Fridays

Ali Khaleghifard, Online Shopping vs Local Stores

2020-02-07T17:41:58+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing. Do you agree or disagree? Today, with the rapid pace of advancements in the virtualization like e-commerce many people shop via the internet. This, however, can cause shop owners to close theirs all around the country. I, personally, argue this phenomenon will happen soon. Development of internet-related technologies has been cited as the main reason for the increase in online shopping. Many choose this since not only is it convenient, but also they have access to many different choices just with one click. They effortlessly can compare various brands’ products with each other by benefiting from many straight forward features on websites. Also, this approach can prevent them from wasting time on city trips (wasting time traveling around in the city) to find a properly desirable product which they seek. Online shopping is popular among those who are pressed for time which, nowadays, many of us struggle with, hence the variety of online shops. On the other hand, this common occurrence, using the internet rather than local stores, can lead many shops to shut down. With the decrease in the number of retailers, many lose their jobs. People are not eager to go outside in order to buy, and they prefer to stay at home to order it in pajamas through a website when are sitting behind their desk and drinking a cup of coffee. This behavior encourages many stores to establish their own website to preserve their revenue from reducing. Consequently, although many shopping stores have many customers these days, I believe that they will be the seemingly imminent sacrifice of online shopping in the near future by new generations.

Bayan, Extinction

2020-02-07T17:41:44+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Our planet Earth now encounters global environmental issues never witnessed by humankind and the extinction of the flora and fauna is one of them, but there is an argument about the prioritizing of these problems. Unfortunately, losing certain types of species has taken a turn for the worse over the past decades it is about losing the very web of life on Earth which is alarming in that the efficiency of the cycle and humans is negatively affected and in the long run the whole system will fall apart. Take honeybees, for example,. they are the primary initiator of reproduction among plants by playing a major part in the pollination of different types of plant, trees and flowers. Now imagine if all bees went extinct, it would destroy the balance of the Earth’s ecosystem and many kinds of plants and insects so this takes its toll on certain species of animals and plants which can lead to a chain of other extinction events in their networks as well as, it can impact on global food supplies that finally humans will bear the brunt of it. Although organisms’ loss is a grave one, there are more serious problems to be dealt with, some of which lies lie at the root of the disappearing of these species. There are many contributing factors such as air pollution, climate change and urbanization. For instance, urbanization has dramatically increased the rate of habitat loss and change. Sprawling development is consuming land, destroying wildlife habitat by clearing and burning forests for some housing development. Were we to find a solution to these problems, we could put an end to this disturbing trend because they are human activities which lead to loss of biodiversity. Ultimately, the fact that species are going extinct is really perturbing, and measures ought to be taken. However, there are other environmental problems which are in order of importance such as climate change, air and water pollution which are the main reasons for dying of particular animals and plants.

Bina, Happiness in Life

2020-02-07T17:41:26+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Is money responsible for happiness in life? There is a common myth among people in their early stages of their life which restricts happiness to money and fame. In other words, a vast majority of the populace believe that the richer you get, the happier you will be, but according to the longest conducted research on 724 men’s life for 75 years, reaching fame and wealth are is not all we need as we go through life to achieve happiness. The study’s results have shown that a healthy relationship brings satisfaction to one’s life to a large extent. Generally speaking, people are constantly told that leaning in on work and achieving more are the factors we need to go after in order to have a happy life. However, much to our surprise the study came up with shocking results. Being in a healthy relationship is considered widely responsible for life satisfaction. By connecting to family and friends, not only do we guarantee our mental health but our physical health. Individuals in a proper relationship have reported less physical pain during their illness as opposed to those who were stuck in a poisonous one. In other words, a pleasant interaction with loved ones, irrespective of their relationship status, makes the physical pain more bearable. Secondly, the ones who isolate themselves from others find themselves less happy and their health declines earlier in midlife and so does their brain’s functioning than those who are not lonely. This research also has shown us that the number of friends and committed relationships does not matter, but the closeness of your relationships does matter. As the saying goes “quality over quantity”. Thus, good close relationships seem to buffer us from some of the slings and arrows of getting old. Plus, living in the midst of conflict like marriages without much affection, people put their health in great danger even more than getting a divorce. Last but not least, the third lesson we learned from the research is that relationships which a party can count on the other one are a great protection for the brain from its decline. That is to say, community involvement namely relationships have a positive impact on our brain without a doubt. To cut a long story short, the aforementioned points and examples have made it clear that wealth and fame have nothing to do with life satisfaction and it is better to invest our time and energy in building bounds bonds and relationships instead of making more and more money.

Negar, Clothes

2020-02-07T17:41:12+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It’s better to have rules about the type of clothing that people wear at schools or in their workplace. Policies about the clothing that people choose to wear in on different occasions have never been the same. Rules vary significantly according to the context they have been established. While some believe that rules should be relaxed in people’s apparel, I think that laws are required in this setting because having harmony in clothes people wear is a practice of discipline, avoids distractions and does not provoke a sense of inequality. Every public environment such as schools or workplaces has set some goals, forcing its member to follow its procedure in order to meet their purposes. When individuals are obliged to accept a dress code, it helps them to take the situation more seriously, realizing the setting they are in cares about discipline generally. For example, in a working condition, when rules regarding clothing are taken seriously by all members, new comers will probably generalize this notion to other fields. It means that they may consider that not only does the company emphasize its policies for attire, but also other issues like punctuality are of great importance in that setting. Therefore, when discipline is practiced in this context, employees may learn some personal discipline in their own lives. Moreover, distraction from one’s own activity is one of the main challenges that the human mind deals with. There are many stimulants in people’s surrounding, making them lose their focus and leave their tasks incomplete. Children and teenagers are more prone to this issue because their mind is still developing in various fields and they easily become distracted. For instance, in a class where important materials are being taught, concentrating on one subject is necessary. When children wear different outfits which vary in coloring, others may find it hard to direct their attention toward their lessons. As a result, by wearing the same uniform in an educational context, instead of losing their attention, children may become more involved in class discussions and receive higher grades. Finally, expressing oneself is more possible through the way they choose their outfits. The wealthier a class in society a person belongs to, the more expensive clothes they may pick to wear. In some situations that where people are gathered to perform a specific task, like studying in school or working in a company, wearing something that reveals one’s social class, may seem inappropriate. Those who belong to middle or lower class in society may feel uncomfortable as a result of having normal clothes. This even may provoke jealousy among children whose families can hardly meet their expenses. As a consequence, some people may feel depressed and lose their motives to work. To sum up, I think that rules of wearing clothes in on formal occasions should be made. I suggest that policy makers impose mild penalty for those who do not follow these rules. Because wearing uniform outfits results in becoming more disciplined in one’s personal life, higher grades in an educational context and having a higher spirit in the workplace.

Niloo, Quickly or Slowly

2020-02-07T17:40:59+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. It is no doubt that nowadays with the modernization of people's lives, the mechanization of everything and because most of the time people struggle with technology they should try to work quickly in order to not fall behind in using it. Most job opportunities are for people who work quickly but do weyou want something done right or get it delivered quickly? First of all, if you want done some projects quickly, the probability of making mistakes would be increased because your accuracy would be diminished, so you have to take the time to correct your mistakes. You cannot do your job both fast and correct at the same time. For instance, I do everything quickly without precision and this is in my blood. Every time my mom says you I must vacuum home, I finish it fast but a lot of trash stays on the floor, so I must sweep again. On the other hand, some people believe that a person who is faster may make some mistakes but they can learn from them and do better next time but due to the fact that there are some jobs that only one small mistake can put many lives in danger, so working quickly is not beneficial. For example, flights safety checks. Occurring every little mistake occurring on a flight can threaten the crews and passengers’ lives. Secondly, when you do something quickly, the stress isreleased in your body subconsciously unconsciously which is so extremely harmful and you can transfer it to others. For instance, according to conducted research when a pregnant women does something quickly, she stresses out and this stress will transfer to her baby, so it can be dangerous for them. In conclusion, from my perspective compared with working quickly and risk taking, working slowly but ensuring correctness is still more important because you do your work in peace and there is no little need to check it again.

Sanjay Kumar, Art

2020-02-07T17:40:42+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Whether art and artists should receive government funding aids has always been a topic of discussion. Some people think that instead of wasting money on arts, Government should allocate its fund for the betterment of other sectors such a science, technology and business. In my opinion art is also as important as other sectors are and should receive government support. Although, arts are not as beneficial as other sectors like technology, defense and business studies are, but it has substantial impact on human life as well as contributes contributing to the country’s economic growth. Artists who are involved in artistic works are taking moving the nation’s cultural legacy forward which is unique and is considered at the identity of any nation. The Face of any national is created by artists including architecturale of monuments, old buildings, foods, and music. People from different nations travel to I the world to study or understand about other countries and one of the major things which attracts them towards any nation is contributed by arts. Therefore, arts can create jobs, tourism and can contribute to a country’s growth. However, spending money on other sectors such as science, defense, education and health sector is more important as these sectors have direct and quick impact on a country. Hence, basic sciences should be focused more by government but arts like music, painting, drama, movies also support the human life as well as a nation equally. When busy life makes people tired or bored, they always find artistic hobbies as an example watching a movie, visiting ancient monuments, listening to music as a stress reliever. To conclude, government should always allocate/allot funds as required for all sectors instead of ignoring one above another the other as every sector has its own contribution to human life as well a country’s growth.

Shideh, Characteristic

2020-02-07T17:40:27+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life. Which do you consider to be the major influence? The way that people behave generally is associated to with their genetics, although world and life experiences shape their attitudes and behaviors. Ultimately, this combination of the nurture and nature shape their personality and identity, but which factor can be more effective? Genes are instruction dictating either how individuals’ body is made or what traits they inherited form their parents like identical twins whose characters are quite similar because their genetic materials are almost exactly the same. Moreover, people in their childhood due largely to less experiences are usually influenced by their parents’s demeanor and traits as a result of conveying heredity. However, the environment and its impacts can play a vital role to in developing a person’s character, so the interaction of both inheritance and social and family background can alter the way of living. Therefore, if people had have a whole diverse set of experiences and events over their lifetime, their genes would will be expressed in distinctive directions such as twins growing up in different areas often behave according to what they have learned or educated studied within their life not their heritable traits. On the other hand, individuals’ purposes and abilities boost their personality which could outweigh their genes. For instance, as people age, they improve a stronger identity and also by the maturity principles, they tend to have stable emotions and positions like becoming more agreeable or aggregate/gregarious. In conclusion, in spite of a complicated relation between genetic and life’ experiences, every person could change the traits underpinning underpinned by genes and improve the sense of self-control.

Vida Sadeghi, Children

2020-02-07T17:40:13+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters( such as food , clothes and entertainment)is likely to result is a Scotty of individual who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them Inbox x Vida Zamir 12:46 AM (11 hours ago) to me Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters( such as food , cloths and entertainment)is likely to result in a group of individual who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them . Some people maintain children need to make their own decision on different matters which it has several benefits. Other believe children are not allowed to decide on various subjects such as food, clothes, and entertainment .Indeed, how much freedom children should be given to everyday matters is controversial. From my perspective, allowing children to make a decision has pos and rocscons. This attitude can help children not only to be creative, but also develop their skills .They obtain the greatest amount of satisfaction and fulfillment.moreover,making their own decision about the things gives,give meaning to theirthem the meaning of life.Meanwhile,permitting children to do whatever they want would be detrimental to the growth of children. On the other side,when children are not allowed to make a decision,the situation is going to be hard to for them to figure out which decision is decent in the future due to lack practice.In addition, they don't have any knowledge about problem-solving and lose their confidence.Last not but least,they are not strong enough to be survived in tough conditions.In conclusion ,I personally believe that parents should neither give absolute immunity to their children nor should they should restrain them in every matter . There must be a balance .