Fridays

Restaurant's Foods and Home-made one, Shirin Seif

2017-10-14T10:03:08+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some People Prefer to Eat at Food Stands or Restaurants. Other People Prefer to Prepare and Eat Food at Home. Which Do You Prefer? Use Specific Reasons and Examples to Support Your Answer. Choosing between home-made food and restaurants' food comes from your priority. Which one is your first concern? Time, money, or health? When asked about their interest in preference of restaurants' food, people mostly complain they do not have enough time to prepare food or they prefer to do more important tasks than consuming their time and energy for in cooking. I agree with time-wise/related concerns but there are some other reasons why do I hold that on preparing and eating food at home is a better choice. Most of the nutritionists banned advise against/frown at restaurants' foods due to hence, their fatty ingredients. Being one of the biggest illnesses in the world, obesity directly resultsed from by foods ((which) are) high in calories. In addition, economically wise, eating food at restaurants is not cheap. You should pay a lot more money than the real costs of raw materials/ingredients and you could not have any input in the way of preparing your dish. When you try to prepare a food for yourself, you focus on every detail of it. The quality of raw materials or the way you prepare it and how much oil do you use, and you can measure how much salt is your intake. By cooking at home not only can you choose to prepare it based on your portion size, but also your taste. Once I ordered a barely soup at a restaurant, and they brought me a red barley barely soup with tomato sauce. I did not eat it because I am used to barley barely soup with milk which is prepared by my mom. In conclusion, I opine, the valuable chance of healthiness is something you cannot buy by money, so you had better to do your best to keep it safe.

News Stories on TV and in Newspapers and Pictures, Zahra Izadi

2017-10-14T10:02:50+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this? Some pictures are presented on TV or in newspapers while news is being broadcast. Some acknowledge these kinds of visual aids and regard them as a more effective approach in conveying massage. There are different skills such as listening, watching or reading through which humans would understand whatever happens in various situations. The supporters of visual learning believe since the information on the pictures gets associated with the earlier data in the mind, it will leave a stronger impact. They suggest through this method firstly, the information will be transferred within a shorter period of time. Secondly, it is going to stay longer (linger) in the memory, and furthermore, it is much easier to retrieve the saved information. On the other hand, there is the opponent/opposing group who argue that the words are already self-explanatory. They point out that although pictures provide some basic information faster than words does. Tthey might not be either comprehensive or clarified. They consider this too narrow a belief to suggest that visual aids play a more integral part in delivering the news to audience. I would rather to hold a more balanced view. Human-beings have the potential to achieve concepts through different methods. Each might perform better in one skill than another. However, for reaching to the highest level of understanding we need to apply each when is needed and that is the attitude media is taking. By accompanying different ways such as pictures and interpretation and developing association between them, it enhances the understanding process exponentially.

Job Loyality, Omid Haghi

2017-10-14T10:02:26+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. When asked about loyalty towards a professional occupation tenure, it is debatable whether it leads causes to carrier prospect or it can be grounds for a constant companion deprived of a range of experiences. First and foremost, extensive expertise put forward the most significant attribute to a member of staff has strong correlation with their commitment to the same company during their professional work span. In other words, loyalty to the same company is considered by most employers to be an essential value competence. It means that, more sustenance in the same organization illustrates more professional competency. For instance, loyal employees demonstrate their both great diligence and industry, giving rise to their constancy of work. Therefore, not only do individuals adhere to the same company to be considered a merit, but also it contributes to being more familiar with the infrastructure of the company due to achievinge a comfortable working atmospherearea. On the other hands, fidelity to the same company for a long time is considered an inefficient attribute for a skilled worker by some experts. They maintain that By this I mean, persisting in working for a long while at the same firm, individuals refuse declined to encounter with both new challenges and experiences. By way of illustration, in the new work place individuals facinged new challenges caused to emergence of some of their abilities in order to resolve the problems and to gain more wages. Consequently, a lucrative salary and suitable position are attainable, hence the importance of the work place/workplace altering. To put it in a nut shell, from my point of view although fidelity to the organization for a long while is considered a merit of employees, it is a real deterrent for them in prospect.

In All Levels of Education, Zahra Izadi

2017-10-14T10:02:07+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree? Some are of the opinion that the educational system more focuses on theoretical concepts rather than hands-on training. I would agree that skill-based approaches are less of a concern for schools and they mostly hold a theory-based perspective/approach in training students. It is almost true that schools provide students with too much information while they finish high school or university. They are overloaded with a lot of information. However, the problem is they do not have the slightest idea how to apply them in real life. For developing their talent and turning their potentials to skills , the schools need a variety of facilities, and a huge budget is essential to cover such expenses which sounds too good to be true. The teachers only adhere to suffice to books in this system of education. Training knowledgeable individuals is considered their basic mission. In this regard, they are doing their best. It is not to underestimate their effort. A number of institutes provide more facilities such as labs, gyms and they offer extra curricularum programs which are in accordance with fulfilling their potentials. However, that would be idealistic if schools applied more hands- on training such as, problem solving, anger management and or car maintenance. This way they would have more a better sense of competence, confidence and self-fulfillment. In conclusion, although schools are doing their best to be committed to their objectives and they are raising educated students, more serious approaches should be taken into consideration to make practical training as an integral part of their schedules. It is on governments to endorse these projects.

Circus Animal Rights, Amin

2017-10-14T10:01:49+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some countries have laws that prohibit animals being used in circuses other forms of entertainments because it is cruel to keep animals in an environment that can cause them stress. Should all countries have laws to prevent animals being used in circuses and similar forms of entertainment? Amin Since the turn of the 21th century, observing animal rights has been causing many strict bills for them to pass in numerous counties. The debate is heated in the community whether animals are being well treated in circuses, if we consider the beasts which are doing unnatural performances. Some might think the trainers in circuses keep the animals in quite adverse conditions. This essay focuses on how governments should make sure to avert misbehaviors against entertaining animals in circuses. Complaining about harsh treatments of animals, including strict punishments for them in order to motivate them to learn, animal right activists constantly impose pressure on the government to legislate an act in this respect. They believe animal trainers in circuses adopt extremely severe punishments against the animals to force them to learn what is interesting to the spectators. Circus managers, on the other hand, oppose the opinion. They state that their trainers are quite adept at teaching animals the routines surprising to the audience. Using an appropriate training process for each specific animal, the trainers exactly know how to treat each animal to minimize the period of learning and the level of punishments. Apart from that, the managers assert that the animals are mostly those who lost their parents in nature during childhood, and therefore leaving them alone would lead/cause them not to survive. Secondly, according to a valid research conducted recently, a group of scientists hold that even giants beasts, tigers, and lions for instance, which are kept far-off far off a wild environment are likely to enjoy getting the attention of humans, let alone domestic ones, such as cats, horses, and, dogs. Animal psychologists also claim that attracting people nudges animals toward mental states conditions which are quite interesting to the animals themselves.In a nutshell, form my point of view, governments should not simply legislate a strict act against activities impressive to both a large number of people and maybe the animals themselves. Rather, they should implement a wise strategy of a chain of supervisions to draw a line between those who observe animals' rights and those who violate them/do not.

Advertisements and Children, Amiradel

2017-10-13T14:58:08+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

These days many advertisements are aimed at children. What effect do you think they have? Should advertising to children be more controlled and regulated? The modern world has been formed based on production and consumption cycles and the driving force of these cycles is advertisement; however, this engine may have some harmful effects on our life, especially for children. This essay has a look at advertising and its impacts on children. Firstly, advertising has negative effects on the area of consumption. Commercials usually promote and encourage people toward in consumerism, especially the next generation. Companies' profit is in selling more and constantly, and they employ complex advertising methods to create a consumerist lifestyle which will be acceptable and normal in the youths' young's viewpoint and appropriate for their business plans. Secondly, although some advertisements are not designed for children, generally we are not able to prevent children from seeing them and this group is easily misleadmisled. For instance, when the young see a huge billboard showing/that shows an alcoholic drink brand and shapes a pleasant image in their mind about drinking while harmful effects of alcohol are undeniable. Lastly, unlike the above issue, while/whereas some adverts are proper for young people, they have various costs to families. Children's logic usually is not developed enough to understand all business tricks/ploy and they may want everything that seems to be attractive,; however, these are parents who have to pay money or feel embarrassed when they do not know or are not educated to deal with this situation. In conclusion, it would seem that like some limitation on watching movies for kids, we need some similar restrictions for showing advertisements to children for keeping/steering them away from some negative effects. Both parents and the government can impose these restrictions and give them this/the chance to have an intact mind for their rest of life..

Essay, Mona Dorji

2017-10-13T14:57:57+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays, it's an important issue as to whether it is that is it good to share as much information as possible in scientific research as possible or not.? Many people believe that some data like business information or sport information should be publicized,. meanwhile, others suppose that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared in the whole community. In my opinion, when people have the chance to access about the important data that they want to used it in their work. they can improve and extending their business. This could greatly reduce money spent on the same task and enhance collaboration across the world. on the other hand I support the idea that negative information should be hidden in public like the information about how to makeingdevelop the a bomb, these techniques would probably be the a root of some global disasters. It only takes a few seconds to get the latest scientific research from the other side of the earth. In conclusion, the admission to access to the essential information should be open to the whole world;, however, vital and dangerous data one should be narrowly provided. And I believe that people who specialize expert in their major should always have the way that they can access to valuable data.

Incarceration or Alternative Ways, Vahid Tavazoei

2017-10-13T14:57:46+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Given the question of reduction in crime rates the role of prisons or some alternative ways can be highlighted. Yet there remains some disagreement as to whether lengthy prison sentences should be considered in an optimistic or pessimistic way. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I personally, believe that the drawbacks of such a trend outweigh its advantages. On the one hand, it is indisputable that long term incarceration is able to reduce crime intensification in society. Affected severely byto being arrested again and moving to the jail over a the long period of time, lawbreakers might find it frightening to commit a crime for the next time. Equally or even more importantly, it is believed that with longer incarceration, the rehabilitation programs can be more effective. As a result, the prisoners have access to this chance to become rehabilitated, hence, the reduction of criminal acts. Also, this it can be clear that in cases of criminals whose crimes are beyond the pale, long period imprisonment can be fruitful in terms of diminishing the crime rate and making society safer. On the other hand and as far as I am concerned, there lie some alternative ways which are able to reduce the rate of committing crimes. At the heart of the matter is education. That expenses related to the prison industry can take a heavy toll on society is inevitable, so if the significant part of these astronomical costs could be reallocated into educational affairs, society would be provided with better educational and cultural infrastructure to prevent people from flirting with crime. Moreover, certain percentages of such costs can be employed in prevention-related measures such as substance abuse treatment and the mental health treatment. In the societal terms, although focusing on making society safer for dwellers, imprisonment poses tremendous social cost when the youth find it demanding to find a job due to criminal record which can lead to unemployment and related crises and gradually the increasing rate of crime. As a result of staggering inefficiency in judicial authorities of many countries, even for small street crimes, criminals are sent to prisons which leads to grave consequences. Unlike this issue, if such criminals were provided with efficient rehabilitation centers and community services, better choices would be available to them it would made better choices for them to give positive outcomes back to society, hence, an improved character for them which causes reduction in reducing criminal acts. In conclusion, however although in some special cases such as assaulting and murder long imprisonment should be recommended, for many particularly good reasons some alternative ways instead of incarceration should be prioritized to affect society positively in terms of reducing criminals.

Job Satisfaction, Amir Gilani

2017-10-13T14:57:32+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say job satisfaction is more important than job security. Others believe that we cannot be expected to enjoy the job continually and having a permanent job is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. There is a growing controversial debate between those who advocate for having a satisfactory job and other members of society whose vote goes for having a permanent career regardless of job satisfaction. However, I believe job satisfaction is more important than the job security, and in the following paragraphs I will elaborate my viewpoints. Being involved in an activity we enjoy is one of the main factors leading to success and happiness and that is why some groups hold the idea that of having a satisfactory job is more important than a job with an acceptable security margin. Keeping in mind that we spend most of our time at work, a lot of people believe we must be involved in a career we appreciate/enjoy or else it can lead to irreparable damages to our mental health due to a sense of frustration. On the contrary, in these days having a secure job is extremely important. We do not have to forget that there are some jobs that no one likes to do them. Some clear examples of unsatisfactory jobs could be funeral services providers, sweepers, and clinical waste disposal collectors. That being involved in such activity is unsatisfying is an undeniable fact. In conclusion, I hold the idea of spending time on with an activity we feel pleased with/enjoy. I think our time for life so limited that if we spend it in a way that we do not like, at the end we face regret and sorrow. In addition to this, many may lose their mental health and this definitely costs more than what they earned during their working period.

Laws Are Needed To Make People Recycle, Mohaddeseh

2017-10-13T14:57:20+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycling more of their waste? In this day and age recycling is concerns a considerable issue which should be noticed by governments. Some people argue that household waste is not recycled properly and they believe that governments should impose severe laws to solve this problem. In my estimation, whether people assist their government in coping to cope with the problem or not relates to their cultural understanding of the concern. Developed countries in comparison with their developing counterparts encounter less fewer impediments and decently address the matter. It proves the fact that there is a direct link between culture and dealing with these affairs. Developed countries spend enough money on recycling and assign money to recycling centers. Moreover, they allocate too much time to related cultural activities. They estimate that by running campaigns and developing educational items, people will enthusiastically support the plan. Nevertheless, there are some people who surmise that educational and cultural affairs have small portion in this case. They suppose that governments should make laws and oppose severe fines for those who do not help the government out with recycling their waste. Although sorely determined laws enforce people to separate their waste for recycling process, education solves the problem essentially as positive attitudes significantly modifies humans' manner. Schools and parents can cultivate children and make them familiar with recycling and its substantial effect on life span of the earth. Overall, there are people who do not separate their waste in different bins to detriment of the environment. As they are not aware of the high importance of this topic, law enforcement is an effective solution. In contrast, there are some people that not only do they use recycle bins, but also they increase social awareness by their cultural activities. It should be considered that natural resources and the environment are valuable heritages from our ancestors which should be appositely transferred to the next generation.