جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

How to deal with drug abuse among teenagers. Are prisons effective? One of the most crucial social ills, over the history, which has been a big concern for governments all around the world is drug-addiction and its deplorable effects on society. Informed of adverse outcomes of this destructive habit for both individuals and society, authorities across the world constantly try to take different measures to eradicate it. The first and most important deterrent to drug abuse/drug-taking is occupation. An Increasing employment rate in a country not only boosts the economy but also secures people against the addiction trap to a large extent. There has been always a correlation between the employment rate and various types of social disorders such as addiction. Another motivation which can distracts younger people from drugs and engage them in a harmless activity is providing them with entertaining facilities. For instance, cinemas, theme parks and youth clubs are the best examples of recreations which seems attractive to youths. Furthermore, for keeping society clean and safe for citizens, it's incumbent on governments to not only take the preventive measures to fight with drug-dealing but also they need to warn parents and everyone about drugs and its their catastrophic consequences. It is widely accepted by most of experts that addiction is a disease, and addicts must be treated as patients, not criminals. I believe this is especially more important when it comes to young addicts; we should encourage them to come back to normal life and make a new start on their lives. People must be trained to embrace those who are struggling with addiction and but have decided to change to a fruitful member of the community.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Soon it will be scientifically possible to clone humans. What are the advantages and this advantages of this? In the modern age, which is called the age of Technology and significant advances in Science, we are encountered with scientific claims and efforts to clone humans. Today, people live a life of higher more longevity life than the past due to breakthroughs in medical science and technology. In my opinion, cloning humans has both its pros and cons which depends on the situation and the way it is used. However, there is a strong disapprobation against human cloning. The major counter-argument is based on the fact that which if it is misused, it would have dangerous consequences. This technology can fall into to the hands of terrorists / land up in terrorists' hands. For instance, they can replace key human parts like eyes and fingerprint to bypass bio-metric security measures. Likewise/also, they can use plastic surgery techniques to fulfill their goals. From another point of view, if human cloning happens, the general public will be provided with spare body parts. Cloning organs yields a more practical way when people want to live a longer life. This method can be used to replace the human organs those of terminally fatally ill people. As we know, there are often inadequate organ donors around to fulfil this need, so by using this discovery we can overcome this issue as there would be always a ready supply. Furthermore, by using this method, people will be able to clone their loved ones and departed/deceased family members. In conclusion, I believe that human replication/reproduction has many advantages and boons to humans. Yet, the government should apply strict legislation to ensure that it would be used only to serve humanity.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

These days the tradition of families eating meals together is declining. Why is this happening? What are the effects on families? Nowadays, less fewer family members seat sit together to have daily meals. While many believe it is mainly due to the hectic pace of life, others are of the idea that this as is a result of broken emotional relation amongst family members. This can lead to many psychological problems to for both parents and children. This essay will elaborate this controversial issue with some relevant examples. Family in most parts of the world is considered as a core part of the society, and because of its critical role even a small fraction fracture/crack in this foundation will lead to irreparable damages to society. Having meals in families could be considered a good reason to bring family members to together and talk about daily issues, but regrettably in these days most parents are both working outside and rarely find time to spend with their family let alone have a meal. Most working mothers usually do not cook, thus children eat with their friends out of home. Not having meals together in a family can lead to serious psychological problems for both parents and children. Children the latter will not receive that much needed attention and care and thiswhich results in feelings of loneliness and many other mental disorders in children. On the other hand, having daily meals separately can reduce the emotional connection between parents and thus emotional divorce has been observed on among couples who mostly will not eat together. Based on a recent research published by school of psychology of UCLA the level of happiness amongst families who do not eat together decreases drastically over timealong the time. By way of conclusion, although having daily meals at a table seems impossible for all family members seems like an unimportant issue, it has been proven it has a major role in the emotional health of families. Many claim that it can damage the economy of a family but I strongly believe that the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extentd do you agree or disagree? In today's technologically advanced days, construction of the public libraries has been decreased abruptly. This phenomenon is mainly caused by the advent of the computer technology which has led virtual libraries to take the place of real ones. Undoubtedly, this breakthrough has progressed the way of accessing adequate reading resources, nonetheless it brings major obstacles for the readers. Libraries seem to have been predominantly built to present an array of paperbased resources for readers. Although there are numerous e-books available on the internet, and also large numbers of gadgets, say iPad or Amazon's kindle which have enhanced reading e-books, electronic magazines and newspapers, people mostly become more satisfied when they read their paper version of them. They appeal to individuals mostmore, since they are touchable, and they cause less pain in eyes or the other organs. Besides, this way of reading is more nostalgic, and gives a more decent feeling for readers. They are able to see how many pages is have been passed or left. Furthermore, public libraries are not considered merely as a book resource. They have been providing a conductive condition for those who are studying for a prominent exam or writers who are creating a novel, scenario or even an article in a newspaper. They are effortlessly able to concentrate, and jot down their ideas without any distraction. Ignoring these real libraries would affect these library members adversely, and unpleasant marks in schools and universities as well as less creativity in writing would emerge. In conclusion, apart from services brought by the computer technology and the internet, they could not make the readers' society along with people who tend to use libraries for their own specific purposes across-the-board delighted. Physical libraries could serve as a springboard for some of these mentioned groups.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Over the last century, due to the health-related developments, people have been living longer than before, thereby having a considerable chance of fulfilling their ambitions. However, this developmentit can be taken into consideration as the major culprit of both overage employees and overpopulation. On the one hand, medical assistance is one of the essential parts of social security, so improvements in this sector are a government's critically important responsibility. Subsequently, these developments mainly contribute to people's longevity which, makes their dream of long-living come true. Furthermore, not only have do the health care advancements have positive effect on quality of health, but also they can promote life satisfaction. On the other hand, although many individuals can be delighted with extended lifespan, the graying of the workforce should not be neglected. Rising life expectancy causes an increase in the proportion of old people and also the cost of supporting them. Therefore, providing adequate capital for dispensing the proper service to them may be difficult. Thus, it can lead to inevitable extension of official retirement time, whereas old workers are markedly less motivated and in some cases, less effective. Moreover, another factor, which is impacted by medical care improvements, is overpopulation. The incident has deleterious effect on the level of social welfare, since it can result in spread of poverty among communities and vulnerable families and also significant decline in the fertility rate. Consequently, whilst living longer is tempting, society's goals can be changed from facilitating people's lives to focusing on supporting the populated old age group, because of the phenomenon of population aging. Therefore, irrespective of that whether high-quality medical care is prerequisite for healthy aging, hardly do irrationally unreasonable improvements in this area seem to be sensible.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Music is played in every society and culture in the world today. Some people think that music brings only benefits to individuals and societies. Others, however, think that music can have a negative influence on both. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. The question of whether music has only beneficial effects on humans's life or it can also be harmful is an old-age debate accompanying humans in different eras. I, myself, believe that, music just the same as any other sophisticated art, is a double-edged weapon which could has have its own pros and cons. In this essay I will explore both edges. On the one hand, some people feel that this cheaply pleasant art is one of the most favorable entertainments in the world, which could eases the tension and boosts the mood. In from their point of view, music is deeply rooted in cultures. Different types of traditional music can demonstrate any nation's belief and history. Besides, this art evokes memories, and reminds people of different events in their lives, which could be helpful for their consciousness. Furthermore, music helps some students on with better concentration during their study. On the other hand, some other people argue that, this art can also be detrimental for the human body. For example, many musicians begin to go deaf because of loud noise of their musical instrument,. it seems that they start music to solace themselves, but the more they drown in the music ocean, the more they lose their mind and neglect the harms that they are about to experience. Furthermore, some of today's song lyrics contain inappropriate contents, which are not suitable for families. In addition, some songs remind people of their bad memories, hence bad feelings and depression. In conclusion, although music is playing a substantial role in humans's life, people must pay attention to how they use it properly. Otherwise, they would face many unpleasant consequences instead of calmness.