جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education. Agree or disagree Nowadays, the world has witnessed a drastic increase in crime rates which should be controlled by the government. Nevertheless, some groups are of the thought that the incarceration is the only key to slow this trend/reduce this matter, while others believe that education could eliminate the problems from its root which I totally disagree with and I am of the opinion that both approaches have their own distinctive merits in order to address this issue. On the one hand, first of all, confining offenders and sentence sentencing them to imprisonment would help increase social security, . to illustrate this, when those who committed unforgivable crimes like murdering are in incarceration, the risk of such disasters will drop and at the same time this imprisonmentit could ensure the safety of other citizens as well. Secondly, being away from beloved ones, lack of freedom and socialization and being kept in a cell, could be a breeding ground for offenders in order to think and learn about their heinous actions. Having said that, being sentenced to prison, some criminals wouldn’t learn from their brutal behaviors and it will not act as deterrent ,.therefore there should be other factors as well.as my considerationin my estimation, education serves as a remedy which helps leads to a decrease in crime rates. Being educated in school with fundamental laws, students will be able to distinguish the right path in their life and also it enables them to heighten their awareness about the impacts of heinous actions on their life. To cut a long story short, I believe imprisonment and education are both are two factors which play a vital role in dealing with crimes. Although governments play close attention to offenders and their behaviors in prison, they should also consider take their education into the account.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think the closure of local businesses will bring about many problems. What problems do you think this trend can bring about? It has been decades that supermarkets have been mushrooming throughout the world, wiping out local, small shops. Although the adverse effects of this trend definitely merit consideration, the need to establish the causes seems necessary. Trying to offer an explanation for the rise of big supermarkets, many experts have reached a number of reasons behind this trend. First, the large variety of products offered by supermarkets gives them a distinct advantage over their small counterparts. This in addition to interior design, artificial lighting and elegant surroundings provide an environment which readily captures customers’ attention, turning a routine shopping experience like an unforgettable event. Moreover, the capital that big supermarkets possess gives them the opportunity to spend lavishly to prop up advertisements in TV commercials, on giant billboards on freeways and subways and popular websites, bringing their less fortunate rivals to their knees. Finally, online shopping, a recent, fast-growing phenomenon, has fanned the flames of the fire on small businesses which had already been torched by the big names. Never will a small business be capable of winning the media battle. The fact that the days of small businesses are numbered can have absolutely negative impacts. Initially, the diversity of places will vanish as popular corporations continue to mutate, stealing the individuality of a neighborhood or even a city. Once branches of a certain supermarket become prevalent all over a country, shining and attracting all the potential customers, making other local shops so extremely insignificant as if they were unpleasant weeds, the unique identity of that place will diminish. McDonald's is a fine example of this as its branches now can be seen in every corner of the world. secondly, the dominance of big supermarkets equals the death of the free market. Such severe is the competition that no private, business will dare step in and fight against popular brands. In conclusion, the cancerous growth of greedy supermarkets, albeit seems being an obvious result of technology and modern time, will adversely impact society on many levels such as the loss of cultures and the free market by the unfair competition they have created.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. There has been much discussion revolving around whether all university students should merely be entitled to choose certain key subjects areas for study or not. While there are compelling reasons for accepting the idea of forcing students to study required subjects, I believe that it is not right to deprive them of what they desire. The advocates of banning students from studying whatever they want claim that these adolescents cannot wisely decide for their future due to their inadequate experience and knowledge about job prospects. Consequently, they may apply for a major which suits neither their talent nor their personal characteristics. Such mistakes can ruin students' future and lead to dissatisfaction, hence the importance of enhancing their knowledge and motivating them to choose subjects that are more likely to be productive in future. Moreover, without regulations for choosing the university majors there would be an imbalance between the required specialists and available ones since studying in some fields requires competencies and perseverance. Therefore, many a students avoids them. In spite of the aforementioned reasons, I would argue that university students should be free to choose what they preferred. Firstly, it is an inalienable right of human beings to fulfill their lifelong ambitions albeit with low probability of finding a secured job related to these fields. Secondly, that no one can predict the future accurately is an undeniable fact. That is to say, we are living in a rapidly changing world and we are witness of to new, innovative and successful jobs which were presumed to be dead ends. Many an entrepreneurs who did not necessarily study scientific or technological majors introduces new start-ups penetrating the market with their services. Finally, studying their favorite subjects, students are more likely to be successful in comparison with those who are not passionate about their majors and it is incumbent upon officials to provide incentives such as funds for the youth to choose highly required subjects. In conclusion, although forcing students to choose technological and scientific subjects has merits for students and society, I opine that it is more beneficial to letting them study pursue the course of their choice.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play until they are six or seven years old. Others believe it is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible. What do you think are the advantages of attending school from young age? In the present century, parents wonder if their children should attend school before the age of six or seven while the majority of them work for a long period of time, so nursery schools or kindergartens are the other choice for children instead of staying at home up to the age of starting the primary school with little fewer opportunities. today, there are controversial debates as to whether is it appropriate for a child to enter the school from a very tender age because the most critical period of children’s life is their first five years and this may cause damage to children’s relationship with their parents or contribute to lose losing their entertainment of the childhood. Also, it might lead to developing some immoral habits like fighting or bullying. However, there are lots of benefits to starting the preschool curriculum because a child at an early age is more talented and can cultivate remarkable skills such as confidence, self-esteem and problem-solving, so exposing him or her to nurturing and education can guarantee that they get off to a perfect start. Moreover, coordination and social skills can be gained via schooling at the young age which can be difficult or frightening for children, starting the first day of school at the age of six. On the other hand, these atmospheres provide creative activities when they are equipped with diverse accessories like learning toys and colorful textures environments in the space. In conclusion, children starting school at an early age are likely to more encouraged to some reinforce their positive positive reinforcement of their actions like interacting with others or learning the sense of responsibility. Furthermore, the children’s training can be for a short term during a day to spend the rest of the time with their parents.