جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Does travel help to promote understanding and communication between countries? In this fast‐changing world, travelling is more and more facile, thence/hence a large number of people around the world travel for visiting other countriesy,. Therefore, travelling is one of the best ways to enhance understanding and communication among countries. First of all, when you travel to another country, it seems troublesome to comprehend an unknown culture because it is totally contradistinctive from yours, but it could be fascinating and valuable to realize about different cultures and to learn about the customs and traditions. Moreover, travelling helps you to know other languages. In this way, we can have a better communication with a larger number quantity of people around the world. In the same way asAs though, in some countries pupils decide to have a summer trip to England not only for a visit and enjoy the life in the United Kingdom, but also for learning English. Eventually, travelling is the most effective way to introduce our products to other countries. These products including variant segments like an agricultureal, industriesial, art, literature literary, music. and Etc. furthermore, we can tell them about our own business and work with those countries on in a bigger scale. However, everything has two sides of the same coin. Under such circumstances To what extent, people swapping their culture during these trips and it causes countries to promote the communication. To sum up, I think it is to be true that communication and understanding between countries can improve by travelling. In addition, people have a chance to being more familiar with various aspects of life in dealing with various varietal/miscellaneous cultures.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Task: some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Nowadays there are many debates about when is the best time for pupils to begin learning a second language. While some specialists believe that primary school is the appropriate time, others think that the secondary school is better. I strongly side with the first group. Based on psychologists' findings founds the best time for learning is between 5 to 7 years. During this period/span In these ages pupils have a brain with little without any distraction which is ready to received data. Consequently, they are capable of learning to learned and memorizinged everything. For example when I compare I myself with my nephews who are at the in age of 8 to 10, they are really better both in either to remembering new words and or spelling. Moreover, as everybody knows making mistakes is a decisive factor in for learning especially for learning a foreign language, and children are less shy compared to rather than adults to make mistakes, consequently the lower the less age, the more learning. In addition, communication plays a pivotal role in building to build future society, and effective communication requires a common language. Thus, bilinguals played the main role in to building a new society. If we want to being able to speak two languages equally we need to learn them it like a mother language and it can be done if we start it in our formative years which . The formative years for human learning, based on psychologists' findings founds, is between 5‐7 or in other words at the beginning of primary school. As a conclusion, from in my point of view children can start the foreign language even before primary school, hence the benefits of learning second language at primary schools bring all the other drawbacks practically to almost zero.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The continued rise in the world's population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present time. What are the causes of this continued rise? Do you agree that it is the greatest problem faced by humanity? Medical achievements in the last century resulted in better cures for diseases and illnesses, so that more patients touched healthiness again and less death of sickness occurred. All these caused population rates to rise steadily and continuously and facing humankind with a new big problem called high population. Many say uncontrolled/unfettered headlong population growth needs more facilities and enormous quantities of infrastructures must be have provided for them. The more children, the need more schools, the more youth needs more living tools and the more elders need more insurance. Besides, society cannot fulfil all these requirements, whereas the number of demands grow up every minute. All these mentioned above issues point out the most serious challenge in the history of mankind. On the other hand, there are proponents of population increment which claim that every new person who steps in this world will start efforts for improvement of the present situation. In addition, the more working forces who trying to gain their portion in this ordered modern world will result in more production of foods and facilities that they need for daily life. The most important thing might be their management which is the government's duty. From my point of view, although population's irregular swelling will create enormous problems for civilians and the governments, this increment will result in magnificent achievements if this potential energy is have been directed and managed in the right order. I certainly believe that population controlling policies would be the last solution if there is not any predefined and prepared program for guiding the swelling general public in the body of society's directing powers and organizations. In a nutshell, population's growth would be the worst or and the best thing that could be happen for a society depending on the situation which that country is in. Hosein Talebi.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. It is an obvious truth that a serious problem of modern society is declining levels of health in the general population. A group of people believe that the best way to tackle this issue is that sport clubs should become easily accessible for everyone. However, others some other group of people think that some other facilities should be provided in order to improve people's state of health. Personally, I fundamentally agree with both views which will be discussed in this essay. Nowadays, everyone is busy earning money and working tremendous numbers of hours. Most of the jobs are physically demanding. additionally, they create mental strain. therefore, there should be a variety of sport activities offered to get everyone interested .Public funding has to go to building sport facilities and health clubs to increase availability and access for everyone. The government should install exercise equipment in parks so that consequently, every individual staff can realize their full potential and ordinary people become gradually healthier and happier. On the other hand, although exercise can prevent from severe illnesses, authorities should become aware of other determining factors which have a direct effect on the health too like either for instance; hospitals, healthy restaurants and organic agricultural products output and etc…and consider enough/sufficient government fund for these places items as well. Magazine's articles, television programs and really anything that can inspire people to be and stay healthy should be utilized. To sum up, if the government provides all these facilities in each district and motivates people to exercise and pay attention to their diet and health , the percentage of disease would will decrease, otherwise persons would plunge deeper and deeper into mental and physical illnesses.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages that disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment? Nowadays there are mainly two types of accommodation available in almost all the cities such as houses and apartments. In this case, some people like to live in a house , while others like to live in an apartment. I think living in a house or an apartment will have its own benefits as well as drawbacks to people. To begin with, I can say that one of the best things about having a house is its privacy which means having more opportunity of peace and quiet. Moreover, we cannot can not ignore its spaciousness in comparisone with apartments. Also, it is a good choice for those who are fond of having their own garden, pets, yard and playground for both themselves and their children. Although However living in a house has its own benefits mentioned above, we should not neglect its disadvantages. Indeed, as they are expensive to purchase and maintain, their security is lower and there is less no close relationship with neighbors. On the other hand, apartments have their own attraction for inhabitants. Although they do not have houses convenienceconvenient, people who live in a flat feel much personal security as there is always a guard at the entrance and they can go for a long trip with less worry, without any tension and as there are so many inhabitants who are living all in one specific place, children can easily find friends and can play in the ground without any problem. In addition, it is more cost effective, but living in a flat may also have some disadvantages, people do not have the needed privacy and such a space to enjoy the real life. To sum up, I have to say that the best type of accommodation depends on different circumstances and personal preferences even though I personally prefer living in an apartment at this stage.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many people believe that healthy eating and the importance of healthy food should be taught in schools. Others say that parents should teach their kids about healthy food and diet. Discuss both views; give your opinion and relevant examples. With the passage of time, the importance of the healthy nutrition has been being apparent for the general public. Not very long ago people used to consume healthier products, but this is no longer the case. Unfortunately, media compound the problem, and the constant barrage of unhealthy foods' advertisement that is directed at the public, particularly the youth which induces them to eat/consume feed with innutritious products such as junk foods. Therefore, it is immediately needed that we raise the public awareness especially children. Now a query requiring to be raised is whether the education is either the schools' duty or the parents' commitment. Some maintain that feeding children in correct way should begin from infancy (time) when the schools cannot play a significant role. In this period, in the first place, not only do children enjoy a the balanced diet, but also they have to be taught in order to distinguish the healthy foods from unhealthy ones. Additionally, children unconsciously opt for their parents as role models, and imitate them even in their foods' tendency, and also parents indirectly launch their infants on the correct way. On the contrary, opponents believe that although parents should feed their children with a healthier method, one of the important duties the mere duty of schools is raising the children's knowledge about the benefits of foods with nutritional values. For strengthening their own opinion, they assert that parents due to the lack of sufficient knowledge might ill‐inform their children. Therefore, authorities should adopt some informative plans in order to raise the public awareness in this respect. For example, healthcare systems can embark upon a massive program such as running the nutrition courses. In sum, in my opinion, both parents and teachers should assume this responsibility to edify the youth about highly nutritional consumption, because we are well aware that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, such that ignoring this subject inflicts the detrimental damages. Words: 306

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

2/12/2016 1 Garbage As a result of industrial development and populations growth , the contemporary world is faced with global increases not only in the amount of waste ,but also in the diversity of its quality . Reusable and refillable of goods specially bags in daily routine can cause garbage reduction dramatically. Firstly , plastic bags can not return to nature , so people can use reversible materials or refillable bags . In this way , people can provide conditions for garbage reduction . Moreover ,garbage collection at the time of ecotourism can contribute to slightly declineing in of garbage amounts from the earth's surface . Also , buying in bulk rather than individual packages not only saves lots of money but also causes reduction in garbages , therefore buying juice, snacks, and other lunch items in bulk and usinge those reusable containers each day will contribute to the uncontrolled increasing in waste materials . On the other hand ,people's efforts for contributing to garbage reduction will be useless without government intervention . First and foremost ,industrial garbages is are a fundamental problems which can put people's health in jeopardy . Therefore , governments can help to garbage reduction with elimination of irreversible productions . We know that electronics devices waste can cause health problems for people . Furthermore , states by with creating a recycling system where electronic devices waste return to new processes for producing usable goods facilitate a way for solving health problems issues . Consequently , manufactured goods which are made withe recycled materials facilitate good opportunities for shopping for people. In conclusion , in my opinion the increasing amount of rubbish has always been a center of attention . And there have been sums of money spent to address this problem . However , l suppose many preventive measures should be taken by both authorities and individuals. 2/12/2016 2

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, While others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What are your opinion on this? Nowadays, a current issue around the world is bout nurturing children and their way of life. Some individuals argue that it is essential for them to take responsibility and experience work out, while others oppose it saying that it is a kind of cruelty and obstacle for their advance. Authority figures state that due to under financial circumstances in many countries children work because their families need the additional income no matter how small. On In other hand, there are some employers headsquer that intend to exploitation from children and they pay lower wages less fee to a child in comparisone with professional one. They expect children to work like an adult. it is unfair and it creates a numerable mental and physical problems. Thirdly, scientists have proved that children should just play in their childhood. they are not aware of/about the dangers and harms of an adult environment and maybe damage/harm/hurt to themselvesself. Working in an adult environment is arduous and somehow dangerous.it is surprisingly soon for them to starting to work. they will learn it later when they are at the in suitable age. In my opinion, it is better to guide children to focus on their education and try to rearing them to learn how who to be responsible and work for the future., paid work may cause themy to feel disappointed. We can enable them to teach/educatelearning children to do unpaid work like helping family members or doing work around the home like gardening or repairing electrical devicesdevises to be responsible for to their life and be independent. Consequently, working for children is not an efficient way for being independent., each age should be spentd according to/related to their wisdom.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. Travelling and working can play a pivotal role in our intellectual maturity. The more mature we grow, the better decisions we can make including those associated with our academic life in university and our working life in our workplace. Obviously, doing a job can bring the youth numerous achievements like learning a sense of responsibility and receiving an income which both can cause the young to distance themselves from dependency on their parents in financial and emotional terms. On the other hand, travelling for individuals, especially during the period of adolescence, can effectively shape their personality and prepare them for a more serious burden of life like family life. They experiment with new cases in order to find their way of life, although some of them these experiences can be destructive. However, some opponents of this assert that these activities just lead to separating the young population from continuous studying and even some of them might quit their academic education for ever after spending this one‐ year period. Moreover, in this gap/hiatus one year, individuals would lose some of their academic knowledge as well as their time. Consequently, universities have to give them some basic training so that they can reach their academic abilities in the previous year one year ago, in which case it would have some demerits for both the university students and the colleges. In conclusion, it seems that taking a trip or undertaking a job has a positive effect in young individuals's life, at the expense of their time which can be assigned to more and effective education in scientific centers.