Fridays

2018-02-03T13:18:07+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The purchase habits and patterns of people are widely believed to be influenced by advertisements and there is no longer a strong direct correlation between real needs of the community and sales quantity of different products. Looking into the list of the most popular goods, which have been on the top rank in terms of sales, shows that the best-sold products are not necessarily the ones which are in the public's demand. Advertisers who invest a fortune on in indoctrinating the public into believing that they require a special product are to blame. They create a false demand among the society using catchy commercials and soon an individual's decision- making process, when it comes to purchasing a goodproduct, would be affected. Thus, sales of a product or even a service mostly reflect the degree of effectiveness of its related adverts and not the existing demand for it. Furthermore, advertisements are inescapable. They are everywhere, from pop-ups when we check emails to billboards when we drive down a road. Being exposed to them, constantly, pushes us toward selecting an item just out of curiosity, and not sheerly, due to our real needs. Some cosmetics, which are advertised widely, are just purchased because people want to try if the slogan in their commercials is true. Additionally, if an individual's need was were the main indicator in a buying process, then there would not be such variety and diversity in the market of customer goods since. Since people's needs can be easily satisfied by the simplest kind of a product. For example, toothpastes are all for mouth sanitation and nothing but advertisement the advertising industry can justify why there are so many colors, brands and odors available. This is to satisfy the various tastes created by this business. To conclude, I harbor hold that advertising as a powerful and influential tool can significantly determine the quantity and even the trend of sales for each product and it is a stronger factor as compared to people's ream real demaend..

Animal Protection, Sahar Sesonbol

2018-02-03T13:17:53+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe animals that are unable to adapt to the changing environment should be allowed to go extinct. What do you think? Many animals on the earth go extinct in the different areas. Maybe a few small number of them can adapt to Environmental changes. this change including weather change, and pollution, Compete with natural enemies and humans' exploitation .For this reason, most of the people believe that if animals cannot adapt with to the conditions, we had better this better we should be allowed them to go extinct. And there are reasons to show that this theory can be true. For some of the critically endangered speciessome of the animal species, the scientists try to find the a way tofor avoiding of animal extinction. They try to revive extinct species by using possible methods, for example, fertilizinge sex cells and cloning. Maybe this opinion first is interesting at first, but it has a disadvantages too that we must know. For one, according to studies, scientists just can revive animal specious species that died out less than Thirty thousand years age. Nevertheless, Due to before this period the extinct animals' DNA wasis damaged and this can create creatures that are unnatural or vulnerable and they can be a threat for the life cycle of other animals and have disastrous consequences. Other causes relate to humans' behavior. After reviving rare species of animals, some people will try to hunt or exploit them for their drive for profit. And it can cause chaos in the wildlife. And there is a final, ethical consideration.as we know, one of the reasons for the extinction of animals is global warming that still there is no solution for that. Therefore, when the extinct animals are revived, we must protect them into in the zoo. So it seems that revivinge extinct species is very wrong and it stems from humans' sense of guilt. If in the future we want to revive animals, we must provide the suitableconditions. Now, we had better this is better that we protect against the threatened species.specious..

Enforcement of a Mandatory Retirement, Shirin

2018-02-03T13:17:40+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Explain why you do or not favor the enforcement of a mandatory retirement age so that more job opportunities can be created for young people. The age of retirement is a controversial topic in every society. One group believe we can gain more experience from adults so we need them. Another the other one believes holds we live in a steadily changing world and moving forward needs new blood and dare to venture new areastheir businesses. It is a fact with the speed rate of technology old methods become expired and if you want to move in coordinatione with these changes, you should be up to date. In my opinion, learning new skills and putting asideaway what you had been doing for 20 years is a big deal, hence accepting these kinds of alterations in adulthood is much too difficult. Furthermore, keeping adapted with to this speed makes a lot of effort and increase in the level of stress. This much pressure not only lessens their efficiency but also affects their health. In addition, youths, who are newly graduate, are more incentivemotivated. Starting their journey and providinge for their future family, these fresh outs have higher rates of life expectancy, so they are motivateding to take risks and dreaming big. In conclusion, although this mandatory obligation results in depression for retired persons, I believe we should give this chance to young people to change our world for better.

Euthanasia, Ahmad Jalali

2018-02-03T13:17:28+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Euthanasia, or mercy killing, has been in the news more and more recently. Many people are strongly against such a practice, but there is a growing demand to have it legalized. Do you agree or disagree with euthanasia being made legal? Terminating someone's life who is experiencing nothing except suffersuffering might be an act of kindness. Many prefer to be dead instead of living in pain. In my opinion, we should allow this action to be happening, but we must introduce extremely restrictive rules for it. Some sick people become broody after a period of time and may wish to end their life. They might lose hope to become healthier or they become tired of the consequences of their disease or the treatment they should take to get better. As a result, they prefer to be dead rather than being alive and suffer. In this case, they should be given hope and help to become more optimistic about life by consultants. There are some other people who have faint hope to get back to a normal life. Although they are in suffering and their treatment process costs extraordinarily, they should make their best effort to defeat their sickness and become healthy again. It is our duty to support them in any aspect they need like providing solid firm asinsurances or emotional supports. The only group of ill people who are allowed to end their life are the ones who are terminally sicknot only did doctors refuse them to get better, but also they are getting worse every day. Their pain is unbearable and they are unable to do anything. Also, both the patient and his family should agree on this hard decision. In conclusion, some diseases can make living unbearable. The harder these sicknesses become, the more our patient's desire to die. We must separate those who may survive from that illness from their sick counterparts who have no hope and are only suffering by creating/introducing truly precise/clear laws.

Happiest, Mona Dorji

2018-02-03T13:17:17+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest of our lives, while others believe that adult life brings more happiness. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Most of us probably don't believe we need a formal definition of happiness. We know it when we feel it and often use the term to describe arrange a range of positive emotion. In my opinion, there are good points and bad points about each of these years. When we are teenagers, it's good because we have lack of responsibilities even we don't think about further future and that's its problems but we have to wake up early every day like six 6 o o'clock also we have to go to school and doing homework every day. Sometimes we have an exam. Our personality is not completely formed. It's time that we can be emotional but that's part of our personality we cannot not decide on our by own. our parents decide among themselves for their children , but in this decade teenagers can grow up in the best way and make a lot of friends. On the other hand, adults can live independently and they have more time for themselves. By this age, the child becomes relativelyity independent of her mother. They can choice choose their own job within their own responsibility . howeverHowever, they can suffer anxiety and stress in their life. Adults go to university and makes friends with in different situations. They can defineition their own political stance . they go on different journeys and getting to know with people who have lots of experience . when both boys and girls get ahead in their independence shown developing independent lives independency,they meeting challenges and have to find their own solutions. In conclusion, grown up ages of our lives have their offering for being happy ,. happiness is not selfish and it's comes from within and it's a choice that can be expaended and also it's not given but earned or achieved.

Price of Petrol, Amir Adel

2018-02-03T13:15:12+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? These days most governments in all over the world endeavour to tackle heavy traffic and severe pollution in their cities and in this way some of them just introduce the most simple solutions to deal with these enormous problems. One of these handy approaches, which is proposed, is the raising the petrol's price even though it is clear that the issues are not solved straightforwardly. Although it seems that increasing the price of petrol can force people to park their cars in garages, if we do not prepare alternative facilities to commuting, they will take their cars again. First, we require strong and sophisticated public transportations in our cities. The subway and BRT are practical means moving transitting citizens in metropolitan cities and it would seems that they have been tested for many years and now are embraced by the public. For instance, consider New York City in the US depending on its huge subway system to transfer millions of people in a day. In addition, if governments have a plane to raise go up the fuel's prices, they should consider some new technological methods for compensating the side effects of this increasing. The internet and IT industry have set up many useful facilities for changing traditional ways for of living. These days, people have an access to the high-speed internet giving them the remote working possibility from their home and it is an incredible chance for businesses, employees and also urban officials to decrease traffic and therefore pollution. Moreover, some interactive mobile applications provide a platform for passengers to share their commute routes with neighbours or colleagues. These convenient carpooling apps reduce the rate of solo driving and improve communication in society. In conclusion, it appears that adopting one approach to manage a big problem like heavy traffic would not be practical and thereby we should employ some parallel actions to make a great change for citizens and our environment.

School Bus, Amir Gilani

2018-02-03T13:14:59+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say it is the government's responsibility to fund school buses, while others think parents should be responsible for bringing their kids to school. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. There is a controversial topic amongst people who believe that the government should pay or at least subsidize school buses, while some opine that parents must be in charge of bringing taking their children to school. Beyond the a shadow of a doubt, both viewpoints have their own benefits and drawbacks, but when it comes to such an arguable topic I strongly hold the idea that school buses should be funded by the state treasury, and parents can focus their time on more important subjects. Clearly/Beyond a shadow of a doubt spending on education is a kind of investment, and that is why many people believe it is incumbent on the government to provide free transportation for schools as a part of the educational system. In other words, free transportation for school children and teenagers provides them convenience, and this can lead to a better performance of them because they can focus/concenterate more on their subjects. In addition to this, children whose parents do cannotnot afford paying their transportation to and from school can be present at their classes regularly. On the other hand, there are so many who argue that transportation of school children is a part of their parents' responsibility, and should be undertaken by parents. They think if parents do this part, the government can spend more on the education system such as building new schools, re-renewing old schools and providing children with updated educational materials. In addition to that, parents can undertake the responsibility of more than their own kids, and this can be a source of income for families. To cput it in a nutshell, I can say that my vote goes for funding school buses by the government because I believe it is a cost saving way of transportation and can teach children punctuality and in addition to this, school busses are safe and can further reduce air pollution by personal cars.

Today, Mahfam Garmaeie

2018-02-03T13:14:46+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Today,the highsales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the ral needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? In today`s world, advertisement is becoming an inevitable part of the modern societies. The range of companies' success will be evaluated by the quantity of goods they salesell. Therefore, the role of advertising should not be underestimated. Nowadays, advertisement is necessary in free market economies. Moreover, companies introduce their products to consumers by means of ads. People can be informed about the choices they have, and they can choose the best which fits their needs. Moreover, Advertisement is not only a modern art, but it also employsees lots of people. On the other hand, advertisers aim to persuade people that buying a product with a special brand will make them happier. In other words ,the more they buy, the more exciting life they have. Such attitude leads to consumerism, by which I mean, individuals just buy and do not pay attention to their real needs. Companies make a mistake and think that they are successful in their production; however, consumers are influenced by advertisement. For example, when viewers watch a especial ad everyday they are more likely to buy that good item even if they do not need it. In conclusion, although in the 21st century advertising is vital for the economy ,we should be aware of its effects on the consumer culture of our society. In my view, its advantages do not justify the negativeinfluences on the buying habits/consumer behaviour of people. Authorities should impose strict laws about this issue.

Fridays

Advertisements

Animal Protection, Sahar Sesonbol

Enforcement of a Mandatory Retirement, Shirin

Euthanasia, Ahmad Jalali

Happiest, Mona Dorji

Price of Petrol, Amir Adel

School Bus, Amir Gilani

Today, Mahfam Garmaeie