Fridays

Animal Use, Amir G

2018-06-01T12:04:01+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while others argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Animals, from the fruit fly to the mouse, are widely used in scientific research. They are crucial for allowing scientists to learn more about human biology and health, and for developing new medicines. While many people believe that animals should be used in medical researches, some others are strongly against this, reasoning that it is a clear violation of animal rights. Those who are not in favor of undertaking so-called medical testing on animals claim that such tests are inhumane and unethical. They opine that we are not allowed to sentence confine innocent creatures who can feel pain and pleasure in laboratory cages poisoning, shocking, burning and kill them atrociously. In addition to cruelty of such tests on animals many reports are indicating that a large portion of medicines tested on animals did not have the same effect on humans. In view of this, more humane alternative technics such as sophisticated computer modeling, cell culturing and using volunteers is proposed. However, proponents of animal testing argue that not only is are limited tests under specific condition necessary to develop medical science, but it is also mandatory to pave the way for further advancement in the boundaries of other sciences such as space explorations and psychology. Admittedly, a shorter life span of animals than of that of humans is another green light for scientists to conduct their research on animals. Advocatesd, however, claim that alternative solutions are still limited, and they cannot rely on new methods to do necessary tests. I personally, opine that although scientific research on animals can be done in a cruelly inhumane way it was necessary during old ages. I do not see any reasonable ground torturing defenseless animals for industrial purposes. That humans at this day and age is are slaughtering animals for financial benefits is an undeniable fact. While I do agree with limited tests on animals under certain humane regulations, I am strongly against animal testing freely without specific rules.

Art, Amin

2018-06-01T12:03:48+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both sides and give your opinion. First of all, it would be pointed out, the culture of every society has initiated into historical background whole of invented past. So when we are talking about a the culture of a country we would say about its own historical relationships .however, art is an effectitive part in the culture of every country. Art is an inseparable part from of any society. Art in any shape brings a powerful background for people of society considerably . Some people think that art is an additional subject thing own their in children’s school. They have a very negative attitude to/toward art. However, peyattention paying attention to matters such as earning money,getting married,working etc is are more important than art . Another attitude is that they believe thatin going to involvement in art makes children’s life a misery as do drugs to their lifes. on the other hand, people would say art is necessary for children because it causes/helps children to have creativity for all aspects of their lifes. Furthermore, that is helpsed to improveing and manifesting brain’s ability such as analyzing ,a profound attitude and having another view about everything. I believe that children have an open mind for doing any work that can be greatly lead to all aspects of their lifes. By the way, the parents should give authority to children who deside decide for themselves.

Childcare Training Courses, Amir Adel

2018-06-01T12:03:35+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. The importance of empowering the next generation for society has caused some people to suggest establishing obligatory training programs for parents. Personally, I am one of the people who believe on in this idea by stressing a mandatory process. Firstly, these days the family circle has shrunk and many times its members live far from each other, therefore new parents do not access their the others’ support especially their parents. Not so long ago, relatives, mainly grandparents had a trainer role and helped their children to know responsibilities of being a parent. These trainings had included some practical and theoretical lessons had been taught before giving birth or during upbringing but now, all of this help these hands should be given by childcare training programs. Moreover, although nowadays we have unlimited access to parenting information resources through the Internet and tremendous numbers amount of books, we also need to classes where someone teaches us all these concepts in practice. Secondly, according to the most psychological researches, parents’ behaviour and ways they choose to raise childrenup have irreversible effects on children’s life and consequently next generation of the community, and it would be more critical than their genes. When we know this fact, it would be logical to establish some courses to for steer new parents to be better educators and role models and this process could be beginbegan from high school or colleages. In conclusion, it appears that upbringing is one the most important dutiesy of formation of family and perhaps the main point, so engaging in childcare training schemes would be less the least that can be done as by a parent.

Competitive Sports, Maryam Mohammadtabar

2018-06-01T12:03:23+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that competitive sports, both team and individuals, have no place in the school curriculum. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Without doubt, sport is one of the important parts of the school curriculums. I strongly disagree with this statement as not only is sport practical beneficial/useful for students in terms of physical and mental health, but also is quite beneficial to their future’s life. Firstly, to some experts physical activity is a necessary part of the school lessons to all pupils and for this reason on the basis of the educational code, barely can you find a school that does not include sport in their curriculums. There are different sports fields in schools such as football, volleyball, tennis and etc. All students are encouraged to take part in a sport in order to that they can be active and happy. In addition, sport protects children against different diseases that are quite popular among them because of their modern inactive/deskbound/ life style. These diseases consist of body posture problems, muscle weakness and obesity. Secondly, competitive sports play a key role in shaping the character of students in school. They have to build up a team with their classmates. Accordingly, they acquire interpersonal and social interaction skills and also some leadership skills that are quite beneficial to them. Besides, all team sports teach pupils how to face success and failure and how they obey the rules of the games as well. In fact, students through sport lessons learn informative tips that are much more essential to their future. For instance, managing of some crucial occasions in their future’s jobs is really easy to for these students who have such experiences. To conclude, it is clear that competitive sports is are quite important for students in school in many ways and without sport curriculums the atmosphere of school will be tedious and students will not have enough motivation to do exercise which is practical beneficial to them.

Couples and Children

2018-06-01T12:03:09+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many countries there is an increasing number of couples choosing to have no children. What are advantages and disadvantages to couples having no children? If we flashback to our previous generation, we find out that parents tend to have more than four kids. But as time passed by parent’s tendency for having less fewer or even no child has been increased become more widespread drastically. Some people believe regard that this issue as beneficialt to of couple’s life, others are on of the thought that this issue can ruin couple’s life. There are so many people who consider children as necessity and the spices of life which can change the life path completely. These people believe that couples will not sense the beauty of the life. Also, their life would be dull and monotonous. On the other hands, when couples age, there would be no one to rely on or be there when they need someone and they will go through so many hardships. Nowadays we could see that the growth of the tendency to have no children. First of all, these couples say that without a child, they have less fewer responsibilities then than when they have one and as a result they could take care of their life better. Secondly, they believe that they could spend less money and save more when they have no child. Finally, they are on of the opinion/thought that they have more free time In conclusion, I am of the opinion that having children is the nature of married life and it is inseparable so couples should have children in the appropriate time. Those who prefer to have no child will face problems in the long term..

Internet Effect on People, Shahroq

2018-06-01T12:02:57+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays people are affected by social media and the Internet. Is it a good or a bad trend in your opinion? Explain it by giving your own examples The internet and its offspring, social media, have not been around for too long, yet their impacts on people have been huge. Whereas some argue that these effects have been detrimental, it seems to me that, on the most occasions, we should look favourably towards their impacts on people. On the one hand, there are several reasons why some people argue against these phenomena. Firstly, the Internet and social platforms have been rightly blamed for young generation’s social isolation. Being constantly online and extensively accessing extensively (to) whatever they need, people have not perceived and almost forgotten the imperative role of healthy social interaction on in both their intellectual and mental well-being. Societies, as a result, would will suffer far more from consequences such as social isolation, losing touch with reality, and a variety of related diseases it brings in. Secondly, not only has the Internet dramatically reduced people’ physical activity, also it has incited a sedentary lifestyle. Gone are the times when we had to commute to banks for our financial tasks, walk up and down offices’ ’s stairs so as to deliver a letter to a college. What people are doing now is open up their browsers while being desk-bound, and either send an email or place a transactional order. On the other hand, the Internet and social media, in many ways, have been of great benefits to people. Knowledge-wise, this connectivity has revolutionizeds people’s access to information globally. Nowadays, connected to the Internet, scholars and people alike, even in the highly impoverished countries, can enjoy an abundance of academic journals and textbooks either freely or with a low fee, which means we are likely to witness less intellectual disparity between the poor and the rich, hence homogeneous nations. Moreover, finding friends and acquaintances have has been massively facilitated by social media. Sharing their hobbies, pastimes, and passions, people are able to strike up friendships and expand their social circle; consequently, if employed with determination, not only would they lead a more satisfactory life, but have greater support on in hardships that life would throw at them.In brief, I concede the deteriorating aspects of internet technology, yet I am holding on to the view that this trend has been ultimately advantageous, for these platforms promote global parity via free flow of information, and make us more sociably contented through expanding our friendship circle.

Museums Charges, Milad

2018-06-01T12:02:40+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Museums, currently, seem to suffer from financial problems, and struggle to earn resources. to that end they tend to make money through people’s admission. However, many are of the opinion that this budget should be obtained from other resources rather than admission fees. To me, the latter’s point of view makes sense for some reasons. First, it should be noted that many museum’s managers are compelled to compensate their expenses of maintenance and renewal of their museums out of people’s aids via admission fees. To explain, retaining a national heritage is a capital-intensive project taking a lot of time and endeavor to keep historical remnants undisturbed, intact and available to every visitor. Moreover, enhancing the quality of facilities offered by museums requires a great amount of money. Therefore, managers are intended intent on offsetingto provide their expenses from visitors and tourists, which is the easiest way. On the contrary, making money out of people’s entrance to museums has its own dissidents believing that these charges should be paid off via other resources. In fact, museums are considered national assets and the heritage of a country, passed on to us safely by our ancestors, through which governments can boost their economy. They prompt tourists to enter the host country to visit them thereby bolstering the status quo of the region. Thus, encumbering the expenses of the museums is incumbent upon governments not people. Logically, governments should allocate a certain amount of budget for that purpose as the profits will return to them multiple times as much in the long-run. As illustrated above, it, therefore, seems that the logic of earning money from museums’ visitors is flawed. Having so many tourist attractions for their inherent cultural value, the museums draw a huge amount of money to the region harboring locating them. To reach this aim this goal, governments, should take the responsibility of providing paying expenses, which is a long-term investment for them.

Prison, Maryam Ahadpour

2018-06-01T12:02:28+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Topic: Some people are of the opinion that prisons are basically universities of crime, fostering the kind of behavior they aim to eradicate, and are, therefore, not effective. Others feel that prison is not hard enough. Discuss the arguments on both sides of the issues. What is your own opinion on the matter? The use of prisons as a means to combat crime has always been as a matter of discussion and is becoming a controversial issue. It is true that jails play a vital role in decelerating the crime rates as opposed to providing developmental programs. This essay will discuss both sides of this issue. Some people believe that prisons are basically breeding grounds for criminals. They believe that prisons' atmosphere can affect prisoners and convert them to professional criminals. For instance, people who enter prison at an early age for minor crime come out with the skills to commit more serious ones. They are prone to develop an anti-social attitude toward society. In from their point of view, using wrongdoers for community services is much more effective and beneficial. On the flip side, others are of the opinion that prisons are not harsh enough. They argue that the small fines for some types of crime do not act as much of a deterrent. It is undeniable that captivity in harsh conditions helps to reduce crimes within society. In addition, capital punishment develops fear inside culprits' mind. Therefore, they realize their fault and stay away from further commission of crime. In conclusion, jails are one of the most important parts of the community which is are dealing strongly with criminal activities despite having its their own drawbacks. In my estimation, the government cannot prevent crime solely, nor can individuals undertake such a formidable task. By and large, provision of public assistance and enforcing balanced law can decrease the crime rate. As the saying goes "Prevention is better than cure!"

Travel, Ardalan Foroutan

2018-06-01T12:02:14+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

some people think personal car is the best way to travel within cities, while others think bicycles are better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. There is a long-standing question as to which kinds of daily commuters, cycling or driving personal vehicles, should be facilitated. This essay will discuss the debate, and give a concluding view. On the one hand, those who support the idea that of using personal vehicles because of being is better than that of bikes, would have some claims. Firstly, it must be said that the government should create a high-quality bicycle path infrastructure, regardless of the cost. Given that the major segment of cities has not got proper paths, the riders could not consistently cycle in inner-city locations. A second claim is that cars occupy the capacity of cars is more space than do bicycles; therefore, it seems that vehicles daily could transfer more daily commuters who have the same destination. Proponents of this view cite that driving to the destination in bad weather conditions, drivers will not involve in endangering themselves in terms of physical injuries; therefore, rarely do they collapse collide with other cars. The other side of this debate is that cycling is admittedly environmentally friendly by which I mean it assists in the effort to alleviate environmental problems when it comes to cutting down on emissions from their cars. A further well-known reason is that regular biking leads individuals to be healthier, and getting considerably exercise considerably, they travel daily to work. Finally, the volume of the traffic jam is a controversial issue in today’s world, so cycling is one of the remedies to contend with this problem. As a case in point, in my country, IRAN, there is an island, Kish, which whose inhabitants are fostered encouraged to use bicycles in lieu of their cars. As a result, the citizens have wasted no time in heavy rush hour traffic. In conclusion, although I would tend to side with the opponents of cars, it seems to be unreasonable that when the cities have not got appropriate bicycle path infrastructure and adequate facilities, and it is inadvisable that we encourage people to use bikes.

Wildlife Protection

2018-06-01T12:02:02+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is often said that government spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important. Do you agree or disagree? Today, according to the development of industry as well as extremely dramatic population growth around the world, the level of human’s manipulation of the environment especially wildlife, for aligning with such changes has escalated markedly. As a result, governments have to spend a great deal of money on protecting of flora and fauna. However, some believe that it is not necessary to allocate such a huge budget for saving wild life, while there are more other important problems. I do not agree with the above statement. In my opinion, not only is it our ethical responsibility to preserve animal life, but also rather it is a vital task which will lead to saving the human’s life in the near future. In other words, if we do not care about the wildlife, no longer can we access to a wide range of food chain. Moreover, we provide a large amount/portion of our pharmaceutical needs as well as the raw materials of the clothing industry by animals. So, the less conservation of creatures is equal to much loos loss of human’s required resources. In addition to the above consequences, the extinction of different kinds of flora and fauna will gradually impact negative effects on the ecosystem. For instance, the extinction of specific plants will affect the life of certain groups of animals, also the lack of those particular animals leads to the death of other kinds of creatures. Hence, this continuing cycle of annihilation will end inup with the ecosystem destruction. Furthermore, sometimes the lack of food sources pushes the animals to humans’ ’s territory where they attack people and bring about serious injuries or even death of individuals. To sum up, it is crystal clear that wildlife protection is one of the most critical subjects which should be taken into account by governments, and allocating such great budget for this problem is not at all the a waste of money.