Fridays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/327-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-04-29 2024-05-03T12:17:16+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Children's Punishment, Bahareh Momtaheni 2018-07-20T15:49:35+00:00 2018-07-20T15:49:35+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/327-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-04-29/2080-children-s-punishment-bahareh-momtaheni <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.04.29/Children's Punishment, Bahareh Momtaheni.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children? During children’s growth, one of the essential points of their education is learning how to distinguish between right and wrong at early age. Many parents consider different kind of punishments as an educational process to their children. I disagree with the necessity of punishments and I believe there are some other ways which have more advantages for child’s development. As far as I am concerned, physical punishment is the worst way of teaching a lesson to a child which a parent or a teacher can use. On this way, besides of its illegal aspects, not even it does not have any positive effects on a child, but also may ruin individual’s life for good. This kind of brutality is influencing directly on the child’s mental and his/hers emotions. Normally, children who suffer from physical abuse are more prone to become anti social or even a law breaker in future. Even though we always hear about child abuses in news, many psychologists, believe that using specific penalizes for children, have positive aspects on children’s behaviour such as preventing them from playing their favorite game or watching TV shows because of their negative way of acting may help them to regard their actions more precisely. By this way, children will pay more attention to their environment, society, friends and family, so they may consider their choices more wisely. In conclusion, I agree with having an effective conversation at the first place by bringing reasons and facts to show them why their manners were wrong to develop their education in a good way. After all, if they repeat their mistakes, it is better to reckon with light punishments as I’ve mentioned.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.04.29/Children's Punishment, Bahareh Momtaheni.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children? During children’s growth, one of the essential points of their education is learning how to distinguish between right and wrong at early age. Many parents consider different kind of punishments as an educational process to their children. I disagree with the necessity of punishments and I believe there are some other ways which have more advantages for child’s development. As far as I am concerned, physical punishment is the worst way of teaching a lesson to a child which a parent or a teacher can use. On this way, besides of its illegal aspects, not even it does not have any positive effects on a child, but also may ruin individual’s life for good. This kind of brutality is influencing directly on the child’s mental and his/hers emotions. Normally, children who suffer from physical abuse are more prone to become anti social or even a law breaker in future. Even though we always hear about child abuses in news, many psychologists, believe that using specific penalizes for children, have positive aspects on children’s behaviour such as preventing them from playing their favorite game or watching TV shows because of their negative way of acting may help them to regard their actions more precisely. By this way, children will pay more attention to their environment, society, friends and family, so they may consider their choices more wisely. In conclusion, I agree with having an effective conversation at the first place by bringing reasons and facts to show them why their manners were wrong to develop their education in a good way. After all, if they repeat their mistakes, it is better to reckon with light punishments as I’ve mentioned.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Freedom of Choice, Sanaz Namdar 2018-07-20T15:49:13+00:00 2018-07-20T15:49:13+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/327-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-04-29/2079-freedom-of-choice-sanaz-namdar <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.04.29/Freedom of Choice, Sanaz Namdar.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Topic: Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food, clothes, and entertainment is likely to result in society of individuals who think about their own wishes. Other people believe it is important for children to make decision about matters affect them. To T o what extent do you agree or disagree? There is this view supporting the notion that given freedom of choice in making decision regarding daily issues, children tend to be self-centered in their future. However, the opponents of this view insist on the importance of decision making in the areas that involve children. I believe that both of these viewpoints are equally important as there needs to be moderation when it comes to raising children. There are some likely explanations which support the view opposes to give freedom of choice to children in their daily affairs. Firstly, as lacking social skills in the childhood, they do not know how to communicate with other people, not least their authorities, so we will face lack of respect and some disorganization in society. Moreover, in negotiating with others, they cannot make compromise as well as they cannot even handle any opposing views. Finally, the dire subsequence of this chaos will derive to society with people who just observe themselves and their own interests and demands. On the other hand, some people mention the necessity of decision making for children’s upbringing. This view expresses that with giving this opportunity to children, they can boost their self-esteem and foster their creativity. This can learn them decision making skills; in addition, they can learn how to face the consequences of their decisions in their adulthood. Furthermore, this freedom situation can be the experience for them to learn how to think and treat independently otherwise blindly obedient members of society. In conclusion, the both two views have some merits and demerits owing to the reasons mentioned above; therefore, I, personally, believe that reaching the middle line among these two views is the point. In other words, trying to givethem some freedom of choice would be effective provided they are under the subtle control of their parents.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.04.29/Freedom of Choice, Sanaz Namdar.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Topic: Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food, clothes, and entertainment is likely to result in society of individuals who think about their own wishes. Other people believe it is important for children to make decision about matters affect them. To T o what extent do you agree or disagree? There is this view supporting the notion that given freedom of choice in making decision regarding daily issues, children tend to be self-centered in their future. However, the opponents of this view insist on the importance of decision making in the areas that involve children. I believe that both of these viewpoints are equally important as there needs to be moderation when it comes to raising children. There are some likely explanations which support the view opposes to give freedom of choice to children in their daily affairs. Firstly, as lacking social skills in the childhood, they do not know how to communicate with other people, not least their authorities, so we will face lack of respect and some disorganization in society. Moreover, in negotiating with others, they cannot make compromise as well as they cannot even handle any opposing views. Finally, the dire subsequence of this chaos will derive to society with people who just observe themselves and their own interests and demands. On the other hand, some people mention the necessity of decision making for children’s upbringing. This view expresses that with giving this opportunity to children, they can boost their self-esteem and foster their creativity. This can learn them decision making skills; in addition, they can learn how to face the consequences of their decisions in their adulthood. Furthermore, this freedom situation can be the experience for them to learn how to think and treat independently otherwise blindly obedient members of society. In conclusion, the both two views have some merits and demerits owing to the reasons mentioned above; therefore, I, personally, believe that reaching the middle line among these two views is the point. In other words, trying to givethem some freedom of choice would be effective provided they are under the subtle control of their parents.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Language For Work Travel, Shahroq 2018-07-20T15:48:51+00:00 2018-07-20T15:48:51+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/327-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-04-29/2078-language-for-work-travel-shahroq <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.04.29/Language For Work Travel, Shahroq.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country .Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. People have different views about the reasons why a foreign language should be learned. Whereas it is argued that the sole reasons behind it are either for traveling or getting a job in a different country, it seems to me that acquiring a foreign language will be of other great benefits to the learners. On the one hand, it is often thought that people feel the necessity of communicating in a different tongue on two occasions. With the advent and easiness of air travel, people, nowadays, are traveling to remote destinations outside of their own country, in which ordinarily a different language is spoken. Knowing an international and widely spoken language, not only would the travelers enjoy their journey more, but also they would be more likely to learn first-handed experiences from local people. Furthermore, the ability to communicate in a foreign language is not considered optional if one wants to apply for a job abroad. Most international companies, which intend to offer their position to foreigners, expect individuals to be able to speak, read, and even write fluently in order to have the job. On the other hand, the advantages of knowing a foreign language are beyond mentioned reasons. The availability of academic resources in the dominant languages, such as English or French, is way more than that of other languages. Mastering in these languages, students can use the enormous numbers of textbooks and papers written in these languages whether it is for a specific curriculum or for their own interest, hence more success in their education. Students mastered in one of these languages, in additions, will be more likely to have superior job opportunities in their own country, for potential employers look favorably toward knowing a second language. Moreover, the most movies, TV series, and music are produced in English. One, if wants to consume these materials, must understand the language. In brief, although work and travel can be considered the only reasons behind learning a foreign language, I believe they are not the only justifications, and plenty of other motivation can encourage people to start learning a new language.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.04.29/Language For Work Travel, Shahroq.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country .Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. People have different views about the reasons why a foreign language should be learned. Whereas it is argued that the sole reasons behind it are either for traveling or getting a job in a different country, it seems to me that acquiring a foreign language will be of other great benefits to the learners. On the one hand, it is often thought that people feel the necessity of communicating in a different tongue on two occasions. With the advent and easiness of air travel, people, nowadays, are traveling to remote destinations outside of their own country, in which ordinarily a different language is spoken. Knowing an international and widely spoken language, not only would the travelers enjoy their journey more, but also they would be more likely to learn first-handed experiences from local people. Furthermore, the ability to communicate in a foreign language is not considered optional if one wants to apply for a job abroad. Most international companies, which intend to offer their position to foreigners, expect individuals to be able to speak, read, and even write fluently in order to have the job. On the other hand, the advantages of knowing a foreign language are beyond mentioned reasons. The availability of academic resources in the dominant languages, such as English or French, is way more than that of other languages. Mastering in these languages, students can use the enormous numbers of textbooks and papers written in these languages whether it is for a specific curriculum or for their own interest, hence more success in their education. Students mastered in one of these languages, in additions, will be more likely to have superior job opportunities in their own country, for potential employers look favorably toward knowing a second language. Moreover, the most movies, TV series, and music are produced in English. One, if wants to consume these materials, must understand the language. In brief, although work and travel can be considered the only reasons behind learning a foreign language, I believe they are not the only justifications, and plenty of other motivation can encourage people to start learning a new language.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Young Population, Dalar 2018-07-20T15:48:07+00:00 2018-07-20T15:48:07+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/327-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-04-29/2077-young-population-dalar <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.04.29/Young Population, Dalar.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adult, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? There are a range of different views on the question whether the societies comprising a large number of youngsters among their populations lead to enough merits that outweigh its demerits. New generations are potential caste for new ideas and energetic workforces; Their demands and expectancies, however, rise up as they grow in number. As it is always said, the youth is the backbone of each community which is a possible labor force and tax payer that promises a prospective growth for economic developments. If a nation owns so many young members, not only will they be a money-wise benefit for the government, but also motivated new generations along with creative ideas may be able to address some, yet to be solved, problems. On the other hand, it is worth mentioning that the higher range of young people exist within a community, the larger amounts of demands to respond in favor of facilities like medical and educational ones, so not everyone could be offered on these opportunities for free as a result of which health care and education’s level slide away respectively. What is more, youngsters, the risk taker caste, are not that experienced in life’s ups and downs which might cause them to make irreversible mistakes with no substitute compensation. By way of conclusion, according to the reasons above, although the role the young population plays, is significant in terms of economic promotion than their aged counterparts, the government cannot afford their demands for the facility needs like medication and schooling. That is to say, only if the authority has enough budget to support new generation’s requirements, will the youth be profitable for the society besides other positive aspects like creative minds and efficient labor forces they potentially are.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.04.29/Young Population, Dalar.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adult, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? There are a range of different views on the question whether the societies comprising a large number of youngsters among their populations lead to enough merits that outweigh its demerits. New generations are potential caste for new ideas and energetic workforces; Their demands and expectancies, however, rise up as they grow in number. As it is always said, the youth is the backbone of each community which is a possible labor force and tax payer that promises a prospective growth for economic developments. If a nation owns so many young members, not only will they be a money-wise benefit for the government, but also motivated new generations along with creative ideas may be able to address some, yet to be solved, problems. On the other hand, it is worth mentioning that the higher range of young people exist within a community, the larger amounts of demands to respond in favor of facilities like medical and educational ones, so not everyone could be offered on these opportunities for free as a result of which health care and education’s level slide away respectively. What is more, youngsters, the risk taker caste, are not that experienced in life’s ups and downs which might cause them to make irreversible mistakes with no substitute compensation. By way of conclusion, according to the reasons above, although the role the young population plays, is significant in terms of economic promotion than their aged counterparts, the government cannot afford their demands for the facility needs like medication and schooling. That is to say, only if the authority has enough budget to support new generation’s requirements, will the youth be profitable for the society besides other positive aspects like creative minds and efficient labor forces they potentially are.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>