جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Celebrities such as athletes, actors and musicians earn large salaries compared to other professionals. Some people consider this unfair, while others think that celebrities deserve to be paid a lot for the work they do. Discuss both points of view and give your opinions on the subject It's certainly true that celebrities earn more income also they are present cooperative in many advertisements which are not related to their carriers careers or many department stores , hotels, restaurants and more places will be established because of their fame and fortune. People who are against to this idea claim that their education in many cases doesn't show any direct correlation with their activities but an obvious positive point has been have determined; , they have much effort much to be professional so , education and theoretical matters can't be a satisfied satisfactory response for those who have talents and abilities. Many believe, celebrities can't live as comfortablye such as others. Not only are they under people's s scrutiny look (focus), but also their family are ready to face deal with many strange gossips. They can't be free in everywhere. Always people are keen to take autographs/signatures or take several pictures with them. Life is hardship certainly hard for celebrities certainly. The last point that I mentionfinally, their "magnificent life" wouldn't be last foreverfor a long times, perhaps their salaries must be saved for future when they do not have hadn't any positions for them or whenever they will be retired. They perform voluntarily or travel to poor areas to be beneficial members in the world,. for this reason, they can be a perfect/greatfabulous example especially for the youth. I believe they live in difficulty, so, if they have been chosen by talent not payola and favoritism, they deserve for some part of their income which they gain with their deeds not for their appearance or impresamotto. To conclude, the outcome will depends on a number of personalities, in fact they are cusses of many exciting and entertainment actions in our life, so, we spend an enormous price to enjoy our life and being happy. 286

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in word, pictures, music, film) in whichever way they wish. They should be no public or government restrictions on what they do. Do you agree or disagree? Censorship of art is always a controversial topic. A Group of people believe any kinds of censorship is against the meaning of freedom and democracy, and another group believe if there were no restriction, it would lead to social anomaly. In my opinion, being the source of art, creativity should not be censored because it does not let people to be much too creative and prevents them from thinking out of the box. Furthermore, artists not only can be a symbol of a protest but also make the next generation aware of what is going on in their time. I believe you cannot censor art completely since an artist can always find a way to express their his feeling and fulfill their mission. For example, we have lots of poems of Akhavan Sales- who foallows modern Persian poetry – which literally talks about nature and figuratively about suffocation of by the establishment. In an opposite view/by contrast, some of these modern trade arts can adversely affect the society in a negative way. For example, a caricature which was against religion and showed it derisive, created a buzz and resulted in a violent genocide massacre attack by a radical religious group for Charlie magazines' staffs which who printed a caricature of Mohammad- the prophet of Muslims –. Lots of people think that if there was no restriction or control in these pieces of arts, artists would go abroad, hence these kinds of sad happenedevents. To sum it up, although censorship is in opposition to the meaning of freedom, in from my point of view, only when these kinds of arts hurt parts of society, should there be have some limits are which hurt part of society and there should be some rules for arts which are broadcast in on television or social media.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? Not only is using trashes for making new objects an adequate way to reduce the amount of utilized raw materials, but also it can assist us in decreasing the cost of creating many products. In my opinion, if we do not employ a law to force people to recycle their rubbish, we would get better results. The first disadvantage of rules is that when we introduce a new law, we should supervise on executing it. Therefore, we require a new organization for this task and it can cost the government a lot/excessively. Also, we should set some punishments for those who disobey the law and punishing is not a proper solution to obligate people to recycle their own trashes. Secondly, we are not well aware about the consequences of forcing our citizens to reuse their garbage. It has been occurred many times that pushing people too hard into an action/doing something, had reverse feedbacks. Consequently, we cannot make people doing do what they do not like by adopting new laws. In spite ofrather than/instead of compelling people to recycle their junk with by creating new laws, which has its own drawbacks, we can teach to our young generation to reuse their waste. Although it would take a huge long time before a great percentage of the community learn to do recycling, we can stop/prevent from many unnecessary costs in future. In conclusion, if we enforce some rules to push/obligate people to recover their own trashes, we may confront with some problems, including the difficulty of enforcing the law and resisting resistenceagainst obeying these orders, hence we should educate our citizens to be responsible with by recycling their own garbage.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many people think that the government should spend money to explore the outer space, while others believe that it is a waste of public money. Discuss both views and include your own opinion. In recent years space exploration has been one of the most important projects which the governments have concentrated on it, in most parts of the world. Even though these researches have a lot of benefits for us and our planet, spending too much money for these purposes has its opponents. I believe that the governments should allocate a part of their budget for exploring outer space because it is important for human life. According to some, knowing more and more about space, monitoring our planet from a long distance and gaining information about other planets has different benefits for humankind. Nowadays scientists launch some satellites in the orbit for many reasons ,one of the important of which that one of the important of them is finding some problems on the Earth. For example, Research about atmospheric changes and forecast about some natural disasters like hurricanes through satellites is quite a beneficial methods to avoid such crisesthe crisis. Furthermore, overpopulation and lack of natural resources are other reasons that convince scientists convince to do research on other planets for finding signs of life in other parts of the solar system in order to sustain life. On the other hand, opponents believe that exploringe the outer space is a waste of time and money. They believe that there are many difficulties on the Earth which the governments should attend to them such as poverty, air pollution, health problems and much more besides. Moreover, these researches are often capital- intensive and /therefore/for this reason/ it might impose more higher taxes on people. Also, they argue that space exploration does not have any positive effects on their life. In addition, finding other planets for living is like a dream for opponents. In conclusion, I opine that discovering of the unknowns and spending money for these researches should be one of the priorities of the authorities via which we can live on in a better condition.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? Today, it would be not possible to imagine the world without using the Internet and our connected devices. We have built a complex and worthwhile network with our friends, colleagues and family members by these tools and this network is being expanded every day. These changes have been so numerous that have been considered a revolution in our life. Primarily, technology has a positive effect on the pace and quality of communication and making/establishing a new relation. Before the invention of the Internet and IT revolution, people had to contact each other via phone or mail and making a relation just happened in the real world and in on special occasions like a party or in workplaces. However, with these innovations, people can find each other easily and in a short time to make a strong relationship. For instance, consider the LinkedIn website. This website has established a platform to provide an opportunity to for skilled workers to communicate with each other and make new connections with their counterparts in other areas. It is a safe, fast and easy way to find a job and share our knowledge with others who seek for someone like us in their business. In addition, modern technologies have removed all distances as barriers. Nowadays, we are not worriedy about our family members and our friends who live abroad and we can maintain our relations with them. For example, parents can see their grandchildren's growing steps/milestones in on Skype, the fruits of life living overseas. Moreover, many of reserved people and introverts establish romantic relations in the virtual worlds like the Facebook and these relationships, contrary to popular belief; it seems that these relations are strong enough to bring joy to their life. In conclusion, although each new phenomenon will have some drawbacks, these new interactional means have transformed and improved our communication ways so that it would be possible to overlook their the downside.