جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Compared to previous generations, an increasing number of people are traveling overseas for holidays. Why is that? Is this a positive or negative trend? Nowadays the rate of outward journeys is faced with an steeply upward trend advanced incline. Many people tend to spend their days off abroad visiting other countries and communicating with foreign cultures. Social researchers believe that the development of passenger transporting facilities, such as aeroplanes and high‐speed trains, have has facilitated made trips more at ease and geographically far countries are now within easy reach.as reachable targets. In addition, the spread generalization of the internet has made the online overseas tours arrangement and accommodation so accessible possible that everybody even by a handset can book hotels and buy plane tickets of planes. Besides, web‐based communications have increased the number amount of photos and videos of tourist attractions which have been captured and transferred over the net which and this has raised the enthusiasm among audiences to visit landscapes all around the world. Despite the fact that critics mention a number of downsides, this upward inclination is of great benefit to travelers and target communities in terms of social, cultural and economic factors. The entering of a foreigner to any visiting country is a potential opportunity for both sides to improve their knowledge and share their experiences. Furthermore, visitors could help the society’s domestic economy by spending money for sight‐seeing and buying handicrafts as souvenir. Besides, the two‐way connection between hosts and guests would evolve their way of life and bring make their beliefs closer and more similar. Quite the contrary, this homogenizing process, from opponents’ point of view, would make the local /regional culture and language disappeared, and it is a meaningful drawback that must be considered. In a nutshell, whether the reason of the boost in tourism which has emerged is revealed is the convenient transportation means or the bombardment of persuading pictures and movies, I am optimistic about this trend and believe that its merits would outweigh overcome the disadvantages.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by government rather than individuals? To what extent do you agree or disagree? The damage to the environment is increasing at an alarming rate due to human activities. Even though, a great deal of effort is now being made by governments all over the word, individuals also have a major role to play in minimizing global environmental hazards. To begin with, one of the main reasons is uncontrolled use of automobiles; cutting down the use of private cars, and promoting the public transportation could be beneficial to/for decreasinge the air pollution,. Another proper vehicle could be bicycles; this striking, old vehicle not only reduces pollution, but also is a healthy exercise which prevents the risk of obesity. Another cause/reason sake of this unsavory matter is certainly industrialization. This issue is one of the fundamental causes which yields a lot of irreparable devastations to the environment and also is the origin of the staggering number existence of factories which produce many variable toxic and dangerous gases besides a huge volume of waste. Governments are liable to put pressure on manufacturers to produce more eco‐friendly products. Likewise, they can educate the people to use these kinds of commodities. The more educated people are, the more advantageous it is for the environment. Levying taxes on the factories which depositing the chemicals and poisonous emissions, governments with the cooperation of some relevant organizations also could be effective in beneficial to decreasinge detrimental waste. To sum up, if people collaborate/cooperateintegrate with the government and similarly think up some strategies, surely this kind of eco‐friendly efforts lead to a much more better and more considerable outcome. AREFE

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Task: some people say that cities are a better place for children to grow up in, while others believe countryside is the right choice. Discuss both views, give your own opinion and examples. Nowadays, people are more eager to live in urban areas, since they believe that this is the right place for nurturing their children, while others assert that the rural areas are more beneficial for growing up raising the children. From my point of view living in cities Is is a better choice for nurturing/bringing up/raising up children. Firstly, some claim that bringing up a child needs some primary/basic facilities and amenities which are easily in hand in cities. For instance, access to modern pedagogical centers and attending in extracurricular extra curriculum programs can be done easily in cities. In addition, because of the urban areas's lifestyle, the social skills of adolescents hone hole well. Besides the advantages of cities, there are some drawbacks in mega cities such as the high rate of felony and air pollution due to cars's harmful emissions which will be a threat to the individuals' adolescents' future and health. Secondly, Others, however, believe that the first issue regarding to children's nurturing is their health issue. Pollution in the country is quite less than that in cities, so children are more healthier in comparison with those in urban areas 's adolescents. On the one hand, due to the life style in countryside children are required to sharp their practical skills which can be useful for their future life. For example, they are required to know about gardening and housekeeping,. also they are more careful about the nature and animals since they are a part of their life. Nevertheless, living in rural areas has its own drawbacks. For instance, access to modern and well‐equipped medical centers is limited which is a must for caring for/ bringing up a child. Also in some remote areas there is not a qualified educational center or educated tutors. In conclusion, I believe that although living in the countryside has its own benefits, cities are a best choice for raising up children and its advantages outweigh its drawback.