Fridays

Family or School is Better for Children, Arman

2018-04-16T13:43:41+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Writing Task 2 Q: Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. As believed by a majority of people, school is the only place that where children learn about science and social relation. To my understanding , it is not a correct approach since children are future of the society and everybody is responsible of for them. To begin with, it is true that children learn different field in science and social relations in schools. They learn how to communicate and respect to each other. This is an important skill that they will use it in future. However, they spend a limited time in the school and teachers are not able to follow each child separately and correct their mistake. However, children spend their main time in the home and parents are able to devote their time to children and teach them more. Last but not least, the school is a place that where children with the same age come together and take same courses and they learn how to cooperate with each other to do the homework. This skill helps them to be an open-minded and contractive person in the future. However, this is not a sufficient item to be a good member of society. The family is an organization that where children learn how to express their feelings each other .For instance, children learn the real meaning of love from the mother. According to “News Week” magazine’s survey, conducted in 2017, the rates of the crime are is relatively low in societies which have a warm and friendly family. To sum up, both the school and the family have profound effects in children’s personalities. Both of them are form infrastructures of the society.

Foreign Language, Sahar Farjoudi

2018-04-16T13:43:25+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reason why someone should learn a foreign language. Discuss both these view. Language is the primary tool that human beings communicate with. Although people of each nation dominate have mastery over their own language, a portion of their population engages in educating other languages as well. This essay discusses whether their purpose of learning another language is for traveling and profession or some other matters. Firstly, that numerous individuals are tending to go abroad in order to work or travel has caused them to learn another language besides their own. On one hand, they acquire an ability which contradistinguishes them at work or even educational environments. On the other hand, communicating with others of different nationalities would be more facilitated in that case. Imagine a situation in another country and compare the merits and demerits of knowing their language. Without knowing that language, everyone has to do pantomime for to expressing thoughts whereas the foreigners would or would not understand them. On the contrary, there would be opportunities to find local friends there and while havinge a memorable and joyful time. Secondly, educating learning foreign languages is becoming increasingly widespread in the globe. In a large far number of countries, another language is a part of their curriculum, depending on the priorities of the country's education and policy. Their obligatory obligation would probably create urge in students to learn another language. The other issue which has encouraged parents and adults to study a foreign on exotic language or make their children to do it is the miraculousle impact of this action on the brain. Research conducted revealed, memorizing and endeavor made to learn and speak in a different language, except the mother tongue one, decline minimise the possibility of getting Alzheimer’s disease. By this approach, grey cells of the brain become stimulated and active. Not only does it assist in brain efficient functionality but also it results in eimproving self-confidence and psychological improvement. To sum up, I opine that learning a foreign language has become a part of people's extra curriculum activities. It is not only for fulfilling the aim of travel and work and also for enhancing their social, psychological and mental condition.

Homework, Shahroq

2018-04-16T13:43:12+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that school should not make children to do homework every day. Others say homework at every age can help children to succeed at school. Discuss both views. People have different views about/as to whether children should be obliged to do homework on a daily basis or not. While practicing lessons which have been taught are an essential part of every education methodology, I argue we should not impose any overwhelming obligation on children in their free times. On the one hand, the time children spend on school seems quite inadequate for synthesizing all lessons. Teachers, ordinarily, just have enough time to educate some core subject principals. These lessons, however, are regularly too general/broad, and pupils need not only practicing but also constant repetition to deeply acquire these subjects. Revising all these lessons are is not practical in limited hours each teacher has. Students, if they intended to master these skills, should do many assignments, readings, and writings. Furthermore, whilst doing these tasks, children require absolute concentration, which is neither guaranteed nor provided in classrooms, in which they are surrounded by their peers. On the other hand, after spending many hours in school, children might become vigorously exhausted by all trainings and acquisition of new courses. Children regularly attend many classes on each school day; thus, by the time they leave school, it is understandably normal for them to want their wanting to enjoy a couple of hours of leisure time. If they were compelled to spend their evenings on studying, we would probably expose them to repulsion and resentment of education. It is fair to say children like adults can enjoy a period of mental refreshment and preparing for upcoming school days. In addition, these after school hours are the only time for children to rebound rebond with their parents and friends. They can, also, use these this free times to pursue either an extra-curriculum activity or a pastime such as learning an instrument or take up a sport, as children’s growth both physically and intellectually would be positively and profoundly be affected by those activities. In conclusion, I can understand why people might be in favor of obligatory homework, but it seems to me that we should let children enjoy their free times in order that they fill it with whatever they are keen on.

No Meat and Fish, Sahar Modirzadeh

2018-04-16T13:43:00+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. These days, the number of people who are concerned with their diet is growing. Every day more and more individuals show interest in foods made of more vegetables and less meat. This trend seemingly is set to continue and there will be pros and cons for that which will be discussed in this essay. However, I am of this opinion that the advantages outweighoverweight the pitfalls. It is quite common nowadays that people try to exclude meat, fish and poultry from their diet because they have been better educated about the drawbacks of eating these foods. The adverse effects of consuming too much meat/overconsumption of … on heart health, cholesterol levels, fat levels and general health are much recognized by experts and widely publicized by different media. Moreover, informed of the disastrous outcomes of having meat and fish on the environment, people try to replace them with other nutrients in their daily diets. No sensible person can ignore the huge amount of water which should be spent on grazing lands suitable for herds of cattle to graze and grow. Considering global water scarcity, overconsumption of rare fresh and clean water on for this purpose would be so extremely selfish and illogical. Rearing fish also requires a considerable deal of water and energy which damages the environment by exhausting natural resources. On the other hand, some doctors claim that humans need to include a certain amount of protein in their routine diet, and this necessary protein is only extracted from different types of meat and fish. Neither vegetables nor other kinds of food can substitute for the vitamins and other nutritional values of the mentioned foods. In conclusion, I think avoidance of meat consumption is well worth practicing by more people across the world because it is not only advantageous for general health, but also it will surely pay dividends environmentally later in future.

Right and Wrong, Simin Gharati

2018-04-16T13:42:47+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Page 88-IELTS writing First of all, the definition of right and wrong should be surveyed. It is important to have a correct definition and interpretation for right and wrong things. I am not going to have a philosophical argument in this case. I am not saying there is not any right or wrong, but if we believe in right and wrong, if we believe in morality, we should know that it is not right or moral to define good and bad, right and wrong based on our willing, benefits and even our culture or traditions. Being parents is an important full-time job which needs knowledge, training, study & thought just like other jobs. It is the same for being a teacher. Therefore, we as parents and teachers should be aware of this heavy responsibility. Parents and teachers should think about these things before making decisions and taking actions. They should not be selfish or strike strict in defining good and bad, right and wrong. The next issue as it was mentioned in the topic, is the way they learn teach children right and wrong especially at an early age and if punishment is necessary or not. My answer is “yes”. I think sometimes both encouragement and punishment are required in the path of teaching and training children. At first we should talk to children and explain to them why they are expected to do or not to do something and as much as possible give them reasons in this case. It is better and more effective to learn teach them to do things because of acceptable reasons, not only for our satisfaction. But talking is not always enough. The next step is encouraging them for their good actions and finally punishing them for their bad actions. But what sort of punishments should parents and teachers be allowed to use? It depends on the case. Sometimes we could punish them by using language or even body language. For instance, we could tell them that we are upset because of their behavior or show them our angry face or do not pay attention to them by an indifferent face. Sometimes we should limit their freedom or facilities. For example, we should get their toy, their mobile or ask them to stay in their room for some hours. In upper ages we could also ask them to do something as the punishment for their bad behavior like cleaning the house, washing the dishes, etc. but I disagree with physical punishment like hitting children. I think it never helps. It disturbs their self-confidence and raises anger, hate and fear in them. It is not also morality. We should not develop encourage violence. Apart from how much children would hurt in this way, we should remember that children are the mens and women of future. How do we want a universe and society without war and violence when we do not do it in a small society like our family or our class?. Children see and learn.

Technology Interaction, Arman

2018-04-16T13:42:35+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Name: Arman Karimmoajeni Writing Essay part #2 Question: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? Answer: With Proliferation of technologies that influence all aspects of human’s societies. ,In fact, the societies are on the cusp of a social revolution. The implications of technology on human’s relations should be considered in all conceivable angles, negative and positive ways. To begin with, it is an undeniable fact that technology provides a variety of opportunities for people to interact with each other. Thanks to technology, the meanings of time and space have been changed in recent years. People are able to travel easily and interact with each other. For instance, people can flight fly from New York to London in less than 7 hours which is not a feasible idea before. In addition, technology has considerable effects on people’s communication ways. For example, not only have social network sites created opportunities to for people to interact with their families and friends, but also they have provided a friendly atmosphere to connect people with different backgrounds. On the other hand, the devastating consequences of technology on people’s interaction should never be neglected. Although technological devices have constrictive impacts on people‘s communication ways. They have gradually undermined feelings and emotions status on social relationships. In modern societies, people have totally immersed totally themselves in daily works. Therefore, they prefer to send a massage or email to their families and friends. These methods of communications arelimited because they do not incorporate all aspects of face to face interaction. Face to face interaction is the most genuine form of social interaction. According to “News Week” magazine’s survey, conducted in 2017, the drawbacks of virtual interaction on the young generation were discussed. In the light of the survey results, it is proved that virtual interaction has threatened the familial relationships. With hindsight, this kind of interaction had adverse influence adversely on face to face communication and at the end of the day will destroy the whole human society’s infrastructures. To sum up, the technology is an important tool that should be used to ease human life and enhance its quality. Indeed, technology has negative and positive impacts on people’s interaction which should be both considered both sides.

Traffic Congestion, Amir

2018-04-16T13:42:21+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The best way to reduce traffic congestion in cities is to provide a free public transport service. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. During the last five decades more and more people have moved to urban areas, resulting in traffic jams in big cities around the globe. Urban designers along with other specialists are trying to find an effective solution to this problem. Fortunately, despite the complexity of this issue not only succeeded have the researchers succeeded in to solvinge this problem to an acceptable level in many metropolitans roads, they also have found new solutions for to be builtbuilding metropolitan areas called smart cities. In this essay, I attempt to elaborate on some practiced methods focusing on free modes of transportations, and at the end I will express my own stances in this controversial topic. One of the most effective ways to control congestion in big cities was introduced in the mid of 1990s by the Japanese. This method was involved with fully subsidized means of transportation with HCV (High Capacity Vehicles). That the fare free public transit was a key way to solve congestion in many parts of Tokyo was an undeniable fact in those days. Jammed and tired of wasting so many hours in the congested highways, people around the world thought this is the ultimate solution, and fare free public means of transportation is the golden key to their locked roads. Statistics on that time showed the average speed in the cities with free public transportation strikingly increased, and this was definitely a remarkable achievement in mass transit. This solution failed after car manufacturers introduced inspiringly seductive sales promotions. It was after the end of the cold war when the price of oil dramatically decreased and people changed their environmentally friendly way of commuting and congestion of roads observed again on main roads of large cities. In spite of the drawbacks of using private vehicles such as air pollution, health-damaging and negative financial impact on society car owners were not willing to commute with by/via free public transport any longer. By way of conclusion, while subsidizing free public transportation definitely can mitigate the congestion on roads in crowded cities, I believe that enlightening people upon the damages of traffic jams on their lives seems more important. I opine that addressing this ever-growing issue requires more than just financial incentives. In other words, making people aware of the downsides of congested roads along with fare free transit can decidedly lead to a permanent solution.