Mondays

Children Punishment, Zahra

2017-07-03T19:19:46+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

I totally disagree with the term of punishment as an element of teaching for children if it is of a physical nature. I believe children learn from their parents, they are children`s very first role model, if they are good or bad in act and behavior, their kids think of that as right. I think parents should avoid physical and verbal punishment toward children, these would not be effective as discipline methods. Effective methods can teach children right from wrong during the time one`s individual conscience is growing. Therefore, they would do right because it is accurate and stop doing wrong because it is dishonest. When children see adults punishing them, they receive the message that larger are allowed to hit smaller ones, hence they will do the same to their juniors. The result will be a society in which morality and humanity could be hardly found and the rate of crime will goes high. I believe children can comprehend happenings if it is clearly explained to them, conversation with kids is the best way of teaching. If punishment is needed it should not be a of physical one punishment, sanctions such as doing chores, withholding rewards, having them apologize to someone they have hurt, and picking up the things they have broken could be applied. It is very important to choose a one which fits the crime. In this way children learn to be responsible about their behavior since childhood. To conclude I think affection always wins. Effective disciplinarye methods help the child builds selfcontrol and self-esteem.

Free Time, Mastaneh Karoobi

2017-07-03T19:19:29+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that children are given too much free time. They feel that this time should be used to do more school work. How do you think children should spend their free time? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Most of people think that it can be better if children use their leisure time to do more school work. I believe that children should do their homework but they need to have some time to be free. It is unfair if they just do their school work without any pause. There are some reasons that/why children should spend their free time. Energy of Children must be released. So it is essential needed for children to have some activity such as playing with each other or attending sports classes. Studying excessively more can lead to/cause some drawbacks such as makinge children tired or disgustedunlike. But watching television and playing with tablets too much time are not suitable for them. In fact, they can use their free time equally to do some activity and school work. However, children are given too much free time these days. They can develop and enhance their skills in their free time by attending some classes. Their parents must prepare a good plan for them to use their leisure time efficiently. The main hope key of each government is their young people. They have to be ready for future and they need to be guided. For instance, when I was 7 seven years old, my mother registered me in an English class after school. That classes helped me to learn a new language that it is needed at my workplace or university now. To conclude, in my opinion, children should be used their leisure time equally to do their school work and other to do some activities as well.

National Holidays, Amir Adel

2017-07-03T19:19:16+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many people think that public celebrations (like national holidays, festivals etc.) are a waste of money and that the government should spend those funds in a better way. Do you agree or disagree? In each society, there are some critics who are concerned about spending country budgets on to celebratinge some special days or events, and from their viewpoint, going on vacation is wasting time and resources. However, it would appear that most people really are desperate for these kinds of events, the breaks between doing their social duties. First and foremost, we should know that people are not robots and they require to stop working and takeing some rest. Around the world, people have this chance to enjoy holidays, go to traveling or be with their family as one of the most favourable remediesy for reducing stress and recoveringy their energy for working again. Moreover, national holidays and festivals are ideal opportunities for strengthening family ties while we are so engaged snowed under that we rarely spend any time with them. Furthermore, these events might improve the a sense of patriotism and unify society for a common cause/aims. Countries need some days, symbols of unification and glory which celebrating them through festivals or holidays gives ordinary people the this opportunity to come together, have fun and more importantly, reinforce their community values. In addition, festivals are the joyful moments for children who are really delighted by participating in therethem. These provide a venue circumstance for social activities and stamp social values on children's memory simultaneously;, it seems that this the point seems that sometimes is more crucial for governors. In conclusion, it appears that not only are national holidays and public festivals not meaningless, but also they have substantial benefits for society which that gives a strong reason to governments for focusing more on them.

Railways or Roads, Maziar Sojoodian

2017-07-03T19:19:05+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extend extent do you agree or disagree whit this statement? Every governments wants to provide the fastest and safest transportation system. It is a considerable achievement for them. Nevertheless, it is an important question, should They more investing in on railways or roads? In this essay this essay we will discuss these arguments before arriving at a logical conclusion. It is accepted that railways are the safest transportation system. Every year thousands of people die because of roads accidents, this trend is far less for that of railways. Due to the fact that rail lines are also the fastest and programmed, people are able to save time and money trough using this kind of transportation. An another significant aspect of railroads is, its positive effect of markets, Firstly it is considered cheaper than roads for daily commute, secondly producers and companies can send tonnes of goods, crops and products through railways remarkably more than roads. However, it is not deniable that, roads should be developed more in future. Unlike railways which it is require to book in advance, people can use roads whenever they need. Also it is connected to all cities, villages and everywhere in the country. Investing in on roads is are notably cheaper to develop. Another reason to develop more roads rather than railways is that most areas are feasible for roads and government cannot not create railways everywhere. After investigatinge on these points of views, governments should decide which are is feasible for railways or roads. Nonetheless, to a certain extent, I would agree that we should spend more budget on developing railways. Since it has less harm to the environment and is also helps us to save time and money.

Smoking, Faezeh Abdi

2017-07-03T19:18:50+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some businesses now say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their office. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer. People today have mixed views on whether it is correct or wrong. But in my opinion, I completely disagree with this statement since there is no correlation between smoking and freedom and also there are many reasons for by which I hold this views. Firstly, some organizations define a policy and apply it in their office and because of this some employers must obey the laws, otherwise many hazards can occur. For example these functions as a way of showing respect to other people who live near or spend their time beside them. By this I mean this action have many influence onmay violate our rights. Another reason is related goes to healthy. Giving smokers the freedom to smoke in public places or offices is too disastrous since some people are as passive smokersing, by which I mean there are some vulnerable groups that we must pay attention to them more and more, like: women, children, illsillnesses, and decrepits. Bbecause it leads to various ailments such as: asthma, heart disease and other issues like these. Putting everything into consideration, not only should we expect defining policy from government or authorities, but we also should develop a condition in which smokers learn to pursuit comply with the rules and believe that limitation on smoking does not ruin their freedom or constrains on their conviction, it just prevents them from severe consequences. In psychological terms, perhaps people want to kill themselves but we can contain it by respecting to other people's rights. To put it simply, based on mounting evidence, there is marked contrast between freedom, limitation and smoking.

Social Skills or Academic Qualifications, Nazak

2017-07-03T19:18:32+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some employers believe that job applicants' social skills are more important than their academic qualifications. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Allocating more importance to social skills for the job seekers is becoming an increasing trend. Some employees even put more emphasize emphasis on this aspect than academic qualifications. From my standpoint, however, I strongly believe that both issues are equally essential for a successful career. The merits of social skills in today's business world are quite obvious while interaction between coworkers is undeniably crucial. Existence of a friendly relationship among employees of a team will results in more efficiency. At the same time, by having better social skills employees will be able to resolve many normal arguments during a day in an office which otherwise would lead to a heated argument/quarrel. Besides, an efficient social skill contributes to a more productive performance. For instance, a new comer in a marketing team of a company with lack of experience and qualifications would be well-assisted by other team members due to working towards the shared goal of the whole team. On the other hand, not only are the social skills vital for a profitable work environment, but also having academic qualifications is as much needed. The role of having enough information about the job is indisputable. Without sufficient knowledge even withby the support of other colleagues, success would not be achievable unless time does not matter which is absolutely rejected in this competitive commercial world. Owning academic qualifications is a pre-requisite of any kind of job and under no account can it be possible to do well done a job well in its abscence. To conclude, I consider both factors are fundamental if a company desires to improve rapidly. I strongly believe that our world requires well socially skilled employees as much as skillful experts.

Sports, Mana

2017-07-03T19:18:16+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people prefer to play team sports, while others prefer to play individual sports. Discuss the advantages of each. Then indicate which you prefer and why. Use specific reasons and examples to support your response. Each of us has experienced playing different kind of sports as a hobby or even a professional career during our lives. The reason behind favoring a specific field has been something unconscious for most of us, but we should be aware that choosing individual or team sports can provide us with distinguishably different advantages, on the following grounds. On the one hand, the proponents of team sports are strongly of the opinion that by means of playing with other team members, we will be able to develop our social skills and increase our responsibility. In other words, we can learn how to interact with different kinds of people who have has the same goal with us, and in this way we will build some characteristics to become ready for our future professional or personal life. Moreover, we will be taught that sometimes we have to overlook our favors in order to reach a common target. On the other hand, from the view point of those who believe in individual sports, self-confidence increase and inner powers detection are the consequences of playing solo sports. To put it in another way, as a result of individually playing, we will face a particular situation in which we will get more conscious about our inherent abilities. Plus, with the help of playing singlehandedly, we will become ready for accepting the results of our decisions. In my estimation, were I to choose either of these options, I would rather team sports rather that than individual ones. Personally speaking, I opine that communicating with others is a great opportunity for each person to develop a broad spectrum of positive points in personality which can by no means be ignored. Team activities not only would prepare us for living in the society, but also enables us to make/establish new relationships. To sum up, although both team and individual sports have some remarkable merits, I believe that the former (first one) helps us feel better compared to the latter (second one).

Travel, Amir Gilani

2017-07-03T19:18:03+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays everyone likes to travel. Some people travel alone while others prefer to travel in a group. Discuss both approaches. Give your own opinion with relevant examples from your experience. Traveling has become one of the most popular activities among/amongst people to spend their leisure time. While some people travel alone, there are some others who choose to travel with/in a group. After choosing the destination, traveling alone or in a group is one of the mainly permanent questions whenever I want to travel, and as both choices has have its own merits and demerits my votes goes for both of them. I think it goes without saying that most people prefer to travel with a group of people who have something in common. Sometimes friends plan to travel, and from my point of view these kinds of journeys are unforgettable. As an example, I still can remember my classmates and I went to Antalyia about eight years ago and whenever we see each other, we start remembering good old memories of that travel. I can remember there were some other tourists from other countries who were alone who joined us and are still connected with us via social networking services. On the other hand, sometimes I prefer to travel alone to relax and forget about the hectic pace of life I am currently involved with. I think everyone needs some time to think and concentrate on his their plans and way of living. I occasionally travel alone to do meditations and recharge my mental energy. Disappointedly lost and tired in this world, there are some people who travel to nature to enjoy the peace and quiet in untouched/pristine jungles and high mountainous areas. In conclusion, I think while it is definitely enjoyable to travel with close friends and relatives it is necessary for everyone to travel alone to have more attention to his their spirituality and stop spending time with others. I strongly hold the idea that striking e a balance in life is one of the most important factors successful people always follow, so from my point of view both approaches are correct and has have some advantages.