Fridays

Airplane Pollution, Sanaz Nasr

2017-07-28T13:57:53+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The impact that growing demand for more flights has had on the environment is a major concern for many countries. Some people believe that one way to limit the number of people traveling by air is to increase taxes on flights. To what extent do you think this could solve the problem? Due to the low price of flights compared with last decades nowadays, people are more traveling by airplanes more. What made flights peculiar unique is that they are quickest means of traveling especially for long distances. Thus, one prefers to travel by an airplane in order to save time. Simply put, when people are concerneding about time constraint, they choose flights rather than other methods of traveling. However, an unavoidable consequence of way too frequently flights is air pollution. Many people argue that we should impose taxes so that we can cut down the amounts of flights. By a large on the contrary, I am of the opinion that this could not be a proper approach for this problem. To begin with, the ever growing number of travelers who choose flights is due to the fact that they are it is affordable by everyone. Therefore, if the taxes increase it would directly effects affect on the rate of futile journeys, which leads to burning a huge amount of petroleum, or forces people to choose the other available alternatives instead. In other words, the more expensive flights, the less pointless traveling we will have. Above all, the emission of carbon dioxide in atmosphere would be less. On the flip side, many opine that the aforementioned policy only target pointing to people from the bottom of the social strata um of society. There have been instances where an ordinary person was able to travel by fights once a year, whereas wealthy families traveling by airplanes ten times as many. Consequently, such policies would not be a force for good. By way of conclusion, I am of the opinion that imposing taxes would be an obstacle lest people causeing more damage to the environment. However, in this case it would only put pressure on lower strataum of society which is not fair.

Art, Faeghe

2017-07-28T13:57:35+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that arts are an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Undoubtedly, studying arts is an essential issue for pupils, but some are opposed to this. This matter can be considered in developed countries, because people who live there need to have this them (arts), whereas in developing countries they (ones) are not as an essential as a result of a variety of reasons. At first, I opine learning arts softens smoothies the soul. In other words, works of art help people to enjoy their life. For this reason, we should learn teach this (art) to our children from their young age. Secondly, that by educating/teaching the art to our children, we will have creative children is an unavoidable matter and thiswhich leads them to have be an inventive and happy generation. The last but not least, it is incumbent on us to preserve the culture and art inherited from our ancestors and this is not possible unless we teach arts to our children. The more we rely on our ancient/old culture, the more we protect our society against social ills. On the other hand, some believe not only is it not needed for children, but also it is waste of time and money. This belief is common especially in the less developed countries. Their nations firmly believe that in this rapidly changing world, their governments should focus on teaching science and business to their children, due to because both making money and getting/finding a job are their priorities. Although art is needed for everyone, it can compensate for the lack of other basic human needs. For example, preferences of people who live in poverty are money, a job and home. Therefore, In that they do not pay attention to other issues such as music, painting and the movie industry. Ultimately, in spite of critiques in some countries, notably in developing countries, learning arts is indisputable. In my opinion, lowly educated people in terms of arts contribute to havinge an immoral, unfriendly society. and unfriendly. In a word, the benefits of learning of art are legions.

Celebrities and Privacy, Elahe Ghasemi

2017-07-28T13:57:16+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Celebrities make a very good living out of media attention and have chosen to live in the public spotlight. They have no right to complain when they feel the media are intruding on their privacy. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Being famous is always alluring. Having a fancy life, elegant clothes, expensive fast cars, luxury houses, first class travels and most of all being in the news limelight makes everyone to be inquisitive about celebrities' lives. However, an enormous amount of curiosity can be detrimental to the privacy of a celebrity. When people have chosen to live in this life style, they know how hard and dangerous it might be and also how being in the public spotlight effects affects their lives. Besides, they learn about lack of security and less little or no privacy. In the past few decades celebrities' privacy has become a widespread topic,. Therefore, it needs more consideration. Almost every day the internet and the mass media are visited by famous people's fans. With only few clicks fans can find out about celebrities' lives. But how many much of these this news should be allowed to be published. Shouldn't there be a limitation on information leakage transpire. Of course celebrities suffer from lack of privacy and paparazzi's omnipresence. Even sometimes a mad fan can cause a serious problem and harass celebrities and their families by knowing about famous their people's personal secret life. Even though they have become more famous by being on the top of the news, however it doesn't mean they want to be in the news limelight about their secret information. Moreover, they have chosen to live in the public spotlight. They have somea knowledge about the a situation they are going through. They are aware of unstable privacy and security and having no secret in their lives and they have accepted to live in this way. On the other hand, celebrities should respect their fans' curiosity and share some news about their lives and works. At the end, all people in every condition have a right to live freely and have privacy and secrets of their own. It is true that celebrities make lead a good life out of media attention but their privacy should not be violated, although they should be convinced of difficulties and problems of this career. In other words, they can aid in to preventing the aspects margins of their life by learning to act like a professional and reduce unexpected behaviors.

Children's Activities, Melika

2017-07-28T13:56:39+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that children's leisure activities must be educational, otherwise they are a complete waste of time. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience. In these previous decades, children's intelligence has been constantly enhanced. It's quite consequential that they should be allowed to be free in their leisure times. In fact, some people including me disagree with forcing kids to just study educate. In addition, there is no mixed conflict up between the pleasurable pastime and education. First of all, pupils need to release their physical energy by doing such extracurricular activities like painting, playing games, doing exercises and watching television. The result is that if they don't have any time for themselves, then they feel frustrated with studying. Moreover, it's mentioned that not only do these kinds of activities leads to beneficial mental effects, but also it they helps children to improve their concentrations. As such, continuous focus on towards homework causes them to decreaseing their motivation for learning many lessons such as Mathematics and Physics analysis. This clearly debunks the idea that pupils should be allowed to perform their tasks in ways which that results in the acquisition of knowledge in terms of fostering both mental and emotional abilities and recuperating their health. Second of all, parents can play an influential role in this path. In spite of many misguided families, the others encourage their offspring to follow their interests while . While, many children like physical labor as well as studying. In other words, how will they be able to find a proper and interesting job if they don't play make-believe games? Or how will they be able to confront the society in foreseeable future if they play in a team? Furthermore, I deem that all pupils should utilize their time properly. In conclusion, it's obvious that children's extracurricular activities are very essential in their longevity so they whom should be allowed to experiment with. Melika Nafar

Education, Adeleh Sirang

2017-07-28T13:56:23+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

At this juncture, education is one of the most important factors all around the world. It is a controversial issue whether that going to school should be mandatory or children can be educated by their parents at home. I strongly opine that school is a better choice. In my estimation, school is not just a place for studying. It has been scientifically proven that not only does attending school help children to educate, but it also ameliorates their social relations. In other words, children learn how to behave with towards each other in different situations and in comparison with children who are taught at home, they can display express a more reasonable attitude in society. Furthermore, students can benefit from class activities, team works and workshops which are really useful for learning life skills. Besides, probably there are children with different cultures or even different religions in the same class. In that way they learn to accept and respect the differences. It will have an unforgettable impact on them and when they get older and enter the society they will interact far more better. On the other hand, children from the poor, ordinary or rich families will learn to consider each other as friends or classmates and they will find out that financial situation does not associatehas nothing to do with friendship. To wrap it up, I am of the conviction that parents who think it is better to keep their children at home and teach them by themselves, should study more about this issue. After that if they still insist (on it), it is better to take prompt measures to reduce the adverse effects of teaching at home.

Education, Arsalan

2017-07-28T13:56:04+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

2. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is easier to become an educated person today than it was in the past. Use reasons and examples to support your position. Learning is one of the issues that every person has to face it. Nowadays, everything is changing differently from the past. In my opinion, it's much simpler to turn into the a scholarly person than it was in the past long ago. I take this view on account of the following reasons. To begin with, the number of universities has been increased and because of that more people can go to the university. In addition, there is a lot of variety for the majors. In the past, there are were a few majors but today the people can participate in a large range of academic programs. At some university, you can take online courses so you don't have to go university and study directly. Hence, you can work and study at the same time which is quiet good for the people whom whose their age is much bigger than the usual student. You can also apply for a foreign country and study abroad. In the past, it is was more difficult to study abroad. As the part of the world is more connected to each other by the internet, it's much more undemanding to search and see others' articles so an educated people are more connected and larger in numbers increased than any other time. Moreover, learning is much simpler by using the powerful tools such as Internet. Today, you can review many courses online and get familiar with lots of information. Furthermore, there are many websites which are concluded include many much required information that could help you to become the a knowledgeable person. As an illustration, one of sharing site which includes much Video's stuff content is YouTube which . YouTube has many videos (that are) relateding to learning about almost anything. Therefore, many people create their own group which contains many educational subjects. It's also useful for the other people. The world has become much closer and thanks to the internet, many groups are created for each major that they can discuss and learn from each other. As such, the new generation is much more intellectual than the previous one. Simply put, the majority of the people know lots of issues. In fact, people try to learn more and more and increase their knowledge and become an educated people.

High Standard of Living, Amir Gilani

2017-07-28T13:55:47+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some countries improve their economy to gain a high standard of living, but some social values can be lost during this transition. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Give your opinion and examples. During the last 40 years many important changes have happened in different aspects of our life. In many parts of the world factories along with labor forces are working 24/7 to increase financial indexes. Dreaming about a better place to live in, human beings are extracting more and more minerals from old Mother Nature to produce more wealth. Although most of the new theories in this century encourage nations to produce more wealth to have a better life, many credible researches show there is not a direct relation between an acceptable level of living and highly economic successes. I believe that the economy is one of the main building blocks of a successful country. However, the question is to what extentd the economy can lead nations to a better life? Focusing on economy can lead to a materialistic society where people are far from one another, different kinds of psychological disorders become popular, and in general people's main concern becomes materials. Regrettably in such societies many humane values have been replaced with materialistic valuesones. People are evaluated based on their wealth but not their understanding, and cruelty becomes something undeniable. Having Experienced such a terrible experience situation in communistm societies, developed countries are now concentrating on financial issues, and there is no doubt that people in those countriesy are enjoying a high level of life, but the most common problem they complain about is they rarely find time to enjoy their family. Children separate from their parents after 18, and in some cases rarely see their parents. They have to spend too much time at work in a waysuch that being workaholic is a common practice disorder amongst labor forces in those countries. Family as a praised social institution in traditional societies has lost it value in modern societies, and from my point of view it should be considered as an threat the existence of alarm to withdrawal one of the main building blocks of societies. In conclusion, I think economy serves as a double- edged sword. In other words, improvement of financial indexes definitely can boost quality of our life but we do not have to forget about its drawbacks. Focusing on economical advances can lead to new wave of psychological disorders that again demands an enormous amount of time, energy and money to overcome them it. I hope we can learn how to balance our lives in both physical and emotional aspects/parts, and share everything we have with one another regardless of race and borders/boundaries.

Life Time, Diako

2017-07-28T13:55:24+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

One the consequences of improved medical care are that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? As scientists make new discoveries and inventions (discover and invent new things) in advantage of medicine and human health, the human life span (span of one's life) tends to grow. And consequently, the world starts facing conclusions with different impacts. To begin with, the more lager population and the longer period of lives are simultaneously growing, the higher the expenditure of earth's food storage. Moreover, at some point, because of the reproduction breeding range tied to people's age, the population's growth process will have experienced a slowing down.which Which results into having fewer young people in the society. Thus, the innovation in the world shall will hit somehow a plato plateau that to compensate it could take a significant amount of effort. Having said all the aforementioned, living longer gives the ability to have more experiences in life. To illustrate it, being able to see more of this world and having more interactions on spiritual levels is a gift that not everyone has a chance to appreciate. To be around your loved ones as much as possible is not only and expectation from life but also a pleasure not everyone is blessed with considering the new diseases coming out/emerge every day. Also, it's a plausible fact that there are a few people obliged by higher powers and considerable valuable intentions that the world could benefit from these people living as long as possible. I personally assume that the world, followed by humankind, evolves on a trend which is neither perfect nor disastrous. Thus, there will be no other ways but, to become accustomed to it. We should be prepared for every eventuality.

Richer Country Means Happier Poeple, Hadi Loghman

2017-07-28T13:55:05+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that if a country is already rich any addition in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Not so long ago countries were evaluated in their fortune by their natural sources and they considered these sources as a gift from God. The more resources you had, it might have been translate into happier individuals who lived in your boundaries, but this situation altered/flipped over the time by the achievements in technology. Nowadays, being depended dependence only on natural resources may cause make people more miserable. But how can it be? Being wealthy by natural resources can destroyuct your motivations and destroy any attempt for the better future. It goes without saying that our natural wealth is limited and no one can recreate and replace them. Unfortunately we, human beings, behave towards/treat our assets having as though they are were infinite. Overlooking our usage and not curbing our unnecessary needs may result in living on the edge in the future. On the other hand, considering countries with slight finite resources are really directing informative. As far as cognitive behavior is concerned these countries focused on their limited resources and their usage became to an optimal state. By living on the edge, they put themselves through their usage and focus on the technology they can give to the world, and nowadays by their developments, we, so called rich countries, rely on them. But this is not the end, being poor led their governors to be more better politicians. They concentrated on how they could benefit of from others' resources and it's self-explanatory that in some cases this scheme resulted in colonialism. And nowadays there is "their way or the highway" which rules over the world. We obey them and their technologies show us the path to the future. Countries such as Saudi Arabia, Iran and etc. are the good examples of rich countries who are really relying on others' technologies and there are the miserables whom live in their countries,. in contrastry to other countries such as Japan ,England and so on, which their who dominate words are bought over the world. In conclusion, the rich countries without any economic achievements have no choice but to change in their old procedures. We should believe in that relying on our natural wealth era is over and we are obliged to do more sophisticated attempts to have a better life.

Studing at Home, Boshra

2017-07-28T13:54:38+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child's development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion. The suitable way of education at school has sparked a heated debate among researches. Some believe that studying at school is more beneficial than staying at home and having some private teachers or taking online courses. Going to/attending/Studying in a traditional school, pupils can socialize with their classmates and teachers. In addition, they should respect some rules at school such as wearing accurate the required uniform and being punctual. Furthermore, they become aware of the importance of being organized in life. Not only do schools consider a pedagogical area, but also it is a place in which students are thought taught regarding some codes of ethics, hence ordinary schools are the best choice to some parents who are not capable of supervising their charges because of their hectic life styles. Educating at home could be attractive to students who live in a country where advanced educational facilities are not accessible to them. In addition, this way of learning is cheaper for them. What is more, learners who study at home follow the curriculum independently, whilst teachers at school allocate some homework to do at home and parents should help their offspring. On the whole, I, personally, assume that studying at home is an appropriate way to university students. However, pupils should be exposed to school atmosphere that is completely effective for their future life.