FridaysGMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم
تلفن: 42-88679341http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/522-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-06-142024-05-05T21:17:08+00:00IELTSTOEFLCENTERinfo@ieltstoeflcenter.comJoomla! - Open Source Content ManagementAmir G, Crime and Punishment2020-09-04T17:23:13+00:002020-09-04T17:23:13+00:00http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/522-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-06-14/3711-amir-g-crime-and-punishmentHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Amir G, Crime and Punishment.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however,
argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should
always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While many individuals hold the idea that a certain penalty ought to be applied for a crime regardless
of the reasons behind the crime such as motivation, age and mental health of the wrongdoer, the
opponents argue that a fair judiciary system can consider the reasonable grounds behind an unlawful
act. When it comes to applying a penalty for a criminal activity, I subscribe to the view that we had
better study the case carefully to find the root causes behind it or a machine can read a look up table
and pronounce the verdicts.
First and for most, we have to note that the main reason behind a punishment is to show the
wrongdoer and other members of society that retributions are defined and will be applied if someone
commits a crime whereby we can curb the criminal activities in societies. Capital punishment, for
example, is an acceptable punishment in many parts of the world where legislators believe it can
prevent brutal criminal activities such as murder. Undoubtedly, judging a wrongdoer regardless of
decisive factors at play could reduce the crime rate in a primitive society.
Having said that, applying a specific punishment for a wrongdoer regardless of his age, mental
wellness, and motivation is not fair. Compared to the past, we are now living in an age where every
single part of life has dramatically improved, hence an improvement in our judiciary system seems
unavoidable. The expected punishment of a person who suffers from a mental disorder, or a child
who cannot recognize the consequent consequence of their actions should be completely different
from normal individuals. From my point of view, obligatory educational sessions for the
abovementioned group work far better than traditional penalties.
To sum up, I subscribe to the view that modern punishment has to be replaced with the traditionally
old ones thereby expecting societies with lower crime rates. Only when the lawmakers manage the
punishment fit the crime considering other factors at play can we expect an impressive reduction in
crimes.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Amir G, Crime and Punishment.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however,
argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should
always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While many individuals hold the idea that a certain penalty ought to be applied for a crime regardless
of the reasons behind the crime such as motivation, age and mental health of the wrongdoer, the
opponents argue that a fair judiciary system can consider the reasonable grounds behind an unlawful
act. When it comes to applying a penalty for a criminal activity, I subscribe to the view that we had
better study the case carefully to find the root causes behind it or a machine can read a look up table
and pronounce the verdicts.
First and for most, we have to note that the main reason behind a punishment is to show the
wrongdoer and other members of society that retributions are defined and will be applied if someone
commits a crime whereby we can curb the criminal activities in societies. Capital punishment, for
example, is an acceptable punishment in many parts of the world where legislators believe it can
prevent brutal criminal activities such as murder. Undoubtedly, judging a wrongdoer regardless of
decisive factors at play could reduce the crime rate in a primitive society.
Having said that, applying a specific punishment for a wrongdoer regardless of his age, mental
wellness, and motivation is not fair. Compared to the past, we are now living in an age where every
single part of life has dramatically improved, hence an improvement in our judiciary system seems
unavoidable. The expected punishment of a person who suffers from a mental disorder, or a child
who cannot recognize the consequent consequence of their actions should be completely different
from normal individuals. From my point of view, obligatory educational sessions for the
abovementioned group work far better than traditional penalties.
To sum up, I subscribe to the view that modern punishment has to be replaced with the traditionally
old ones thereby expecting societies with lower crime rates. Only when the lawmakers manage the
punishment fit the crime considering other factors at play can we expect an impressive reduction in
crimes.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Darya Atighi, Crime2020-09-04T17:23:03+00:002020-09-04T17:23:03+00:00http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/522-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-06-14/3710-darya-atighi-crimeHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Amir G, Crime and Punishment.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Why do some people commit crime?
Every morning when we wake up and turn on the tv and listen to the news we heard some bad news like
robbery or raped rape of someone , hostage taking , honor killings and domestic violence… . The main
question is that how we can control people to do less the crime.
The main reason I think is poverty and a family growing up in it. However, there is are some other
reasons like injustice , class inequality , … . if we support poor family families and create jobs/provide
employmentdo entrepreneurship for them or support the orphans child give them good food , shelter
and send them to school for education I think this these things reduce commit commission of crime .
with a glance look at the society we understand/realize some people like some children may commited a
crime for getting the attention of their parents ./seek their parents’ attention
The preventative measures is are putting surveillance in the street , alley , stores and letting them know
if they do something wrong we can see them and they are getting in trouble and specify some
punishments for each crime and imprisonment a guilty person .
At the end, we cannot/can not understand the situation that a criminal is in when verdict why people
committing crime; we are not in their place . however, we can make society a better and safer place
with by helping people finish their education, give them good work and arrest the guilty persons for a
crime committed.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Amir G, Crime and Punishment.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Why do some people commit crime?
Every morning when we wake up and turn on the tv and listen to the news we heard some bad news like
robbery or raped rape of someone , hostage taking , honor killings and domestic violence… . The main
question is that how we can control people to do less the crime.
The main reason I think is poverty and a family growing up in it. However, there is are some other
reasons like injustice , class inequality , … . if we support poor family families and create jobs/provide
employmentdo entrepreneurship for them or support the orphans child give them good food , shelter
and send them to school for education I think this these things reduce commit commission of crime .
with a glance look at the society we understand/realize some people like some children may commited a
crime for getting the attention of their parents ./seek their parents’ attention
The preventative measures is are putting surveillance in the street , alley , stores and letting them know
if they do something wrong we can see them and they are getting in trouble and specify some
punishments for each crime and imprisonment a guilty person .
At the end, we cannot/can not understand the situation that a criminal is in when verdict why people
committing crime; we are not in their place . however, we can make society a better and safer place
with by helping people finish their education, give them good work and arrest the guilty persons for a
crime committed.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Farkhondeh, Agriculture Methods2020-09-04T17:22:53+00:002020-09-04T17:22:53+00:00http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/522-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-06-14/3709-farkhondeh-agriculture-methodsHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Farkhondeh, Agriculture Methods.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some modern agriculture methods damage the environment. People think
providing more food for the growing world population is more important than
protecting the environment. Do you agree with this view?
Over the past century, because of advancement of technology, humans̕ welfare has been
improved. The unfettered increase Increasing in population and urbanization are two factors,
which endorse the importance of food expansion by utilizing modern agriculture methods.
However, there is not any public consensus in this context. Although some people believe that
providing food for the growing world population is more important, others continue to assert
that protecting the environment is much more critical. I believe that preserving the
environment is more vital and ignoring it can have dire consequences. In the following
paragraphs, I will explain my reasons.
As the first reason, modern agriculture uses state-of-the-art methods to produce higher
amounts of foods. Although in the short run, it seems that these methods boost the food
production, in the long run, it can have irreparable effects on the ecosystem and result in
changing it. It is a controversial subject that in some areas some animal species migrate to a
new place to find food and survive and some animals have been found dead in forests because
of lack of food. In fact, due to human’s manipulation, the ecosystem chain has been disrupted,
so an incorrect intervention in a particular plant species can have effect on all wildlife and wild
flora. As a result, in a long time because of death of animal species and changing of plants, the
environmental resources will be reduced.
Furthermore, in my opinion, some modern agriculture methods lead to irreversible changes like
increasing the greenhouse gases and global warming, loss of water resources and so on.
Increasing the increase in the number of factories and industrialization of countries causes air
pollution that over time raises the number of diseases like cancers. Furthermore, utilizing
chemical fertilizers can lead to water pollution. As a result, these methods not only do not have
benefits for humans, but rather can result in a variety of sicknesses. On the other hand, some
techniques in modern agriculture like new methods of irrigation can increase the food
production and do not have any disadvantage for the environment.
In summary, despite the dramatic increase of population and urgent need for food resources
and widespread hunger and malnutrition, it is better to take a long-term perspective instead of
trying to solve and overcome the problems only for a short time. The Ecosystem, plants and
animal species are heritages, which have been given to us and it is our duty to give it them to
next generation.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Farkhondeh, Agriculture Methods.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some modern agriculture methods damage the environment. People think
providing more food for the growing world population is more important than
protecting the environment. Do you agree with this view?
Over the past century, because of advancement of technology, humans̕ welfare has been
improved. The unfettered increase Increasing in population and urbanization are two factors,
which endorse the importance of food expansion by utilizing modern agriculture methods.
However, there is not any public consensus in this context. Although some people believe that
providing food for the growing world population is more important, others continue to assert
that protecting the environment is much more critical. I believe that preserving the
environment is more vital and ignoring it can have dire consequences. In the following
paragraphs, I will explain my reasons.
As the first reason, modern agriculture uses state-of-the-art methods to produce higher
amounts of foods. Although in the short run, it seems that these methods boost the food
production, in the long run, it can have irreparable effects on the ecosystem and result in
changing it. It is a controversial subject that in some areas some animal species migrate to a
new place to find food and survive and some animals have been found dead in forests because
of lack of food. In fact, due to human’s manipulation, the ecosystem chain has been disrupted,
so an incorrect intervention in a particular plant species can have effect on all wildlife and wild
flora. As a result, in a long time because of death of animal species and changing of plants, the
environmental resources will be reduced.
Furthermore, in my opinion, some modern agriculture methods lead to irreversible changes like
increasing the greenhouse gases and global warming, loss of water resources and so on.
Increasing the increase in the number of factories and industrialization of countries causes air
pollution that over time raises the number of diseases like cancers. Furthermore, utilizing
chemical fertilizers can lead to water pollution. As a result, these methods not only do not have
benefits for humans, but rather can result in a variety of sicknesses. On the other hand, some
techniques in modern agriculture like new methods of irrigation can increase the food
production and do not have any disadvantage for the environment.
In summary, despite the dramatic increase of population and urgent need for food resources
and widespread hunger and malnutrition, it is better to take a long-term perspective instead of
trying to solve and overcome the problems only for a short time. The Ecosystem, plants and
animal species are heritages, which have been given to us and it is our duty to give it them to
next generation.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Farzaneh, Historic Buildings2020-09-04T17:22:43+00:002020-09-04T17:22:43+00:00http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/522-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-06-14/3708-farzaneh-historic-buildingsHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Farzaneh, Historic Buildings.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people say that the government should break down all the
historic buildings and replace them with modern buildings. DO YOU
AGREE OR DISAGREE?
As buildings from the past centuries or decades constitute a part of today’s cities,
their maintenance or destruction and replacing those them with modern ones by
the authorities has have theirits advocates and I subscribe to the view of the
former group, which prefers the ancient buildings being preserved.
The absence of construction technologies or effortless methods, which just have
been developed in the recent decades, prove that the process of building in the
past was far more complicated and harder than that of the present. Constructing
buildings mostly by workforce instead of machines and equipment, the old
builders had to endure many hardships compared to their current counterparts
whose works are much more rapid and automatized. Their hard work, alongside
their attention to the sophisticated details in buildings, which can rarely be found
in the present-day ones, is the main reason to regard them as invaluable
architectural heritage.
Although the maintenance and the reinforcement of the historic buildings might
come at a huge cost to the governments and the idea of substituting them with
the modern places is a tempting one, as they might be more luxurious or
magnificent, I believe preserving such national heritage will be worth it. What
justifies such expenditures and resisting those temptations is that learning about
ancient buildings is profoundly informative. Many aspects of the ancients’ lives
and culture would be revealed by studying those places. By that, we can be
informed about their beliefs or even their ongoing crisiscrises. For instance, the
thick high walls of an old place, which seldom have an opening on itthem, can
indicate the levels of safety in its society or tell us of the long wars the city might
have been involved in. Due to the many contributions these places can make to
the knowledge of our society and their high value as our heritage, the
governments have to set many rules to preserve them while allocating adequate
budget to their maintenance.
In conclusion, although protecting historic places from being demolished while
there is a high demand for modern fancy buildings is a hard job, I believe theamount of knowledge brought about by the delicate historic buildings could be
valuable and instructive enough to justify the hardships.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Farzaneh, Historic Buildings.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people say that the government should break down all the
historic buildings and replace them with modern buildings. DO YOU
AGREE OR DISAGREE?
As buildings from the past centuries or decades constitute a part of today’s cities,
their maintenance or destruction and replacing those them with modern ones by
the authorities has have theirits advocates and I subscribe to the view of the
former group, which prefers the ancient buildings being preserved.
The absence of construction technologies or effortless methods, which just have
been developed in the recent decades, prove that the process of building in the
past was far more complicated and harder than that of the present. Constructing
buildings mostly by workforce instead of machines and equipment, the old
builders had to endure many hardships compared to their current counterparts
whose works are much more rapid and automatized. Their hard work, alongside
their attention to the sophisticated details in buildings, which can rarely be found
in the present-day ones, is the main reason to regard them as invaluable
architectural heritage.
Although the maintenance and the reinforcement of the historic buildings might
come at a huge cost to the governments and the idea of substituting them with
the modern places is a tempting one, as they might be more luxurious or
magnificent, I believe preserving such national heritage will be worth it. What
justifies such expenditures and resisting those temptations is that learning about
ancient buildings is profoundly informative. Many aspects of the ancients’ lives
and culture would be revealed by studying those places. By that, we can be
informed about their beliefs or even their ongoing crisiscrises. For instance, the
thick high walls of an old place, which seldom have an opening on itthem, can
indicate the levels of safety in its society or tell us of the long wars the city might
have been involved in. Due to the many contributions these places can make to
the knowledge of our society and their high value as our heritage, the
governments have to set many rules to preserve them while allocating adequate
budget to their maintenance.
In conclusion, although protecting historic places from being demolished while
there is a high demand for modern fancy buildings is a hard job, I believe theamount of knowledge brought about by the delicate historic buildings could be
valuable and instructive enough to justify the hardships.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Mohamed, Change or Accept2020-09-04T17:22:30+00:002020-09-04T17:22:30+00:00http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/522-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-06-14/3707-mohamed-change-or-acceptHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Mohamed, Change or Accept.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage
of money. Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
How paradoxical that human nature consists of both enthusiasm for change and fear of it. To compound
the irony, both attempt to make a change and patience with hardship have been extolled by many
throughout history. After thousands of years of human civilization, the question still remains but
through different forms and terms. There is no point in denying that in order to answer this question
and take any side, it is required to cast some light on what is worth trying to alter.
Before all else, we should identify what we can change and what not. All inspirational, beautiful
sentences quipped by nominal scientists and philosophers regarding making or undergoing changes for a
better life notwithstanding, the hard truth is that sometimes a change is out of question no matter how
hard one tries. It is only everyday life when you face difficulty triggered by decisions you made in the
past. stuck in a career that you hate, for instance, while all your childhood you had your heart set on
another which necessitates a university degree or other requirements you do not possess is bitterly
painful yet surprisingly commonplace. Although perseverance and tenacity are good personal traits,
they cannot always bring about a better situation as the decisive factors are beyond control, and any
more effort leads to failure and a sense of frustration.
Meanwhile, the definition of a bad or good situation is such relative that no one is able to determine
what it is and what the assessment criteria are. It varies widely according to the person, the generation
or even the culture. In other words, someone's ideal job might be another's nightmare. Many
desperately seek a nine-to-five job with insurance and safety/insecurity but limited responsibilities and
no risks whatsoever, whereas others find this a living in hell due to their adventurous nature. Similarly,
financial problems may be interpreted in numerous ways. Many affluent a person seeks more wealth
however tremendous they have managed to gain, whilst their high-spirited fellows are contented with
far less property.
However, the state of satisfaction should not cause lethargy. It is believed that efforts to change an
unpleasant situation are a success whether attaining the goal or not since it leaves no residual regret
later in life. Only when an individual works hard to achieve his dreams and progress, will he not be
remorseful about his past. Besides, an alteration can open up a whole gamut of new experiences, which
in turn may open the door for a better future. Quitting a job or a field of study that is excruciating, a
great number of thriving figures in various times and places could morph their monotonous, hard life
into a magical experience by which a taste of better life became possible.
In conclusion, although the idea of a change for a better life is highly attractive, altering all the bothering
elements in one’s life might not be easy in practice. However, I am of the opinion that this should not
justify the tendency towards inactivity, praying for a miracle.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Mohamed, Change or Accept.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage
of money. Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
How paradoxical that human nature consists of both enthusiasm for change and fear of it. To compound
the irony, both attempt to make a change and patience with hardship have been extolled by many
throughout history. After thousands of years of human civilization, the question still remains but
through different forms and terms. There is no point in denying that in order to answer this question
and take any side, it is required to cast some light on what is worth trying to alter.
Before all else, we should identify what we can change and what not. All inspirational, beautiful
sentences quipped by nominal scientists and philosophers regarding making or undergoing changes for a
better life notwithstanding, the hard truth is that sometimes a change is out of question no matter how
hard one tries. It is only everyday life when you face difficulty triggered by decisions you made in the
past. stuck in a career that you hate, for instance, while all your childhood you had your heart set on
another which necessitates a university degree or other requirements you do not possess is bitterly
painful yet surprisingly commonplace. Although perseverance and tenacity are good personal traits,
they cannot always bring about a better situation as the decisive factors are beyond control, and any
more effort leads to failure and a sense of frustration.
Meanwhile, the definition of a bad or good situation is such relative that no one is able to determine
what it is and what the assessment criteria are. It varies widely according to the person, the generation
or even the culture. In other words, someone's ideal job might be another's nightmare. Many
desperately seek a nine-to-five job with insurance and safety/insecurity but limited responsibilities and
no risks whatsoever, whereas others find this a living in hell due to their adventurous nature. Similarly,
financial problems may be interpreted in numerous ways. Many affluent a person seeks more wealth
however tremendous they have managed to gain, whilst their high-spirited fellows are contented with
far less property.
However, the state of satisfaction should not cause lethargy. It is believed that efforts to change an
unpleasant situation are a success whether attaining the goal or not since it leaves no residual regret
later in life. Only when an individual works hard to achieve his dreams and progress, will he not be
remorseful about his past. Besides, an alteration can open up a whole gamut of new experiences, which
in turn may open the door for a better future. Quitting a job or a field of study that is excruciating, a
great number of thriving figures in various times and places could morph their monotonous, hard life
into a magical experience by which a taste of better life became possible.
In conclusion, although the idea of a change for a better life is highly attractive, altering all the bothering
elements in one’s life might not be easy in practice. However, I am of the opinion that this should not
justify the tendency towards inactivity, praying for a miracle.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Niloo, People With Different Skills2020-09-04T17:22:20+00:002020-09-04T17:22:20+00:00http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/522-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-06-14/3706-niloo-people-with-different-skillsHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Niloo, People With Different Skills.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many skills are more successful than people who focus on one
skill only. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is stating the obvious that success has several meanings for each person and it
depends on each individuals' individual’s situation. That has been
considerquestioned, whether people who have various skills are more prosperous or
others who focus on one skill only, which has always been a much debated
argument. Despite the argument asserting that people who focus on one tasks are
more successful based on having a high concentration on their works, I believe
otherwise on the grounds that a person who learns different tasks are is more
creative and flexible to in several careers than others which is conducive to being
more successful.
First and more obvious, the crux of the matter lies in the fact that people who
develop various skills are more productive. In simple terms, being more productive
gives more chance to a person to become more creative. The best example is, a
worker in a company who knows numerous skills. He is able to work in different
parts of that company and as a result, is a more productive and highly-respected
worker in that company. Besides, since he knows several tasks he gains more
experiences in different fields which is culminates in fixing better problems it in
terms of being a creative and experienced person. Therefore, it goes without saying
that a person who learns more than one task has a more opportunity to become a
productive and creative person, thereby copping coping better with difficulties which
may he may face on the way to successbe face in the success way.
Another striking point is that people with several abilities are more likely to flexibly
develop their careers. To put apposite words, fundamentally they have more
opportunity to find jobs compared to people who focus on one ability. For the
purpose of illustration, a person who graduated from electrical engineering and
knows mechanics and is also fluent in English and French not only has he more
chances to find several jobs but also he may has have more salary than others.
Hence, as is clear, individuals with diverse skills are more better able to flexibly
develop their careers whereby having a more better chance to choose their career as
much as possible.
To cut a long story short, although some people believe that individuals who focus on
one skill are more successful in terms of concentration, people with various skills are
more creative and productive person individuals and also they have more
opportunity to find more jobs which will be more beneficial during their life.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Niloo, People With Different Skills.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many skills are more successful than people who focus on one
skill only. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is stating the obvious that success has several meanings for each person and it
depends on each individuals' individual’s situation. That has been
considerquestioned, whether people who have various skills are more prosperous or
others who focus on one skill only, which has always been a much debated
argument. Despite the argument asserting that people who focus on one tasks are
more successful based on having a high concentration on their works, I believe
otherwise on the grounds that a person who learns different tasks are is more
creative and flexible to in several careers than others which is conducive to being
more successful.
First and more obvious, the crux of the matter lies in the fact that people who
develop various skills are more productive. In simple terms, being more productive
gives more chance to a person to become more creative. The best example is, a
worker in a company who knows numerous skills. He is able to work in different
parts of that company and as a result, is a more productive and highly-respected
worker in that company. Besides, since he knows several tasks he gains more
experiences in different fields which is culminates in fixing better problems it in
terms of being a creative and experienced person. Therefore, it goes without saying
that a person who learns more than one task has a more opportunity to become a
productive and creative person, thereby copping coping better with difficulties which
may he may face on the way to successbe face in the success way.
Another striking point is that people with several abilities are more likely to flexibly
develop their careers. To put apposite words, fundamentally they have more
opportunity to find jobs compared to people who focus on one ability. For the
purpose of illustration, a person who graduated from electrical engineering and
knows mechanics and is also fluent in English and French not only has he more
chances to find several jobs but also he may has have more salary than others.
Hence, as is clear, individuals with diverse skills are more better able to flexibly
develop their careers whereby having a more better chance to choose their career as
much as possible.
To cut a long story short, although some people believe that individuals who focus on
one skill are more successful in terms of concentration, people with various skills are
more creative and productive person individuals and also they have more
opportunity to find more jobs which will be more beneficial during their life.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Wealthy Nations2020-09-04T17:22:10+00:002020-09-04T17:22:10+00:00http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/522-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-06-14/3705-wealthy-nationsHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Wealthy Nations.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such
things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look
after their citizens themselves?
Some expect that rich communities are responsible for supplying food and education for impoverished
people from poor societies, on the other side, this question might come up to our mind, is this the right
way? What about the Governments of these societies? Are they not responsible for these?
On one side, some claim that supplying food and education is not a solution. Firstly, because it could not
be a sustainable trend. Secondly, politicians of these countries usually abuse their power for their own
benefits and they do not care about their people as long as they receive their needs from other
communities. Given that, supporting such countries might not be the best answer.
On the other side, for people of wealthy countries, who usually consume more than they need almost
every day, helping other communities, that are in need of their basic necessities such as food and
education, not only should not be a concern, but they should think of it as an opportunity for a safer and
better world. Since we are living in a globalization age and the whole world is connected together,
helping other people is a sign of humanity. However, we are all witnessing people who escape from
their countries because of lack of their vital needs and they live in the difficult situation of the refugee
camps all around the world from Europe to New Zealand these days.
To conclude, although governments should be responsible for fulfilling basic human needs for their own
nations, people in developed countries are morally obliged to help people in poor countries for
humanitarian reasons.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.06.14/Wealthy Nations.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such
things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look
after their citizens themselves?
Some expect that rich communities are responsible for supplying food and education for impoverished
people from poor societies, on the other side, this question might come up to our mind, is this the right
way? What about the Governments of these societies? Are they not responsible for these?
On one side, some claim that supplying food and education is not a solution. Firstly, because it could not
be a sustainable trend. Secondly, politicians of these countries usually abuse their power for their own
benefits and they do not care about their people as long as they receive their needs from other
communities. Given that, supporting such countries might not be the best answer.
On the other side, for people of wealthy countries, who usually consume more than they need almost
every day, helping other communities, that are in need of their basic necessities such as food and
education, not only should not be a concern, but they should think of it as an opportunity for a safer and
better world. Since we are living in a globalization age and the whole world is connected together,
helping other people is a sign of humanity. However, we are all witnessing people who escape from
their countries because of lack of their vital needs and they live in the difficult situation of the refugee
camps all around the world from Europe to New Zealand these days.
To conclude, although governments should be responsible for fulfilling basic human needs for their own
nations, people in developed countries are morally obliged to help people in poor countries for
humanitarian reasons.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>