جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays more and more people have access to the Internet. But constant availability of any information worsens people's memory and critical thinking skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Nowadays people’s lifestyle has been changed because of the fast growth of technology, especially since the Covid-19 pandemic commenced/broke out in the world, the most attention was on the internet. There are constant benefits of utilization of the virtual world. The Internet and the virtual world has have been made for easing our life and they are a part of our lives. There are significant uses of the internet in today’s life. All data and also all documents that we are looking for can be found on the internet by just a quick search. Because of the rapid results that we achieve by searching, most of us have the tendency to use the internet even if we know the answer. The arouses temptation of using the internet is obviously visible in our lifestyle and people have become accustomed to use using the virtual world in every part of their life. Although, using the internet is tempting and typical but these brief looksglimpses and not hesitating for answering, has have undeniably undeniable effects on people’s memories. In this decade people usually are reluctant for to searching something in their memories. This menace will intense intensify diseases like Alzheimer’s, Parkinson, and also premature aging. This is a huge crisis for the society. However, in a recent physiological psychological research that some psychologistsphysiologist had have just approved, it has been shown that the range of memory uses and some kind of thinking skills are mostly used in slum areas, because of the poverty and not having the facility to access to the internet. The evading of using our memory is gloomy and we have to find some ways to survive and fortify our skills. For instance, we can use some memory games or even counting number from 1 to 100 inversely. Also solving puzzles, Sudoku’s, word tables and..., can improve our thinking skills. In conclude, I believe that using internet has been a huge harm for our mind and our memory skills. This approach will be a great threat for later population and if we ignore it, all of the world will possibly confront a pandemic of memories diseases. Correlation/Causation

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Should parents be obliged to immunize their children against common childhood diseases? Or do individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children? At this moment in time, with spectacular growth and substantial advances in medical science taking place far and wide, a vigorous debate has arisen as to whether or not parents should be pressurized into vaccinating their charges/offspring. However, I take the view that with us living in a world replete with evidence-based research, it is imperative for parents to abide by the findings of scientists’ surveys. That is to say, the responsibility lies with every parent to inoculate their children against various diseases. Some individuals are of the opinion that irrespective of the situation, no curbs should be imposed on human discretion over their decisions. They draw attention to the essence of a concept, namely free will, which is the ability to choose between different possible courses of action unimpeded. Moreover, they arguably draw attention to the fact that some vaccines may have side effects such as allergic reactions. Although the issue adverted to might be true, it is worth mentioning such side effects are extremely rare and undoubtedly the drawbacks of vaccines are eclipseddwindled by the benefits, hence the significance of due vaccination for children. However, as far as I am concerned, ignorance and lack of knowledge are to blame for such notions owing to the fact that parents are to shoulder the responsibility to shield their children from contracting diseases, and all the more so, some of them are life-threatening and incurable though preventable. By the same token, the stubborn resistance of some parents to immunizing their own offspring could render other vulnerable individuals in jeopardy, inasmuch as some of these conditions are contagious. Furthermore, it is worth bearing in mind(that?) nowadays, thanks to developing vaccines people are not anymore suffering some of the? infectious fatal diseases such as smallpox and cattle plague which have already been successfully eradicated. The main conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is that parents should not be entitled to have the right not to immunize their children. Far from it, strictregulations should be set and enforced to compel them to vaccinate their children albeit reluctantly, lest they jeopardize their children’s health.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people use the Internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples from your experience. In this day and age, the Internet plays a pivotal role in almost every aspect of human life. However, there has been a heated debate amongst individuals as to whether the online medical information provided by cyber platforms has more benefits than drawbacks or not. I would argue that if the content of these sites is controlled precisely by professionals in order to prevent spreading misleading data, people can reap the benefits from them on several grounds. On the one hand, it is true that many a person searches their symptoms on the Internet prior to any other action when they feel unwell which could negatively affect their wellbeing. To start with, not every information on the Internet has been written by specialists who consider all the contributing factors in an illness. Moreover, doctors with years of study and work diagnose an illness by asking questions about patients’ history, physical examination and keeping them under surveillance for a period of time. That is to say, it is too simplistic an approach to start curing based on a general review of a disease and its common symptoms written by an anonymous writer since a wrong decision could leave a detrimental effect on one a person’s health. On the other hand, reading simplified articles about health issues, people can raise their awareness towards their body in order to prevent some ailments and diseases. In other words, the accurate and reliable information can shed light on many small symptoms sending an alert about an illness which was underestimated before. That the early diagnosis and medication can prevent a severe illness such as cancer from getting so acute is an undeniable fact, hence the importance of having comprehensive information about medical issues, thereby preventing many potential diseases in the future. In addition, some minor ailments such as flu can be cured by reading some advice online. These illnesses are not life threatening and by curing them at home people can lessen the workload of medical practitioners. In conclusion, while the content on the Internet can be highly misleading, reading them it can be so informative that it could save people’s life and reduce the workload of the already overwhelmed medical staff and health care system.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people are of the opinion that prisons are basically universities of crime, fostering the king of behaviors they aim to eradicate, and are, therefore, not effective. Others feel that prison life in is not hard/harsh enough. Discuss the arguments on both sides of the issue. What is your opinion the matter? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nowadays, the effectivity of crime prevention measures, especially confinement, has been frowned upon/has come under fire, all the less so with escalating crime figures which are a proof of the ineffectiveness of detention. As for the grounds for this complication, some people are inclined to attribute it to the fact that prisons are not tough enough on offenders whereas others reflect that the reason lies with the fact that correctional facilities are breeding places of criminality. With respect to the former group, they conceive of penitentiaries as places that where offenders (who perpetrated) perpetrating felonies must be strictly controlled and even forbidden of basic rights with a view to appreciating those rights after they are released, lest they reoffend. From the perspective of the latter group, not only are correctional facilities not conducive to eliminating crimes, but also they sow the seeds of the very offence that has brought the alleged victim before the law court at first. Despite efforts being exerted to preclude crime, detainees in a prison will inevitably share their methods of engaging in manifold offences and , thereby affecting other detainees, especially juvenile delinquents who are more liable to be influenced. On the other hand, it is a given that criminal gangs do exist in penitentiaries, promoting practices such as intravenous drug using or physical assault. As far as I am concerned, albeit challenging to find, there is a fine line between being tough enough on a criminal and preventing the convict from feeling outraged and thereby seeking revenge from society/nature/the environment. As the pressure on inmates builds up, they are inclined to feel more inflamed as to the way they are being treated which, in turn, will invite future crimes, trapping the criminal in a vicious circle, hence the failure of this strategy. As for the view of prisons being universities of crime, my firm conviction is that this is the very problem we need to address, otherwise young lawbreakers will turn to felons. The main conclusion to be draws drawn is that should we genuinely aspire to make prisons an effective measure of combating crime, exerting pressure on inmates will not be a pragmatic approach, emphasizing the importance of prospecting for alternative initiatives. 361 words

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior, in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they like. To what extent should children have to follow rules? An appropriate behavior with/toward children and adolescence, now, is regarded as a fundamental issue. Many believe that this matter is a vital factor in the future of humanity. In most societies, children likely face firm behavioral rules to follow; whereas, their counterparts in other places are not made to follow, obey, observe, respect chase specific laws. The question is as to which of these trends could be considered the most efficient approach to take? Society might encounter/face serious problems if children are raised with severe rules; that is, being a coward is the most probable result of tight restrictions. To put it another way, children have insufficient bravery to pursue their interests; hence, society will probably suffer from a lack of creativity and braveness of people. Due to the nature of the penalty coming experienced infrom childhood, in the future they will be adults withare often conservative attitudes, so they do not tend to express themselves clearly. The lack of innovation/creativity/brainchild in Iranian’s company companies is the best example of this view. Freedom in all the affairs, on the other hand, may contribute to bringing up (upbringing of) a child as an irresponsible individual in his life. According to psychologists believe rules can play a crucial role in responsibility since children are accountable for their actions. Apart from this, a considerable number of people believe that children who are allowed to act freely generally will be rude and aggressive people. For instance, plenty of anti-social behaviors have resulted from limitless actions. In conclusion, although freedom in events can lead to more creativity, self-esteem, and courage, in the meantime has have its their own drawbacks as well. From my point of view, moderation is the best course which should be taken in all affairs otherwise both groups of children will face difficulties during their adult life.s

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Telecommuting refers to workers doing their jobs from home for part of each week and communicating with their office using computer technology. Telecommuting is growing in many countries and is expected to be common for most office workers in the coming decades. How do you think society will be affected by the growth of telecommuting? The spread of telecommuting is proving to be effective in many parts of the world and especially with the advancements that technology brought upon, it is becoming more and more frequent and unchallenging. It is an interesting way of working which enables workers to save up their commuting time and their energy for more important matters and the fact that assigned tasks can be performed in a quiet place with more focus is undoubtably undeniable. As mentioned, the growth of telecommuting can be of numerous advantages and those which affect the society as a whole are that not only the congestion we faced on streets will decrease dramatically, but also, the air pollution drops as well. The Covid-19 pandemic forced some organizations and even governments to employ such a strategy to prevent further spread of the disease and this enforcement made them realize that teleworking has many pros and some are even considering continuing it for even after the pandemic ends and for a major part of their coming lifetime. The statistics of efficiency of telecommuters, which has been published in some papers, indicate that the majority of people who experienced telecommuting are not only performing much better than before but also their creativity and even responsibility has risen to a great extent. Although this relies on the characteristics of employees and it is even proven that some people are taking advantage of this provided option. Some are working two jobs and doing their tasks simultaneously in an unacceptable way in other company that they work in and some are even ditching their job doing nothing, leading to a situation where that neither of the assigned duties are performed as the employers desired. With time passing, monitoring systems regarding workers’ performance are being upgraded as well and entrepreneurs can now make sure that their staff are carrying out their jobs just as they should and with this in mind, it can be assured that telecommuting can be a great incident/phenomenon for both parties. To sum up, telecommuting is a double-edged sword and though it is awesomebeneficial, it is not applicable to everyone due to their circumstances or characters but eventually to choose one, I believe that it is a great matter that has been introduced to peoples’ people’s lives and gradually everyone can get used to this way of working, because so far, it is has been shown that its merits outweigh the demerits. people/police