جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that children should be allowed to say at home and play until they are six or seven years old. Others believe that it is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible. What do you think are the advantages of attending school from a young age? Children are born proactive in the present generation, hence every parent is quite enthusiastic to make their child grow faster. It is the responsibility of the parents to send their children to school at the right age. It can be believed that sending children to school is more comfortable rather than keeping them at home. In my opinion, a child definitely gains something more if he or she is sent to school at a very young age. Speaking globally, nowadays we have extraordinary school teachings like e-techno. Therefore, the more school age would be earlier, the more benefits children would achieve. As can be seen, competition plays a vital role in this completely competitive world. Thus, having educated at a young age, the young would have a more opportunity than the others to make beneficial experiences for their career life. As one of the other advantages of decreasing school age, it could be mentioned that the average age of academic social would decrease. Moreover, not only are is children’s going gone to school earlier conducive to more socializing collective, but also leads to interacting with a lot of different people very easily. Many a child who does not have any siblings, so attending to school is a good chance for them to develop faster socially. Besides, they are generally more confident and independent than children who stay at home with their parents. In conclusion, Arguably by no means does attending to school from a young age have disadvantages, but also has amazingly positive impression on children’s life.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that news and media are affecting our life in a positive way while others disagree. What is your opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. Today the media and news play essential roles in human life and can have profound effects on people’s thought, knowledge or even welfare. It seems that most of these impacts have been positive and some of which are not should be managed carefully. Primarily, the media have raised awareness of general information among populace which previously belong to a small elite. In the past, people did not access this information or they had to acquire it through books which it was not a way that everyone are keen or able to do. However, the modern media broadcast this information twenty-four seven and almost most people can see or listen to them, ; the general information such as sanitation, health and parenting which knowing them has significant effects on communities. Secondly, covering the press reports from around the world, news agencies inform all of us about events and changes and therefore we would be ready for any appropriate reactions. For instance, in some cases like earthquakes or any other disasters, these kinds of reports can persuade other people to aid the sufferers while in the past, this news was reached too late. Lastly, a valuable but less seen aspect of mass media is entertainment of the crowd. Before emerging of these media, it was so difficult to entertain people especially in their free time and there were a few ways to spend spare time. However, these days we need just to turn on TV or click a few times to drown ourselves in these virtual worlds. While this form of leisure activity has its own drawbacks, it can serve many of people’s needs of fun inexpensively and less harmful. In conclusion, although in some cases, the media can be leverage in the hands of powers for controlling and shaping society, these systems generally have provided new methods of communication and relationship which have improved the human life quality.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that entertainers (e.g. film stars, pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? Which other types of jobs should be highly paid? In almost every part of the globe celebrated artists and sportsperson are paid more than others. This has become the subject of a heated debate in different levels of societies. Opponents of such high pays argue these controversial payments can lead to an unbridgeable gap between people. This short essay elaborates my view points on this contentious topic. I maintain that the extortionately expensive professionals regardless of their profession are, in fact, harvesting what they planted years ago, and since they are not paid from governmental budget, applying any kind of restriction does not seem reasonable. This it is, in fact, their highly demanded competence that makes large companies sign exorbitant contracts with them. That well- established sports clubs such as Estaghlal or legendry entertainment companies like Warner Bros make a substantial profit from superstars is a given. Additionally, the governments are by and large rewarded with a handsome amount of profit coming from the direct tax of fruitful contracts of celebrities. Besides the artists and sportspersons I hold the idea that teachers especially those involved in teaching the elementary students must be paid more than usual. Persevered and patience, teachers who are not paid appropriately in almost all parts of the world must be praised financially for their contribution for the good of the community. I believe that not only do teachers have to be paid more than usual, but they are also needed to be given special social privileges By way of conclusion, Once again I reaffirm my position that celebrities must not face any limitation regarding their income. In other words, they can be paid as much as their sponsors choose to pay, and no legislation seems required to limit their revenue. Admittedly, only when all gifted people are free to explore their talent, can we expect a society flourishes in all aspects. This One

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. The issue of whether building more railway lines are more efficient than promoting current transport facilities is certainly a contentious one. While some people argue that increasing these lines is the best way to modify available transport industry, I ,personally, believe we should place a premium on other pubic conveying systems as they could be time and money-saving. On the one hand, the point which is absolutely pivotal is the fact that in today’s chaotic society public transportation, especially fast ones, plays an essential role in people’s daily commutes. Fast trains designed by cutting-edge technology can facilitate transportation both in long and also daily distances. Being under pressure after a long work day, people deserve getting to home as soon ass possible instead of getting stock in standstill traffic. Moreover, perhaps the most favour of this argument is the safety of this valuable kinds of means which would be ensured about. Less contact between transportation modes, less likelihood of an accident occurred. On the other hand, In my belief people can take full advantage of current public transportation as well. Repairing these facilities, they could work effectively better than the first day. Also if they are improved dexterously, not only may they take less cost than building new railway lines, but also their progress seem to need less time an skills in comparison with constructing modern ones. Admittedly, first way can be a potentially dominant solution. Nevertheless, I believe it is unlikely to happen while it is money consuming and needed training professionals informed with latest technology. Therefore, improving existing commuting modes is bound to be more rational than abandon them as obsolete. In conclusion, I believe growth of railway technology is neither the best nor the sole way of transportation improvement. We should simultanasly distribute budget between all parts of this industry and also encourage people to use them through public education campaigns.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that the only way to judge someone’s success is the amount of money the make. Is this a true indicator of the success of a business , and in what other ways could success in a business be measured ? These days it is generally admitted that money plays an undeniable role in every aspect of our lives. Therefore, evaluating the success of a business by its profit does not seem like an unreasonable idea. Although it may not be the only scale for judging the efficiency of a particular business, I personally believe that it is the most determining item among all the other indicators. Viewing a business from the financial perspective , the only thing that can help grow a business further , is the money the owner earns from it. Moreover, having an extensive customer base is another important matter in deciding whether a business is successful. Because happy customers will refer others and this will build quite a reputation among the targeted users of that business and we all know that businesses thrive only because customers believe in them. Other than that , as the face of a company, the staff have a critical part in prosperity of a business. Ensuring of the positive work environment, the employees satisfaction can be earned. This could eventually make them do their job more passionately which helps the business to flourish. At the end, self satisfaction seems to be the most valuable issue to help you find out the level of success in any business you are running.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many countries people are concerned about the number of children who are overweight. What do you think are the cause of this? What solution can you suggest? In recent years, the obesity in children have become a huge problem in countries many countries including USA, UK. This is mainly due to poor diet and lack of exercises. In this essay I would discuss the cause and solution to this problem. The children nowadays are not following the proper diets, and their eating habits are attracted to fast food due to advertisements. Although, awareness to the health has been increased, still the children are taking less part in exercises as they are addicted to computers, and video games. Parents may try to guide them about the food, but they are not always with them. On the top of that, most of the time spent by children is at home. This not only led them to increase their weight but also make them inactive. While in past young people used to take part in various activities and burn their energy, but now they are less active as they spend time indoors. They have less opportunity to burn their calories. The solution to the above mentioned problem would be as following. Firstly, food awareness should be provided at school and home. This will not only help them to choose the type of healthy food but also makes them aware of energy contents of a food. Secondly, parents can help their children to go to exercises by putting their children in sports activities. This will result in reducing weight as well as make them healthy. Lastly, government can play their roles by putting heavy taxes on fast food and by providing awareness on healthy foods via TV programs. Although, the above solutions can benefit children, they themselves also need to take care of the things which are good for them.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

What famous place would you like to visit? Use details and reasons to explain your response. If you would ask me this question many years ago I had a different idea, but now I will select Spain for travel. From my point of view, there are two main reasons that attract me to this perfect country. Firstly, its individuals are human. Secondly, their concerts are full of sensible. First, disappointed with current manners and immoral habits, I have searched for a utopia society. Actually, I found Spain a precise country where I tend to visit at least once during my life. On the one hand, Spanish people are kind together and try to have a perfect behavior. For instance, one of my teachers told us "when you are walking to streets in Spain you will see some excellent manners", he pointed out that he has seen an old woman who met a little girl with her mother and she started to talk with that kid and said some positive sentences like "where have you been little angle? Do you know how much the world become amazing after your birthday, your majesty? You are the most beautiful princess that I know." In addition, she made friend with her mother. On the other hand, I have a lot of German friends who are very logical and seem impartial about emotional factors, but one of whom is different. one day I asked her why you are happier and more kind than the other compatriots, then she said that she has lived in Spain for just 2 years. Second, not only do Spanish individuals not care about annoying subjects, but also they dance and play music in their sad situations. Hence, they use music a lot for their happiness and their glad time, their melodies are professional. In other words, I would like them and I want participate in their native concerts, as well as visiting their popular singers. Moreover, I prefer to observe Spain because of its language, too. It would be so wonderful to behave toward this nation, as well as relating to them. By way of conclusion, I want to visit Spain because I believe that there is the position where its population has found their humanity and it will be a dreamy trip for me.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Amirmehdi Akhtari Subject: One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Thanks to recent medical advancement, life span of human beings has been surprisingly escalated. Nowadays, this matter is day-in day-out questioned by folks referred to both merits and drawbacks. It will be critiqued in next paragraphs based on majority of viewpoints. There is no doubt that, we humans like other creatures tend to live as linger as possible, while having immortality was always a dazzling dream of the Empire Kings as history declared to Hollywood Super Heroes as screened by directors. Indeed, modern technology, invention of preventing drugs like vaccines and the establishment of sophisticating healthcare centers around the globe and so on led to brilliantly wiping out fatal diseases. Considering above mentioned fact, people are now capable of serving the society even in elderly ages, in the variety of positions like being consultant or university professors. Consequently and based on global economical statistics, this phenomenon resulted in equity, prosperity and delivering knowledge to new generations as well as let our grandparents accompany us more time. It should be taken into account that not only does it contribute to longevity but also it could enlighten our future prospect. Certainly, there are few concerns attributed to this subject, including but not limiting to loss and exhaustion. For instance, by living longer you would possibly get exposed to suffering from disability, Alzheimer, loneliness and enormous stress of losing loved ones. To illustrate more, high grades of depression caused by facing death of loving spouses has been reported. It might be barely challenging for all of us especially after retirement. To sum up, people can apparently enjoy more happiness by increasing life expectancy as beneficial as the society would able to keep its precious human resources. Although we are able to reach more horizons in our expanded lives, we must enrich our personalities to tackle the upcoming tragedies of aging.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. To what extent do you agree or disagree? The most viable measure that can be taken to overcome traffic congestion in urban areas is to diminish people need to daily commute to workplaces, shopping malls, and schools. The fewer people travel the less traffic jam we have. However, I strongly disagree with this solution. Firstly every profession cannot be done at home such as engineering, medicine and firefighting. This kind of occupations needs a skilled person in order to carry out their responsibilities at the workplace. Similarly, when we do online shopping the delivery staff is still on the street to hand over goods to their recipient and also we cannot judge products quality by a picture on the internet. In addition to this, some technical courses need special laboratory works and online classes cannot amply fulfill these requirements. Indeed online courses cannot be compared with classroom teaching. Moreover, confinement of a person in an area can develop some physical and emotional problem like obesity and depression. In order to tackle traffic congestion governments should take realistic actions. One such action can be public transportation improvement which can discourage citizens to use their private cars. Furthermore, the state can encourage people to use environment-friendly vehicles like a bicycle at least in short distances by dedicating a separate lane for them. In conclusion, reduction of our needs to travel cannot be taken as an effective measure for traffic jam problem because commuting is an inevitable part of our daily life. In order to address this issue, we should tackle its root causes by the use of public transit and eco-friendly vehicles.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children? As we all know, it is imperative that children form the ability to distinguish acceptable and unacceptable behaviors from early childhood, with some suggesting that punishment contributes to their learning. I, personally, quite disagree with the above viewpoint for a number of reasons. Generally, the whole point of punishment is in order to reduce the frequency of an unwanted behavior. However, in reality, rarely does punishment results in prevention of an inappropriate behavior, if it does not encourage it. Punishment, specifically corporal punishment such as spanking and smacking, often brings about a sense of fear in children. The Fear of being physically or emotionally hurt, of their privileges being withdrawn, or of being grounded. This might prevent the children from their wrongdoings temporary, yet never provides them with reasons of why such behavior is against the norms of a society. Consequently, not only does punishment not eliminate the immoral behavior in children, but also they might become persistent in behaving so. Moreover, corporal forms of punishment teaches our children that it is right to inflict pain in others, which most probably turns them into aggressive and bully individuals in the future. Therefore, would it not be more rational to replace punishing our offspring with disciplining them? Disciplining takes place in a number of ways. One way to do so is for parents to attempt to provide good examples in their behavior. The family is the first environment in which the children form their intellectual abilities and main personalities which stick with them for the rest of their lives. Going through early stages of life, children tend to imitate adults' behaviors superbly. Keeping that in mind, is it possible for a child to learn honesty provided that his or her caregivers are perfect liars? Another way to deter children from poorly behaving is to inform them about the detrimental effects of their wrongdoings on themselves and others. A young child has so open a mind that enables them to understand anything perfectly easy. Consequently, hardy ever do parents need to use punitive methods instead of communicating with their kids. Overall then, parents ought to avoid punishment when it comes to educating youngsters how to distinguish right and wrong, since its demerits would definitely outweigh its merits.