جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Since decades ago, working systems all over the world have been is following a the same old pattern with a five days a week and eight hours a day of working. Many people are satisfied with it the way it is and many prefer it to be different. I strongly agree that a job with three working days per week with whith longer working hours is more enjoyable than one a job with five days with shorter hours. I have reasons to support my claim among which having more time to allocate to personal activities and more productivity in work days stand out and will be discussed in the following paragraphs. The first reason I have concerns the matter that a vast majority of people including me prefer to have some days to allocate to personal activities which really influence one's life in many directions. I stand for the opinion that having a life with career and personal life in balance is a key factor in people's success and satisfaction in life. For instance, I can refer to my own life, when I can manage my schedule schedual to both complete my work duties and get to my exercise exersice and music classes calsses as well, I feel much more vigorous and am prone to do much more things. Such a lifestyle pleases me in every aspect of my life. Moreover, I believe that these this activities can lead us to a more mental and physical stablized level of health and can affect our efficiency in our career. In addition to personal time, I think with this scheduale arrangement, people might have more inclination to focus on their jobs on working days. from a psychologicalacl point of view, and as dependable statistics show, people who have such discrete work schedule scheduale, can concentrate much more effectively on their tasks as they are working. They also show a greater level of creativity. Also, in the a long run, they bring more productivity and prosperity in their fields which not only benefits themselves with a remarkable sense of achievement, but also contributes to their society. All in all, by taking all the mentioned points into in to consideration, in can be easily concluded that people having a working schedule which is more flexible and more capable of personal plannings can result in their mental and physical health and also provide them with a much more inclination to focus on their jobs. Finally, I believe that all of these can provide people with a better life management opportunity, which consequently can result in societies' overall quality

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

More and more city workers are deciding to live in the country and travel to work every day. The result is increased traffic congestion and damage to the environment what measures do you think could be taken to encourage people not to travel such long distances to work. Nowadays, with the hectic modern life we have had, the major cities have become been becoming over populated due to the concentration of job opportunities and facilities there. In fact, jobs in the countryside are so scarce that , so people who live there have no choice but travel (except travelling) between city centers and the countryside which leads to heavy traffic congestion in the outskirts as well as the cities and also more environmental pollution. As far as urban designers are concerned, the efficient solutions to these problems are up to the governments to implement some measures to relocate factories to the countryside and encourage employers and companies to move there. It is naturally true that if the countryside's dwellers are forced not to not travel long distances, they are unable to cope with unemployment and hardships of their daily lives. On From the other hand, making having made them immigrate to the cities have more destructive consequences in terms of housing, overpopulation, so the only possible way is up to the that governments should to encourage them not to leave the countryside neither for jobs nor for the facilities such as universities or hospitals. Now, taking this issue into the account, I would get the impression that if governments encourage different factories to relocate their places, they could prevent frequent travelling to the cities. Also providing some subsidies and tax exclusion are other motives for them. What it all comes down to is that the rural residents are not willing to commute such a long distances, but they have no other choice., therefore, if the governments facilitate them with their basic needs, they no longer leave the peace and contentment of the countryside.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyright music and books from the internet for no charge. To what extent is this is a positive or a negative development? Nowadays, with the advent of new technology and the accelerating the development of that, access to music and electronic books is facilitated. Although some believe that downloading these materials for free is a plus point, others say this kind of activity is an abomination and to the detriment of the creator of that art. Firstly, too many say downloading music and books illicitly not only does discourage creators or authors, but also makes them to avoid being prolific because there will be no advantages such as money for them to keep continue to write more books or create more music. Also, opponents point out that these kinds (such) this kind of infringements that are occurring by in pirates should be restricted by governments. In this respect they should enact some strict rules on electronic/digital electric books and music to prevent pirates from downloading illegally. Secondly, in striking contrast, some say this development is positive because in some countries access to international transaction is inaccessible. For instance, in my country if someone has have an intention of buying their favorite story books legally, specifically international ones, there is no way for them to do so. In addition, in some developing countries the price of those books and music is much/exorbitantly thoroughly higher than their incomes, so they cannot afford to purchase. Furthermore, in terms of social literacy, if the access to all books, or magazines etc gets simplified, the general knowledge of all individuals will show an upward trend. To sum up, from my perspective, if this is available for us to download a book or music legally, we should do so. Moreover, governments had better monitor this kind of activity and mandate rules against wrongdoers.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? As the 21th century came along, people's connecting devices reshaped and somehow people's connecting ways were colored by technology. These alterations deformations are targeted for criticism aimed as easy targets by many critics, but ordinary people use them every day more than thepast and of course enjoy them. Users look at them as gifts of technology for them. They sign in different social networks every day and share their moments with friends and of course make new friends., however, these new friends are just net friends. Some even call them imaginary friends. Whatever you call them, users believe in them and share their moments with them more and more to the point that their physical connections with family and friends have been limited more than ever past, but they do not care and sink in deeper every time they turn on their cell phones or computers. Critics try to wake them up from their dream rabbit sleep and tell them that finding new friends in such ways is just chasing a mirage. Besides, sharing personal data on the internet with unknown imaginary friends is not recommended for safety reasons because maybe some of them were wolves in sheep's clothing wolfs in sheep's skin and use this these information against them or for accusinge them of to something they had no role in didn't interfered with. Objectors of new communication methods reveal that some companies save your shared data in their data bases and they spy on you on what you like to eat or what do you prefer to wear; even what do you do as hobby. Using these data, companies target aim you for selling their commodities/stuff or sending smart commercials intelligently to people who probably use them. In my opinion, easy ways for connecting to each other would be fun and useful though it is better to save privacy for your security. In fact using social networks will be fine if and only if you did not trespass privacy policies and remember to share your personal important information just with your physically known reliable or close friends. For the last words, using new technological connecting methods of course has pros and cons but if you obey essential data keeping principles, their benefits will outweigh conquer their disadvantages.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? In this day and age, overconsumption of fast foods has become one of the major ills in this these rapidly improving modern urban life. Thus, some argue by raising with rising taxes on these items, administrations can control citizens's health indirectly. However, this approach may neglects some aspects of this issue which can be even beneficial. To begin with, advocates of passing more taxes on fast foods point out that this method can alter this kind of food to an expensive one which in turn can be conducive to a free fall in its consumption. That is to say, if individuals want to spend a considerable amount of money purchasing food, they are more likely to buy the food which comprises more nutritious ingredients. In addition, the more expensive most fast foods become expensive, the fewer number of such restaurants we encounter. In other words, the availability of junk foods has a direct correlation with their its prices. For instance, about two decades ago in my home town pizza was regarded as a relatively high‐price food. Furthermore, there were just a few restaurants in our city which sold pizza. Having said that, however, after placing high taxes on fast food, a multitude of people may be overlooked. To make it crystal clear, a host of workers as well as students are extremely dependent on these foods since they do not have enough time to prepare home‐cooked ones during their work‐days. Secondly, another point that should be made here is not only most of the fast foods are neither greasy nor contain low quality material, and moreover, they have been produced from both fresh and nutritious vegetables and meats, so they should be cheap and affordable for all economic classes. In a nutshell, although there are a host of negative points about fast food, limiting them through increasing prices cannot be a wholly positive development.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Numerous/ Plenty of people spend their leisure times in traveling to exotic places. People appropriate a huge budget to their journeys. A question which is the matter of concern is whether internal journeys are have more profitable than external journeys? I am, to a great extent of the opinion that internal trips have more advantagesous over external trips. To begin with, traveling in our own country helps to the country's economy. Broadly speaking when you go from your state to another state you will spend your money in your country and thiswhich will help to the economy of that states. In internal traveling you consume inner/domestic productsproductions and services and go to inner hotels and pay their rents. To be more specific on in each business or vacation trip workable journey or fun journey you appropriate money for the hotel and many other expenses things that you need; these help money to circulate/turn in an economic cycle and it leadleading to a thriving tourist industry. When this section succeeds, success it could help to other industries to overcome their problems. As an illustration, an the economic magazine mentioned (?) that the tourist industry has 0.2 percent of the economic rising rate in the developed countries and if a country can encourage its his (?) people to internal traveling it could raise rise this factor. External trips are expensive and on in these trips you have stress. Of equal importance is the fact that some problems such as security are very important in a foreign country. Strangers have been easily attacked by culprits. Simply stated, in a new place that you do not know it you will be vulnerable. Health problems are very dangerous for you because you do not have not any friend to help you and you have a limited budget. However, what I stated cannot be over generalized to all contexts,. in a new country you can learn a new language, see different cultures and a lot of new places. To put it in a nutshell, it is better to travel in our country because not only does it help our economy, but also an external journey has many problems and it is usually expensive.