Fridays

Ali Banaei, Railways

2020-12-26T21:06:45+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Investing in railways more than roads would result in considerable benefits and advantages not only for the environment and ecosystem but also for the society and public health. In this regard, I believe that extending the railways and train transport can be a better option than developing roads. First of all, travelling by trains and subways instead of other vehicles results in a remarkable reduction in greenhouse gases, which are produced by cars and busses. Hence, by extending the railways and promoting the use of trains, particularly the modern once ones which use non-fossil energy, the rate of using fossil fuel and air pollution will decline. Secondly of all, travelling by trains is a great deal/by far safer. The rate of train 's accidents in the world is extremely lower in comparison to that of other vehicles. Using GPS and other communications equipment, along with moving on one-way-roads have has a significant impact on reducing crashes in this type of transportations. Specifically in unreliable weather conditions such as rainy or snowy days. Finally, modern trains move with high pace, about 300 kilometers per hour. As a result, travelling by trains and subways is not only is safer, but also is faster. Moreover, there is no traffic congestion in subways which leads to not wasting time. Instead, individuals can use their time by reading a book or relaxing. To sum up, according to the aforementioned discussion, I think due to the benefits of using trains rather than the other vehicles, governments should expand the railways and train stations more than the roads by allocating the proper budget.

Change is Always a Good Thing

2020-12-26T21:06:35+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change .Others , however ,think that change is always a good thing . Over the past few decades,the changes in the life of human beings have dramatically increased .These changes have been driven by technological and scientific breakthroughs.Some people tend to to live with routine habits and prevent avoid getting involving involved in new things/developments .Meanwhile ,some people who are willing to experience the changes in life and implement them in their lives to move forward into the modern life . Firstly ,some people believe the change is not crucial in life as it causes lots of hardships and exclude deprives them ofto have peace in their Lives .Indeed ,they are not willing to get into new things and step outside from their comfort zone . People would like to be in on the safe side .it can not be denied that they feel more comfortable with routing habits .For instance ,in my country the adults are not interested into new devices .they prefer to be informed about news by TV than other devices like tables tablets .The primitive methods would be more desirable for them.They claim implementing old methods makes their lives safer. On the other side,there are various aspects against these arguments .Some people are confidante confident that changes are inevitable and help them to get talented more capable .Also ,they will be able to have fantastic special/rare opportunities in different fields and make their lives much better .In addition,it helps them to acquire significant knowledges in different areas .It is explicit obvious the changes are the essential factor in people’s life . To conclude, both views seems decent .However,I personally think the changes are vital in life and make people’s lives more successful .They are able to move forward into a better future and have a better perspectives of all matters around the world . 295 words 1:30 3 essays

Countries Are Becoming More and More Similar

2020-12-26T21:06:26+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? In our today’s contemporary world, thanks to the widespread cross-border trade in goods and services, individuals are able to access whatever product they wish for from every corner around the globe, giving rise to the reduction of cultural and social diversity. Even though beneficial implications of such a phenomenon cannot be overlooked, from my perspective this is more of a detrimental issue rather than an advantageous one. First of all, globalization of international markets has imposed enormous effects on job prospects. As opposed to some advocates who might insist that globalization this trend has led to increased employment opportunities throughout the world, it evidently acts rather differently in that it could shift production from high-cost countries to their lower-cost counterparts, thereby reducing occupational positions in the former. Moreover, owing to the loss of interest in traditional and local merchandise, the aforementioned phenomenon could create havoc in local markets and render their economies stagnant as well. Besides, local products such as traditional medicines, clothes, and handicrafts are part and parcel of a country’s culture and customs. With more and more people purchasing goods form international corporations, the loss of countries’ distinct customs and traditions are, without a shadow of a doubt, on the horizon. Last but not least, how would someone feel should wherever they travel look exactly the same? There would be no unique souvenirs or ware to buy apart from those in your home country. The main conclusion to be drawn is that in this writer’s view the drawbacks of the mentioned issue outweigh its merits, and that this uniformity can cause a serious harm to the(?) culture and the local market of each country.

Farkhondeh, Play With Children

2020-12-26T21:06:17+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to schoolwork, which of the two approaches do you prefer? Nowadays, in this modern era, parents are preoccupied with innumerable responsibilities influencing the amount of time they can allocate to their children. As a result, because they do not have much time, it is inevitable to spend their time on higher important issues. In this regard, some believe that it would be better if they devote their time to playing with their children. Others, however, assert that they should help their kids in their academic matter if they have any free time. Personally speaking, I agree with the former idea for some reasons. Firstly, there are other people that can be a better resource for children in their school issues. To explain more, all people have some duties and responsibilities in their life. Teachers are more specialized than parents to help children in their schoolwork and try to solve their academic obstacles. Although parents are able to guide their kids and address their scientific issues, teachers, on the other hand, are not capable to of spending their time playing with students. As a result, if parents do not allocate enough time for their children to have fun with them, nobody can do this. As an example, when I was in elementary school, we had some financial problems so that my parents had to work most of their time. Whenever my mother found some free time, we went out together. In these situations, I had a chance to speak with my mother and counsel consult with her about my frustrations. As a result, in spite of her professional occupations, I had a chance to communicate with my hermother, which strengthened our relationship. Second, parents can boost their children’s skills through/during paly play more efficiently. To clarify, as children represent their emotional needs and problems when they are playing, parents have an appropriate opportunity to address such desires. In addition, they can teach numerous abilities to their kids by playing. For example, when children lose a game, naturally they should be upset. However, sometimes some kids suppress their emotions instead of share sharing them with others. In this situation, children have a chance to learn how they can effectively regulate their negative emotions if their parents allocate time to them to play together. In sum, I believe if parents are too busy and overwhelmed so that they should choose between having fun and practicing school matters with their kids, it would be more beneficial to play with themtheir children. They can educate their kids how to manage their feelings effectively. Meanwhile, they can spend their time on speaking about their children’s problems in their life.

Milad Banaei, New Stories On TV and Newspapers

2020-12-26T21:06:07+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

New stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this? During the last few decades, the methods of showing and presenting stories and information have faced with significant changes. Nowadays, modern technologies have brought about certain benefits in many fields. Therefore, TV programs and newspapers are not far from these improvements. That is to say, nowadays TV programs and newspapers are more covered by flashy pictures compared to the past. There are many who believed that this new trend has a rewarding impact on capturing the viewers’ attentions. It is notable that the lack of sufficient technology and poor-quality equipment in the past was the major reason for/behind using fewer pictures in TV programs and newspapers. Having said that, nowadays due to the comprehensive improvements of modern technology and new devices which are available for everyone, we can see that TV programs and newspapers are fully covered by pictures. For instance, TV producers now have great access to various professional devices such as high-tech digital cameras, powerful computers, and a variety of designing software which would help them to produce more picturesque programs. Additionally, the new generation of industrial printers contributes leads the press to add more colorful pictures in their pages rather than using simple texts. This approach has become really popular not only due to its possibility of new technology but also due to its decent feedback from the viewers. It seems that the number of viewers and spectators of TV programs and newspapers which were used more pictures in their stories and pages has increased considerably. Consequently, the producers had no other choice in order to become prosperous in this close competition to capture their share from the market. Meanwhile, there are many who are opposed to this trend and argue that this approach has weakened the reading habits among ordinary people. In conclusion, although there is a significant tendency to watching images rather than reading texts, the important role of texts and words in conveying deeper concepts should not be disregarded. Therefore, we have to take the balanced approach of collecting information from the media, not only by the images but also by words.

Punishment in Children

2020-12-26T21:05:58+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Melika Jameie Some people consider punishment an effective method for upbringing of well-behaved children as opposed to some other ones who strongly believe there is no use punishing young children whatsoever. The former group, might have faith in the saying which goes “spare the rod, spoil the child.” The latter, on the contrary, discusses there are ways more reasonable and beneficial alternatives to bringing up a child who is confident, courteous and successful. To my mind, moderation is usually the best course to take. Believing in imposing out punishments, the first category draw attention to this fact that children should receive punishment for their misbehavior and disobedience lest they grow up tactless and unsuccessful. To put it simply, imagine a situation when a child should make a decision between hanging out with their his/her friends and studying for their upcoming exams. The responsibility lies with both parents and teachers as to how children would behave in such important conditions. Nevertheless, it is worth stating the fact that inflicting corporal punishment is not an iota of an accepted strategy. When it comes to the alternative strategies, it is worth mentioning although there is a wildly held belief that there is not merely one effective approach to raise raising a child, evidence based research suggests some healthy discipline strategies to parents such as giving consequences and calling a time out. To bring the first approach to light, consider when your child resists collecting their toys from the floor and you tell them if they don’t listen to your commands, you will take their toys away for the rest of the day. This situation was an example of giving consequences to children. Another strategy is calling a time-out, that is to say, when children disobey rules they should go to a time-out and come back when they feel ready and in control. However, it is important to memorize that not only could harsh and strict punishments render the child unconfident and much too wary, but also it prevents the child from experiencing new activities and situations. The main conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is that it is incumbent upon parents to raise well-bred children, hence the importance of learning positive discipline strategies and establishing a fine balance between punishing and rewarding our children.

Re-Offender, Shaghayegh

2020-12-26T21:05:48+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? These days the number of people committing crimes has been increasing, particularly those who had been in jail. Many reasons can be considered why they tend to carry out itthem, but it is more important to know how to address such problems. There are several main reasons why offenders commit more serious or violent crimes. Foremost, recent surveys have been carried out to determine that thousands of re-offenders who were young with no criminal background but they were charged to prison where considerable dangerous criminals live there minor offenses; as a result, new ones acquire a broad range of criminal activities that means they have adequate time to exchange their information about the methods have already been used. Furthermore, they are in an environment that requires pushes them to be able to protect themselves in order to survive; consequently, they become more violent and dangerous. Secondarily, a growing number of offenders come from poor background families where they are mostly uneducated and unskilled children; hence, they tend to commit crimes to live. To solve this phenomenon the criminal justice system should focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment. A straightforward solution would be to separate inexperienced offenders from those having serval committingpriors. This trend might avoid prevent the various methods they carry ou t crimes. In addition, governments could provide a proper situation in which criminals obtain suitable acquisitions of skills in order to find an occupation. Moreover,the executive officials/authority figures can encourage offenders to read books and take notes to reduce the amount of punishment since reading is regarded as a way in which we can shift attitude. In conclusion, it is undeniable that re-offenders are one of the semost severe verest problems that many countries face. However, there are various measures that can be taken to mitigate this issue.