جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many people today use their phones to communicate by sending messages than talking. What are the reasons for this? Are there more advantages than disadvantages? In the 21st century, a myriad of individuals tend to use their cell phones to text to others rather than calling them. There are a few causes why this occurs. Although there are several merits in this trend, the drawbacks are harmful. To commence with the reasons, nowadays, the speed of life is dramatically high. Thus, no one is able to spend a lot of time chatting on the phone for hours. Everyone prefers sending messages to avoid wasting time. Texts are easy and fast to send, and for their remarkable convenience they have become the most preferable way of communication. Another cause to mention would be the fact that everyone is able to convey a message by texts everywhere they are; silent zones such as hospitals and conferences, for instance. However, calling is not possible in such situations. To continue with the disadvantages, it is worth mentioning that these messages may lead to misunderstanding. Obviously, the tune, melody of voice and the mimic of the sender is not distinguishable for the receiver. Therefore, a dispute may arise between the two people. Another demerit could be the lack of ability to show your emotions. Nevertheless there are some emoticons available on applications, WhatsApp or Telegram, for example, we cannot transfer our love to those we appreciate. To endanger a language may be another negative impact this development brings about. To speed up writing texts mostly everybody uses abbreviation or slangs which jeopardize an authentic language in time. In conclusion, there might be positive points in sending texts to others, to save time or its availability. Nonetheless, the demerits of this fast spreading trend should be carefully taken into consideration to avoid misunderstanding, increasing emotional distance between human beings or disappearance of a language.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people take a year off between school and university, to work or to travel. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Some individuals would rather take a year off between school and tertiary education in order to travel or work. I partly align with this notion because its benefits surpass its disadvantages, albeit it cannot ring true for whole cases. On the one hand, if were students are in jobs or on a journey, they could be more seasoned alongside their peers and counterparts. To exemplify, they are supposed to communicate with other people which could lead to learning more and more in with regard to their communication and accountability whether in at work or in on a trip, in turn, they get to know how to deal with money and how to accomplish their tasks according to what others anticipate as well as what they are fond of. As a whole, their attitudes and personality are going to be modified or tempered. On the flip side, some say in some cases, an interval between study could back fire on students. Only when they are among inappropriate jobs or dishonest people could they their interest evaporate their interest toward further education. According to them, Those aforementioned jobs and people can indoctrinate students’ mind by not wasting their time in university or higher education which belongs to incompetent people. Needless to say, their peer pressure can put a strain on them and change their trajectory in the wrong direction. To summarize, if they are resolute and determined, they students who pause their education for a year are less likely to be influenced by others even if they are in a destructive atmosphere and can benefit from any virtues of jobs and travel.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes. Some people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damage to environment, while others think that the government should do something to help. Discuss both views and give your own opinion The nature of the environment is changing/has been changed; accordingly, the world faces danger constantly. The question is whether all the steps to reduce this potential danger should be done adopted/taken by governments or individuals play a significant role as well. In most societies, the lack of public awareness about irrecoverable environmental effects on the next generations of humanity results in allocating less budget on to proper education in the area of the environment. In fact, should governments raise environmental awareness, possible consequences of people’s actions could be reduced substantially. According to recent surveys in nations where the ecological syllabus is inserted compulsory to train fresh minds, a the range of environmental degradation has been reduced significantly. Furthermore, governments could impose legislation on antienvironment actions which means that heavy penalties could be considered in order to protect the environment. For instance, under new ecological regulations, new constructions are used using environmentally friendly materials in their foundations having the minimum damage. The High tax (which is) put on oil is another tangible example. The modification of lifestyle, on the other hand, can allocate play a significant part of in reducing this damage. These days, the way people live is affected by the media; encouraging them to follow the latest fashion. As a result, they are more materialistic and consumerism consumerist compared to/in comparison to/as against/as opposed to the previous generations. This trend calls for more utilize utilizing of the limited natural resources. The futuristic view of this means that essential actions should be done, otherwise the world will face difficulties in providing necessities. Moreover, people could be encouraged to not only use reusable tools but also recycle their trash. In conclusion, although the role of governments to tackle this problem is inevitable due to its power in increasing public awareness and imposing laws, all of the efforts are incomplete without people’s contribution. I believe that all individuals and authorities should have close participation cooperation/collaboration together.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or DVDs. Do you agree or disagree? Advancement of technology has caused all public places to changegetting changed, to a great extent. These days, public libraries are contained plenty of various high-tech media facilities. Some people hold that it is a way of wasting money to provide software, videos and DVDs for library user; however, others assert that people are more attracted to these technical materials and libraries should consider them as much as books and periodicals. From my stand point, most of libraries’ financial resources should be spent on providing technological materials. To find out how much of public libraries’ resources needs to be served on the technological part, a group of people mention that the attraction of these materials are is not even compatible to traditional book shelf’s. Library goers tend to use visual-audio DVDs and videos CDs in order to enhance their hands-on experiences. Although, the old-fashioned way of reading a book can gives them theoretical information, they need to watch and hear those items visually to have better function in practical partaspects. They will be more expert in their relative field by reading books and watching videos, simultaneously. It is also more advantageous to use software at public libraries, since it is more efficient in terms of cost-benefit, compared to buying expensive software. For international students, for instance, it costs them a fortune for them to buy these staffsmaterials, so using them at libraries is more functional, convenient and beneficial. Furthermore, using the internet for books, borrowers can make the procedure of borrowing less time consuming, compared to the traditional ways of searching for a particular book. If they cannot find their required book in their local library, they still can find its location in other libraries, in a the blink of an eye. The internet networks has opened many different ways of connection for library users. To put it in a nutshell, some people however, are concerned about the reduction of value and role of books in people’s life., I strongly agree with those who believe that technology plays an active role in providing new and functional facilities for library goers and it is not a the way of wasteing of libraries resources.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some say that rich countries should help poor countries with trade, health and education. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience. One of the main goals of the United Nation is to facilitate deprived countries' sustainable development. Yet, there has been much discussion revolving around whether developed countries should assist the emergent nations. My firm conviction is that providing international aid is of paramount significance to ensure world's peace, security and equality. People living in economically developing countries grapple with many difficulties. To start with, lack of education deprives them of securing steady jobs with stable income. In addition, the lack of career prospects could aggravate the vicious circle created with illiteracy and unemployment, ; therefore, people are condemned to a life of poverty made making them apathetic to improve their living standards. The emergence of extremist extremism and radicalism is one of the inevitable corollaries of the aforementioned situation, where underprivileged and uneducated individuals are induced to commit crimes and spark off riots threatening the such country's countries’ security and putting citizens' life in danger. Not only would poor countries be debilitated by these internal conflicts, but also the neighboring ones and the world as a whole may bear the brunt of these antisocial/dangerous activities which by and large threaten the civilization. A blatant example of this phenomenon is the emergence of ISIS waging war in the Middle East, ruining many human heritages and leaving many people with no choice but to leave their countries behind and seek asylum overseas. Many of the an aforementioned disasters can be sustainably mitigated by international cooperation. First and foremost, skills and education are instrumental in building resilient economies and ensuring that the local labor force can enhance their economic empowerment. Secondly, only when the developing countries have access to the recent medical technologies and medicines which are typically/by and large peculiar to rich countries, can they alleviate many health problems and fight contagious fatal diseases. Finally, ensuring a predictable and rules-based trading system in which poor countries can reap market opportunities, the international aid organizations can lay a sound foundation for them to promote/expandprosper their domestic business in a sustainable manner, thereby combating poverty. In conclusion, I would argue that providing the under developed countries with international assistance will help them overcome insurmountable obstacles which curtail their individual capabilities. Otherwise, the poor will be destined to become poorer leading to existence creation of an impending threat tofor global peace and security, hence the importance of joining hands to address the global problems.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Kamal Sadeghi Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noises. Other think that they could just make as much as noise they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. People have different views about the problem of noises that should be controled and limited or let others free to do it. I would say that people have the right to show this kind of emotions as they want to do. Sabaitc.com To begin with, for several reasons some commentators say that loud noises should be controled by producers. Firstly, in hospitals and some houses there are some people who are struggling encountered with problematic health issues, . consequently, they need rest in a quiet and relaxing/ed atmosphere in search of recovery. Another reason would be those citizens who need to concentrate on their work or lessons, . for example, some students who need towho have to focus on their lessons, which needs a quiet site to pass exams that leads to a good result. However, some justifiably believe that people sometimes have the right to make noises that they want to do, and I have the same believe belief with as them. Producing noises sometimes is a kind of positive motivation that some individuals like. For instance, cheering from the football fans or singing at clubs or at houses in is one of the interesting favorites for certain individuals/some guys. Furthermore, it is undeniable that in modern life man has found various ways to deal with the problem of loud voices. There are some inventions including insulation materials for doors, windows, walls, and roofs, which can reduce these noises completelymarkedly. In conclusion, although there are some reasons that extra loud noises may bother some people, I completely believe that people have the right to produce/makedo noises that they want to do and those who feel bothered can use technological methods, which were mentioned above to reduce these voices/noises.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Maybe we can say that, the most memorable events for each person have been happened in on his journeys. In traveling, we are developing our ability to transform in difficult situations. Trips are putting us in a resting state and When we are straggling with annoying life problems, they can inject energy into our body cells. At the end of each trip, we will have achieved some outstanding experiences which could help us in the future to cope with our life stressors as well as possible. As I think journeys have to give us the sense of self-control so I believe that traveling by a tour guide not only makes you more dependent but also dealing with a group can makes you more tired. For example, a man who is traveling by on his own/by himself should manage his money along his journey to afford his expenses. He has to schedule his departure and reach the hotel accurately. He has to look into the map and search to find astonishing places. he can make a decision more freely but he will learn to pay his decision’s cost. All of this will lead to having self-efficacy more and more. On the other side, when a supervisor is a coordinator, we will lose a wide range of decisions. We have to inhibit ourselves sometimes, to be adapt with to the group. you are always aware of somebody's presence who can support you in unexpected conditions. By contrast,Despite this when you are alone, you consciously know that the only person who is able to cope with unprecedented incidents harness disasters is yourself. Eventually, I guess traveling without a group leader can improve our skills in managing money/budget, problem-solving and its final gain is the sense of self-control. However, traveling in a group is a very good opportunity to work as a team member but it cannot help us to refresh ourselvesretrieve our energy.