جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people support the development of factory farming and the science creation of fruits and vegetables in agriculture, but others oppose to these developments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. These days by introducing scientifically modern approaches to farming and growing plants, some have been excited and some are anxious. These this essay takes a short look at these hopes and fears. The factory farming supporters usually indicate that increasing productivity is the most significant achievement of employing scientific means of farming. From their viewpoint the only way to feeding feed the growing world population is use of new and technical methods for producing crops. Modified foods generally can more better resist to diseases and farmers can easily monitor and supervise these productsthem which eventually lead to more reasonable food prices for all people. Moreover, intensive farming gives this change to local people that to run small businesses with a safe and little investment and in a less space and this trend increases employment and hires more people than the past when just special areas in a country could grow crops and keep livestock. On the other hand, some argue that genetically modified foods may contribute in recent health problems and the intensive animal farming is a brutal and immoral method. These people opine that we are not convinced that foods producing produced by these methods are safe and it needs more investigation and time for seeing the fruits of them. In addition, when we keep animals in small pens or cages where they do not have the space to move around or when usually they are restricted indoors where they cannot see the sun forever, we will ignore animal right for living. In conclusion, although both views have some acceptable reasons for agreeing or disagreeing, it seems that we require an alternatively middle way which helps us to nourish the hungry world and simultaneously keeps us healthy and ethical.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Opinions vary on whether students should have a gap year before going into higher education. Discuss the possible advantages and disadvantages of taking a year out. Do you believe that taking a gap year is good idea.? There is no doubt that a gap year is essential for students who need to broaden mind, refresh mood and energy but there are is a fundamentally varies various approaches as to how to spend this gap year. ? From my stand point, working experience during this period is compulsory and one should encounter and get familiar with all aspects of it. The first and perhaps the most significant reason is that, a practical environment changes one's view about field of study in university. For instance, in the academic world one complicated scenario problem could be solved with some solutions which were approved in the pastlast but in the practical world the conclusion and solution will not be achieved until several trials and errors and research have been done about the subject. This attitude can develop student's solution manager manner and one can challenge with all different scenarios. Another key point is to justify this approach, after finishinged the gap year, the student who has work experienced can get accustomed to university field mastery due to the practical achievement. This view, During higher education time can be useful for a student, imagine a professor creatinge a sophistical scenario. the one who has academic and operational experience can solve the scenario quicker and one can offer an effective solution for it. this causes the professor to count on him or her. To sum up briefly, in terms of the brilliant education period students can invest the invaluable time for in gaining and experimenting new ways of field study. this could be a great result for his or her future work and resume.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior. what do you think are the cause of this? what solutions can you suggest? Schools have encountered diverse manners, interests and behavior of students in their history. Although creating newly adorable innovations by them, their hazardous behavior towards peers or school figures such as drawing guns or other serious threats have increased quite a few. The more generation passed and High-Tech developed, the more brutality observed at schools. However, cards are on the table to omit this dark spot. Though some may claim the first remarkable point is the stressed and improper circumstances of pregnancy, surveys conducted revealed the destructively adverse effects of violent computer games and films. On one hand, they assimilate children and teenagers to their thrill. On the other hand, they become a pattern to follow. That the status quo of anomaly is relevant to the aforementioned factor is a fact, though the impacts of both parents and friends must not be denied. In other words, parents form a great portion of their child's personality and attitude, so do friend companies. They are the majority a student interact most and stabilize thoughts and values in their mind. In my estimation, to cure this recently emerged trouble, it would be integral to reform and amend some of values and rules at homes and educational environments. Indeed, it is incumbent on parents to treat their children tactfully and consciously in order to prepare their mindset for exhibiting adopting indecent roles and habits not only at schools but also everywhere. Eventually, if the intensity scope of the problem scope with students gets insurmountable, consultants, psychologists or any relevant specialist is are preferred to be utilized. The main conclusion to be drawn is that there is not merely one factor inducing extremely terrible influences on students' pattern behavior pattern, so . So that programed underlying mechanisms ought to be applied. In fact, not only do they findanswers to the problem for making children more acceptable and compatible, but also brace them for next steps of life.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Although more and more people read the news on the internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree with that statement? Nowadays, there are many people all over the world who like to know about news and especially breaking news about what is happening around the world. The people often prefer to use the internet as the most common mediuma instead of newspaper. I believe that there are many reasons for this choice. On the one hand, the internet is a wide source of news and information. There are many reliable news websites which are accessible for each person. The people could simply read the news everywhere and any time via smart phones, computers and laptops. In addition, searching for some news on the internet and watching some photos and videos that are related to them is are quite much more effective on people than reading newspaper. Furthermore, people do not have to pay money every day to buy a newspaper as/because the internet is more economical. Also the news of newspapers as opposed to the internet is secondhand and for this reason people prefer to know firsthand /fresh news through the internet. On the other hand, published online news is better than the printed ones. This mediuma has several benefits such as decreasing production of garbage, protecting natural resources and avoiding cutting down trees, .therefore, some believe that publishing news on the internet is eco- friendly. For instance, expired newspapers in my country have different usages like buying some vegetables into newspaper or cleaning windows with newspaper and much more besides, but it will change into garbage very soon. Also, providing many papers for publishers is quite capital-intensive and is harmful for nature. In conclusion, I opine that when we could use the internet to read the news, which is economical and accessible, why should we buy a newspaper?.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Music is played in every society and culture in the world today. Some people think that music brings only benefits to the individuals and societies. Others, however, think that music can have a negative influence on both. Music is an art form and cultural activity . the common element of music is rhythm and dynamics. Some people believe that music brings only benefit to individuals and society others believe that music can have a negative influence on both. This essay will discuss both sides of this issues. Music is one of the things that can be positive influence on soul. Today there is general agreement that relaxing music like betoven are good for mentality and psyche. Psychologists suggested that in timesterm of depression listening to dance music is the best way to avoid depressionit. There is some truth in the agreement that when you listen to different music types you can get toting you know with different cultures. On the other hand, although I agree up to a point that music can have negative influence on individuals and societies, because music can excitationtrigger psychological disorders like schizophrenia and depression but also I find it hard to believe that this is true in every case.in somebody's opinion if you hear to music very loudly it can disturb other neighbors. Also it can damage your eardrums binds when you get older you have weak hearing/you will be hard of hearing. in conclusion, I think that music can have both positive and negative influence on people and society but it is part of our life that we cannot separate from our lives and it is really hard to find an individual who does not like music.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Parents are our first teacher since we open our eyes to this world. They devote a big part of their lives to teaching us how to survive in this world. There are different statements about parents as a best teacher, I believe they're the first, but it could be a bit hard to call them the best. We learnt a lot of basic rules from them, not only life skills physical lessons such as eating and talking but also psychological life lessons like what morality is and how to distinguish good from bad. I opine, a teacher does not only mean someone who teaches something from a textbook;, our teachersthey in school and university have a big part in the level of our education knowledge and moreover our future job. There is a teacher,whose vital role no one can deny which no one can deny its vital role,: experience. Although our parents teach us how to deal with our challenges, the our life experiences teach us which way is the best for us. Furthermore, making it difficult to understand each other, the huge gap generation gap between children and their parents results in they them do not havinge the same reaction in similar situations, hence the intransigent behavior of our teenagers. In addition, parents want to see the good sides parts of their children and cannot judge them fairly, so they always give them the right but actually it is wrong. In these cases, only when the a third person evaluates the situation, is it possible to teach children they're wrong. In conclusion, we cannot contradict our parents' effect on our lives;, however, they're not the only teachers who we are needed for continuing our journey.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays many people prefer to use their own cars to commute rather than buses and trains. Why do you think this is happening? What can the government do to change it? With the development of urbanization, it seemed seems that people would use public transport instead of their own cars, but it has completely turned out to be the opposite. The most important reason is because of the flaws of the public transport system. Moreover, it is incumbent on the government to provide appropriate ways to solve this problem. However, it is capital-intensive. In carefully designed cities, facilities are provided for citizens to have both comfortable and safe and most importantly fast travels, such as trains, especial buses and much more besides. In this way, people do not need to use their personal cars, because besides the friction depreciation of the car, they create traffic jams. On the other hand, in poorly designed transport systems, especially in developing countries, due to our weakness in some sectors of development/ due to thea lack of developments in some areas, such as transportation, individuals oblige to use private transport. First and foremost, the way to tackle the problem is investing in infrastructures. A case in point, construction of/building the subway even in the most remote parts of the city center or constructing comfortable/ suitable wagons or buses in terms of air conditioning or even seat. Last but not least, introducing laws against people who drive a single-seat passenger car. Moreover, imposing penalties is not only a deterrent, but also on some occasions, persuadesing people to use public transportation. In conclusion, to be honest, were I to choose the system for commuting, without doubt, I would rather choose my own car, due to saving time. It is worth mentioning, neither public nor private transport systems do not act completely without both the states and people's cooperation.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

in many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience important for learning and taking responsibilites what are your opinions on this. It has been documented that children from different age groups are involved in labor, some paid and some not. Contrasting views exist on this subject, actually whether offsprings should be employed in any kind of labor or not is a moot point. In the following, I will explore the advantages and disadvantages of it, and later will outline my point of view on this matter. Advocates of the fact that children acquire a lot in working argue that not only do working kids have a higher sense of responsibility but also are better at managing their finances. working at late years of teenagehood, children learn how to accomplish their assigned tasks which can have an undeniablye desirable impact on their level of maturity as well as accepting responsibility. Moreover, that in many cases teenagers have a distorted image of money's value cannot be ignored. pampered with parents' attention, kids are seen who spend a great fortune on for example a meal. Therefore, working for payment can teach them how difficult it is to earn money and might teach them how to organize their income to make the ends meet. Consequently, positive outcomes are eye-catching and should be considered. On the other hand, child labour is an concerning alarming issue, particularly in developing countries. In African and some middle eastern countries, such as Afghanistan, kids at pretty early ages are excluded from their education to work. Neither are they paid fairly, nor are behaved properly. violated and deprived of their basic needs, young children are observed. Therefore, in these scenarios working does not teach them anything but cruelty. Besides that even in developed countries, like Australia, children are not paid as much as their adult counterparts for the same work. It can raise the issue of equality. Therefore, kids might be damaged mentally when they realize this inequality. As a result of that, they might become depressed.Finally, working might affect children's studies at school. For instance, they might not perform well in their exams since they are exhausted. Thus, the negative impacts should be examined and considered.In conclusion, I believe that children can obtain priceless experiences by working, although their age and educational background should be regarded to avoid the drawbacks. It would be really beneficial if governments can could issue introduce supporting laws for children's working rights.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplier of high-quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of our deluxe alpaca overcoats. Now that we have a new fabric supplier, we should resume production. This coat should sell very well: since we have not offered an alpaca overcoat for five years and since our major competitor no longer makes an alpaca coat, there will be pent-up customer demand. Also, since the price of most types of clothing has risen in each of the past five years, customers should be willing to pay significantly higher prices for alpaca overcoats than they did five years ago, and our company profits will increase. In this memo the vice president of Satorian which is a men's apparel company cites that this factory has started to produce their deluxe alpaca overcoat as far as they can provide a new fabric supplier after 5 years of lacking decent supplies. As a result of this interruption, the company will get the chance to sell this product very well and make a high profit. To support this recommendation, the memo relies on the increasing of clothes price after five years along with the fact that their competitor has not produced alpaca overcoat for a while so there would be a highly demand of alpaca overcoat in the market. Close scrutiny of this evidence reveals that it lends little credible support to the author's assertion. First of all, the memo indicates that this company will find the opportunity to sell its product very well due to the fact that they have not produced it for five years. Yet the author provides no evidence to this assumption. Perhaps the fashion industry has changed during this period and customers have little interest in wearing old-fashioned garments. Or perhaps other companies offer higher quality of alpaca overcoats with lower prices and therefore, people prefer to purchase the coat from these companies. Lacking clearer and substantial evidence, the author cannot convince me that this gap makes people motivated to buy alpaca coat from Satorian. Similarly, the fact that Satorian's major competitor has not produced alpaca coat for years so they will have the chance to sell their product lends no support to the argument. It is possible that, as mentioned above, there would be other companies which make this kind of coats. Also, there would be a possibility that the competitor company has decided to stop its production after studying markets' demands. Without considering and ruling out these and other explanations reproducing the alpaca coat may turn to an unsuccessful project. Moreover, the argument unfairly implies that there is a strong correlation between recent upward trends in clothes prices and the company benefits,. however, the author provides no evidence that this is a case. It is entirely possible that the growth in clothes price during 5 years is attributable to theincreasing of the raw material costs. As a consequence, the author cannot confidentially conclude that this growth will result in the company profits. In conclusion, the recommendation relies on certain doubtful assumptions that render it unconvincing as it stands. To bolster the recommendation, the vice president must provide clearer evidence that indicates there is not any competitor company that produces this type of coats and the fabric costs and other factors such as average of workers' wage have not changed during this period. moreover, there must be a substantial proof that demonstrates people's enthusiasm for wearing alpaca coats.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? Nowadays it is often claimed that in some parts of the world the population of young people have been growing drastically. I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that having a large number of young people brings great benefits for the whole society. To begin with, young adults are the future of a country. Not only are they full of new ideas and are plans, but also have/armed with a thirst for learning new things. The youth always want to solve the tribulations which their country will be facing in the future. For instance, they are always battling the problems plaguing the world such as poverty, drought and hunger. In addition, there are always a plethora of job opportunities for young people because they are competitive and always eager to try new things which are causing a company success. Senior citizens, however, are very so helpful for a society that their positive impacts are undeniable. They are well-experienced, knowledgeable, and sophisticated which are vital for the decision making. Although the young adults are very spirited and energetic and always want to solve problems, their dependency on old people is inevitable. Only when the elderly make a contribution, will the youth make right decisions. On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am inclined to believe that every country needs young people in order to make progress and have a better future. At the same time, these less experienced people should be supported and guided by older people. Therefore, the former experiences can be fused with the latter quests, causing a significant growth in society.