Mondays

Amir G, Rubbish

2018-12-04T04:25:26+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays the amounts of rubbish are constantly increasing in many countries of the world. Why is it happening? How can it be controlled and eventually reduced? During the last five decades, the amount of waste material produced by people have become a critical problem in many parts of the world. This controversial issue is now threatening life on our planet in a way that scientists are working hard to find a sustainable solution to manage this ever increasing production of garbage by humans. This essay elaborates on the reasons behind this problem, along with a few simple solutions to reduce the amount of rubbish production. The first and perhaps the most significant point in this issue lies in the fact that people are consuming more commodities than before. Tired of hectic pace of life, people from all walks of life especially in the industrial countries are using disposable materials to compensate their time limitation. What makes this matter worse is the remaining parts of non-recyclable electronic devices and petroleum products such as polymeric materials. Although scientist are trying to find a permanent solution for such materials, regrettably they have not succeed in finding a reliable solution. Fortunately, nowadays an overwhelming majority of people are aware of the harmful effects of production of this much of waste. That people’s awareness play a significant role in reduction of garbage is an indisputable fact. Thanks to the Internet and social media these days in different parts of the world an acceptable portion of the population are dividing their waste into two main categories to pave the way for the recycle procedure. Only when the authorities provide families with appropriate materials and introduce proper laws, can they expect ordinary people to reduce their waste. By way of conclusion, I reaffirm that had we known about the consequences of this issue, we could have prevented it earlier. However, I still maintain the idea that addressing this problem requires collective wisdom besides group cooperation of every concerned individual around the globe.

Anahita, Decrease Illnesses By Government

2018-12-04T04:25:12+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should try to reduce environmental pollution and housing problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Nowadays the world witnesses a wide range of illnesses being prevalent in societies due to poor standards of living of citizens. Many people are of the opinion that governments could play a substantial role in tackling some problems such as poor housing and air pollution so as to decrease the number of consequential diseases. I strongly agree with this view. One of the controversial top-ranking news items in mega cities is dealing with air pollution. Based upon recent statistics the number of heart attacks has increased particularly in industrial cities. To be more accurate, a quite large number of death has been being reported for about ten years highlighted among adults over 60s and children less than 10 years old. Though Valuable progress has been though achieved on technology and industrial fields, no one can deny the serious illnesses affect inhabitants due to industrialism. Hence, a percentage ofgovernment’s budget is spent annually on social health care. If governments had controlled the air pollution or had improved the quality of petroleum, the hospitals would serve fewer patients today. The healthier the people are, the more productive a society become. Although big cities, such as Tehran, are enormously luxury to live, they include some parts in which hardly can people reside. In fact, some regions especially south parts are concentrated by poor communities living in extremely unhygienic places. To illustrate, because of disgusting housing circumstances some dwellers' sleeping areas surrounded by garbage or a large number of families using a shared toilet. These are the current facts which can be seen both in developing and developed countries. Not only are the governments responsible for allocating a share of the budget to expand science, but also they should better to improve the slum surroundings by building apartments for poor level society with the aim of firstly elevating social welfare and secondly reducing the diseases.In conclusion, if the governments are really keen on improving the social health, they have to address the real cause of diseases. In other words, by simply making housing affordable for all and controlling air pollution, the government can prevent its people from illnesses. Prevention, after all, is better than cure.

Beheshteh, Larger City Problems

2018-12-04T04:25:00+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

From the industrialization till present days, the process of urbanization has brought a laborious welfare for the city dwellers. This oxymoron literally means prosperity and opportunity are intrinsically bound up with difficulties for those who opt to live in cities. I believe that these cities could be the most convenient place to live, but implementing some effective measures are required. Aiming to progress, many a villager or rural settler leaves all the belongings behind and steps in to the fully challenging area called cities. Therefore, the growing density encounters various problems that pollution and traffic congestion are on the top point requiring to be tackled. Too much time spent in streets with the heavy traffic causes great amount of stress on the commuters as well as drastic production of pollution. To overcome the problem, higher investment on boosting up the quality of public transportation would ease the traffic, as would bike lanes. Besides, using light vehicles in the way ‘green cities’ such as Copenhagen do, in turn, can play a significant role in reducing the air pollution.Unfortunately, vulnerability of larger cities to the crimes such as terrorist attacks is inevitable. Living in metropolitan centers is compromised with the constant fear and threat in comparison with the smaller towns or villages. One applicable way in putting a halt on the crimes, to some extent, would be to embark the CCTV on any corner of the cities to monitor the possible threats. It is claimed that a reasonable amount of terrorist attacks in London have been foiled as the result of applying the CCTV. So overall, living in metropolis cities are filled with prosperity and opportunity, albeit at the cost of the life quality. The more populated the cities are the weaker quality dwellers are faced with. Only if some serious measures are undertaken, could we possibly consider larger cities a utopia.

Boshra,Hand Writing

2018-12-04T04:24:47+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say children no longer need to develop handwriting skills. Others believe that handwriting is still important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Due to a the high pace of technological progress, our lifestyle has completely changed. That is why, some researchers assume that we do not require handwriting skills. Some others, however, assert that despite all alterations, this skill has its own place in our life. From my point of view, the ability of writing properly by hand is a prerequisite for numerous skills. This short essay will elaborate on this controversial issue. First and foremost, communicating through technological devices in this high-tech era, rarely do individuals write manually. For instance, by drawing a comparison between past decades when students did all their assignments by writing and now that they present some of them through computers, we easily get to know that the importance of this skill has decreased. Further and even more importantly, at offices employees send official letters trough through some internal networks allocated to their workplace. As opposed to several years agotoday, they used to write them by hand and transfer them by themselves, thereby being persuaded to use the skill. On the other hand, opponents opine that, not only is the skill of writing necessary in learning basic contents of science at school, but it also is beneficial for developing cognitive abilities especially for those in brain developing stages. The case in point is honing painting skills which needs appropriate hand-eye coordination, and it improves by writing regularly. Last but not least is associated with the fact that writing through computers needs an operator capable of writing legibly meaning that we cannot ignore the significant role of this skill. On the whole, in spite of some people's opinion believing that writhing by our hands is not beneficial these days, I, personally, maintain that it is of great benefit for to us.

Eslami, Learn Foreign Language at Primary

2018-12-04T04:24:35+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? There is a controversial debate over the topic whether learning second language at early ages or postpone it to adolescences. Some argue opine that the best time for learning new language is childhood while other believe that secondary school is much appropriate time to start learning new foreign language. In this essay, I will discuss the merits and demerits of both points of view and clear my side. In this era, with considering fast growth of technologies and new sciences, communicating with other people is one of the vital ability that mankind need. The basic and essential way to communicate is learning new language at an early age. According to new science research, the years before puberty is the crucial period that our brain is ready to learn and accept new materials in the fastest way, so learning two or three foreign languages at elementary school is obviously one the best way to tackle this issue. On the other hand, some individuals believe than learning new language must be at secondary school. During childhood our hobbies trend playing with plaything or going to camp to learn new courses. By learning new language at primary school not only should they learn mathematics and physics but also they are forced to spend time to learn new languages. By learning new language at secondary school, children have so many leisure times for play with other same ages. To put in it in the nutshell, the overall advantages weigh of learning new languages at primary school are more than the disadvantages and I strongly believe that this method is the best and most effective way to start learning new languages or sports. When we grow up, the ability of our brain to accept new science is decrease dramatically.

Farshid, Recycling Material

2018-12-04T04:24:23+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? Without doubt, recycling materials is one of the widespread concerns of today. There are many ways to encourage people to recycle wastes while forcing them by making law is another way. I think that laws are necessary to reach high rate of recycling and I will elaborate that in this essay. First of all, although citizens benefit from wastes recycling, mostly it is not their concern either for their lack of time or some difficulties in dividing recyclable materials. Therefore, making the law as well as the use of force will be highly beneficial way soaring the amount of recycled garbage. Besides, any new strange phenomenon is faced with protest, hence disobedient citizens. Thus, making the law could force them to obey the rules. To exemplify, in my country drivers have accepted fasten their seatbelts since they had been forced by law as well as excessive fine. These rules can be applied for recycling process as well. Secondly, humans are not consider the consequences of not recycling materials. Consequently, not only does not recycling materials cause different types of pollutions, but also non-renewable energy will be depleted in near future. Whereas,, whereas authorities have to prepare the infrastructures and facilities for those who arevolunteers to recycle their wastes such as establishing more recycle centers to reach effortlessly. At last, the main conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is that recycling, though hard, can be manageable by the governments, who have the authority to make the law and charge the citizens with heavy fine.

Forough Khalili, Global Warming and Deforestation

2018-12-04T04:19:58+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

While some people consider global warming to be the most pressing environmental problem, which we have at the moment, others believe that deforestation has a more devastating impact on our world. Discuss both sides. Nowadays many people are concerned about the arising problem causing by global warming and deforestation. While some people think that global warming leads to serious problems that should be addressed first, others contend deforestation has a much more damaging impact on the earth’s environment. Both sides of this debate will be analyzed in this essay. Global warming has raised the average of temperature of the earth several degrees over the few centuries which it has negative effects on our habitats, the earth planet. For example, global warming results in the icebergs melting at the poles, which then leads to several effects such as extreme floods and storms. Rising of sea levels has put some cities surrounded by the water on at the risk of being drowned by deluges. Hence, it is argued that global warming is one of the most serious problems of our planet. On the other hand, Forests have a critical role in absorbing greenhouse gases, which fuels global warming. In other words, removing the forests means that a large amount of carbon dioxides will enter the atmosphere and begin the greenhouse circle. The forests are natural habitats for many species in on the earth and if we continue to ruin their homeland, they cannot/will not be able to survive so the effects of deforestation are completely obvious. In conclusion, the effects of them in our world are indisputable, it is impossible to say that one issue leads to more problems than the other. Therefore, we can hope both the people and the governmentall over the world; take some steps to alleviate the ecological problems that our planet is facing.

Mahta, Parents Childcare Training

2018-12-04T04:19:46+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. Due in part to more complicated social relationships in societies, parenting issues have become more crucial recently. In this regard, there has been a controversial debate as to whether or not the guardians should pass some compulsory childcare /caring courses before their child's birth. Child being given birth/ being delivered. Personally, as I believe that many a complex in today’s humans has emerged owing to a lack of parents’ appropriate behavior, I wish the authorities had thought about this solution before. However, the mandatory structure for these preparation lessons can still be a subject of debate. In this essay, I will elaborate my opinion more clearly. First and foremost, life was much simpler before. In other words, living in more crowded environments with various types of personalities, children are more prone to face difficulties in adapting themselves to their life environment. To exemplify, having a plain life style in calm and spacious farmland, hardly did the rural people be confronted with environmentally physical and mental issues for raising their child, two of which are city-driven pollutions and cultural differences, hence less further future health problems for their offspring. Thus, greater responsibilities lie with today's parents to rear their children successfully. Therefore, some helpful courses can pave the way for them to care their kids more effectively. The second question, however, is “should these courses be mandatory?” On the other hand, although as I mentioned before parents training can be considered to be an intelligent idea, these programs had better to be held gratis since not every parents can afford the fees, especially the time that they should economically prepare themselves for their child’s future expenses. Last but not least, as different families might have different circumstances, not only should these trainings teach general lessons, but also it is required to mention the way of behaving toward special cases, such as newborns with some disorders. To put in a nutshell, I am of the opinion that the governments should have taken this into consideration that if they had provided better infrastructures forinexperienced parents' education, we would have a safer life today. Thus, enlightening parents on different aspects of children's nurturing can be useful as it could hopefully contribute to the future generation’s health.

Mosadegh, Community Services

2018-12-04T04:19:34+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? Nowadays, efficiency of the education system is a controversial issue. some agree that students should have be prepared early to take important responsibilities for their future and society too. Other opponents believe that social responsibilities such as charitable work, voluntary teaching may detract students’ attention from studying their textbooks and doing their mandatory homework. In the following, drawbacks and benefits of both views will be discussed. There is no doubt that obtaining life skills are more important for every individual and what they had better to start joining society sooner. It has reciprocal benefits for the second school students and society. Through participating voluntary work, charitable work or some which can boost society, adults are be able to gain experience of having a career and position and also learn how to manage their time for school homework and after school tasks. These are significantly important, not only for their curriculum vitae, but also for increase their employability. On the other hand, there is an opposite view to the mentioned statement that says unpaid community services should not be mandatory for high school students. Because adults in that ages are not mature enough to cooperate with parts of society tasks and maybe they do not feel confident to cope with such work and these obligations make them dissatisfied and consequently diminish their qualification and interest in future careers. Moreover, it may affect their exams and education. In conclusion, despite some disadvantages, I have to say, taking responsibility to educated school students during their free time like summer holiday as an extra curriculum is more acceptable than when they struggle with their study. All in all, it is a huge responsibility for school to optimize students’ education, life skills, attitude and behavior by involving practical activities and social benefits tasks in the school program.

Parinaz, Increase Price of Petrol

2018-12-04T04:16:43+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

 Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?  What other measures do you think might be effective? In last decades, the issue of traffic and air pollution became popular in the large cities around the world. There is a view that increasing fuel price can be viewed from various perspectives. I barely can contribute to this idea completely. Any Fuel price increase may attain its drawbacks while two raised issues could be solved by other possible measures. First, it is obvious that in short-term a price increase of petrol can plummet the traffic congestion and consequently affects the air pollution, but it is not a long run solution. Moreover, since the petrol price has a domino effect on transportation, its price can impact the price of all other goods in the market. Therefore, price increase not only cannot be a solving solution but also emerge another predicament for society. For example, in my country, any fluctuation in the price of fuel can impact the price of various goods due to its direct relevance to transportation. Secondly, there are other measures that can be implemented to avoid air pollution and also oversee the traffic more properly. Being more available, public transportation in rush hour may make it plausible that people use public transportation such as subways and buses instead of their private car. In addition, government can render ascheme to increase public awareness to use public transportation for their own good and enjoy a healthier air. As an example, Amsterdam, which is a enormously touristic city has promoted the idea of using bike while it has provided substructure and specific roads for bikes in parallel. As a consequence of Following to these measures, air pollution and traffic jams can be controlled. In conclusion, I restate that price increase of petrol, following by which have less air pollution and more control over traffic is a controversial topic but cannot be the descent solution in a long-term. Also, other practical actions may facilitate the process of controlling the growing traffic and diminish air pollution to some extent.