Fridays

Economic and Governments, Sanaz Nasr

2017-01-06T12:51:00+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.In recent years, some countries' only target is economic growth. It is inevitable that economic developments can bring about a prosperous future. However, some people cannot accept economic progress as a pivotal target because of its side effects, namely social and environmental. criteria. To start, as it has have been proved to everybody all over the world, developed countries have gained power as a result of economic progress. To a country, economy is like blood through the heart. A country with a strong economy is able to defend its borders because it can invest huge amounts financial resources in their military capabilities and provide facilities for its citizens such as improving infrastructures, job creation, providing international trade, higher salaries and educational developments. For example, Dubai is an Asian economic hub and not only has created made a large number of job vacancies for its citizens, but also has recruited a significant number of overseas workforce. In other words, a strong economy can assist a country in standing on the global stage, in terms of its political influence and trading power. Although, industrialization and success in trades have ensured economic stability to many countries, they have caused the environmental damage too. On the other hand, as a consequence of higher standards of living, people might have to lose their traditional values and uniqueness as a nation. It seems that change is the fundamental basis of development. Thus, if a nation is worried about its old way of living, it would fail to ensure that those developments are comparable compared with others. Rarely can you you can find a country which remains loyal to its traditional values and has not suffered from impoverishment.to sum up, I would argue that, there is no doubt that economic progress should be an uppermost aim for a government, but there are still many aspects which are important.

Homeschooling, Arefeh

2017-01-06T12:50:29+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child’s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion. Homeschooling or regular school? It is a controversial issue and there is a heated dispute between educationalists and some people. The former Some educationalists insist on persist in sending children to school, while some over-sensitive parents are inclined to homeschooling although numerous benefits of attending school have been proven by experts. Some parents who are excessively worried about their offspring prefer to hire a private teacher to teach them. That way, parents can monitor both their children and the process that they are studying/study in, and also they can spare much more time beside their family. Furthermore, they are safe from being bullied bullying by their classmates at school. Meanwhile, these children have a more flexible schedule not to mention that they can express their interest and point of view about their curriculum. However, attending school is twice as beneficial as teaching children at home, advantages, which homeschool proponents fail to get. Students taught at home might be isolated. If not communicated with their peers, children may become diffident and without a doubt in their adulthood they will not be able to interact with other people easily and it is imaginable that they are more vulnerable to against social ills than those who have experienced presence in schools. Attending schools and socializing with various people, children can broaden their minds as opposed to those who spend their time just with a teacher at home or at most with their few siblings. In conclusion, I would argue that if parents let their children go to school, in fact they have given them a chance them to encounter different situations independently so that they can stand on their own foot. Not only can they learn a variety of skills in at those educational environments, but also it develops their self-steem steam and deter them from being spoiled. Arefeh

International Cooperation for Solving Problems, Hossein Talebi

2017-01-06T12:50:05+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays most of the urgent problems can only be solved through international cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Our world is becoming more like a global village, and it seems that every issue anywhere around the world affects all the countries more or less. Therefore, the idea that tackling such a situations everywhere on the earth needs an international effort to be addressed, has been emphasized recently. Many sociologists believe that dealing with the pressing problems urgent events which have been occurred for any government is incumbent on all other countries, inasmuch as their adverse effects of such problems sooner or later will be felt/seen/experienced noteworthy not only in that particular region, district, but also and even in physically far countries. For example, the current war in Syria has not only impacted the life of Syrians people, but also an the immense/huge/considerable/large/vast number of refugees have become became a burden on European countries which are targeted by locals of war-torn provinces who have lost their shelter. Experts assert that if other countries, especially European ones, had have helped the government of Syria to tackle the rebels from the beginning, they would never have encountered with the problem of numerous war displaced persons. On the other hand, some people are of the opinion that any no effort in should be spared to solvinge problems which happen to other countries might be interpreted as considered as interfering in their internal affairs private issues. For instance, the government of Syria has accused the United Nations organization and some other countries of interposing its civil/internal war with opponents, and arming them against central administration of the country. Besides, many critics claim that interference of other nations, financially or militarily physically, in such events not only would not help to eradicate the issue, but also will lead to a chaos in to sorting out the problem. From my point of view, intruding into events which others have encountered with suddenly without their permission or awareness will fail to address the problem. However, under certain circumstances that a disaster stricken nation obviously could not help itself to survive or people are massacred, United Nations organization and other countries are responsible for to controling the situation even by means of using military forces. Although such actions might not return everything back to the previous state, at least they it can cut down the gravity of the rate of consequences.To conclude, I certainly believe that some urgent problems need a global support to struggle with. Therefore, all the countries should join forces their hands to resolve such events in conditions where that it they would become internationally hard to solve problems.

Learning Foreign Language, Maryam Ahadpour

2017-01-06T12:49:45+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

TOPIC: Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Nowadays, it is widely believed that studying a foreign language at primary schools is more effective than secondary schools as opposed to traditional practices. Drawbacks and benefits of this topic will be covered in this essay. On the one hand, proponents of this view argue that there are many reasons behind of their claims. The most important one is about a recent research which . It reveals that children between 5-9 ages have a greater opportunity to learn new languages. They have the capacity to remember a new language twice as fast as people from other age groups, so . So they can easily pick up the right pronunciation and try to copy it as they are less self-conscious. Naturally, not only are children more curious, but also they are eager to learn new things in this period their tender age. Moreover, givinge the special care and settlinge down a proper curriculum could be profitable for them in this regard. On the other hand, opponents argue/hold/maintain discuss that it could be a waste of time since children need to focus on other subjects such as math and their own mother tongue language. If they have to learn a new language in primary school, they will be loaded with tonnes of irrelevant homework everyday instead of allocating time to studying more useful subjects. Sometimes, children show disrespect and lack of interest in towards foreign languages due to increased workload in schools. Consequently, they may develop a negative attitude toward in learning, especially towards language learning. Furthermore, children may get confused because of learning many languages at the same time which leads to havinge a negative impact on their development. Looking at the points discussed above, we can come to the conclusion that the advantages of learning a foreign language at an early age outweigh the disadvantages and I would argue that children's language acquisition talents innate abilities should be harnessed to make countries more prosperous.

New Stories on TV and in Newspaper are Very Often Accompanied by Pictures, Maryam Attarzoghi

2017-01-06T12:49:14+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are most more effective than words. What is your opinion about this? Fulfilling in order to fulfil the purpose of conveying a new message to the audience, the mass media implement several strategies. Some people uphold the assertion that images are more effective compared with any written material. Similarly, it is agreed that these visual depictions possess stronger effects, as having long-lasting impacts on viewers’ minds as well as containing more details in less space, which are the contributory factors in proving to prove the efficacy of the role of photos in the media. One of the main missions to be accomplished by TV and the printed media is to leave deep-rooted impression/effects on people’s minds. For instance, commercial advertisements tend to use images rather than words. According to a psychological research, twice as easy as text, photos are committed to the memory. That is, pictures contain shapes and colors which can be easily memorized. Simply put, the more they are utilizedestablished, the longer the influence on viewers’ mind will result. In addition, narrating a story, words are occupying more space to cover the whole details, as opposed to images, in which case. In this case, these illustrations are more likely to fulfill the portrayal of a specific story in more limited space. For example, the comic magazines and newspapers prefer to use more photos not only for consuming fewer papers and savinge more of those, but also to encourage their readersspectators to follow the whole narrative, because just %5 of the readers read an article, but almost all the photos get noticed. In other words, photos carrying more data leads to trapping the readers in a glimpse. This cause renders people disinclined to read the words for gaining more information. In a nutshell, the media transmits the information to the society members apace by establishing more pictures. In my view, because of the more technological advances, people are getting used to less wordy materials, hence facing the photo-based media in a foreseeable future.

Traditional Culture, Faegheh

2017-01-06T12:48:55+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that adults should follow their traditional culture. Others, however, think that it is not necessary in the modern society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. The function of culture is to enrich national identity and it has/plays an incredible role in all societies. However, we could not ignore the affection effect/impact of technology in our modern life. I would start the discussion about my country "Iran" which is . Iran is one a country with a rich culture. Other countries maybe do not want/ or may not desire or cannot be proud of this kind of civilization, but we should honor our great civilization. what strikes me most is that despite thee cultural diversity, we have enjoyed a good understanding among different ethnicities.the diversity of the culture whereas It was strengthen understanding among wide variety ethnic groups whom lived in this country since long years ago. There are questions as to why tradition is significant. Traditions give us a sense of connection with the past; it they can bring people together and reminds us of the memories that we share. Customs promote national integration for their a nation's people. A considerable achievement of customs is ensuring social stability. Besides, another theory was developed which posits that and it was being modern and living with new lifestyles are is more important than ancient/traditional lifestyle. I think this hypothesis it was has arisen just because of people who were was being uptodate and become more trendy. Moreover, we do not want to lose interest in enjoying higher standards of living due to traditions. Not only should we not maintain the status quo, but also we should make a leap forward. In a nutshell, traditional culture is rooted in our existence and is as important as modernity. We should equally give equal more attention to both parts and it takes some adjustments. Traditions transmit accepted values to future generations and modern life has made our lives easier and more comfortable.