Fridays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/181-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-08-28 2024-05-04T05:43:13+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Change, Arefeh 2016-11-18T14:24:33+00:00 2016-11-18T14:24:33+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/181-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-08-28/1008-change-arefeh <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Change, Arefeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding changes. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Over the last half century the high pace of change has become an undeniably bound up fact in the life of human beings. This has been impelled by technological and scientific breakthroughs which are altering our whole life almost in its all aspects. In this regard, some have a tendency to remain with their old habits and shun new experiences while others welcome the change with open arms since they consider it a progress. Usually counter-change people who seem conventional tend to abide by the past and fail to try new comings like achievements of technology which are included new media, gadgets, virtual networks, and much more besides. Although this group is probably the people who preserve our traditions, customs and also they maintain many culturale aspects alive, as a matter of fact they avoid involving in risk. Not only will they not assay a novel phenomenon, but also they prefer to stick to accustomed matters, because they feel they have achieved some security by doing the same, familiar things. By contrast, advocates of change who are often pragmatic believe that change is inevitable and based on that approach they are willing to keep pace with their speed up with change, in another words, they try to benefit from that. For example, the invention of the computer as a technological development is a change that has had many positive impacts on our lifestyle which if we ignored it we will certainly lose numerous advantages such as decent /good jobs, quality methods of studying and even new enjoyable applications, for we refuse to acquaint ourselves with their application.how those apply. In conclusion, I would argue that change can be an incentive and a positive reinforcement for individuals when they opt for a greater good. However, it can be detrimental if it leads to people neglecting of their traditional patterns of living. Arefeh</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Change, Arefeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding changes. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Over the last half century the high pace of change has become an undeniably bound up fact in the life of human beings. This has been impelled by technological and scientific breakthroughs which are altering our whole life almost in its all aspects. In this regard, some have a tendency to remain with their old habits and shun new experiences while others welcome the change with open arms since they consider it a progress. Usually counter-change people who seem conventional tend to abide by the past and fail to try new comings like achievements of technology which are included new media, gadgets, virtual networks, and much more besides. Although this group is probably the people who preserve our traditions, customs and also they maintain many culturale aspects alive, as a matter of fact they avoid involving in risk. Not only will they not assay a novel phenomenon, but also they prefer to stick to accustomed matters, because they feel they have achieved some security by doing the same, familiar things. By contrast, advocates of change who are often pragmatic believe that change is inevitable and based on that approach they are willing to keep pace with their speed up with change, in another words, they try to benefit from that. For example, the invention of the computer as a technological development is a change that has had many positive impacts on our lifestyle which if we ignored it we will certainly lose numerous advantages such as decent /good jobs, quality methods of studying and even new enjoyable applications, for we refuse to acquaint ourselves with their application.how those apply. In conclusion, I would argue that change can be an incentive and a positive reinforcement for individuals when they opt for a greater good. However, it can be detrimental if it leads to people neglecting of their traditional patterns of living. Arefeh</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Children VS. Diseases , Maryam Ghavamian 2016-11-18T14:24:19+00:00 2016-11-18T14:24:19+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/181-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-08-28/1007-children-vs-diseases-maryam-ghavamian <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Children VS. Diseases , Maryam Ghavamian.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Maryam Ghavamian Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immune their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children? According to a the recent study in science and medical enhancements, vaccines are one of the most vital human-made inventions tackling a wide range of fatal diseases .Nevertheless, some parents refuse to vaccinate their children for various reasons , the rights of decision-making by parents should be taken by law to provide medical care for a child. Some parents skip vaccinating their children which leads to their offspring facing the preventable illnesses. Unfortunately, the families with low levels of education might have been misled by faulty information hearing from friends and neighbors. There are also the other groups of families fearing of the gentle side effects which are produceding by vaccines such as fever, they held hold the mistaken belief that not only might these might have benefits for the babies’ health but they also would trigger some diseases such as Autism. Although, individuals have absolute authority to make all decisions for their children, it would be more beneficial to take the medical-decisions away from the families which might put the children at risk of death .Firstly, these basic illnesses prevented protecting by vaccines contribute to a better life as an adult and prevention of preventing of becoming an epidemic in the next generation. For instance, chicken pox has not been seen as a fatal disease factor. Secondly ,the more prevention with lower cost ,the more budgets for to investment in other medical aspects such as coping with modern diseases such as AIDS with even frightening name known as a growing death killed factor in recent years or manufacturing the complicated medical instruments in diagnosing the unknown diseases in human body. Finally ,If these simple preventable illnesses were not have not been controlled in the past at in an early age, the adults who are now involved might provide other problems in society and even for families. ,consequently ,this would be the government's s’ responsibility to take care of them in hospitals or medical care centers .furthermore ,they would need some technological facilities to live like as other citizens who which all impose have excessive expenditures for states. Maryam Ghavamian In conclusion, immunization of the children by vaccine is one of the most important medical achievements which has had significant impact on longevity/life span/life expectancy /the length of human life, so it would be preferable to be assured all children would benefit from this important action it by introducing posing laws and taking the rights of decision-making away from parents who might neglect it for various reasons.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Children VS. Diseases , Maryam Ghavamian.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Maryam Ghavamian Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immune their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children? According to a the recent study in science and medical enhancements, vaccines are one of the most vital human-made inventions tackling a wide range of fatal diseases .Nevertheless, some parents refuse to vaccinate their children for various reasons , the rights of decision-making by parents should be taken by law to provide medical care for a child. Some parents skip vaccinating their children which leads to their offspring facing the preventable illnesses. Unfortunately, the families with low levels of education might have been misled by faulty information hearing from friends and neighbors. There are also the other groups of families fearing of the gentle side effects which are produceding by vaccines such as fever, they held hold the mistaken belief that not only might these might have benefits for the babies’ health but they also would trigger some diseases such as Autism. Although, individuals have absolute authority to make all decisions for their children, it would be more beneficial to take the medical-decisions away from the families which might put the children at risk of death .Firstly, these basic illnesses prevented protecting by vaccines contribute to a better life as an adult and prevention of preventing of becoming an epidemic in the next generation. For instance, chicken pox has not been seen as a fatal disease factor. Secondly ,the more prevention with lower cost ,the more budgets for to investment in other medical aspects such as coping with modern diseases such as AIDS with even frightening name known as a growing death killed factor in recent years or manufacturing the complicated medical instruments in diagnosing the unknown diseases in human body. Finally ,If these simple preventable illnesses were not have not been controlled in the past at in an early age, the adults who are now involved might provide other problems in society and even for families. ,consequently ,this would be the government's s’ responsibility to take care of them in hospitals or medical care centers .furthermore ,they would need some technological facilities to live like as other citizens who which all impose have excessive expenditures for states. Maryam Ghavamian In conclusion, immunization of the children by vaccine is one of the most important medical achievements which has had significant impact on longevity/life span/life expectancy /the length of human life, so it would be preferable to be assured all children would benefit from this important action it by introducing posing laws and taking the rights of decision-making away from parents who might neglect it for various reasons.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Comfortable Life, Mehdi Samimi 2016-11-18T14:24:03+00:00 2016-11-18T14:24:03+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/181-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-08-28/1006-comfortable-life-mehdi-samimi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Comfortable Life, Mehdi Samimi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? "Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children." Nowadays, with the advances in technology, human’s life has evolved in several aspects. There is no room for doubt that this changes have had a significant positive effects on our lives and has made it easier, however, there are individuals who claim that these advancements are drawbacks and our previous generations lead easier life. In my point of view, I personally think that the life is more satisfying in these days. Firstly, thanks to the scientific research and developments in this area it has been proofed that the medium life expectancy has been dramatically increased through decades. Based on a study conducted by FSU college of social sciences, the senior citizens of a specific neighborhood claims that within their adulthood they have experience a more comfortable life than those of their young ages, so by given explanation I think that it is obvious that we are living in an era that the hardships and difficulties has minimized. Secondly, one might argue that we as a human kind are facing with a mechanical life that has influence our lives in many aspects which has consequently lead us to face with plenty of challenging situations and that our grandparents has easier lives. I think that although there are definitely some drawbacks with these improvements the advantages far outweigh its downsides. Moreover, previous generations were facing with some serious difficulties namely as child labor, illiteracy, poverty and so on which are not completely eradicate yet, but the improvements in these areas are significant. In a nutshell, as mentioned earlier although technology and its results have had some negative effects on our lives, the upsides cannot be denied anyway and it outweigh the drawbacks, so however, there are still room for improvements, the type of challenges and difficulties has change in a way which has consequently made life easier than before.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Comfortable Life, Mehdi Samimi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? "Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children." Nowadays, with the advances in technology, human’s life has evolved in several aspects. There is no room for doubt that this changes have had a significant positive effects on our lives and has made it easier, however, there are individuals who claim that these advancements are drawbacks and our previous generations lead easier life. In my point of view, I personally think that the life is more satisfying in these days. Firstly, thanks to the scientific research and developments in this area it has been proofed that the medium life expectancy has been dramatically increased through decades. Based on a study conducted by FSU college of social sciences, the senior citizens of a specific neighborhood claims that within their adulthood they have experience a more comfortable life than those of their young ages, so by given explanation I think that it is obvious that we are living in an era that the hardships and difficulties has minimized. Secondly, one might argue that we as a human kind are facing with a mechanical life that has influence our lives in many aspects which has consequently lead us to face with plenty of challenging situations and that our grandparents has easier lives. I think that although there are definitely some drawbacks with these improvements the advantages far outweigh its downsides. Moreover, previous generations were facing with some serious difficulties namely as child labor, illiteracy, poverty and so on which are not completely eradicate yet, but the improvements in these areas are significant. In a nutshell, as mentioned earlier although technology and its results have had some negative effects on our lives, the upsides cannot be denied anyway and it outweigh the drawbacks, so however, there are still room for improvements, the type of challenges and difficulties has change in a way which has consequently made life easier than before.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Powerful International Companies, Hossein Talebi 2016-11-18T14:23:44+00:00 2016-11-18T14:23:44+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/181-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-08-28/1005-powerful-international-companies-hossein-talebi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Powerful International Companies, Hossein Talebi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some international companies are very powerful now and many people believe that it is a negative development. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your reasons and relevant examples. The prosperity of some world-spread companies has made some people suspicious as to whether this expansion is beneficial or not, and this doubt has sparked a heated debate between economists and sociologists. On the one side, economists believe that not only have products and service which are provided by such multi-national corporations benefited individuals all around the world, but also their contributed efforts have given gave rise to magnificent competitive attempts. For example, some famous trade-marks, like Apple, have now become are now became as a role-model for other thriving cellphone handset manufacturers as well as the fact that people are blessed with iPhone as a useful device. On the contrary, sociologists assert that not only are mega companies preparing prerequisites to make other competitors to fail in production, but also they tend to attract all customers to their own products by malicious activities. The bigger they grow, more they get bigger, the keener more they become keen on monopoly of other commercial branches. After a while, there will be just one producer which people have been forced unconsciously to buy its merchandise. Therefore, the customer right will become a fairy tale, and the commercial competition would be mentioned as if it has been a legend from the very first day. From my perspective, both sides’ considerations are noticeably correct. Such companies could be disadvantageous while they are profitable. In the beginning, they all try to be innovative and attractive, whereas after spreading broadening their domination on the targeted consumers, trying to delete other opponents, they change skin and turn into a commercial monster which swallows other competing manufacturers. To sum up, I give sociologists the right to be worried about such developments. However, in conditions where that a supervising authority could control the legitimacy of actions of international companies and parallelism of their goals with society’s eventual/ultimate goals/targets which are people’s welfare and satisfaction, such concerns could be addressed.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Powerful International Companies, Hossein Talebi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some international companies are very powerful now and many people believe that it is a negative development. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your reasons and relevant examples. The prosperity of some world-spread companies has made some people suspicious as to whether this expansion is beneficial or not, and this doubt has sparked a heated debate between economists and sociologists. On the one side, economists believe that not only have products and service which are provided by such multi-national corporations benefited individuals all around the world, but also their contributed efforts have given gave rise to magnificent competitive attempts. For example, some famous trade-marks, like Apple, have now become are now became as a role-model for other thriving cellphone handset manufacturers as well as the fact that people are blessed with iPhone as a useful device. On the contrary, sociologists assert that not only are mega companies preparing prerequisites to make other competitors to fail in production, but also they tend to attract all customers to their own products by malicious activities. The bigger they grow, more they get bigger, the keener more they become keen on monopoly of other commercial branches. After a while, there will be just one producer which people have been forced unconsciously to buy its merchandise. Therefore, the customer right will become a fairy tale, and the commercial competition would be mentioned as if it has been a legend from the very first day. From my perspective, both sides’ considerations are noticeably correct. Such companies could be disadvantageous while they are profitable. In the beginning, they all try to be innovative and attractive, whereas after spreading broadening their domination on the targeted consumers, trying to delete other opponents, they change skin and turn into a commercial monster which swallows other competing manufacturers. To sum up, I give sociologists the right to be worried about such developments. However, in conditions where that a supervising authority could control the legitimacy of actions of international companies and parallelism of their goals with society’s eventual/ultimate goals/targets which are people’s welfare and satisfaction, such concerns could be addressed.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Rural Area, Farnaz 2016-11-18T14:23:27+00:00 2016-11-18T14:23:27+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/181-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-08-28/1004-rural-area-farnaz <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Rural Area, Farnaz.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many people leave their homes in the countryside to live in large cities What factors make people want to move to the city? How realistic is it to control the numbers of people moving to the city? Throughout history, humans have been seeking better life conditions due to their inherent nature characters. Although it has several benefits for individuals and it is not void of profits for a distantce city, the quality of life in the host country probably degrades as a result of growing population. In this essay, I will attempt to indicate factors which consequently lead to local immigration. Besides, we will have a brief argument around the issue of controlling this entrance. On the one hand, there are varieties of push factors leading to immigration. Natural disasters, food crisis, low incomes and lack of educational facilities and welfare. Most of the rural areas especially in developing countries suffer from the lack of primary life condition. Therefore, their citizens prefer to live in an area which guarantees their foods, pure water and their job prospective. On the other hand, the impacts of pull factors are undeniable. People are seeking a better labor market, higher wages and living standard, leave their hometown and immigrate to the urban areas. Furthermore, the desirable level of accommodation and recreational facilities are enough attractive enough to give up their father’s land and look for a better life. Personally, I believe that it is not both unrealistic and inhumane humanitarian to limit the movement invasion of population from rural areas to urban ones. Everybody has the right to utilize their country’s facilities as equally to their counterparts. The only measure to control urban sprawl associated with local immigration is to distribute facilities fairly all around the country. To sum up, despite the increasing megacities’ population, it is not fair to stop rural people from entering cities. The only way is to deliberate on the reasons of local immigration and offer solutions in preference to this illogical control.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Rural Area, Farnaz.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many people leave their homes in the countryside to live in large cities What factors make people want to move to the city? How realistic is it to control the numbers of people moving to the city? Throughout history, humans have been seeking better life conditions due to their inherent nature characters. Although it has several benefits for individuals and it is not void of profits for a distantce city, the quality of life in the host country probably degrades as a result of growing population. In this essay, I will attempt to indicate factors which consequently lead to local immigration. Besides, we will have a brief argument around the issue of controlling this entrance. On the one hand, there are varieties of push factors leading to immigration. Natural disasters, food crisis, low incomes and lack of educational facilities and welfare. Most of the rural areas especially in developing countries suffer from the lack of primary life condition. Therefore, their citizens prefer to live in an area which guarantees their foods, pure water and their job prospective. On the other hand, the impacts of pull factors are undeniable. People are seeking a better labor market, higher wages and living standard, leave their hometown and immigrate to the urban areas. Furthermore, the desirable level of accommodation and recreational facilities are enough attractive enough to give up their father’s land and look for a better life. Personally, I believe that it is not both unrealistic and inhumane humanitarian to limit the movement invasion of population from rural areas to urban ones. Everybody has the right to utilize their country’s facilities as equally to their counterparts. The only measure to control urban sprawl associated with local immigration is to distribute facilities fairly all around the country. To sum up, despite the increasing megacities’ population, it is not fair to stop rural people from entering cities. The only way is to deliberate on the reasons of local immigration and offer solutions in preference to this illogical control.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Team-work or Working Alone, Mehdi Samimi 2016-11-18T14:23:09+00:00 2016-11-18T14:23:09+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/181-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-08-28/1003-team-work-or-working-alone-mehdi-samimi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Team-work or Working Alone, Mehdi Samimi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Team-work or working alone? It has been one of the most controversial disputes/ disputations between psychologists and behavioral sciences experts recently. Some educationalists thinks that by working together in a team students can gain more invaluable knowledge and learn efficiently. However, there are peoples who thinks that by working alone one can be more result oriented and have better results than those of in a team. In my opinion, I think that by working together students can be more effective. Firstly, when teachers assign a group of students to work on a project, not only do the students learn from each other's experiences and knowledge, but they will find out found out how to address an issue on more sophisticated situations and know how to cope with difficulties in a group. Based on a study conducted by JIS/RIT School of behavioral sciences, the students who which have has had more experiences working within a group were was more successful gaining crucial information and consequently within their career. Moreover, when students work together on a project or a research they can share their ideas and knowledge in a certain area, so they learn from one another each other’s in order to make the a best decision for the outcome of a project or research. On the other hand, however, one might say that when individuals work together, there is plenty of are a myriad of wasted time arguing with other members of a group, so when peoples work on their own they are more successful and more result oriented. Although from my points of view, working alone has it’s its own merits, working in a group has its own upsides and students are more passionate to work on a project when they observe that their efforts are vital for the an outcome of a project. In a nutshell, I personally think that the advantages of working in a group far outweigh the upsides those of working alone on a project. By giving the opportunity to students working together not only would they would learn more effectively, but also they we could develop a sense of responsibility and managing conflicts in them, so from my own experiences I can draw a conclusion that team working is a more rational approach towards teaching(edifying?) the essential information to the for students.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Team-work or Working Alone, Mehdi Samimi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Team-work or working alone? It has been one of the most controversial disputes/ disputations between psychologists and behavioral sciences experts recently. Some educationalists thinks that by working together in a team students can gain more invaluable knowledge and learn efficiently. However, there are peoples who thinks that by working alone one can be more result oriented and have better results than those of in a team. In my opinion, I think that by working together students can be more effective. Firstly, when teachers assign a group of students to work on a project, not only do the students learn from each other's experiences and knowledge, but they will find out found out how to address an issue on more sophisticated situations and know how to cope with difficulties in a group. Based on a study conducted by JIS/RIT School of behavioral sciences, the students who which have has had more experiences working within a group were was more successful gaining crucial information and consequently within their career. Moreover, when students work together on a project or a research they can share their ideas and knowledge in a certain area, so they learn from one another each other’s in order to make the a best decision for the outcome of a project or research. On the other hand, however, one might say that when individuals work together, there is plenty of are a myriad of wasted time arguing with other members of a group, so when peoples work on their own they are more successful and more result oriented. Although from my points of view, working alone has it’s its own merits, working in a group has its own upsides and students are more passionate to work on a project when they observe that their efforts are vital for the an outcome of a project. In a nutshell, I personally think that the advantages of working in a group far outweigh the upsides those of working alone on a project. By giving the opportunity to students working together not only would they would learn more effectively, but also they we could develop a sense of responsibility and managing conflicts in them, so from my own experiences I can draw a conclusion that team working is a more rational approach towards teaching(edifying?) the essential information to the for students.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Unemployment Insurance, Yes or No, Sarang Rose 2016-11-18T14:22:54+00:00 2016-11-18T14:22:54+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/181-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-08-28/1002-unemployment-insurance-yes-or-no-sarang-rose <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Unemployment Insurance, Yes or No, Sarang Rose.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Task: In some countries, people who are unemployed receive a sum of money each week in the form of a benefit. While some support this, other people believe that this money should not be given. Discuss both points of view and give your own point of view. Paying money to the jobless is a controversial issue among the experts. While there are persuasive arguments in favor of that, others believe that it is not a proper policy, inasmuch as this attitude creates a huge amount number of problems. My personal conviction in this regard is not different from the second group. Advocates claim that in many countries the high rate of the unemployment is a consequence of wrong political decisions among the governments who are generally responsible for creating a job opportunitiesy, so it is incumbent on the politicians to financially support the out- of- work individuals. Moreover, in some countries recession is a pivotal key in causing job losses.making individuals to be jobless. In these countries companies are forced to cutbacks the number of (employees who are responsible for) breadwinners(families’ expenditure(expenses)). Thus, from proponents’ perspective, support from governments is a must to prevent families from breaking. Opponents, on the other hand, assert that such policies would lead to laziness(paying a sum of money has many drawbacks. They believe that this attitude can make many jobless people lazy, )for they do not feel any financial pressure/problems, so they will shirk responsibility regarding finding a job. In addition, critics claim that this policy/practice can create a considerable amount number of dissatisfaction among both employers and employees who believe that they pay taxes in order to enhance the quality of facilities in society. however, their taxes support the jobless who are not applying for a job since they earn an easy money. In conclusion, I firmly hold the opinion that governments who support this idea should strike a balance in this case. Simply put, they should restrict their help in order to encourage the jobless to look for a job as well as having them not relying on this income as a life- time warranty.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Unemployment Insurance, Yes or No, Sarang Rose.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Task: In some countries, people who are unemployed receive a sum of money each week in the form of a benefit. While some support this, other people believe that this money should not be given. Discuss both points of view and give your own point of view. Paying money to the jobless is a controversial issue among the experts. While there are persuasive arguments in favor of that, others believe that it is not a proper policy, inasmuch as this attitude creates a huge amount number of problems. My personal conviction in this regard is not different from the second group. Advocates claim that in many countries the high rate of the unemployment is a consequence of wrong political decisions among the governments who are generally responsible for creating a job opportunitiesy, so it is incumbent on the politicians to financially support the out- of- work individuals. Moreover, in some countries recession is a pivotal key in causing job losses.making individuals to be jobless. In these countries companies are forced to cutbacks the number of (employees who are responsible for) breadwinners(families’ expenditure(expenses)). Thus, from proponents’ perspective, support from governments is a must to prevent families from breaking. Opponents, on the other hand, assert that such policies would lead to laziness(paying a sum of money has many drawbacks. They believe that this attitude can make many jobless people lazy, )for they do not feel any financial pressure/problems, so they will shirk responsibility regarding finding a job. In addition, critics claim that this policy/practice can create a considerable amount number of dissatisfaction among both employers and employees who believe that they pay taxes in order to enhance the quality of facilities in society. however, their taxes support the jobless who are not applying for a job since they earn an easy money. In conclusion, I firmly hold the opinion that governments who support this idea should strike a balance in this case. Simply put, they should restrict their help in order to encourage the jobless to look for a job as well as having them not relying on this income as a life- time warranty.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> University, Vahid Tavazoei 2016-11-18T14:22:38+00:00 2016-11-18T14:22:38+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/181-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-08-28/1001-university-vahid-tavazoei <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/University, Vahid Tavazoei.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace .others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake. regardless of whether the course is useful to an employer. Generally speaking the literacy and knowledge play a main role in our future such that one could have this chance to be a winner in the tough competitions especially in the workplace. Many people believe that the education in university must be related to one's ’s future occupation. However, the others say that the nature of knowledge must be significant regardless of what kind of relationship there is between the workplace and education. What we will be addressing in this essay is the discussion about the influence of educational based concentration and preparation of jobseekers before landing/finding/getting/obtaining a related job on their effectiveness which as far as the writer’s concerned there is a direct bearing between them and there is going to be clarified as below. It's an inevitable fact that when there is spoken the more concentrated one is, the more effective and successful one he/she is in the workplace. regarding this matter the role of suitable and needed prerequisites such as related former education are highlighted which lead jobseekers to claim for a the better position such as manag management ing in white color jobs in high level vocational classes due to direct relationship between mentally preparation and concentration which is affected by the level of linked education while the majority of people have lots of problems owing to lack of preparation before getting a job. Secondly, when one takes the job related to one's course in the university it is not only beneficial for employers to cut the expenses of education which is required during the job, but also it is really helpful for employees regarding passing taking practical courses which makes them knowledgeable know-how enough to be successful in their future job. Finally, psychologically speaking people could find their self-belief and release their mind in the stressful ambience of job derived from tough competition regardless of how long their courses were just by consideration of this feeling they passed related course so they have stronger CV to offer to their employers though, admittedly, the more competent and qualified in passing a course one is, the more dexterous one he/she is during one's their job. To sum up, it's crystal clear when it is the positive role of mental and practical preparation is addressed the positive role of mentally and practically preparation for landing a related job which could be derived however educated and skilled one is in advance which shows the vital role of the related education for paving the way of getting suitable job. The more prepared and concentrated you are, the better paved the way for progress. v@hid t@vazoei</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/University, Vahid Tavazoei.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace .others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake. regardless of whether the course is useful to an employer. Generally speaking the literacy and knowledge play a main role in our future such that one could have this chance to be a winner in the tough competitions especially in the workplace. Many people believe that the education in university must be related to one's ’s future occupation. However, the others say that the nature of knowledge must be significant regardless of what kind of relationship there is between the workplace and education. What we will be addressing in this essay is the discussion about the influence of educational based concentration and preparation of jobseekers before landing/finding/getting/obtaining a related job on their effectiveness which as far as the writer’s concerned there is a direct bearing between them and there is going to be clarified as below. It's an inevitable fact that when there is spoken the more concentrated one is, the more effective and successful one he/she is in the workplace. regarding this matter the role of suitable and needed prerequisites such as related former education are highlighted which lead jobseekers to claim for a the better position such as manag management ing in white color jobs in high level vocational classes due to direct relationship between mentally preparation and concentration which is affected by the level of linked education while the majority of people have lots of problems owing to lack of preparation before getting a job. Secondly, when one takes the job related to one's course in the university it is not only beneficial for employers to cut the expenses of education which is required during the job, but also it is really helpful for employees regarding passing taking practical courses which makes them knowledgeable know-how enough to be successful in their future job. Finally, psychologically speaking people could find their self-belief and release their mind in the stressful ambience of job derived from tough competition regardless of how long their courses were just by consideration of this feeling they passed related course so they have stronger CV to offer to their employers though, admittedly, the more competent and qualified in passing a course one is, the more dexterous one he/she is during one's their job. To sum up, it's crystal clear when it is the positive role of mental and practical preparation is addressed the positive role of mentally and practically preparation for landing a related job which could be derived however educated and skilled one is in advance which shows the vital role of the related education for paving the way of getting suitable job. The more prepared and concentrated you are, the better paved the way for progress. v@hid t@vazoei</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> University's Degrees, Ineluctable or Not, Morteza 2016-11-18T14:22:23+00:00 2016-11-18T14:22:23+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/181-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-08-28/1000-university-s-degrees-ineluctable-or-not-morteza <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/University's Degrees, Ineluctable or Not, Morteza.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Morteza Nemti Writing Task II #5 Some people think that to lead a successful life a university degree is important. Others believe that this is no longer true nowadays. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Graduation/education has been widely thought of as a secure way to build one’s life up on. However firm this foundation may be beheld by its advocates, the higher the educated unemployment, the more they will rethink going for academic titles. From In my point of view, what one does to graduate not only helps them afford their life, but also enhances their logical thinking which could be a worthwhile an achievement to pursue. For long, it has been extensively believed and asserted that society needs a variety of jobs many of which do not demand a highly-educated holder. That is why in most communities a majority of people do not seem to be keen on learning anything else other than what would end up with in a higher salary, but it is not not is it fair to exclude anyone from the advantages of being academically educated in the name of their needlessness to higher degrees, neither the only benefit of holding a university degree is a better employment and nor is even success in life is limited to getting or holding down a desirable job. Given the many years that university title holders have to spend learning how to find answers to all questions they face, the public opinion should arrive at the fact that a graduation is not merely (or exclusively?) a university title. It is also a capacity to find better answers to formerly answered questions as well as a gained ability to choose from opportunities wisely while decisively. These are the skills the combination of which will result in living a life of success. In my opinion, although some jobs do not require an academic title, a winning life is far beyond holding an intended job to afford life with. Graduation could not be summarized in its earned degree. It represents formative years of having been asked questions and of practicing on collecting, organizing and using data to answer them, hence the correlation between passing university courses and accomplishing life goals.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/University's Degrees, Ineluctable or Not, Morteza.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Morteza Nemti Writing Task II #5 Some people think that to lead a successful life a university degree is important. Others believe that this is no longer true nowadays. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Graduation/education has been widely thought of as a secure way to build one’s life up on. However firm this foundation may be beheld by its advocates, the higher the educated unemployment, the more they will rethink going for academic titles. From In my point of view, what one does to graduate not only helps them afford their life, but also enhances their logical thinking which could be a worthwhile an achievement to pursue. For long, it has been extensively believed and asserted that society needs a variety of jobs many of which do not demand a highly-educated holder. That is why in most communities a majority of people do not seem to be keen on learning anything else other than what would end up with in a higher salary, but it is not not is it fair to exclude anyone from the advantages of being academically educated in the name of their needlessness to higher degrees, neither the only benefit of holding a university degree is a better employment and nor is even success in life is limited to getting or holding down a desirable job. Given the many years that university title holders have to spend learning how to find answers to all questions they face, the public opinion should arrive at the fact that a graduation is not merely (or exclusively?) a university title. It is also a capacity to find better answers to formerly answered questions as well as a gained ability to choose from opportunities wisely while decisively. These are the skills the combination of which will result in living a life of success. In my opinion, although some jobs do not require an academic title, a winning life is far beyond holding an intended job to afford life with. Graduation could not be summarized in its earned degree. It represents formative years of having been asked questions and of practicing on collecting, organizing and using data to answer them, hence the correlation between passing university courses and accomplishing life goals.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Vegetarians, Maryam Attar 2016-11-18T14:22:06+00:00 2016-11-18T14:22:06+00:00 https://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/181-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-08-28/999-vegetarians-maryam-attar <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Vegetarians, Maryam Attar.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people choose to eat no meat or fish, they believe that this is not only for their own health, but also benefits the world as a whole. On the other hand there the others who disagree with these beliefs. Discuss these views and give your own opinion. With the medical research on the rise, people are becoming more health-conscious. In developed countries, in particular, large numbers of people take the precedence over watching their food ingredients. A High percentage of people believe not only are the poultry, red meat and fish not efficient nutritional sources, but also vegetables and herbal products provide proper nourishment for people. On the other hand, critics, who take issue with this belief, act entirely differently. From my perspective, both groups are entitled to their comments to some extent. Vegetarians, who take up special diet which mostly includes agricultural products such as pulses, vegetables, herbs and so forth, consider their choice on two fronts. Firstly, they believe the idea of killing animals for human needs is abhorrent; let alone for food purposes.????? They assert animals have the right to live on the earth without being endangered. Secondly, they argue that Nature reimburses us from other different sources. As I mentioned before, all the products which can be cultivated and planted are said to be the best supplants as they are well-nourished, healthy, stomach-friendly and reduce the risk of vast range of diseases. However, critics are not on the same page boat with vegetarians. They are do not attract to the taste of vegetables, neither do not they think that this kind of food can provide the whole essential vitamins, minerals or protein for body. From my perspective, it is expedient to follow a moderate diet in order to ensure ourselves ing of receiving complete package of essential nutrition factors. My strong conviction is that the decent way of being a picture of health, is avoid consuming synthetic and chemical food, instead of organic and healthy one. As an upshot, living a fast-paced life gives rise to healthy food ignorance, it is incumbent on us to moderately consume all organic food, hence avoiding extremism.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.08.28/Vegetarians, Maryam Attar.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people choose to eat no meat or fish, they believe that this is not only for their own health, but also benefits the world as a whole. On the other hand there the others who disagree with these beliefs. Discuss these views and give your own opinion. With the medical research on the rise, people are becoming more health-conscious. In developed countries, in particular, large numbers of people take the precedence over watching their food ingredients. A High percentage of people believe not only are the poultry, red meat and fish not efficient nutritional sources, but also vegetables and herbal products provide proper nourishment for people. On the other hand, critics, who take issue with this belief, act entirely differently. From my perspective, both groups are entitled to their comments to some extent. Vegetarians, who take up special diet which mostly includes agricultural products such as pulses, vegetables, herbs and so forth, consider their choice on two fronts. Firstly, they believe the idea of killing animals for human needs is abhorrent; let alone for food purposes.????? They assert animals have the right to live on the earth without being endangered. Secondly, they argue that Nature reimburses us from other different sources. As I mentioned before, all the products which can be cultivated and planted are said to be the best supplants as they are well-nourished, healthy, stomach-friendly and reduce the risk of vast range of diseases. However, critics are not on the same page boat with vegetarians. They are do not attract to the taste of vegetables, neither do not they think that this kind of food can provide the whole essential vitamins, minerals or protein for body. From my perspective, it is expedient to follow a moderate diet in order to ensure ourselves ing of receiving complete package of essential nutrition factors. My strong conviction is that the decent way of being a picture of health, is avoid consuming synthetic and chemical food, instead of organic and healthy one. As an upshot, living a fast-paced life gives rise to healthy food ignorance, it is incumbent on us to moderately consume all organic food, hence avoiding extremism.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>