جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is widely accepted that people who have post-school qualifications earn a higher salary than those less educated do. University students should, therefore, pay all the full cost incurred over the course of obtaining a college education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? An overwhelming majority of people subscribe to the view that tertiary education should not be funded by governments reasoning that graduates from higher education centers will earn handsome salaries, therefore it is incumbent upon students to pay for their education. When it comes to this notion, I hold that free education can perhaps pave the way for talented students who cannot afford the cost of higher education and not tax payers. It goes without saying that higher education is one of the main pillars of a civilized society, hence the importance of free education for certain people. I opine that if tertiary education centers charge all students, many gifted young individuals face difficulty to pursuing their education owing to their financial problems. Though provision of free education for people from all walks of life may not seem like a wise solution, students coming from lower social strata to some extant extent do not tend to enroll for higher education because of their formidably financial plight. Despite various benefits, higher education can demand a considerable amount of public funds, and that is why free education is not considered a high priority in many parts of the world. Officials can introduce appropriate rules with which lower income students can benefit from to cover their expenses during education years based on their results and level of income. Wave Waiving the tuition fee and offering monthly salary for eligible students can be a logical solution with which not only can all student continue their education, but the government can spend their funds more reasonably. To cut a long story short, I must say that I do agree with free higher education, but not for everyone. Arguably those who can afford their cost have to incur their expenses. Considering the current economic climate across the globe, we must make an informed choice to keep the cost reasonable. I argue that though hard, but it is time we removed the obstacles for gifted people so that they can lift a variety of humans’ plight in the future.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

What who is the an ideal parents? The measurement of an ideal parents is outcome of their children. Simply put, how the youth will behave in the society is the best way to elaborate the quality of a successful parents. As it is obvious, an infant is an amorphous soul which can be shaped during the time that it spends in its family. The didactic ways that parents choose to bring up their child with, is the answer to our question. Although some people believe that the strict disciplines breed better children, I , personally, think that the more strict the rules, the better lier liars the youth. Each individual tends to experience a majority of things emotions in his/her life which are pernicious, like sadness, heartbroken heartbreak, etc. The strict parents try to circumscribe the possibilities of deafit defeat in the life of their childern in order to preserve them from getting hurt. Considering that children are eager to know everything by theirselvesthemselves, the inevitable outcomes are either a depression depressed child who is afraid to be a maverick or a perfect lair who knows the best way to circumvent his / her duty. There is a series by Netflix which shows the future of technology, in one of the episodes, a single mother tried to eliminate the violence, andpronography pornography , etc. from the sight of her daughter by putting a chip in her brain. The result was a girl who asks her classmate to tell the story of movies with the scenes that she cannot see. I am of the opinion that an ideal parents will be a closed friend with their children, and help them to choose their way under the circumstance which they expound for them. They let them to experience, to lose, to win and to taste the result of bad decisions. I assert this is the only way to educated the next generation. Considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion which can be drawn, is that by a friendship friendly supervision the ideal parents can culminate help their children to be successful in their future life. The strict orders and limitation limiting atmosphere will ruin the creativity of the children and hurt them in their forth coming life.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Should governments make decisions about people’s lifestyle or should they make their own decisions? As a government has responsibility towards its citizens, some argue it also has the right to control them; many, however, question such involvement as far as personal preferences are concerned. I, too, take the issue with the unwelcome intrusion of the government into people’s lifestyle. Selecting the way of life is indeed a private matter and government involving in that could bring serious repercussions. Although members of a community may share many of the same interests, their tastes probably vary since they belong to different generations and subcultures. These differences, whether distinct or sublet, could form their choices in their lives. From appearance such as the type of outfit, they prefer, to the food they cater can demonstrate their identity. Consequently, restricting this range of choice, albeit bringing unity, can mean the loss of individuality. In extreme cases, in which the government pull the strings behind the creation or eradication of lifestyles, it is highly likely for a community to lose its diversity or even creativity. On a more societal scale, to dictate people what they should favor can be regarded as infringing their basic rights. Deprived from of these, by either statutory obligations or in the name of the law, residents tend to feel repressed and may develop a sense of intense hatred towards their own governments, and this, as a result, leads to a society where citizens struggle to enjoy their lives. They will consider themselves worthless, removable units rather than pillars of the community. Such an Orwellian level of government involvement will picture nothing but a hopeless future. In conclusion, the determination of people’s lifestyles by the government will bring adverse effects on both individual and societal levels, although some argue it would create a more united society.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

88 One’s Job is an inevitable part of everyone’s life. Furthermore, people consume the main part of their daily time at work and it is imperative to enjoy it. Job satisfaction the same as happiness has not determined factors and it is varies between employees, for instance in a software company you can find two developers with the same level and earning that one of them whom is happy with his work, while the second developer is looking for a new job position because he are is not satisfied with his career. Job satisfaction is related to many items, for instance, people’s characters and their plan for progress in future. Enjoying with a stable position, people who are not adventurous have not risky character because they prefer working with one employer and don’t like changing the job, in contrast people who are take risky in their life prefer challenging jobs with flexible salary because they have an ambition to do great jobs and getting a high position in their future. In spite of aforementioned, some items have positive effects on most of the employees and as result of which them they can bring cause well jobemployee satisfaction, Such as having the an employer who is caring about hisits employees. This is because that employers are care about health, family, progress of their workers. A Friendly environment is another factors that has significant effect in job satisfaction and that is why employees are enjoyed working familiar in a friendly way together and they do notn’t feel anything/issue bothering items on the part of the from co-workers. In conclusion,. Though job satisfaction items are different amongbetween workers, with a multidimensional approach to employee satisfaction it is possible to find some common factors. As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all worker?

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Museums are of paramount significance for countries since many invaluable national heritages are conserved in them while exhibiting to the public. However, there has been much discussion revolving around whether the entrance of museums should be free for everyone or not. While the cost of the ticket would serve as a deterrent for the less fortunate individuals, I would argue that it is more beneficial. On the one hand, charging people for visiting museums will benefit society on several grounds. To start with, museums will earn money independently and this income could encourage the officials to improve their services by hiring more personnel for preserving the museums such as experts, safety guards and tour guides. This cash flow will enable museums to improve their advertising and marketing methods to appeal to more visitors, thereby developing the tourism industry. Moreover, if museums were open to public freely, the public who are not passionate about museum pieces would come in droves to spend their free time without taking advantage of them. This would make tourists and some visitors refrain from visiting since the crowd would disrupt them from concentrating and learning, and also prevent the employees from protecting the place. On the other hand, many an underprivileged family cannot visit museums due to their shortage of fund for paying for entry tickets. These families mostly toil from dawn to dusk to make their ends meet and cannot set aside some money for cultural activities. In my opinion, the charges of these families would bear the brunt of this trend. Not only can visiting museums help them to broaden their mind, but also change their perception of life. For that reason, it is incumbent upon officials to introduce ticket discounts for school visitors and children and force schools to include visiting museums in their activities. In conclusion, although I concede that charging people for visiting museums would deprive some of them of learning about many issues, due to the importance of maintaining these places this trend has more merits.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Mobile phones and the internet have made it easier to stay in contact with other people. However, as a lot of time is spent using telephones and computers, there is less face-to-face contact and direct communication. Is the growing use of communications technology a positive or a negative development for society? In this day and age, the pace of technological enhancement is indeed not comparable with the past. The advent of high-tech means of communication has led to increasing people’s welfare which in turn brings about life satisfaction, even though its side effects cannot be ignored at all. First and foremost, it is an axiom that state-of-the-art technology such as cellphones or the internet has facilitated human life, particularly so as to stay in contact with each other. In other words, everybody is completely able to contact others from anywhere of in the world through such modern devices and the media. I opine its overt advantage is that not only can people call but also they are able to see each other easily. For instance, in emotional terms, those who are far from their relatives can be traumatized less significantly. In addition, nowadays, it has been a common practice for the youth to contact universities’ or companies’ staff in order to achieve more abroad opportunities abroad. Moreover, a mobile phone has a major role to play in emergent emergeciessituations by which plenty of unpleasant phenomena will be mitigated considerably. However, the downside of this moot point cannot be denied. On the psychological side, a large number of people regrettably become addicted unconsciously through continuous use of such novel technological devices. Therefore, they not only spoil their useful time but also cannot give full attention to the individuals who are around them. I strongly believe this trouble can be excessively destructive for immediate family relationships. Last but not least, from a social standpoint, people should foster their teamwork ability which is generally gained through face-to-face communications. My firm conviction is that only if each individual puts histheir every effort into boosting this skill in real world, will they he be content with their both his work and personal life. In conclusion, further to the above explanation, the positive effects of communications technology will outweigh the negative ones provided everyone tries to be responsible for managing the manner of their use in this regard.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In the past, people wore their traditional clothes and followed their culture. These days, most people wear similar clothes and therefore look very similar to one another. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? In this fast-paced world people’s perspective on the type of clothing and their appearance has changed due to the enormous development in their lifestyle, although the value of the age-old clothes which are associated with a person’s roots cannot be denied. Generally, traditional clothes are known as a symbol of each nation’s culture and identity. Wearing them usually brings a sense of national pride to every person to introduce his/her heritage or the story behind them. Moreover, a handful of people opting to use their classic dress not only have maintained the global diversity, but also preserved their historical traditions. For instance, in Iran, most of the people living in villages, who have continued to wear their traditional dresses and performed their ancient ceremonies, have piqued affected others’ interests to participate in these customs which can contribute to being acquainted with their cultural legacy. However, since a great number of individuals have been influenced by fashion trends, they are willing to follow them to be more classy, stylish and also attractive in on various occasions which are completely different with the past. Also, it is believed that national clothes make people, particularly youngsters, feel more confident because they are portraying a modern image of themselves as well as rising raising a sense of unity instead of thinking about divergence. On the other hand, manufacturing ordinary clothes has promoted lucrative markets potentially as a result of being produced faster and more affordably than traditional clothing that most of them are hand-crafted with costly fabrics such as Indian Sari. In conclusion, the positive results of wearing similar and contemporary clothes outweigh the drawbacks because people’s lifestyle and attitude have adapted to novel and modern times as well as their style of clothing, although they should be persuaded to follow and respect their customary dress which can be a way to be attached to their ancestors.