جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some students like to take distance‐learning courses by computer other students prefer to study in traditional classroom settings with a teacher. Consider the advantages of both options and make an argument for the way that students organize their schedule. There has not been a long time that the internet has become a necessity in everywhere. With By the wide spreading of the internet all over the world all aspects of social life from the simplest daily chores to the most time consuming and demanding processes such as banking and booking have been totally changed. In fact distance‐learning courses have been a valuable achievement of the Internet entering the internet in our life. In online courses many limitations have been removed to amend it to a more inclusive program. moreover, not only do the learners choose their suitable and flexible time schedule for learning but also save their time which was supposed to be spentd in commuting from home to schools or institutes. On the othe other hand, for learners who are forced to take up a job it really would be a wonderful opportunity to raise their educational levels with this new trend which might leads to job promotion after graduation. By contrast, distance‐learning courses intensify the disadvantage of recent sedentarylife and make it more passive, consequently many physical problems are likely to be emerged such as obesity and spine problems.in In addition, it eliminates social interaction between students and teachers which is gradually is lowering the social abilities. Besides, some educationalists believe that in traditional methods students are obliged to study more seriously which that finally resultsed in a better understanding of the courses. To sum up while distance learning has have precious benefits such as flexible time frame and time schedule which lead to making make the best use of time, it may cause both physical and social problems in the most students and lowered productivity of learning. I do believe distance learning is a new trend that could be help some learners who have time constraints/limitation because of their occupation or students who intend to learn two courses simultaneously which would not be possible unless using distance‐learning is used, but in other cases I prefer traditional teaching which improves social manners and physical activity as well as information and knowledge

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Book 10‐ Test 4‐ Writing task 2: Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? Museums are the most admirable places that people can visit them for the masterpieces that have been hidden behind between their walls. Also, they are usually art pieces from an in architectural point of view. All these charming specifications sends an invitation to people to see sight them, but sometimes people are faced with an admission protocol from people In charge of masters of museums, so the debates raised about is whether it is acceptable to oblige people to pay a fee for getting permission to visit their national treasures. Critics of these authorization protocols mention that it is people's right to freely visit art works and masterworks that they pay by taxes to be cared. These objectors point out that all expenditures of museums are paid from taxes that citizens pay to the government, so why can't they sight them freely in conditions that they will not harm any of the contents? How do they know their artists and culture if they cannot make connection with handicraft hand crafts of their ancestors? Besides, if descendants did not know what their pasts had done, how will you expect that they can make valuable handy pieces? On the other hand, there are specialists that they affirm those protocols are necessary for protecting these monuments and the arts underlying lied inside them. They claim if they were achievable for the public who did not know their spiritual value, now nearly all of them would be were totally destroyed. Of course it this is people's right to visit them, but generally if people did not pay money for sightseeing directly they would will not respect them as decent masterpieces. These authorizations are neither is for prohibiting people from sightseeing nor set for isolating these places from public. These are all conditions that are mandatory for protecting them as national arts. I think, as I saw myself that people unintentionally try to destroyuct these places and art pieces when they do sightseeing, then it is necessary to put some permission protocols for people who want to see these museums, but if artists and archaeologists or students of arts or archaeology tried to visit these places there must be some facilitating rules to help them freely view and study arts lying lied in the walls and rested on the walls of every museum. In addition controlling the visitors of museums will help to manage these collections better and safer. In summary, putting some admission on museums has benefits of controlling them and preventing arts from being damaged damaging but if besides the disadvantages of decreasing the connection of ordinary people with master pieces that our ancestors made.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Telecommuting refers to workers doing their jobs from home for part of each week and communicating with their office using computer technology. Telecommuting is growing in many countries and is expected to be common for most office workers in the coming decades. How do you think society will be affected by the growth of telecommuting. With the intensely rapid development of technology and growth of computers and also the Internet, inevitable changes are constantly happening in life routines like shopping online, paying bills with a couple of clicks and virtual communication using video chats. One of the most considerable trends of all is telecommuting that allows people to work from home instead of necessarily having to attend the office. Working from home, people can benefit in a vast number of ways. Employees may enjoy fluid work hours or another scenario can be parents with children whom are in need of to being taken care of. Companies on the other hand, will have more office space and empty desks available for people that actually are required to be physically present. Moreover, employers gain a higher chance of recruitment because they can hire people who live in different cities and even foreign countries. Apart from individuals who are directly involved in a job, other persons in the society can also take advantage of telecommuting. An outstanding example can be a significant reduction of daily traffic leading to less intense peaceful rush hours. Business districts in each city can experience less crowded days as well, resulted from smaller concentration of offices. Finally, like every other aspects of life, there are also drawbacks in this matter. As communications are becoming more and more virtual, people tend to get aloof and not willing to socialize in the real world environment; therefore, certain understandings and ground rules must be defined in order to maximize the merits perks and lessen the inevitable pitfalls.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing ( for example, through cell‐phone tracking and security cameras) .in many cases , the people being monitored unaware that this is happening. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantage? Over the past few years, the technological enhancement has been improved in every aspect. Security cameras and cell‐phone tracking are two one of these achievements. Like most things , there are is both a good and a bad side. Now I would like to discuss it in more depth. Nowadays, it has been become moremuch easier for the police and the government to dominate on society in order to prevent crime through these security instruments and if any crime is carried out, there will would be more evidence enhance for investigation. These facilities act as a deterrent to the criminal. If a criminal decides to commit a crime , there it will would be more complex issues for him. On the other hand , the right of the individual will be endangered by constantly recording people's activities and movement. People would have less privacy in their lives which that it doesn't sound pleasant to them. Although however, people could further protect provide their privacy more by considering some issues. For instance, there is are a wide range of social networks such as Facebook and Instagram whose servers could access all our data that are uploaded and could use them for their financial gain. Therefore users of such social networks must beware not disclose too much data. From my point of view, despite all the drawbacks, the pros outweigh the cons. These security facilities have provided more safety and comfort for societies and have decreased many crimes. Also, people are responsible about their privacy by being more careful in use of social networks, although however, they cannot couldn't control other aspects.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do. Agree: 1‐ it depends of the circumstances: frivolous individuals: not interested in taking responsibility: bad effects on economy and social situation, family, 2‐ not too bad trike balance between both of them With the progress of technology and humans' perseverance for facilitation of their assignments, notwithstanding its numerous advantages, novel social and personal characteristics have emerged, some of which were the humans' tendency to have frivolous lifestyle and even preference to avoid confronting unresolved challenges and tribulations. Although these mentioned individuals believe that pursuing doing their enjoyment is a pivotal factor for pleasure, some thinks this approach has irreversible outcomes, and I myself think likewise to some extent (in some aspects). First and foremost, it is a widely held belief that the sense of adventure, being successful and even in a broadened view, becoming famous has have been an some incentive for people to progress, invent and discover in diverse areas of study. The point is how we can expect a person always standing on the sidelines to be inclined to revitalize this inalienable condition of humans' advancements? In other words, it sounds plausible that not only will not human society progress, also its situation can be aggravated escalated in the upcoming future. As an example, nowadays some developed countries such as Australia and England intend to employ apply hard‐working labor from developing countries, since they are more meticulous and have more competitive in natureinstinct. Secondly, I maintain that some people dedicating their time to on their own favorite affairs excessively may be reluctant to sacrifice themselves for others' needs and desires. Furthermore, it is probable to avoid taking on some severe responsibilities like raising children, and in the case of acceptation of their the parental role, they will not make sufficient effort to nurture productive social members, not to mention the possibility that their offspring may just consume ing the economic resources of a country. And last but not least, it is worth bearing in mind that there are some exceptions among these types of personalities. On the other hand, they are neither apathetic, nor neglectful (irresponsible). They have enforced one dimension of their personality per se. The majority of scholars and tremendous specialists tackle this psychological phenomenon. For instance, Einstein or Tolstoy had not had satisfying family life, owing to the fact that they were keen on carrying out their interests favors compulsively. To put in a nutshell, I agree with the topic that in the modern epoch, people prefer to concentrate on their own interest more than before. It can have some menaces like continuation of Homo sapiens' advances with a slower pace and even reduction of future members' efficiency, but otherwise some geniuses spend too much on their enjoyments just because of one‐dimensional personalities

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Without any doubt all of us are aware of the importance of our children's attitude and effectiveness in society. As children grow up they will learn important facts through different experiences. There are different ideas about this matter; some thinks that parents are responsible for in this issue. on the other hand, there are people who believe this, as one of the school's tasks. Regarding this issue, both of the parents and school are responsible. Family as the first society that kids grow up in them is in duty to teach primary facts and manners and introduce kids to with the world. In addition, to them school as the next society that children will experience, includes more challenges for kids, makes made them to act more appropriately towards the others and make important decisions in complicated problems. These two alongside each other have a key role in educating and should complete each other's task in best way. Children will learn to be helpful society members a good person in their life and try their best to improve for improves of their society. The fact that should not be forgotten is that parents and schools must have cooperation and coordination with each other and have a single a one goal. For enjoying pleasant pleasure moments in our society and be sure of the future we should never forget that it is a duty for all of us, as a part of society in every level and place that we are it is our responsibility to not only be a good example for our kids, but also try our best to teach right things to them, who one day will be a role model for their next generation.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it, or is it better to save your money for some time in the future? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. Probably the main reason of working for most people is earning money. From my point of view, we earn money to enjoy the life more. What can be more important than making more pleasant seconds of life? Who knows how many years they are is alive? And what if all the saved money have becomes stolen or disappears into thin air overnight ed in one night? To my mind, life has consistsed of all the seconds which we should make the best of them the best. Definitely expending money could be one way to create happier and nicer moments. If the earned earning money hasn't been expended on pleasure and enjoyment, then, what would be used for? In addition, there is no guarantee of the money being usefulness the money which has been saved for maybe many years. Therefore, unpredictable life causes people to think more about the enjoyable seconds of the present. Some people believe in saving money as if they would be alive forever. In other words, they prohibit themselves from enjoying money in order to save that, but, what if a person will not survive hasn't been alive until the day he has already planned to spend the deposited money. In fact, no one can foretell the future and tell what will happen to people's destination. Thus, isn't it a wiser idea to enjoy the moments? These days we are observing so many companies that deceive people to take their money. Imagine if these dishonest companies would cheat people who have saved their money for several couple of years at the expense of having pleasure, who deprived themselves of having fun when they had earned money, who haven't worked to live, but, have lived to work. Consequently, in my opinion, they might have lost the one time chance of pleasure living. To sum up, appreciating the moments, believing in unforeseen future, and considering the probability of losing the deposit in some unpredictable cheating that are prevalent in my country lead /cause me to prefer to enjoy my money rather than to save it.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Dear Ms.Elham Sadri, I do appreciate your kind caring offering email. I would love to apply for the LLM program and scholarship application as well. As you mentioned, Iranian students confront some financial difficulties, so scholarship will definitely help. I will be thankful if you guide me through both the LLM application and scholarship application. I hold a bachelor's degree in Civil Law from University of Tehran as well as also a master's degree in Private Law from Islamic Azad University of Science and Research Branch in Tehran. Moreover, I have been an Iranian lawyer for six 6 years. I finished Oil and Gas Contracts and Law post‐ graduate courses in University of Tehran. I have read the website. There are some vague points that I would like you to make them clear. Please give me more information about the LLM program and let me know whether it is course based or research‐ based. I would appreciate it if you explained like to ask you to explain more about the Application Requirements, part 2 about Transcript Evaluation. I am looking forward to hearing from you soon. Thank you for your attention and time in advance. Truly yours, Maryam Azimi

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believed that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however,argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. There has been a need for living in a civil society because of creating a sense of trust and security for citizens. To this end, first and the foremost, we should legislate comprehensive laws which and they should be enforced by some organizations like police and courts. Whether we should have fixed constant punishments for the same crimes or not is a passionate debate among people. Some say that no one should be able to enforce a law by her/his taste. For instance, if a crime leads to 10 years of detention, it should be fixed throughout the state. in all of a country. No one is allowed to cut down on his/her punishments by hiring a professional lawyer. It is not fair and can create an distrust atmosphere of distrust among people against towards laws. Looking at it from another standpoint, we should care about a motive behind a crime. There is an inevitable difference between those committing a crime by mistake or just one time and skilled thieves earning money from these ways and spending most of their life in detention. These skillful robbers should serve go to the long term jail without hesitatione. To sum up, it seems that it is quite hard to choose between these two options there is no way to choose one of those .therefore, I believe that we should curb the breeding ground for crime alleviate the fields of crimes in society with economic prosperity and devoting more time to rear our children.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Pros and cons of cohabitation In this today's day and age, some social stigma and relaxation around men and women have has changed. One of the changes is cohabitation before people get married. In fact in this age, moving move and living live together are is commonplace. Although it could have positive aspects, there are some drawbacks as well. I have some ideas in both sides but I think the advantages outweigh is overweight the disadvantages On the one hand, cohabitation could provide a proper situation for both men and women before they make extra commitment and become a married couple because they could spend more time together and have the chance to get to know their habits. There is a little room for doubt; in such circumstances for both sides there are have financial benefits. In fact all of living expenses are split among both of them whether or not they could make monetary savings. Namely there is one rent payment, or the charge for of cables will be divided between two people. On the other hand, living together could have some disadvantages versus privileges. Cohabitation could lead to expection of marriage and they are disappointedment if marriage married doesn't happen. Furthermore, it might cause reduction in to reduce excitement of marriage because they will go back to the same home where they lived prior to getting married. In addition, although both partners are motivated to save money, unclear division of responsibilities leads to tremendous financial misunderstanding. In sum nutshell, cohabitation needs to manage a variety of factors because of the potential for of miscalculation. Whereas modern life doesn't allow a person to spend enough time knowing to know together each other, and subsequently it can start make a family. moreover, in these days living in real life isn't as powerful as living in virtual one, so this approach might help people to make a decision for their future life and the next big step could lead to a successful marriage. Good luck!