Mondays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/232-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-05-09 2024-04-30T00:44:26+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Copyright Digital Resources, Maryam Ghavamian 2017-08-01T17:32:58+00:00 2017-08-01T17:32:58+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/232-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-05-09/1386-copyright-digital-resources-maryam-ghavamian <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.05.09/Copyright Digital Resources, Maryam Ghavamian.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Modern Technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge. To what extent is this positive or a negative development? It is undeniable that with the advancement of technology we have free unlimited access to the e-books and digital music, whereas it is not beneficial for the writers and the musicians. In my opinion, it is obviously a positive improvement for the users,. nevertheless, some laws should be imposed to protect the authors' and the producers' rights simultaneously. On the one hand, with the advent of the internet in our era, we are able to download all sources of recent books or music free of charge with quite a fast speed. Hence, the people have the possibility to get the source of knowledge more straightforward than before, and consequently, the public awareness is rising significantly economicallyin the economy way. The unemployed teenagers with no earning moneyor little income can listen to their favorite music online which is playingplays an amusing role in their lives and enriches them in their spare time. In addition, the digital copies occupy millimeters of space on magnetic disks. They are mobile and light to carry in our gadgets, so most people are encouraged to read more in their free time even in metros. The students are not obliged to go to the libraries in person for their assignments and they have the possibility to access digital libraries from their universities or their homes. On the other hand, the producers are not delighted with this progress, because nobody few will purchase the electronic books and the investmenting will not pay them back. In my view, firstly, the public should be educated to buy the produced digital products to support their authors and singers. Secondly, the publishers should sell these products at a low/reasonable price to encourage people not to copy or download from untrusted sites, because although they may be have easy access to various sites, they should be aware of any harm triggereding from viruses on their devices. Finally, the governments should impose some strict rules to protect the authors' and the singers' rights and supervise the users. In conclusion, the easy access to online digital resources has had a positive effect on our life especially for the students who can benefit from these in their studiesy and also amuse themselves by listening to their favorite music, nonetheless, the authors' and singers' rights should be protected by both the rise of public awareness and the governments by imposition of copyright's laws.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.05.09/Copyright Digital Resources, Maryam Ghavamian.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Modern Technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge. To what extent is this positive or a negative development? It is undeniable that with the advancement of technology we have free unlimited access to the e-books and digital music, whereas it is not beneficial for the writers and the musicians. In my opinion, it is obviously a positive improvement for the users,. nevertheless, some laws should be imposed to protect the authors' and the producers' rights simultaneously. On the one hand, with the advent of the internet in our era, we are able to download all sources of recent books or music free of charge with quite a fast speed. Hence, the people have the possibility to get the source of knowledge more straightforward than before, and consequently, the public awareness is rising significantly economicallyin the economy way. The unemployed teenagers with no earning moneyor little income can listen to their favorite music online which is playingplays an amusing role in their lives and enriches them in their spare time. In addition, the digital copies occupy millimeters of space on magnetic disks. They are mobile and light to carry in our gadgets, so most people are encouraged to read more in their free time even in metros. The students are not obliged to go to the libraries in person for their assignments and they have the possibility to access digital libraries from their universities or their homes. On the other hand, the producers are not delighted with this progress, because nobody few will purchase the electronic books and the investmenting will not pay them back. In my view, firstly, the public should be educated to buy the produced digital products to support their authors and singers. Secondly, the publishers should sell these products at a low/reasonable price to encourage people not to copy or download from untrusted sites, because although they may be have easy access to various sites, they should be aware of any harm triggereding from viruses on their devices. Finally, the governments should impose some strict rules to protect the authors' and the singers' rights and supervise the users. In conclusion, the easy access to online digital resources has had a positive effect on our life especially for the students who can benefit from these in their studiesy and also amuse themselves by listening to their favorite music, nonetheless, the authors' and singers' rights should be protected by both the rise of public awareness and the governments by imposition of copyright's laws.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Parenting, Mehdi Samimi 2017-08-01T17:32:38+00:00 2017-08-01T17:32:38+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/232-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-05-09/1385-parenting-mehdi-samimi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.05.09/Parenting, Mehdi Samimi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many people believe that woman make better parents than men and that this is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as woman at parenting. Write an essay expressing your point of view. Traditionally till the modern age in most societiesy woman were hold held responsible to take care of their offspring and raising raise the children, and men were the one who would be the breadwinner of the family and the financial supporter, however, this trend has undergone go into changes recently and some believe that both the woman and the man should be held responsible for this key parenting role. In my opinion both man and woman are responsible and it is up to the couple that should to decide whom of themwhich one can plays a key role in this regard. Firstly, as mentioned earlier woman before the modern age was not truly involved in business and the society views man to be the protector of the family. But, this point of view has been challenged in the modern era and woman has fight fought for their freedom. In this regard now it has beenis largely believed that both man and woman can get their independent salary and work outside the house, so, as some of the mothers are working, the responsibility for raising a child should be incumbent on both on man and woman. On the other hand, one might say that woman due to their traits and characteristics are more capable of raising a child in comparison to a fellow man. This traditional way of thinking suggests that woman can better support the children emotionally and raise them in a better way to be well-equipped for getting into the society and man can be the advisor in this way. Although, this strength point of woman which is their emotional help cannot be denied, I believe that the woman itself herself should have the option to decide which role she wants to play, as it has been proved that woman can be a good mother and a good employee at the same time. In a nutshell, I want to emphasize that although generally I believe that woman can be a better emotional supporter for a child, she should make her choice. In addition the man has the same responsibility as a parent for a child. Time: 28 mins</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.05.09/Parenting, Mehdi Samimi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many people believe that woman make better parents than men and that this is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as woman at parenting. Write an essay expressing your point of view. Traditionally till the modern age in most societiesy woman were hold held responsible to take care of their offspring and raising raise the children, and men were the one who would be the breadwinner of the family and the financial supporter, however, this trend has undergone go into changes recently and some believe that both the woman and the man should be held responsible for this key parenting role. In my opinion both man and woman are responsible and it is up to the couple that should to decide whom of themwhich one can plays a key role in this regard. Firstly, as mentioned earlier woman before the modern age was not truly involved in business and the society views man to be the protector of the family. But, this point of view has been challenged in the modern era and woman has fight fought for their freedom. In this regard now it has beenis largely believed that both man and woman can get their independent salary and work outside the house, so, as some of the mothers are working, the responsibility for raising a child should be incumbent on both on man and woman. On the other hand, one might say that woman due to their traits and characteristics are more capable of raising a child in comparison to a fellow man. This traditional way of thinking suggests that woman can better support the children emotionally and raise them in a better way to be well-equipped for getting into the society and man can be the advisor in this way. Although, this strength point of woman which is their emotional help cannot be denied, I believe that the woman itself herself should have the option to decide which role she wants to play, as it has been proved that woman can be a good mother and a good employee at the same time. In a nutshell, I want to emphasize that although generally I believe that woman can be a better emotional supporter for a child, she should make her choice. In addition the man has the same responsibility as a parent for a child. Time: 28 mins</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Planting, Faeghe Mousavi 2017-08-01T17:32:17+00:00 2017-08-01T17:32:17+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/232-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-05-09/1384-planting-faeghe-mousavi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.05.09/Planting, Faeghe Mousavi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Planting trees is very important for environment. Some people say trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns, while other says housing facilities should be built instead. Do you agree or disagree? Not only is planting trees very essential for our environment, but also it should be considered an important matter for our next generation. That is to say, it is incumbent on governments to encourage people to plant trees in their own private areas as well as in the vacant areas of the cities and towns where the government is responsible, whereas some say that providing facilities is more important than have having a clean environment. The first and foremost issue is that by planting trees, we prevent soil erosion and it leads leading to both reducinge the effect of it and havinge a clean environment that is nowadays it is a potentially fatal issue. In other words, because of the lack of green space, people are more exposed to various diseases, such as heart hurt attack and respiratory diseases. Finally, we should prevent our environment from urban sprawl/ sprawling. Simply put, the more we build different either buildings or accommodations, the more we destroy our natural environment. On the other hand, people tend to live in areas where they have access to many/ much more facilities. For example, hospitals, schools, highways and much more besides. In spite of the fact that most of them know about the disadvantages of living areas without green resources, they prefer to spend their life comfortably on welfare in terms of urban facilities. In conclusion, that living in lush green areas is an advantage is indisputable pattern. To put it simply, we should make every effort to preserve these natural resources. Moreover, we cannot damage them, just because of providing making facilities for ourselves and ignoring/ denying our children´s future.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.05.09/Planting, Faeghe Mousavi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Planting trees is very important for environment. Some people say trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns, while other says housing facilities should be built instead. Do you agree or disagree? Not only is planting trees very essential for our environment, but also it should be considered an important matter for our next generation. That is to say, it is incumbent on governments to encourage people to plant trees in their own private areas as well as in the vacant areas of the cities and towns where the government is responsible, whereas some say that providing facilities is more important than have having a clean environment. The first and foremost issue is that by planting trees, we prevent soil erosion and it leads leading to both reducinge the effect of it and havinge a clean environment that is nowadays it is a potentially fatal issue. In other words, because of the lack of green space, people are more exposed to various diseases, such as heart hurt attack and respiratory diseases. Finally, we should prevent our environment from urban sprawl/ sprawling. Simply put, the more we build different either buildings or accommodations, the more we destroy our natural environment. On the other hand, people tend to live in areas where they have access to many/ much more facilities. For example, hospitals, schools, highways and much more besides. In spite of the fact that most of them know about the disadvantages of living areas without green resources, they prefer to spend their life comfortably on welfare in terms of urban facilities. In conclusion, that living in lush green areas is an advantage is indisputable pattern. To put it simply, we should make every effort to preserve these natural resources. Moreover, we cannot damage them, just because of providing making facilities for ourselves and ignoring/ denying our children´s future.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Technology vs Books, Sara Kasaei 2017-08-01T17:32:01+00:00 2017-08-01T17:32:01+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/232-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-05-09/1383-technology-vs-books-sara-kasaei <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.05.09/Technology vs Books, Sara Kasaei.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think advance technology such as the Internet is a powerful source of information. Others, however, think that books are also a good source of information and entertainment. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples. In our contemporary era, the Internet has become an inevitable portal for the majority of people to reach their needed information and unfortunately, as the a result of this approach, society is gradually dissociating from books. However, in from my perspective, both Online and printed versions of data are equally valuable and should be used depending on the subject, occasion, availability and habits of the person. These days, the Internet is widely used for almost everything from following the news to a local home remedy for an ache. The main reason is often considered as its countless amount of information as well as the possibility of accessing the latest comments and specialists' viewpoints which provide a vast variety of knowledge for the users. Moreover, the sources are mostly free or at least less costly compared to printed ones. I, myself, prefer to download tutorial videos and learning materials related to the architectural softwares programs namely, 3d max which I use regularly rather than buying its educational books due to the fact that they are mostly more functional and up to date and are gathered by professionals who are keen on sharing and staying up to date. Books, on the other hand, can be reached everywhere, even in the remote places where there is no network access which and that makes it immortal sources for saving the Information. The other reason might be the simplicity of keeping books for a long time. The joyous moment when you can have your forefathers' favorite books with their handwritings on its pages just by taking them on your book shelf is indescribable. In addition, many of the main resources in various categories had been written or printed on paper and they will always remain in the libraries for the future generation to study them. In brief, I completely agree with the idea that both online websites and printed books are precious in an equal manner and people should choose them based on their needs and characteristics.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.05.09/Technology vs Books, Sara Kasaei.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think advance technology such as the Internet is a powerful source of information. Others, however, think that books are also a good source of information and entertainment. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples. In our contemporary era, the Internet has become an inevitable portal for the majority of people to reach their needed information and unfortunately, as the a result of this approach, society is gradually dissociating from books. However, in from my perspective, both Online and printed versions of data are equally valuable and should be used depending on the subject, occasion, availability and habits of the person. These days, the Internet is widely used for almost everything from following the news to a local home remedy for an ache. The main reason is often considered as its countless amount of information as well as the possibility of accessing the latest comments and specialists' viewpoints which provide a vast variety of knowledge for the users. Moreover, the sources are mostly free or at least less costly compared to printed ones. I, myself, prefer to download tutorial videos and learning materials related to the architectural softwares programs namely, 3d max which I use regularly rather than buying its educational books due to the fact that they are mostly more functional and up to date and are gathered by professionals who are keen on sharing and staying up to date. Books, on the other hand, can be reached everywhere, even in the remote places where there is no network access which and that makes it immortal sources for saving the Information. The other reason might be the simplicity of keeping books for a long time. The joyous moment when you can have your forefathers' favorite books with their handwritings on its pages just by taking them on your book shelf is indescribable. In addition, many of the main resources in various categories had been written or printed on paper and they will always remain in the libraries for the future generation to study them. In brief, I completely agree with the idea that both online websites and printed books are precious in an equal manner and people should choose them based on their needs and characteristics.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Technology, Arash 2017-08-01T17:31:37+00:00 2017-08-01T17:31:37+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/232-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-05-09/1382-technology-arash <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.05.09/Technology, Arash.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? In the present time the countrycountries needs to be accustomed to technological advances because of their infrastructures, Backbones, mechanisms and interior polices. Hence, this transition should not influence/affect on traditional crafts and old aged skills. The governments should make thrive and support their conventional skills but in terms of keeping alive old traditions. On the one hand, imagine old farming methods which was were wasting time, money and energy.in recent decades technology has equipped this field and modernized it to cultivate their lands with high quality and also yield become more productivity. Farmers now useing tractors and modern farming facilities and enjoy their new trend of working.life style. On anthe other hand, even though the technology has developed sharply, some rural handmade Crafts are becoming popular using and having eager customers in modern urban life. Local residents need to real support to produce their local goods and technology can help them to achieve this indispensable Matter. In conclusion, technology can preserve some old-fashioned ways of life, and this essential tool can be modified and shows us new alternatives toward a better world and human life.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.05.09/Technology, Arash.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? In the present time the countrycountries needs to be accustomed to technological advances because of their infrastructures, Backbones, mechanisms and interior polices. Hence, this transition should not influence/affect on traditional crafts and old aged skills. The governments should make thrive and support their conventional skills but in terms of keeping alive old traditions. On the one hand, imagine old farming methods which was were wasting time, money and energy.in recent decades technology has equipped this field and modernized it to cultivate their lands with high quality and also yield become more productivity. Farmers now useing tractors and modern farming facilities and enjoy their new trend of working.life style. On anthe other hand, even though the technology has developed sharply, some rural handmade Crafts are becoming popular using and having eager customers in modern urban life. Local residents need to real support to produce their local goods and technology can help them to achieve this indispensable Matter. In conclusion, technology can preserve some old-fashioned ways of life, and this essential tool can be modified and shows us new alternatives toward a better world and human life.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> University 2017-08-01T17:31:12+00:00 2017-08-01T17:31:12+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/232-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-05-09/1381-university <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.05.09/University.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others. Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive the government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages? In every country, there are some priorities about university subjects, based on the industrial, economic and social climate and also natural resources of that region. The government can manage these preferences by giving incentives to students for choosing those fields to study. Obviously, one way to do this, would be for the government to pay the included fees for those students who choose such subjects. Actually, there are some advantages of such a strategy for the country. The more scholarships paid by the government, the more students would be encouraged to enroll. Therefore, the existing employment gap would be filled in a rather short time. For example, in developing countries like Iran, engineering fields are really highly valued and developed while other fields like liberal arts are neglected. However, drawbacks of such a policy would be really quite considerable. For instance, the students attracted by the funding, may not be really interested or talented in that field. Such students may be dropped out before graduation or even after working for a short time. On the other hand, priorities may change during time, but the policies may not be updated regularly. In conclusion, I believe that granting scholarships for preferred fields of study would be helpful in short time to compensate for lack of skills for development. But this program must be revised periodically in longtime not only to be effective but also to mitigate the negative consequences.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.05.09/University.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others. Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive the government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages? In every country, there are some priorities about university subjects, based on the industrial, economic and social climate and also natural resources of that region. The government can manage these preferences by giving incentives to students for choosing those fields to study. Obviously, one way to do this, would be for the government to pay the included fees for those students who choose such subjects. Actually, there are some advantages of such a strategy for the country. The more scholarships paid by the government, the more students would be encouraged to enroll. Therefore, the existing employment gap would be filled in a rather short time. For example, in developing countries like Iran, engineering fields are really highly valued and developed while other fields like liberal arts are neglected. However, drawbacks of such a policy would be really quite considerable. For instance, the students attracted by the funding, may not be really interested or talented in that field. Such students may be dropped out before graduation or even after working for a short time. On the other hand, priorities may change during time, but the policies may not be updated regularly. In conclusion, I believe that granting scholarships for preferred fields of study would be helpful in short time to compensate for lack of skills for development. But this program must be revised periodically in longtime not only to be effective but also to mitigate the negative consequences.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>