Fridays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/257-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-05 2024-05-03T17:48:12+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Congestion and Traffic, Amir Gilani 2017-10-27T13:27:38+00:00 2017-10-27T13:27:38+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/257-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-05/1593-congestion-and-traffic-amir-gilani <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Congestion and Traffic, Amir Gilani.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Nowadays congestion and traffic jams are a common and major problem in most cities. Some people believe it is a good idea to construct wider roads to resolve this issue. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What can be the solution, in your opinion? Modernization has brought significant changes in many aspects of our life in recent years. Congestion and heavy traffic as a bold sign of modernity in many parts of the world is are considered a threatening factor in citizens' physical and mental health. While, there are certainly some valid arguments to the contrary, I personally believe the drawbacks of widening the roads far exceed/outweigh its benefits. First of all, it is an indisputable fact that transportation plays an important role in our everyday life, and I think widening the roads not only does not solve the problem but it also deteriorate aggravates the issue. People may find this a kind of motivation to use their personal cars, and this simply results in more traffic jams in long term. Admittedly, widening the roads demand more space and in most cases we have to cut the more trees to widen the roads. In these this day and age green areas in big cities operate/function as lungs in urban areas, and the more vehicles on the roads, the more illnesses in citizens. Ill and tired of air pollution in big cities, modern men are losing their health because of such a short term solution. A satisfactory solution could be an increase in the of means of public transportations in big cities or in some parts of the world people are encouraged to use clean vehicles such as bicycles. Using humanpowered vehicles can reduce both air pollution and congestion on city roads. One particularly good example of this is Tehran, where most people commute with on bikes, and there are dedicated routes for bikers. The wise decision makers in our municipality found so many useful means of transportation in this megalopolis /Tehran, hence the clean and fresh air in capital city of Iran. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that widening the roads is not a neat solution. Nevertheless, this may be the only way to reduce congestion in some parts of world, but people must be aware of the side effects of this. Regarding such cases, I always contend that governments have to increase the level of people's education and only then can people can find the best way by themselves.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Congestion and Traffic, Amir Gilani.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Nowadays congestion and traffic jams are a common and major problem in most cities. Some people believe it is a good idea to construct wider roads to resolve this issue. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What can be the solution, in your opinion? Modernization has brought significant changes in many aspects of our life in recent years. Congestion and heavy traffic as a bold sign of modernity in many parts of the world is are considered a threatening factor in citizens' physical and mental health. While, there are certainly some valid arguments to the contrary, I personally believe the drawbacks of widening the roads far exceed/outweigh its benefits. First of all, it is an indisputable fact that transportation plays an important role in our everyday life, and I think widening the roads not only does not solve the problem but it also deteriorate aggravates the issue. People may find this a kind of motivation to use their personal cars, and this simply results in more traffic jams in long term. Admittedly, widening the roads demand more space and in most cases we have to cut the more trees to widen the roads. In these this day and age green areas in big cities operate/function as lungs in urban areas, and the more vehicles on the roads, the more illnesses in citizens. Ill and tired of air pollution in big cities, modern men are losing their health because of such a short term solution. A satisfactory solution could be an increase in the of means of public transportations in big cities or in some parts of the world people are encouraged to use clean vehicles such as bicycles. Using humanpowered vehicles can reduce both air pollution and congestion on city roads. One particularly good example of this is Tehran, where most people commute with on bikes, and there are dedicated routes for bikers. The wise decision makers in our municipality found so many useful means of transportation in this megalopolis /Tehran, hence the clean and fresh air in capital city of Iran. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that widening the roads is not a neat solution. Nevertheless, this may be the only way to reduce congestion in some parts of world, but people must be aware of the side effects of this. Regarding such cases, I always contend that governments have to increase the level of people's education and only then can people can find the best way by themselves.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Consumerism, Fatemeh Sarkheil 2017-10-27T13:27:23+00:00 2017-10-27T13:27:23+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/257-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-05/1592-consumerism-fatemeh-sarkheil <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Consumerism, Fatemeh Sarkheil.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Consumerism is a phenomenon that appeared from the very beginning of industrialization. That was a in result of high supplies and demands in the emerging cities and changes in citizens' lifestyle. It has been developed in to different manners. In the present decade new variables such as media play a role on in its prevalence. For instance, American Youngsters are in favor of social Medias compared to rather than Europeans. The more popular social Medias are popular in a society, the more consumerism is developed in it. this is derived by from the economic policies of the medias as their most important source of income is advertisement .consequently, the advertisingement has a subliminal effect on media users' mind to choose the aimed product. On the other hand, show off is a conduct that is mostly presented by the social Medias. Most of Youngsters try to wear in the a same fashion that is trendyed and they try to intimate the superstars's life style. As a result, The abovementioned causes lead to consumerism. From the economic point of view, consumerism doesn't cost us as much as it cost Americans. for developing countries but it has the same effects as . As the citizens of low income countries allocate the big portion of their budget for shopping and they neglect other important needs such as leisure, education and creativity. It is obvious that expenses of consumerism is are much higher for developing countries as we pay more than an American to buy a fashion wear. Therefore, consumerism costs much more than it may have for low income countries despite its prevalence. As a conclusion, it iswe are supposed to focus on this phenomenon from a/the cultural aspect. Citizenship Training like telling talking about the importance of entertainment rather than show off is a useful strategy to manage the phenomenon in an appropriate way.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Consumerism, Fatemeh Sarkheil.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Consumerism is a phenomenon that appeared from the very beginning of industrialization. That was a in result of high supplies and demands in the emerging cities and changes in citizens' lifestyle. It has been developed in to different manners. In the present decade new variables such as media play a role on in its prevalence. For instance, American Youngsters are in favor of social Medias compared to rather than Europeans. The more popular social Medias are popular in a society, the more consumerism is developed in it. this is derived by from the economic policies of the medias as their most important source of income is advertisement .consequently, the advertisingement has a subliminal effect on media users' mind to choose the aimed product. On the other hand, show off is a conduct that is mostly presented by the social Medias. Most of Youngsters try to wear in the a same fashion that is trendyed and they try to intimate the superstars's life style. As a result, The abovementioned causes lead to consumerism. From the economic point of view, consumerism doesn't cost us as much as it cost Americans. for developing countries but it has the same effects as . As the citizens of low income countries allocate the big portion of their budget for shopping and they neglect other important needs such as leisure, education and creativity. It is obvious that expenses of consumerism is are much higher for developing countries as we pay more than an American to buy a fashion wear. Therefore, consumerism costs much more than it may have for low income countries despite its prevalence. As a conclusion, it iswe are supposed to focus on this phenomenon from a/the cultural aspect. Citizenship Training like telling talking about the importance of entertainment rather than show off is a useful strategy to manage the phenomenon in an appropriate way.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Extra Money for Staff, Mehrdad Rahimi 2017-10-27T13:27:12+00:00 2017-10-27T13:27:12+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/257-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-05/1591-extra-money-for-staff-mehrdad-rahimi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Extra Money for Staff, Mehrdad Rahimi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard? Rewarding staff for their exceptional performance is a crucial key in management, but paying extra money to the best employee has always been controversial. Although it may encourage other staff to work harder, but it also may lead to negative competition among the employees, making and make them think their work is not valued. To begin with, the very first reason for working is to gain money, so . So it seems quite reasonable that the prize for good performance would be extra money. But as I personally experienced, this method may lead to negative and endless competition among the staff to work harder and for more hours and finally decreases their satisfaction withof their jobs. I used to work in a small office with only 10/ten employees, and the rivalry to be the best employee caused long working hours and made the atmosphere so intolerable that I finally resigned. For sure there are other ways to honor the best employee such as "extended holidays" or "Job promotion" and many think/argue/hold/maintain these are better ways. I would like to suggest that the financial prize would be awarded to all the staff in case of good performance and to motivate individuals, it would be better to use encouraging schemes such as "employee of the month". This way, the sense of cohesion and cooperation is boosted and there will be a positive competition to help each other. Finally, I would like to insist that determining good employees and rewarding them is not only beneficial but essential. Only when this reward benefits all the staff, will it motivates them to work harder and better. Therefore, it would be better if the financial prize wereis awarded to all and the best employee gains a title and simply extended holidays.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Extra Money for Staff, Mehrdad Rahimi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard? Rewarding staff for their exceptional performance is a crucial key in management, but paying extra money to the best employee has always been controversial. Although it may encourage other staff to work harder, but it also may lead to negative competition among the employees, making and make them think their work is not valued. To begin with, the very first reason for working is to gain money, so . So it seems quite reasonable that the prize for good performance would be extra money. But as I personally experienced, this method may lead to negative and endless competition among the staff to work harder and for more hours and finally decreases their satisfaction withof their jobs. I used to work in a small office with only 10/ten employees, and the rivalry to be the best employee caused long working hours and made the atmosphere so intolerable that I finally resigned. For sure there are other ways to honor the best employee such as "extended holidays" or "Job promotion" and many think/argue/hold/maintain these are better ways. I would like to suggest that the financial prize would be awarded to all the staff in case of good performance and to motivate individuals, it would be better to use encouraging schemes such as "employee of the month". This way, the sense of cohesion and cooperation is boosted and there will be a positive competition to help each other. Finally, I would like to insist that determining good employees and rewarding them is not only beneficial but essential. Only when this reward benefits all the staff, will it motivates them to work harder and better. Therefore, it would be better if the financial prize wereis awarded to all and the best employee gains a title and simply extended holidays.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Inernational Sports Events, Amiradel 2017-10-27T13:26:59+00:00 2017-10-27T13:26:59+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/257-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-05/1590-inernational-sports-events-amiradel <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Inernational Sports Events, Amiradel.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many nations like to host international sporting events, but some people are against it. Describe both views and give your own opinion. Every year many countries compete to win a race to host worldwide sport events and in this way they spend a lot of money. However, it seems that holding these games is not acceptable for all citizens making some notable reasons for their opposition. The majority of people state that these such events bring many economic benefits for their country. These people cite the money that visitors and spectators spend during these events and investments that these games attract. By the way of illustration, consider the Olympic Games when many people come from all around the world and require some facilities like transportation, accommodation, foods and also entertainment which all of these which may boost the country's economy and provide many job opportunities. Moreover, most media will zoom on the city or country where these events take place and it is an unrepeatable chance for introducing its culture and attractions into the world. Recall the last football World Cup in Brazil where most TV programs broadcasted some unseen aspects of the country on/under the pretext of this tournament. On the other hand, there are some people arguing about the side-effects of global sport events in their country. One of these pernicious impacts is the white elephant. The host mostly has to construct several huge venues according to international rules and then in the wake of the tournament, these settings often will become unnecessary facilities for local people who are plagued with high costs and decaying sport infrastructures. For instance, after finishing the Olympic games in Greece, stadiums were being built only for this game, gradually became worn and abandoned places. In conclusion, it seems that these worldwide events should not be organized in countries that cannot afford to maintain these huge infrastructures or it would be practical if we modifiedy some unnecessaryily legislations that force nations to erect these huge white elephants.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Inernational Sports Events, Amiradel.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many nations like to host international sporting events, but some people are against it. Describe both views and give your own opinion. Every year many countries compete to win a race to host worldwide sport events and in this way they spend a lot of money. However, it seems that holding these games is not acceptable for all citizens making some notable reasons for their opposition. The majority of people state that these such events bring many economic benefits for their country. These people cite the money that visitors and spectators spend during these events and investments that these games attract. By the way of illustration, consider the Olympic Games when many people come from all around the world and require some facilities like transportation, accommodation, foods and also entertainment which all of these which may boost the country's economy and provide many job opportunities. Moreover, most media will zoom on the city or country where these events take place and it is an unrepeatable chance for introducing its culture and attractions into the world. Recall the last football World Cup in Brazil where most TV programs broadcasted some unseen aspects of the country on/under the pretext of this tournament. On the other hand, there are some people arguing about the side-effects of global sport events in their country. One of these pernicious impacts is the white elephant. The host mostly has to construct several huge venues according to international rules and then in the wake of the tournament, these settings often will become unnecessary facilities for local people who are plagued with high costs and decaying sport infrastructures. For instance, after finishing the Olympic games in Greece, stadiums were being built only for this game, gradually became worn and abandoned places. In conclusion, it seems that these worldwide events should not be organized in countries that cannot afford to maintain these huge infrastructures or it would be practical if we modifiedy some unnecessaryily legislations that force nations to erect these huge white elephants.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Social Responsibilities, Elahe Ghasemi 2017-10-27T13:26:47+00:00 2017-10-27T13:26:47+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/257-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-05/1589-social-responsibilities-elahe-ghasemi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Social Responsibilities, Elahe Ghasemi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Today, even though earning money is a significant issue in terms of the business world, social responsibilities are another aspect which should be considered. To some extent, I agree with this argument. For better or worse, we live in a society that is significantly influenced by economic tasks. Money is a fundamental element for every business and it is a testament to successful remaining. To put this issue in perspective, if a company could not meet its financial needs it would not be able to fulfill their targetsbroaden its horizon in the other areas such as social obligations, so it would eliminate its efficiency. Also, making money is a main goal in every company and it has many beneficial results in society. For example, it can create the job opportunities for the vast majority of people and therefore, the economic level of society can be developed. Secondly, having social responsibilities in the businesses can cause a healthy atmosphere in the working environments. The more employees see their companies involved in social causes encounter with companies social obligations the more they can they trust them, so the organization's efficiency may be increased. On the other hand, by contributing to in charity works businesses do not have to pay taxes. One of the textbook examples in this regard is ORS's donation of $15000 on cancer researches in 2006 for tax evasionas to running from $600000 tax. In conclusion, although making money is an important factor in different businesses, social obligations play a key role in their successes. Also, both a friendly job environment and accounting loopholes are the results of companies' social responsibilities.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Social Responsibilities, Elahe Ghasemi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Today, even though earning money is a significant issue in terms of the business world, social responsibilities are another aspect which should be considered. To some extent, I agree with this argument. For better or worse, we live in a society that is significantly influenced by economic tasks. Money is a fundamental element for every business and it is a testament to successful remaining. To put this issue in perspective, if a company could not meet its financial needs it would not be able to fulfill their targetsbroaden its horizon in the other areas such as social obligations, so it would eliminate its efficiency. Also, making money is a main goal in every company and it has many beneficial results in society. For example, it can create the job opportunities for the vast majority of people and therefore, the economic level of society can be developed. Secondly, having social responsibilities in the businesses can cause a healthy atmosphere in the working environments. The more employees see their companies involved in social causes encounter with companies social obligations the more they can they trust them, so the organization's efficiency may be increased. On the other hand, by contributing to in charity works businesses do not have to pay taxes. One of the textbook examples in this regard is ORS's donation of $15000 on cancer researches in 2006 for tax evasionas to running from $600000 tax. In conclusion, although making money is an important factor in different businesses, social obligations play a key role in their successes. Also, both a friendly job environment and accounting loopholes are the results of companies' social responsibilities.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Social Responsibilty vs Making Money, Vahid Tavazoei 2017-10-27T13:26:32+00:00 2017-10-27T13:26:32+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/257-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-05/1588-social-responsibilty-vs-making-money-vahid-tavazoei <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Social Responsibilty vs Making Money, Vahid Tavazoei.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? These days the idea that social responsibility should be prioritized as well as earning money by businesses has become widespread. As far as I am concerned and in terms of importance, the former has to be addressed equally or even more than the latter. For several reasons the necessity of making money for companies should be addressed. First, this it is indisputable that companies need money to survive in a competitive world. For example, there were a handful of large companies in Iran which have failed to continue their commerce due to inadequate cash flowpoor financial turnover. Secondly, if companies are set for being active in other aspects besides making money, they should experience a particularly good economic situation. In other words, the more economically powerful companies are, the more possibilities available for them to make their contribution in society. On the other hand, although involved in the sole goal of making money and maximizing the profit, company owners should address the other issues such as social obligation equally or even more importantly. In societal terms, there should be social affairs in companies which should not be neglected by employers. Ranging from showing recognition to mutual understanding such as setting up wedding anniversary and birthday celebration for employees, such affairs and obligations play the main role in raising efficiency and productivity which would probably lead to a better economic status for society. Also, some philanthropic affairs such as charity work are already one of the fundamental needs of society which should be put importance on by businesses. What is really worth-mentioning for me is my father's company which contributed in to some humane activities no matter how capital intensive it could be. In conclusion, I do believe that both of social responsibility and making money should be taken into account as influential factors by businesses which could be beneficial for society in on the level of economy and much many more aspects.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Social Responsibilty vs Making Money, Vahid Tavazoei.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? These days the idea that social responsibility should be prioritized as well as earning money by businesses has become widespread. As far as I am concerned and in terms of importance, the former has to be addressed equally or even more than the latter. For several reasons the necessity of making money for companies should be addressed. First, this it is indisputable that companies need money to survive in a competitive world. For example, there were a handful of large companies in Iran which have failed to continue their commerce due to inadequate cash flowpoor financial turnover. Secondly, if companies are set for being active in other aspects besides making money, they should experience a particularly good economic situation. In other words, the more economically powerful companies are, the more possibilities available for them to make their contribution in society. On the other hand, although involved in the sole goal of making money and maximizing the profit, company owners should address the other issues such as social obligation equally or even more importantly. In societal terms, there should be social affairs in companies which should not be neglected by employers. Ranging from showing recognition to mutual understanding such as setting up wedding anniversary and birthday celebration for employees, such affairs and obligations play the main role in raising efficiency and productivity which would probably lead to a better economic status for society. Also, some philanthropic affairs such as charity work are already one of the fundamental needs of society which should be put importance on by businesses. What is really worth-mentioning for me is my father's company which contributed in to some humane activities no matter how capital intensive it could be. In conclusion, I do believe that both of social responsibility and making money should be taken into account as influential factors by businesses which could be beneficial for society in on the level of economy and much many more aspects.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Spending a lot on Holding Parties, Shahab Eshghifard 2017-10-27T13:26:18+00:00 2017-10-27T13:26:18+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/257-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-05/1587-spending-a-lot-on-holding-parties-shahab-eshghifard <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Spending a lot on Holding Parties, Shahab Eshghifard.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that spending a lot on holding wedding parties, birthday parties and other celebrations is just a waste of money. Others, however, think that these are necessary for individuals and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Nowadays it is often claimed that throwing a party is very important and should be celebrated grandly. Contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that parties like marriage are an important custom not only for individuals but also for society. On the one hand, parties have been held for several reasons. Parties are good places for families to gather together and have a good time with their relatives. For instance, every family has great photos which were taken in family parties and shows best moments in their life. Many people believe that parties actually create value and it is important to hold it in the best way. By spending limited money it is almost impossible to hold a memorable event. Only when people allocate a lot of money, will they achieve something special that will be remembered forever. On the other hand, there are other ways to celebrate important events that may have greater value rather than spending too much money. For example going to on a family trip and spending a good time with immediate family or intimate friends. Besides, there many people who live under starvation and need help. The money (which is)spentding on celebrations can be sent to them. Hence, a few individuals refute to spend a huge amount of money on personal celebrations. On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am inclined to believe that although parties are a form of social event and many people consider them special moments in their life, other choices should be considered in order to save their money and use it in better ways like helping people who do not have enough food to eat for a single meal a day.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Spending a lot on Holding Parties, Shahab Eshghifard.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that spending a lot on holding wedding parties, birthday parties and other celebrations is just a waste of money. Others, however, think that these are necessary for individuals and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Nowadays it is often claimed that throwing a party is very important and should be celebrated grandly. Contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that parties like marriage are an important custom not only for individuals but also for society. On the one hand, parties have been held for several reasons. Parties are good places for families to gather together and have a good time with their relatives. For instance, every family has great photos which were taken in family parties and shows best moments in their life. Many people believe that parties actually create value and it is important to hold it in the best way. By spending limited money it is almost impossible to hold a memorable event. Only when people allocate a lot of money, will they achieve something special that will be remembered forever. On the other hand, there are other ways to celebrate important events that may have greater value rather than spending too much money. For example going to on a family trip and spending a good time with immediate family or intimate friends. Besides, there many people who live under starvation and need help. The money (which is)spentding on celebrations can be sent to them. Hence, a few individuals refute to spend a huge amount of money on personal celebrations. On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am inclined to believe that although parties are a form of social event and many people consider them special moments in their life, other choices should be considered in order to save their money and use it in better ways like helping people who do not have enough food to eat for a single meal a day.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Teaching Children Moral Values, Amin 2017-10-27T13:26:06+00:00 2017-10-27T13:26:06+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/257-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-05/1586-teaching-children-moral-values-amin <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Teachin Children Moral Values, Amin.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">It is the parents' responsibility and not the schools' to teach children moral values. Who is most responsible for children's moral education and what is the best way to teach wrong from right? Amin Without any doubt, both parents and the education system play a major role in establishing the character of individuals who grow up through the teaching processes devised by them. This essay focuses on the heated debate as to who influences children's upbringing to a higher degree, especially in the responsibility of making them distinguish between right values from wrong ones as well as the most efficient method to adopt. One group of experts urge that it is the school which impacts the personality of children. Regarding the time taken for children to interact with the education system, a number of authorities in the government adhere to the view that the teachers should take the responsibility of helping them to learn ethics fundamentals. The officials arguably state that children will not sufficiently be aware of moral values, unless they realize the outcomes resulting from their perception of wrong and right values. The other part of society, however, believe that parents are most likely to be accountable to raise their children's awareness of what is yielded as a result of wrong choices to make. Taking the parents into account as the first people children cultivate relationship with since they are born, some psychologists essentially maintain that children tend to assume their parents as their heroes in their small world. What it easily brings to mind, consequently, is that even every single action the parents take has a direct influence on their children's understanding of ethics, due, in large part, to their tendency to mimic what they observe in their surroundings. On the other hand, the answer simply comes to light if we consider parents to be more concerned about the approach their children choose to behave. If a person, for instance, follows a career which is inconsistent with an environment in which he has grown up, it is a given that his parents will be more influenced by his choice. To put in a nutshell, the responsibility of teaching children moral values should be held on parents' shoulder at in the first place, owing to the roles they reflect on their children's future life. Besides, in my estimation, the best way in this respect liesbehind parents' behavior because children learn as they see how their parents behave.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Teachin Children Moral Values, Amin.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">It is the parents' responsibility and not the schools' to teach children moral values. Who is most responsible for children's moral education and what is the best way to teach wrong from right? Amin Without any doubt, both parents and the education system play a major role in establishing the character of individuals who grow up through the teaching processes devised by them. This essay focuses on the heated debate as to who influences children's upbringing to a higher degree, especially in the responsibility of making them distinguish between right values from wrong ones as well as the most efficient method to adopt. One group of experts urge that it is the school which impacts the personality of children. Regarding the time taken for children to interact with the education system, a number of authorities in the government adhere to the view that the teachers should take the responsibility of helping them to learn ethics fundamentals. The officials arguably state that children will not sufficiently be aware of moral values, unless they realize the outcomes resulting from their perception of wrong and right values. The other part of society, however, believe that parents are most likely to be accountable to raise their children's awareness of what is yielded as a result of wrong choices to make. Taking the parents into account as the first people children cultivate relationship with since they are born, some psychologists essentially maintain that children tend to assume their parents as their heroes in their small world. What it easily brings to mind, consequently, is that even every single action the parents take has a direct influence on their children's understanding of ethics, due, in large part, to their tendency to mimic what they observe in their surroundings. On the other hand, the answer simply comes to light if we consider parents to be more concerned about the approach their children choose to behave. If a person, for instance, follows a career which is inconsistent with an environment in which he has grown up, it is a given that his parents will be more influenced by his choice. To put in a nutshell, the responsibility of teaching children moral values should be held on parents' shoulder at in the first place, owing to the roles they reflect on their children's future life. Besides, in my estimation, the best way in this respect liesbehind parents' behavior because children learn as they see how their parents behave.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Teaching Children, Farzaneh Aryaie 2017-10-27T13:25:55+00:00 2017-10-27T13:25:55+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/257-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-05/1585-teaching-children-farzaneh-aryaie <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Teaching Children, Farzaneh Aryaie.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Farzane Ariaei Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. The basis and the core of children's upbringing is family which shapes child's their behavior and character. Similarly, since the second center of education is school, it plays an important role in teaching children to be good members of society. there are two different points of view about the responsibility of this subject that will be mentioned. Clearly, the first people who whose an infant communicates with them are parents. the morality, culture, religious issues, social skills and the distinction between right and wrong are taught in a family environment and The behavioral model of parents affects on their child'ss' personality. Not only is an infant affected by acquired patterns, but also by hereditary characteristics, hence the importance of parents' role in formation of moods. Therefore, paying attention to the reactions in different situations and also modifying the poor behavior is required by parents. Obviously, the first social place that children enter in it is school that where they learn social skills, interactions and other aspects of education there. Spending the most useful hours of the day at school, children are affected by their peers and schools officials. Some claims that most of the social anomalies and intransigent behaviors such as smuggling, drug dealing and addiction originate from school. The wrong method of teachers' training can lead to irreparable damages on the child's spirit and subconscious that has have a direct effects on their future. I opine that both parents and teachers are at one level responsible forin bringing up children and Their contribution of them for in shaping the community members is required. They can share their ideas and inform each other by holding consulting sessions and learning programs to reach/build a healthy society.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Teaching Children, Farzaneh Aryaie.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Farzane Ariaei Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. The basis and the core of children's upbringing is family which shapes child's their behavior and character. Similarly, since the second center of education is school, it plays an important role in teaching children to be good members of society. there are two different points of view about the responsibility of this subject that will be mentioned. Clearly, the first people who whose an infant communicates with them are parents. the morality, culture, religious issues, social skills and the distinction between right and wrong are taught in a family environment and The behavioral model of parents affects on their child'ss' personality. Not only is an infant affected by acquired patterns, but also by hereditary characteristics, hence the importance of parents' role in formation of moods. Therefore, paying attention to the reactions in different situations and also modifying the poor behavior is required by parents. Obviously, the first social place that children enter in it is school that where they learn social skills, interactions and other aspects of education there. Spending the most useful hours of the day at school, children are affected by their peers and schools officials. Some claims that most of the social anomalies and intransigent behaviors such as smuggling, drug dealing and addiction originate from school. The wrong method of teachers' training can lead to irreparable damages on the child's spirit and subconscious that has have a direct effects on their future. I opine that both parents and teachers are at one level responsible forin bringing up children and Their contribution of them for in shaping the community members is required. They can share their ideas and inform each other by holding consulting sessions and learning programs to reach/build a healthy society.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Young People More Than The Old People, Mona Dorji 2017-10-27T13:25:42+00:00 2017-10-27T13:25:42+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/257-fridays-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-friday-96-08-05/1584-young-people-more-than-the-old-people-mona-dorji <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Young People More Than The Old People, Mona Dorji.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young people adult compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages. Nowadays the people of some countries that have the young people more than the old people. Some people thinkg that this is beneficialt for their countries because they have nation builders. Another people thinks that it's not beneficialt due tosince some countries limit the population, if that have has more young children, this essay will discuss about the advantages and disadvantages about in some countries have the young people more than old people. Any country with that youth peoplea young population equal to that of India would be a country of power, it is a sea of potential, good quality education, basic rights and jobs can bring good economy growth also have lots of future worker. If these people are educated they can be a useful human resource and serve the country, otherwise/if not they can turn into liability. On the other hand, governments have to invest in the educational system for these youths people and also more schools are needed and when they have new schools there will not be enough teachers will not enough for them.in addition, more health care and more food and water are is needed. Young people are often more challenged to find jobs that pay well because young people have less experience than older people .furthermore, when they grow up the unemploymentee problem will happen because the companiesy cannot provide vacancies.receive anybody to get job. In conclusion, the government should manage the educational system in some countries that have a young population and they should have planning for their future job. Also provides a growing market for the manufactured products should be provided.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1396/Writing Workshop Friday 96.08.05/Young People More Than The Old People, Mona Dorji.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young people adult compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages. Nowadays the people of some countries that have the young people more than the old people. Some people thinkg that this is beneficialt for their countries because they have nation builders. Another people thinks that it's not beneficialt due tosince some countries limit the population, if that have has more young children, this essay will discuss about the advantages and disadvantages about in some countries have the young people more than old people. Any country with that youth peoplea young population equal to that of India would be a country of power, it is a sea of potential, good quality education, basic rights and jobs can bring good economy growth also have lots of future worker. If these people are educated they can be a useful human resource and serve the country, otherwise/if not they can turn into liability. On the other hand, governments have to invest in the educational system for these youths people and also more schools are needed and when they have new schools there will not be enough teachers will not enough for them.in addition, more health care and more food and water are is needed. Young people are often more challenged to find jobs that pay well because young people have less experience than older people .furthermore, when they grow up the unemploymentee problem will happen because the companiesy cannot provide vacancies.receive anybody to get job. In conclusion, the government should manage the educational system in some countries that have a young population and they should have planning for their future job. Also provides a growing market for the manufactured products should be provided.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>