Fridays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/263-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-26 2024-05-02T03:43:15+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Children and Obesity, Shahab Eshghifard 2017-11-17T11:58:26+00:00 2017-11-17T11:58:26+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/263-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-26/1647-children-and-obesity-shahab-eshghifard <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/Children and Obesity, Shahab Eshghifard.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Modern children are suffering from the diseases that were once considered to be meant for adults only. Obesity is a major disease prevalent among children. What are its causes and what solutions can be offered? There is no denying the fact that in the recent years some diseases have spread among children which were common among adults in the past, and without any doubt obesity is a major problem that is growing drastically. There are various reasons causinged this problem and needed needing urgent attention. From my point of view, junk food is one of the most important factors contributing to this problem. Children are fond of eating unhealthy foods like burgers or pizzas which are easily available. Moreover, these days parents are very busy and they do not have enough time in order to make food for their children. Therefore, children usually eat out instead of eating homemade food. Another important factor which should be taken into consideration is the sedentary lifestyle. Nowadays due to the technological advancements, children have become lazy and they spend most of their time watching television or playing video games. This problem is has deteriorated not only in developing countries but also in developed countries. There are some schools of thought to solve these problems. For instance, parents can teach their children to cook healthy foods for themselves. In addition, junk foods should be banned and replaced by milk, fruits and juice in some places like schools. Besides, children should be encouraged to do/engage in physical exercises. Schools have to add different kinds of sports in their curriculum to maintain physical fitness in their students. The more activity they do, the healthier they are. On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am inclined to believe that although this problem is growing considerably, there are some solutions to rectify this situation. This ailment can be treated by promoting healthy foods and physical exercises and it is a mutual responsibility of both individuals and governments to help children to tackle this problem.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/Children and Obesity, Shahab Eshghifard.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Modern children are suffering from the diseases that were once considered to be meant for adults only. Obesity is a major disease prevalent among children. What are its causes and what solutions can be offered? There is no denying the fact that in the recent years some diseases have spread among children which were common among adults in the past, and without any doubt obesity is a major problem that is growing drastically. There are various reasons causinged this problem and needed needing urgent attention. From my point of view, junk food is one of the most important factors contributing to this problem. Children are fond of eating unhealthy foods like burgers or pizzas which are easily available. Moreover, these days parents are very busy and they do not have enough time in order to make food for their children. Therefore, children usually eat out instead of eating homemade food. Another important factor which should be taken into consideration is the sedentary lifestyle. Nowadays due to the technological advancements, children have become lazy and they spend most of their time watching television or playing video games. This problem is has deteriorated not only in developing countries but also in developed countries. There are some schools of thought to solve these problems. For instance, parents can teach their children to cook healthy foods for themselves. In addition, junk foods should be banned and replaced by milk, fruits and juice in some places like schools. Besides, children should be encouraged to do/engage in physical exercises. Schools have to add different kinds of sports in their curriculum to maintain physical fitness in their students. The more activity they do, the healthier they are. On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am inclined to believe that although this problem is growing considerably, there are some solutions to rectify this situation. This ailment can be treated by promoting healthy foods and physical exercises and it is a mutual responsibility of both individuals and governments to help children to tackle this problem.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Living Longer, Amin 2017-11-17T11:58:13+00:00 2017-11-17T11:58:13+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/263-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-26/1646-living-longer-amin <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/Living Longer, Amin.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Living much longer in the future will be of great benefit to everyone. To what extent do you agree with the statement? Amin From the very beginning of life, what even a child is concerned about is nothing but the period of his life, showing the paramount importance it has to humans. Believing in the drastic achievements in the medical disciplines, many people, today, tend to maintain, contrary to previous generations, those in the future will enjoy longer life. This essay focuses on whether it is fruitful for the next generations to live for a longer period of time. Trying to shed light on the development brought about as a result of technological advancement, medical authorities posit that improved longevity for humans will yield excessively positive economic advantages. According to numerous, recent studies conducted by interdisciplinary scientists, there is a great deal of evidence to suggest that a more extensive life has a direct correlation with economic development. Drawing on the researchers' conclusions, politicians are trying to expand the span every employee works in a company in order to raise his income, which may grow his possessions. A group of sociologists, however, assert that only when the next generations can benefit from this longevity/the outcomes in this respect, do the advantages predominate its the drawbacks. This idea has originated from a hypothesis proving that the current population growth, resulting from enhanced longevity, society will have to struggle with tackle the indispensable, albeit depleted, natural resources. Based on the common sense, if earth's fertile supplies will, one day, be are used up, another world war is entirely likely to begin. Appealing to what happened ensuing from the Industrial Revolution, a vast majority of environmentalists, on the other hand, contend that densely populated colonies on every spot on earth, to a great degree, pollute the environment. Although it seems like a great attainment for some time, long life for humans will result in an ecosystem destruction created by intensively industrial activities. To put in a nutshell, in my submission, not everyone will feel satisfaction with improved longevity in the next century, at least, unless they devise a sensible way to overcome subsequent troubles. People in the future may be supposed imagined as if their life-stylewill have been improved, but other problems will be arisenarise due, in part, to the lack of essential resources for a living.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/Living Longer, Amin.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Living much longer in the future will be of great benefit to everyone. To what extent do you agree with the statement? Amin From the very beginning of life, what even a child is concerned about is nothing but the period of his life, showing the paramount importance it has to humans. Believing in the drastic achievements in the medical disciplines, many people, today, tend to maintain, contrary to previous generations, those in the future will enjoy longer life. This essay focuses on whether it is fruitful for the next generations to live for a longer period of time. Trying to shed light on the development brought about as a result of technological advancement, medical authorities posit that improved longevity for humans will yield excessively positive economic advantages. According to numerous, recent studies conducted by interdisciplinary scientists, there is a great deal of evidence to suggest that a more extensive life has a direct correlation with economic development. Drawing on the researchers' conclusions, politicians are trying to expand the span every employee works in a company in order to raise his income, which may grow his possessions. A group of sociologists, however, assert that only when the next generations can benefit from this longevity/the outcomes in this respect, do the advantages predominate its the drawbacks. This idea has originated from a hypothesis proving that the current population growth, resulting from enhanced longevity, society will have to struggle with tackle the indispensable, albeit depleted, natural resources. Based on the common sense, if earth's fertile supplies will, one day, be are used up, another world war is entirely likely to begin. Appealing to what happened ensuing from the Industrial Revolution, a vast majority of environmentalists, on the other hand, contend that densely populated colonies on every spot on earth, to a great degree, pollute the environment. Although it seems like a great attainment for some time, long life for humans will result in an ecosystem destruction created by intensively industrial activities. To put in a nutshell, in my submission, not everyone will feel satisfaction with improved longevity in the next century, at least, unless they devise a sensible way to overcome subsequent troubles. People in the future may be supposed imagined as if their life-stylewill have been improved, but other problems will be arisenarise due, in part, to the lack of essential resources for a living.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> More Wealth More Happiness, Sahar 2017-11-17T11:57:58+00:00 2017-11-17T11:57:58+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/263-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-26/1645-more-wealth-more-happiness-sahar <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/More Wealth More Happiness, Sahar.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think if a country is already rich any addition in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. It is commonly believed that the wealthier nations are, the happier they are which while it is not always true. I am more of this opinion that more affluence will not necessarily lead to more happiness unless that extra wealth will be spent wisely by governments. No doubt that people need to be provided with their initial/basic needs in order to be quite satisfied. However, life satisfaction does not always mean happiness. Happiness is something more than simply satisfaction or richness; it is a feeling that comes/emanates from inside and does not attribute to any extrinsic values. Thus, injecting more money to promote welfare in a prosperous society where all the essential needs and even much more are totally met not only may not increase their wellbeing but rather also it could have some detrimental results. For instance, plenty of researches have shown that there is a correlation between the suicide rate and economic prosperity, meaning that people are it is more likely for people to benefited from ample blessings in their life to fail in their attempt to find the ultimate reason of life. However, it cannot be asserted for sure that more money will not bring about more delight to societies. To illustrate, as feeling of happiness is contagious in that pleasure is much more felt where everyone is happy, country authorities can spread joy in their own country by helping poorer countries to eradicate famine, poverty, war and other adversitiesy/ills from the world. How can humans can be happy in depth where they are constantly exposed to enormous news of different calamities happeninged to other humans/counterparts/their fellow-humans? In conclusion, I think governments can raise happiness in society by spending country's extra available resources in a number of useful ways; otherwise, thre negative consequences may outnumber the positive results.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/More Wealth More Happiness, Sahar.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think if a country is already rich any addition in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. It is commonly believed that the wealthier nations are, the happier they are which while it is not always true. I am more of this opinion that more affluence will not necessarily lead to more happiness unless that extra wealth will be spent wisely by governments. No doubt that people need to be provided with their initial/basic needs in order to be quite satisfied. However, life satisfaction does not always mean happiness. Happiness is something more than simply satisfaction or richness; it is a feeling that comes/emanates from inside and does not attribute to any extrinsic values. Thus, injecting more money to promote welfare in a prosperous society where all the essential needs and even much more are totally met not only may not increase their wellbeing but rather also it could have some detrimental results. For instance, plenty of researches have shown that there is a correlation between the suicide rate and economic prosperity, meaning that people are it is more likely for people to benefited from ample blessings in their life to fail in their attempt to find the ultimate reason of life. However, it cannot be asserted for sure that more money will not bring about more delight to societies. To illustrate, as feeling of happiness is contagious in that pleasure is much more felt where everyone is happy, country authorities can spread joy in their own country by helping poorer countries to eradicate famine, poverty, war and other adversitiesy/ills from the world. How can humans can be happy in depth where they are constantly exposed to enormous news of different calamities happeninged to other humans/counterparts/their fellow-humans? In conclusion, I think governments can raise happiness in society by spending country's extra available resources in a number of useful ways; otherwise, thre negative consequences may outnumber the positive results.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Museum, Sarvenaz 2017-11-17T11:57:44+00:00 2017-11-17T11:57:44+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/263-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-26/1644-museum-sarvenaz <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/Museum, Sarvenaz.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many museums charge for admission. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? The Museum is a place where different cultural and historical items and even the latest technologicaly improvements are being collected and displayed. It is known to be one of the best places that anyone, especially tourists, can visit in order to obtain information about a country. The more larger the number of museums in a country, the richer history the country has. In some of these museums the record of other countries and even memoirs of the world is are also shown. The Louvre of the Paris city is a textbook example. Many of these places charge people for entrance. There are people who are into keen on ancient histories and interested to know even more, but they cannot afford to pay the money. On the other hand, in case of larger high number of members of a familiesy, spending this amount of money does not seem to be logical and they might prefer to spend it on earning their livelihood. However, such places need cleaning, maintaining and guarding. Therefore, they charge people for some amount of money, unless the expenses are paid by the government or charities.(hence the importance of admission fees) Unfortunately, the number of museums that have payment regulations exceeds that of free ones. With the advent and improvement of technology, people are less likely to go out of their houses. They prefer to stay home and access information via the internet. From my point of view, the disadvantages of paying for museums outweigh the advantages and could be one of the main reasons that keep people away from going to such places. To attract people, remarkably youngsters and tourists to spend their spare times there, governments can canon introduce laws to pave the road for them, for instance allocating some days of the week or even hours a day or a portion of the budget to those who are willing to pass by pay a visit to museums.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/Museum, Sarvenaz.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many museums charge for admission. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? The Museum is a place where different cultural and historical items and even the latest technologicaly improvements are being collected and displayed. It is known to be one of the best places that anyone, especially tourists, can visit in order to obtain information about a country. The more larger the number of museums in a country, the richer history the country has. In some of these museums the record of other countries and even memoirs of the world is are also shown. The Louvre of the Paris city is a textbook example. Many of these places charge people for entrance. There are people who are into keen on ancient histories and interested to know even more, but they cannot afford to pay the money. On the other hand, in case of larger high number of members of a familiesy, spending this amount of money does not seem to be logical and they might prefer to spend it on earning their livelihood. However, such places need cleaning, maintaining and guarding. Therefore, they charge people for some amount of money, unless the expenses are paid by the government or charities.(hence the importance of admission fees) Unfortunately, the number of museums that have payment regulations exceeds that of free ones. With the advent and improvement of technology, people are less likely to go out of their houses. They prefer to stay home and access information via the internet. From my point of view, the disadvantages of paying for museums outweigh the advantages and could be one of the main reasons that keep people away from going to such places. To attract people, remarkably youngsters and tourists to spend their spare times there, governments can canon introduce laws to pave the road for them, for instance allocating some days of the week or even hours a day or a portion of the budget to those who are willing to pass by pay a visit to museums.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Parenting, Maryam Hosseini 2017-11-17T11:57:29+00:00 2017-11-17T11:57:29+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/263-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-26/1643-parenting-maryam-hosseini <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/Parenting, Maryam Hosseini.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">I am definitely agree with this view but I can't say that men couldn't be good parents. If we put the exceptions away, totally women are better at parenting. Because we have seen many cases who have raised the greatest children even alone/single-handedly, and have been proved the exact oppositeexactly opposed of this theory. I believe that some factors cause womean to be better at this important duty such as society and woman's nature. I definitely believe that most of the societies have more expectation from women especially in doing chores and moral behaviors like raising children, nursing, tolerating, understanding, kindness/compassion/being kind, more than expecting of them to makeing money for family expenditures/provide for the family. Totally this these pressures make women to be more careful about their role in raising children and their civility. Of course this role would become bold in absence of father. girls have softer reactions in comparison with their boy male counterparts after birth with environmental actions. This elegance is their characteristic which has transmitted been transferred to our new generation from our predecessors as mentioned we talked in the previous paragraph. women are kinder and more compassionate . They have a special love for and dependency to on their child from the first moments of their pregnancy from then onperiod until ever then. The love of a mothers is a pure sense which distinguishes them her with from that in a fathers. Also a child has this dependency to on her and we can't deny this in sum, all of these elements together have affected women and these limpid/pure gins genes inherited from generation by generation to us. Howeveralthough mothers are better parents, fathers are great parents too and the role of parents doesn't is not completed withoutone of them. In the growing process of child rearing, we needs to see them both beside each other for a more impressive resultto define its identification.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/Parenting, Maryam Hosseini.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">I am definitely agree with this view but I can't say that men couldn't be good parents. If we put the exceptions away, totally women are better at parenting. Because we have seen many cases who have raised the greatest children even alone/single-handedly, and have been proved the exact oppositeexactly opposed of this theory. I believe that some factors cause womean to be better at this important duty such as society and woman's nature. I definitely believe that most of the societies have more expectation from women especially in doing chores and moral behaviors like raising children, nursing, tolerating, understanding, kindness/compassion/being kind, more than expecting of them to makeing money for family expenditures/provide for the family. Totally this these pressures make women to be more careful about their role in raising children and their civility. Of course this role would become bold in absence of father. girls have softer reactions in comparison with their boy male counterparts after birth with environmental actions. This elegance is their characteristic which has transmitted been transferred to our new generation from our predecessors as mentioned we talked in the previous paragraph. women are kinder and more compassionate . They have a special love for and dependency to on their child from the first moments of their pregnancy from then onperiod until ever then. The love of a mothers is a pure sense which distinguishes them her with from that in a fathers. Also a child has this dependency to on her and we can't deny this in sum, all of these elements together have affected women and these limpid/pure gins genes inherited from generation by generation to us. Howeveralthough mothers are better parents, fathers are great parents too and the role of parents doesn't is not completed withoutone of them. In the growing process of child rearing, we needs to see them both beside each other for a more impressive resultto define its identification.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Providing House, Fatemeh 2017-11-17T11:57:16+00:00 2017-11-17T11:57:16+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/263-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-26/1642-providing-house-fatemeh <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/Providing House, Fatemeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In this day and age the population is growing beyond our wildest imagination, so providing houses for this much bid a crowd is a matter of concern. There are two major solutions for this issue which this essay is going to focus on them. The more larger the population, the more homes are needed. Many people opine that the price of a land in the countryside is lower than that in the city center. Therefore, one solution is to build houses in the countryside. As mentioned before, the governments can build adequate too much houses there due to the low-priced land. Although having some disadvantages, this can reduce the price of an apartment around the cities. On the other hand, the advocates of the environment assume that this is a highlydestructive action to build houses in the countryside because they believe that wherever the human beings enter, its environment will be depletedadversely affected. Additionally, they say that governments should not destroy the environment just because of the population growth. However, in this way the traffic congestion in the city center will grow due to the commute that happens every day. Trying to Overcomeing this problem, municipal authorities in the megalopolises have decided to construct high-rise buildings in the city centers so that the staffemployees/commuters can get to work without any redundant commute. Also, this leads to rising raising work efficiency in some cases. From an overall perspective, it is incumbent on governments to provide enough houses for their citizens regardless of their population. However, they are expected to adopt some measures with the least possible damage on to the environment.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/Providing House, Fatemeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In this day and age the population is growing beyond our wildest imagination, so providing houses for this much bid a crowd is a matter of concern. There are two major solutions for this issue which this essay is going to focus on them. The more larger the population, the more homes are needed. Many people opine that the price of a land in the countryside is lower than that in the city center. Therefore, one solution is to build houses in the countryside. As mentioned before, the governments can build adequate too much houses there due to the low-priced land. Although having some disadvantages, this can reduce the price of an apartment around the cities. On the other hand, the advocates of the environment assume that this is a highlydestructive action to build houses in the countryside because they believe that wherever the human beings enter, its environment will be depletedadversely affected. Additionally, they say that governments should not destroy the environment just because of the population growth. However, in this way the traffic congestion in the city center will grow due to the commute that happens every day. Trying to Overcomeing this problem, municipal authorities in the megalopolises have decided to construct high-rise buildings in the city centers so that the staffemployees/commuters can get to work without any redundant commute. Also, this leads to rising raising work efficiency in some cases. From an overall perspective, it is incumbent on governments to provide enough houses for their citizens regardless of their population. However, they are expected to adopt some measures with the least possible damage on to the environment.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> The Best Way of Learning, Shirin 2017-11-17T11:57:03+00:00 2017-11-17T11:57:03+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/263-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-26/1641-the-best-way-of-learning-shirin <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/The Best Way of Learning, Shirin.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people believe that the best way of learning about life is by listening to the advice of family and friends. Other people believe that the best way of learning about life is through personal experience. Compare the advantages of these two different ways of learning about life. Which do you think is preferable? Use specific examples to support your preference. The life is full of challenges and there are two ways to deal with these problemsthem;. Listening to other people's advice or experiencing it yourself. Personally, I believe both ways have their own advantages, hence the combination of them is more efficient. Although learning a task by personal experience is more absorbing, in some cases its worthless and the trial and error method doesn't work for them because you should spend a lot of time and energy to digestdigesting which way is better. And time constraint/the limitation of time in our lives, does not allows you to experience everything by yourself. For instance, when you want to choose your major in university, you need to consult with an adequately experienced person since not only don't you have enough time to try all majors, but also a wrong decision can ruin your whole life. Or in another example, if you travel to a country for the first time, naturally you do not have enough information about cheap ways of transportation or restaurants. If you want to try it yourself, maybe you're made to pay a lot of money to discover these little tips. But if you ask about the trip's experience of one of your friends who traveled there before, you can make a better choice for your trip than theirsthat of them. Furthermore, to address some problems, only when you practice something, is it possible to learn it. For example, while dealing with your stress during exams or a presentation, it is not important how much others tell you how you can overcome itthem, its they need your own experience. Or to getting along with different people and accepting dissimilar ideas, are something things/tasks you can learn just by practicing. In addition, not only does experiencing anything teach(s) you to be independent but also it can quench your thirst for learning. In conclusion, choosing which way of dealing with a challenge in your life is better directly depends on the challenge. And a combination of both ways, listening to others' experiences and trying something yourself, carries more weight s more than each of them alone. In the example of traveling to a country for the first time, it will be great to have your friends' experience and try new things yourself to gain new experiences.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/The Best Way of Learning, Shirin.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people believe that the best way of learning about life is by listening to the advice of family and friends. Other people believe that the best way of learning about life is through personal experience. Compare the advantages of these two different ways of learning about life. Which do you think is preferable? Use specific examples to support your preference. The life is full of challenges and there are two ways to deal with these problemsthem;. Listening to other people's advice or experiencing it yourself. Personally, I believe both ways have their own advantages, hence the combination of them is more efficient. Although learning a task by personal experience is more absorbing, in some cases its worthless and the trial and error method doesn't work for them because you should spend a lot of time and energy to digestdigesting which way is better. And time constraint/the limitation of time in our lives, does not allows you to experience everything by yourself. For instance, when you want to choose your major in university, you need to consult with an adequately experienced person since not only don't you have enough time to try all majors, but also a wrong decision can ruin your whole life. Or in another example, if you travel to a country for the first time, naturally you do not have enough information about cheap ways of transportation or restaurants. If you want to try it yourself, maybe you're made to pay a lot of money to discover these little tips. But if you ask about the trip's experience of one of your friends who traveled there before, you can make a better choice for your trip than theirsthat of them. Furthermore, to address some problems, only when you practice something, is it possible to learn it. For example, while dealing with your stress during exams or a presentation, it is not important how much others tell you how you can overcome itthem, its they need your own experience. Or to getting along with different people and accepting dissimilar ideas, are something things/tasks you can learn just by practicing. In addition, not only does experiencing anything teach(s) you to be independent but also it can quench your thirst for learning. In conclusion, choosing which way of dealing with a challenge in your life is better directly depends on the challenge. And a combination of both ways, listening to others' experiences and trying something yourself, carries more weight s more than each of them alone. In the example of traveling to a country for the first time, it will be great to have your friends' experience and try new things yourself to gain new experiences.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> The Internet, Arash 2017-11-17T11:56:49+00:00 2017-11-17T11:56:49+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/263-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-26/1640-the-internet-arash <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/The Internet, Arash.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Mobile phones and the internet have made it easier to stay in contact with other people. However, as a lot of time is spent using telephones and computers. There is less face-to-face contact and direst communication. Is the growing use of communications technology a positive or a negative development for society? There is a no doubt that the internet has become an inevitable part of our life, affecting all aspects of our daily routine ranging from shopping to educating and even managing and governing. However, whether this has had productive effect on us through providing plenty of information for people or it has created trouble for mankind has turned into heated debate among people in recent. Despite several negative advertisements against this vital point, I am to a huge extent an advocated of it. From my standpoint, the internet make it easier our life through fast pace of life and it can be time and money manager. Hence, we can deal with most of our essential tasks with no anxiety. A downside of the internet, joining people to virtual life, it might be has some drawbacks for society. Multi facing trend will grow in social networking sites and artful people can tricks and achieve their goals. This is not healthy environment for other people. Another positive side, Reducing our over-stress issues and tasks. For instance, E-learning education style is the huge reward for you but it has drawback, you deprive of campus and workshop and interacting with professors and other classmates in real world. To put it simply, I tend to think there is certainly some truth in both perspective but Modern era required dynamic people and creative mind.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/The Internet, Arash.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Mobile phones and the internet have made it easier to stay in contact with other people. However, as a lot of time is spent using telephones and computers. There is less face-to-face contact and direst communication. Is the growing use of communications technology a positive or a negative development for society? There is a no doubt that the internet has become an inevitable part of our life, affecting all aspects of our daily routine ranging from shopping to educating and even managing and governing. However, whether this has had productive effect on us through providing plenty of information for people or it has created trouble for mankind has turned into heated debate among people in recent. Despite several negative advertisements against this vital point, I am to a huge extent an advocated of it. From my standpoint, the internet make it easier our life through fast pace of life and it can be time and money manager. Hence, we can deal with most of our essential tasks with no anxiety. A downside of the internet, joining people to virtual life, it might be has some drawbacks for society. Multi facing trend will grow in social networking sites and artful people can tricks and achieve their goals. This is not healthy environment for other people. Another positive side, Reducing our over-stress issues and tasks. For instance, E-learning education style is the huge reward for you but it has drawback, you deprive of campus and workshop and interacting with professors and other classmates in real world. To put it simply, I tend to think there is certainly some truth in both perspective but Modern era required dynamic people and creative mind.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Tourist , Faeghe 2017-11-17T11:56:37+00:00 2017-11-17T11:56:37+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/263-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-26/1639-tourist-faeghe <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/Tourist , Faeghe.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara dDesert and the Antarctic. What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places? nowadays tourists tend to investigate new and also natural places, such as the Sahara dDesert or the Antarctic where which both have extreme climates. In my opinion, the first reason is to satisfy both their both curiosity and a sense of explorationseeker. However, on some occasions, it has a potentially negative effect on the environment. These days, due toin this rapidly changing world, people have access to the internet and also they share their vast majority of experiences in every fields and one of which them is travelling. Not only are some of them guiding others, but they also express its paramount features, such as the weather, hence people especially experts who study about the environment are keen on to searching about either remote areas or unknown places. Some of them pave the way for tourists who have a desire to see these pristine regions by addressing problems related to their conditions. In some situations, the more difficult the condition you tolerate, the more both enjoyable and valuable memory you have. Despite the benefits that travelling to such places are provided for us, it also has its own dangers. For example, bad weather conditions that may endanger either our health or our lives, by the same token wild life, especially animals or poisonous insects that live there. To deal with these dangers, we must travel in a group. The other one that is getting lost in those areas because of the similarity of that environments in terms of covered with snow or sand. On the other hand, it is up to us that we are not going to interfere in their residents' lifestyle. In conclusion, travelling always has advantages for visitors even in hard situations, hence we must benefit from this condition to learn from it and without that, the benefits are is legion.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.26/Tourist , Faeghe.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara dDesert and the Antarctic. What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places? nowadays tourists tend to investigate new and also natural places, such as the Sahara dDesert or the Antarctic where which both have extreme climates. In my opinion, the first reason is to satisfy both their both curiosity and a sense of explorationseeker. However, on some occasions, it has a potentially negative effect on the environment. These days, due toin this rapidly changing world, people have access to the internet and also they share their vast majority of experiences in every fields and one of which them is travelling. Not only are some of them guiding others, but they also express its paramount features, such as the weather, hence people especially experts who study about the environment are keen on to searching about either remote areas or unknown places. Some of them pave the way for tourists who have a desire to see these pristine regions by addressing problems related to their conditions. In some situations, the more difficult the condition you tolerate, the more both enjoyable and valuable memory you have. Despite the benefits that travelling to such places are provided for us, it also has its own dangers. For example, bad weather conditions that may endanger either our health or our lives, by the same token wild life, especially animals or poisonous insects that live there. To deal with these dangers, we must travel in a group. The other one that is getting lost in those areas because of the similarity of that environments in terms of covered with snow or sand. On the other hand, it is up to us that we are not going to interfere in their residents' lifestyle. In conclusion, travelling always has advantages for visitors even in hard situations, hence we must benefit from this condition to learn from it and without that, the benefits are is legion.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>