جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

?eople living in the 21st century are enjoying better quality of life compared to people who lived in the previous centuries. ?o what extent do you agree or disagree? It has been argued that the ever- rising quality of people’s living in the present century in comparison with last century causes major segments of individuals should to be satisfied rather than past. I , for one, assert that the influence of excessive development in technology on quality of people’s living plays a leading role for such satisfaction. The main obstacle would used to appear to be a lack of communication, and citizens simply suffered from a shortage of access to information simply, but according to developments in technology these days people could widely get access for to any data in terms of economically developeddevelopment, medical research, and scientific methods and so on. It has resulted in enhancing people’s circumstancecondition. A further well-known reason is that by supplementing artificial intelligence with human’s wisdom in the 21st century admittedly contributes leads people to having less physical activity/works; therefore, people’s living can be facilitated, and they have more leisure time. One final point against this proposal is that currently, various recreational activities bring about delight in people becoming more delighted. Plenty of activities are created , for instance , aquatic and air sports and so on . on the other hand , Although quality of people’s living is improved, but the menmankind cause irreplaceable damage such as environmental degradation which includes discharging chemical waste into rivers, depleting natural resources, ecological crisis crises and deforestations which all of them which will endanger next generation’s lifeliving . In conclusion, people’s circumstances have improved raises up in comparison with the past, but it is better that individuals had better should be wary of living in the future. As a result, a remarkable factor which leads to improving quality of population’s living of the 21st century is technology.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

People living in the 21th century are enjoying better quality of life compared to people who lived in the previous centuries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Someone believes that living in the 21th century includes greater life conditions rather thanin compared to the past time. I partly agree with this idea because, although technology has improves improved impressively in this these years and make made many work tasks easier, life has become more complicated and stressful. On one hand, nowadays people can enjoy modern facilities and have a much more comfortable life by using technologies in different ways. Firstly, great improvements in medicine have caused a lot of diseases to become curable and many disabilities could have been resolved. For example, some disabled people can live like others by using modern artificial body parts. Furthermore, a lot of hard and harmful work that used to be done by humans now can be done by machines and anymore no more is there is no any harm onin doing these types of work. Finally, many facilities are devised that make traveling and communications faster, safer and easier like planes, cars, the internet, smart-phones, etc, so people have more options to choose for where or how they want to live. On other hand, people experience higher stress in their daily life in these days because the world has changed faster and workers need proper reaction to these changes and it causes a lot of pressure on people. Moreover, the increasing population of the world makes has created lots of problems such as different kinds of pollution, destroying natural supplies and over-crowding. All these issues can decrease quality of life in developed countries in this century. In conclusion, I believe that people have been live living in better conditions in recent decades by developing and using new technology technologies although some issues may engender.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? Today, compared with the past people spend much more time workingto work. At the same time thatthe technology has developed, so has the recession has increased too. As a result not only in developing countries, but also in their developed counterparts, individuals have to work more to afford their life expenses. Hence, some managers ask their employees to be in touch all of the week days even on holidays out of office hours to do unfinished works. In this essay I am going to discuss about the pros and cons of this issue. On the one hand, some people are of the opinion that contacting between an employer and employee out of office hours is a good idea to boost the efficiency of the work as well as increment the reinforcement of a sense of responsibility beyond among the staff. It means that whenever the personnel know the importance of their role in the programs of the company; consequently they would be motivated to work passionately. On the other hand, the opponents believe that the leisure time of staff belongs to them. So they have that the right to allocate it to their families and their friends in a relaxed atmosphere without any stress. Moreover, no longer can employees endure the high pressure that is due to their jobs, when they have not a time especially for to themselves. In my view, it is true that in this day and age, anybody has to work as harder as possible to create his or hertheir ideal life, . however, people should pay attention to the consequences of such non-stop e stop working, like some mentaly disorders as well as physical disabilities .In conclusion, the disadvantages of keeping being accessiblein touch on holidays with for the personnel are more than the advantages and therefore should be stopped.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that the government should invest money in arts and cultural events, while others believe that the government should spend money on more important things. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Investment in culture oriented activities and artistic works by governments in many parts of the world has been praised by a large group of people. There are certainly many individuals who argue that the public budgets should be spent on more basic demands. When it comes to this notion I hold the idea of maintaining a balance between the two opinions. This essay elaborates on both two viewpoints along with my own idea. That arts and cultural events play an important role in improvement of people’s social interactions is an undeniable fact. Although spending money and energy in such fields in a society suffering lack of basic needs such as health care, education, clean water and enough food does not seem reasonable. Encouraging individuals to take part in cultural events can guarantees respect for to moral values in addition to curbing criminal activities of all walks of life. On the other hand, those who are against of investment of governments in artistic works and cultural activities opine that people can live without such products, but definitely lose their lives if they do not have access to their basic needs. They claim that not only is spending governments’ income in cultural fields is not necessary, but also this is a waste of time and financial resources. The more we spend, the more artists and related activistses demand. Disappointed and tired of this hectic pace of life, people apply themselves to acquire their basic needs. By way of conclusion, once again I reaffirm my position that expenditure on cultural activities is as important as infrastructures of countries. A society with a strong culture needs to answer people’s need for their basic demands as well. Most developed countries acquired their achievements based on both cultural events benefits besides prediction of fundamental demands of their nation.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The widespread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today's world? Internet access has broadened people’s information. We can hear this sentence in almost every discussion revolving around this new achievement of human civilization. In my opinion, we can encounter this idea from two different points of view as I explain bellow: On the one hand, this is fair enough if we refer to the very ability of access which is gained by the internet nowadays. There are many websites offering the an array of topics from cooking to abstractive philosophical content. In my experience as a researcher, the internet has have empowered me to read a dozen books and articles by just some a few clicks where were I to do this along during days without it. Or people could be updated in some a second after many events. For example, I can remember the day I read a news item about Thai coupe, before one of my Thai friends get got informed. On the other hand, there is really a troublesome criticize criticism about information that the internet can offer people around the world. Apart from the accuracy of information, like those untrueth matters about famous people’s death or wedding which are notable here, there are two main problems with it. First of all, in the political aspect people are being played with information storm throw through popular sources almost serving as propaganda pressings or yellow magazines which is are simply recognizable in on political occasions. Secondly, we can ask a simple question: does is a bunch of information considered to be knowledge? In terms of science, information needs to be processed to be converted to knowledge. Philosophically, the human mind could not stand simply before the storm of information. It means, neither masses of people nor elites can absorb the plenty of data and comprehend them without spending a meaningful time to cluster and analyseis them. Now you answer, does the internet as a mediuma share this demand? To sum up, there are a lot to say about the spread of internet affection on human-life but it is not possible to judge roughly about the quality of it determinately . Maybe, it is servingserves as a doublesword to us as I explained. Finally, I should say all depends on individuals. There are many opportunities to enjoy get utilized thanks to this new gained achievement, or we can be being played.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many people prefer to live in their own house, while others are prepared to live in rental properties. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and examples. People from all around world have various attitudes to the house where they want to live. Some people save money or try to get a mortgage for buying it and others spend on or invest their money on in other ways rather than real state and would rather to rent one. I, personally, prefer to buy my own home with a small garden, although spending money on other ways would be tempting. There are some people who argue that having a property especially a home will bring some financial benefits as well as satisfaction. In some countries or cities where demand for houses is high, buying a house can have some economic advantages for an individual or a family. Indeed, buying properties is a kind of business and even if you buy it by mortgages, you will have this chance to sell it with a considerable profit. Furthermore, those interested in owing a house usually are keen on customizing/remodeling their property. When you are a landlord, you will have this right to change your the indoor or outdoor design of your home according to your preferences albeit with by obeying some urban or rural laws and this freedom of action gives you a pleasant sense of self. On the other hand, some people believe that spending money on purchasing a home is futile. These people usually live in some locations where property values not only are stagnant but also sometimes decrease. In this condition, people prefer to rent a home and spend their money on other ways. For instance, they want to buy a better vehicle or spend money on travelling around the world. In addition, when you rent a property, you will not have to pay some specific taxes and some repairing and maintain maintenance costs. These costs sometimes would be quite expensive and by saving them, we can manage other important aspects of life like education or a pension plan. In conclusion, it seems that both sides of this argument have some logical reasons, and based on economic conditions or personal preferences these choices would be various.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Smokers can cause themselves serious health problems. The choice to smoke is made freely and knowledgeable of dangers. Smokers should therefore expect to pay more for medical treatment than non-smokers. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Crucial perils of smoking have been proved to human beings all over the world. Hence, smokers are aware of the side effects of this habit, so they impose a higher treatment fee. The most preventable lifestyle factor affecting passive smokers’ health, the odor fumes of cigarettes, causes the high risk of getting cancer as much as active smokers. Therefore, not only does smoking has have a myriad of negative impacts on active smokers but also it has harmful effects on second-hand smokers and they need to spend money on destructive effects as much as active smokers. Nevertheless, it is possible for these people to be away of from smokers. For instance, active smokers can smoke outdoors and non-smokers will not be exposed to smoking. Besides, tobacco has sort of negative impacts on mental and physical health. To illustrate, blood pressure and heart attack are the examples of these health problems and smokers impose are forced to spend much more money for these types of diseases. On the other hand, based on the recent statistics the researchers claim that Nicotine provides a long list of mental illnesses such as depression. One of the most important problems among the negative effects of mental illnesses, the tendency to smoke more cigarettes, causes smokers to waste money on smoking. Actually, they believe that smoking increases their anxiety. After a while, they deduce realize to take some trophy therapy to stop smoking and improve their mental problems which refers to one aspects of paying money on for smoking side effects. In conclusion, it is totally clear that smokers pay more money than other people because of the mental and physical problems made by smoking, . However; for any other illnesses they need to pay same as non-smokers.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

When a country develops its technology, the traditional ways of life die out.it is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extant do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Nowadays, we face so many developments in technology which leads to the vanishing of the traditions. Some people believe that we should keep up with these developments and forget the old ones, others are on of the thought that it’s essential to keep traditional ways alive. We could see through the years that how these developments have made our life much easier, from invention of electricity to emersion of the internet. The internet has made so many changes in our life for example in the past people used to send letters to their family who lived far away but nowadays people make phone calls to see them. This is one example which indicates that nowadays letters is are about to disappear from our life On the other hand, there are some people who think that following the traditional ways is much better then technology because it has negative impacts on society ,also by following traditions we can keep our culture alive as well. For example, some parents are on the thought belive that their children shouldn’t play with computer games, instead they should do the physical activities for their entertainment like playing football. Moreover, we can mention unclearnuclear power, these people are completely against it because they believe that it can be used in unclearnuclear weapons and it is dangerous for the world. In conclusion, I’m of the opinion that we should keep the balance between tradition traditional ways and technology .in that case, we can take advantage of the technology and keep alive all the traditions.