Fridays

Alternative of Fossil Fuels, Sanaz Nasr

2017-04-21T13:58:30+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? The world is becoming extremely dependentd on fossil fuels. While more countries develop their industries, the scale of their use continues to grow, and there have appeared different problems related to the extraction and usage of such fuels. First and foremost, the main reason why the alternative energy sources are needed to be in priority is global warming. A clear example is, factories burn gases and coals which whose fume is released into the atmosphere then leads to the air pollution. and AS as a consequence of pollution, the world runs into difficulties such as disappearance/depletion of the Ozone layer and emergence of many health problems, such as lung and heart diseases. Secondly, some countries already use renewable energy sources for instance, wind, solar farm or water power. It seems that there has not been any investment in developing these technologies in order to make making them available for all. Many argue that it should be a global priority to invest in such research and development lest pollution poses major problems. On the other hand, there are other global priorities that we also need to deal with/approach namely, poverty and disease. All these issues are global rather than national ones. However, in terms of energy sources there is a sense of that time is ticking away for our planet and any solution for this case will takes time to achieve results. By way of conclusion, I opine that finding alternative energy sources in spite of instead of fossil fuels due to the aforementioned reasons should be one of the most pressing prioritiesy if not the most important one.

Children and Handwriting Skills, Amir Adel

2017-04-21T13:58:17+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say children no longer need to develop handwriting skills. Other believe that handwriting is still important. Discuss both of these views and give your opinion. All traditional means that human beings have invented and developed for a long time, nowadays seems to be changing and the writing skill is not an exception. Now, there is controversy over forcing new generations to work on their handwriting or even whether they should be writing by hand or not. From the perspective of those who believe into writing scripting by hand, there are some circumstances which where the quality of handwriting proves its importance. For instance, when someone has to write some things in on a whiteboard in front of his or her their colleagues or classmates or even in an exam, he or she will be concerned about prejudgments. Indeed, these people believe that scrawling can reveal their weaknesses or conversely, the art of producing beautiful writing manifests the owner's intelligence. The result of this viewpoint is that children have to dedicate more time to on the scripting skill instead of their real requirements. On the other hand, many, usually young and prospective, follow new technologies and truly believe that new generations do not need to waste their time anymore on improving handwriting. By introducing various electronic devices like laptops, smartphones and tablets, these days, people demand to learn typing rather than writing. Moreover, there are many applications that prepare tremendous options for editing and decorating and it will not be too far away when we will just speak and computers catch it in a note. In conclusion, by looking back on human history, we will notice that traditional methods will be replaced with newer ones sooner or later and therefore, we should be awake when it is time to change for future generations as well as and also us.

Foreign Films vs Local Film industries, Boshra

2017-04-21T13:58:04+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many people prefer watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? Watching movies is one of the most popular ways of spending time on vacations or in the evening at home. Some movie fans believe that foreign movies are more attractive and wealthy worthwhile to visitsee, hence why we should waste our time on visiting local films. They assume that authorities should pay more attention to raisinge the quality of movies by allocating a certain amount of money to this area. Watching movies that are made in abroad could be a suitable way to cement the relationship between countries by having interactions through the film industry. of producing movie. In addition, in this way inhabitants got get familiar with foreign cultures and their lifestyles have some beneficial effects on their life. Another important issue is associated with learning new languages. Some teachers claim that the best way to learn a new language is watching series or films that speaks in that language. Despite Although the given benefits related to watching foreign movies, researchers show that watching inner domestic programs are is more attractive to individuals and the major cause of about movie-watchers' attention to films produced abroad attracting member of the public to abroad is their quality. Iranian movies are mentally and characteristically closer. Furthermore, they might be the best tools for to governments to get closer to citizens and teach them some subjects. For instance, notifying about the history of their own country, visitors viewers/movie fans are proud of some remarkable achievements of famous poets and historical characters. What is more, providing jobs and supporting artists them is are other one of other benefits cial matters to them. regarding supporting Iranian artists. On the whole, I personally believe that supporting people in different industries is an undeniable duty of the government. The more financial support by government, the more getting promotion in jobs.

Healthy Lifestyle, Sara Kasaei

2017-04-21T13:57:50+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think governments should take measures regarding the healthy lifestyle of individuals. Others think it must be managed by individuals. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. The necessity of following a balanced diet with a daily dose of exercise for each member of society has been a common subject during the last decades. Whereas some tend to advocate that everyone should take responsibility for their lifestyle individually, many more are of the opinion that it has to be one of the government's major goals to publicize this approach. Those supporting individually controlled lifestyles, build their argument on the inevitable role of self-will(?). This belief asserts that the more self-motivated a person isbe, the higher chance for a permanent, healthy routine life they will have regardless of their age or hectic work schedule. In other words, Nowadays, countless free sources about sustainable life can be easily reached just by one click on the Internet. Therefore, not only could everyone arrange the most suitable list of healthy habits based on their interests, but also they have the opportunity to stay up-to-date about related subjects. For instance, recipes for vegetarian cuisines or new techniques released by cardio trainers. From a broader point of view, that governments could directly benefit from developing healthy habits among their citizens is not questionable in that lots of a country’s annual budget can be saved by reducing the expenditures on the patients’ treatments procedures, medications for ever-growing diseases like diabetes among children and the public health insurance. Moreover, following a healthy lifestyle could usefully contribute to more satisfactionamong members of the society, especially those who are in their middle ages. Consequently, they would be more productive which is one the essential factors of/in economic growth. In brief, although everyone has to decide about their method of living, governments could positively affect their decision-making process by implementing numerous actions. For example, providing convenient local sports amenities as well as encouraging young generations to be more physically active. Decreasing the price of healthy organic foods, namely vegetables, might be another effective motivator in fostering to make healthy lifestyle a part of each nations’ culture.

Medical Care, Adeleh

2017-04-21T13:57:28+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? From many years ego, people were seeking for the elixir of youth. Then, living longer was an important aim for the humanity. Nowadays, scientists discover things that increase life expectancy and help people to live longer. In fact, living longer is a controversial issue which has many advantages and disadvantages as well. In my estimation, the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages. First of all, we can have our family and the ones one’s whom we love, longer and enjoy living together for many more years. Also, I suppose when people know that they can live longer, they will be more relaxed and they won’t be in a have rush and be tense for things like getting marriagemarried, collecting money or having babies. In such situations, they can live more comfortablye and easilyeasier. From one aspect, some people who are very useful for the society and the world, can live longer and help human beings to have a better life. However, from another point of view, bad people with all their wickedness’ will live longer as well. In relation with/as for the disadvantages, the pressing issue of this development is increasing the population which may cause lots of problems, although scientists have been finding remedies like living in other planets. Also Regarding to soaring/increasing/the increase in the age of marriage and having children, the population will be old and in this case, the society will get involved with problems. To wrap it up, despite of the fact that living longer is an interesting issue, I am doubtful if living longerit makes me happier.in my humble opinion, the quality of living is more important than its length/the length of it.

Migrating to Cities, Majid Talebzadeh

2017-04-21T13:57:11+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? Cities are often seen as places of opportunity, however living there it leads to large a number of immigrants who leaves their own locations in hopes of just hope for a higher quality of life. Whether or not this is good thing for community, is a moot point. Living in the cities obviously is more safe and comfortable in comparison with living in the countryside. However, inhabitants of cities have to pay higher prices for housing, transportation and even food. As a result, the cost of living is likely to be much higher than that it is in small towns or villages. Additionally, a big part of their time is employed in traffic jams every day. We can quote the example of Tehran as a metropolis with a vast crowd gathered. Furthermore, the air quality in cities is often poor, due to pollution from traffic, and the streets and public transport systems are usually overcrowded. As a result, city life can be unhealthy and stressful. However, there are various steps that governments could take to tackle these problems. First of all we it needs to pay more attention to old structure parts of the city that are is usually crowded with a heavy traffic. Secondly, by farming green places and popularization of electrical vehicles we can help to reduce the air pollution. For instance, in Beijing authorities by investing in electrical motor cycles not only could decreased the traffic, but also really help to air and noise pollution. A third option would be that by moving industriesy and jobs to regions, they can create make a better atmosphere for living. In conclusion, governments can play a vital role in for promotinge the quality of life for all residence residents by providing modern transportation systems and a better structure for mega cities.

Playing Sport at School, Sahar

2017-04-21T13:56:58+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It's very important that children should study hard at school. Time spent playing sports is time wasted. Do you agree? School is a place which where students atin different ages have spent a huge portion of their life in it and has influenced a massive part of their time. Schools have different aims but unfortunately most people focus merely on the educational aspect. part merely. according to our experiences, schools are not only a place for education but also a place for communications and other skills which are required during our life time. A research done recently on educational systems has shown that although spending too much many hours studying hard/tough/harsh although is applied in most of countries, this approach isn't efficient and doesn't have proper feedbacks. This study says suggests that it's very absolutely essential to spend your time at school on various courses and some free time spending with your counterparts/peers in different aspects like sport or art or even some activities like home chores on school premises which are obligatory obliged in Japan. In other words, however, although we may think schools are a place just for developing our educational enhancement/progresss different aspects/sides of a person such as behavior, attitude and even the way of speaking. In fact it leads to changes, either good or bad but eventually it depends on everybody to choose their his or her side. Besides, a majority of people, especially parents, believe the time of playing different sports at school is a kind of wasting students' time which can be used for extra curricula/extracurricular activities. Sometimes they don't even accept neither sport activities nor art ones while one considerable approach by these two is promoting students' social behavior and conformity that may not get improved any other time or place. To conclude, the whole understanding and idea which I have got is that In in schools we need some time for activities like sport and art as much as curricula and the old-fashioned attitudes about this multi-objective/multi-purpose place and educational programs must be refreshed to help the next generations.

Wildlife Protection, Vahid Tavzoie

2017-04-21T13:56:44+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Governments spend a lot of money on wildlife protection instead of starting new projects. Is this a positive or a negative trend? Give your opinion and examples from your experience. Nowadays government splash out for conserving animals’ habitats and caring for wild animals. While addressing new projects and introduction of new activities might be suitable for countries , I strongly believe that these expenses must not be covered by payments for protecting wild animals. There are several reasons which demonstrate why governments must not pay too much money for starting new projects end. firstly there is room for doubt if these projects end up with success. Secondly these projects are more likely to be capital and labor extensive, so . So this is better for governments to encourage appoint private companies to for investing in these new economic activities. Finally this it is arguable argued that if it is suitable for regular/ordinary people. The effect of these new projects on people are is ambiguous .for instance, the space exploring activities have has no significant influence on individuals and must be paid from extra budgets. On the other hand, protecting animals and their living place is really important no matter how much money Must be paid by the government for this issue. First of all, there is a direct relationship between protecting Wild life and maintaining the environment and earth. While there is no concern for conserving wild life , lots of trees are cut down for construction and industrialization . furthermore , there is no right for humans to destroy animal life while observing animal right is one of the symbols of civilization and culture .for example in developed countries any animal harm is punishedseverely. In these countries animal right must be observed in the same way as same as human right. Moreover, any interference in on the food chain in nature could pose serious pressing difficulties for the human bodybodies. In light of this issue, over fishing could be highlighted which leads to running out of ran out of fish in near future . At the end ,there are some endangred animal species of animals which are endangered of being extincted, so . so the government must consider these issues and pay lots of a great deal of/sufficient money to pave the way for protecting animals. In conclusion, although the government must do much more to provide for providing a better situation/condition for its people by new projects, the private sector involvement could be a great boon in this regard. there must not be overlapped with expenses which are allocated for protecting animals.