically declined, and surely we need to find new sources to replace what we have already used. The good news is scientists succeeded in to finding plenty of sources of helium and iron mines on mars Mars thus far. In the health section for example, we are now using the same methods of purifying water in Sahara as the way scientists use in the International Space Station. That the satellites play a crucial role in our life in both security and telecommunication is an undeniable fact. On the other hand, those who are on the contraryopposed claim that, not only is the budget spent on the space is a waste of money, but it also it reduces the speed of scientific researches on important issues on our planet, earth. They opine that we still could not find a certain cure for terminal diseases such as cancers, Alzheimer's or Ebola. Admittedly, while lacking to in food is killing dozens millions of people in underdeveloped regions, we are not morally allowed to spend our funds on such subjects. By way of conclusion, I would like to note that, while there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary of spending money on research on existence of life on other planets, I believe the merits of these findings far outweigh its their drawbacks. Unlike the way the oppositions think, I believe this is not a luxurious field of study and we surely need the direct or indirect outcomes of this these researches in both now or and in near future.

Top Executives Salary, Amin

2018-02-27T12:15:01+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Top executive are paid huge salaries. Why it is and is it justified while many other professionals are unable to make a living wage. To what extent do you agree with the statement? Amin In the recent decades, the rising economic status of the world, especially those of developing countries, have has benefited some portions of the community who are at the climax of economy's pyramid. It is now an established unwritten custom that the great profit has to be shared among senior managers helping accelerate making money. This essay focuses on two reasons why companies' leaders have been entitled to enjoy great wages and the submission as to why this trend is irrational. Top executives are highly paid, firstly because they are put into a position where which enables them to directly influence the company in which they serve. A manufacturer's president's decisions, for instance, as well as the policies he makes are occasionally so influential that convert a bankrupt company into a profitable one. Taking this efficiency into account, some people maintain that this kindthese kinds of presidents are not only is the most constructive element to a country, but also helps them to raise their wages at in the second place. There are top executives, however, who misuse their authorityies to regulate rules, allowing for them to have a highly rising income, in spite of their enormous faults, which pose the company in a real financial crisis. When it comes to the judgment on whether high salaries gained by managers, two factors are very noteworthy to discuss. The aristocrat story in a community's stratification is almost always is in favor of getting a great deal of money ignoring the fact that the poor story has numerous problems in their own daily routines. How might they enjoy the wealth they accumulate, if they recalled those in poverty? On the other hand, although patriotic senior managers may get a high income, most of them are likely to distribute a great portion of it when necessary.needed among the needy. To put it in a nutshell, even if top executives' competency flows large profits into the company they run, it is not reasonable to give them large wages 70 times that of (as much as) an average one of an ordinary employee.