جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is some times said that the countryside offers a high quality of life, specially for families. What are the arguments for and against families choosing to live and work in the countryside. For example farmers? What is your own view about this? living countrysides based on numerous advantages which are available for humans can be worth while. Yet there remains some arguments as to whether such a place for living should be considerd in an optimictic or a pessimistic approach. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I personally believe that the benefits of living out of cities far outweigh its drawbacks. First of all, it is indisputable fact that living in rurall areas revolutionized the way we resid. It is undeniable that little matchs the peace and tranquility of living in villages. Being surrounded by water bodies and wildlife, country dwellers find it enjoyable to do some related jobs such as forestry and animal husbandry and farming. What is really significant in this regard is relaxtion and a healthy lifestyle as opposed to hectic pace life and anxiety which are widespread among cities. Admitedly, living in a backwater and being deprived of cutting-edge facilities and amenities, youths in rural areas move to big cities in search of greater job opportunities and higher qualiy of life, hence, rural unimployment and depopulation. Despite some problems such as the scarsity of employment opportunities and even rural poverty, an abundance of organic foods and fresh air can be influential as to why people choose villages for their living. Raised environmental awareness, some groups of individuals would like to focus on environmentally friendly issues and allocate a major part of their lives to support animals and nature. Meanwhile they use fresh vegetables and fruits and are more phisically active which ends up in guaranteed healthy status. Equally importantly, though, thanks to breakthrough of the internet it can be possible for some people such as managers to live in countrysides and use the advantages available for them while they use some method such as remote viewing to control their workplace, so their material considerations can partly disappear. However, problems related to the pace of the internet and the technology particularly in developing countries can pose problems to live in far-flung vilages and supervise workforces in cities. Nonetheless, the feeling of self-sufficiency and resistance which are exemplified in farmers' lives can be regarded as as possitive approach. A case in point is in spite of some pressing difficulties and limitations, subsistence farmers use some methods such as crop rotation to overcome some limitations in order to keep the soil healthy. By way of conclusion, I reaffirm that living in the rarual areas can be looked optimistically because of its influence on healthy issuse and focusing on ever-growing population of cities as deterrent factor. vahidl

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

"Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion." Nowadays, there are many changes that take place/taking place taken place in educational systems. While some people think that they need a different solution to evaluate students' level in a class instead of traditional giving marks, others believe different approach. In my opinion, I still believe that marks are a credible standard that encourages students to learn better for following reasons. First of all, grades motivate students to approach their studies in a deep and meaningful way. Without a score, the effort of pupils is meaningless, especially for those who are in young ages. As children, they haven't been clearly aware of importance of study. Many of them still try to get best marks. As an illustration, ever since I was a little kid, I always try to achieve full points due to the fact of getting a star on my notes. At that time, I really did not understand the seriousness of my lessons. There is more to education than just giving a score. Furthermore, grades motivate scholars because they serve as an objective measurement of our knowledge. Not only do scores are assigned in a systematic way, but also they demonstrate which students in a class are the best and brightest. If an instructor set "pass/fail" rules for their courses, no matter how hard you try, you will pass the class. In addition, in classes where grades are given, they will strive to succeed. As an illustration, in my freshman year I took the class in which it which has a "pass/fail" course in literature. Since only a moderate amount of effort was required to pass the class. On the other hand, when I took another class at the same year, I spent many hours inlibrary doing my research. As such, I could show my professor that I was intellectually superior to my classmates. As the result, I've got an excellent score. In conclusion, I strongly believe that grades stir up those who want to be succeeded in their major. This is due to the fact that it gives young learners a way to distinguish themselves from their peers.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Going abroad and living there as a student is being an ambition of many youngsters these days. A lot of people who are in the age of study are interested in continuinge their education in some other countries except their own motherland, as they believe not only do they study there, but also get familiar with a new culture and language and many other new events , which are interested me as well. From my point of view, living in a foreign country for schooling has its own difficulties and conveniences too. Most people who either have a plan to go to overseas or they have gone there for study, are youngsters, which is their first experience staying far from their homeland. Therefore, it is like a new adventure for them which broadens their horizon and helps them boost their self-confidence. However, sometimes it causes them to feel lonely and homesick especially when they are emotionally disturbed and need someone very close and trustable. Any countries have their own culture and custom, despite reading in the history books or watching any national Geography program on TV, still they are unaccustomed with to those occasions. But understanding those rituals and traditional events when they are presented there would help them to perceive those occurrences better. Moreover, it helps them try for adapting themselves to many differences which they have been facing them. Furthermore, studying to in any foreign country needs learning a new language. As a result, learning language is like opening a window to a new life. Being expert to in any new language has many advantages, one simple example is finding jobs easier. Knowing a new language enables them to have a worthy communication with a lot of new people and find new friends from a different country. That can be very helpful especially when you are alone there. In brief, living in a different country helps people know the differences and learn how they can live and adapt themselves with to new circumstances. It helps them, particularly young people, be more selfconfident and experienced which is more usable for their future life.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Essay: The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree? There are different solutions to solve the problem of poverty, that can be categorized to straight funding and indirect investment. In my opinion, investing money to build infrastructures to help the poor could be a more valuable solution since it can have long-term effectiveness. There are many disadvantages to directly giving money to the poor, as it can only be used as a temporary solution. Giving subsidy to the impoverished, just like a painkiller may minimize the problem, but it actually aggravates the inflation. If money is directly given to governments to help the poor, due to inappropriate legislation that had caused the gap between rich and poor, it not only doesn't only help but also maybe just a small portion of it will be given to needy due to financial corruption. Moreover, many of those impoverished, do not exactly know howhave to employ the money to improve their lives effectively. There are worldwide NGOs and other foundations that collects money, investing in areas to improve the standard of living of the poor. These funds can be invested to accommodate the homeless, to improve sanitation, as well as constructing especial schools in isolated areas where young children work in order to feed their family and do not earn enough to pay school fees. Taxes can be managed to increase the minimum wage, as it can easily improve their lives since they can eat better, seek a better education and their children can have better jobs. additionally, they can buy more and factories have to produce more, so more workers are needed, consequently more job opportunities are provided for the jobless. All in all, direct funding cannot permanently solve the problems of improvised, but constructing infrastructures to help them improve their standard of living as well as reducing inequalities would be more beneficial. Nazanin Ghods

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

How can we motivate the staff? Is giving money a good way? In this rapidly-changing and materialistic world, money is said to be one of the most important factors needed. "Money talks" and "no money, no honey" are examples of expressions which directly draw our attentions to the importance of money. Thus, people believe the more money they earn; the happier they are in life. Therefore they intend to work harder and spend most of their times at their work places just to achieve the goal of having a larger amount of money. But the question is whether the companies should take advantage of this weak point to make the staff work harder or in other words is providing them with money the only way to motivate employers? I opine, we cannot debunk the role that money plays in our today's lives, thought it is not the only item in terms of profession satisfaction. Prior to money, a appropriate working environment is a necessity. Despite the high wages the employers receive, there are some unsafe/unsound working places they cannot tolerate. Moreover, there are other ways to encourage the personnel such as having ac competition among the employers, set a target and provide them with bonuses. That everyone needs to relax and take some time completely far from his/her job should be also taken in to account. To that end, some companies oblige their staff to go on vacation, since it is obvious that their tiredness decreases the quality of their outcome. Another influential factor could be flexible working hours of a company, which was not very common among the companies, but recently they find it useful. Aforementioned point are some examples that, in my estimation, could persuade the employers to work for a company more than money. I, personally, prefer to work in a place with a friendly environment where there are other items rather than money that can sparkle my enthusiasm.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Schools spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skill that can help students find a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Institutions educate their students conventional subjects such as history until now. However, some people who are opponents to these subjects argue that we should educate students in technical matters which are helpful on their future. To begin with, technical subjects can be computer, painting, plumbing or electrical to name a few. If students spend more times on those subjects, they are more likely to find their field of interest. In addition, pupils who experience even the basics of these matters are skilled properly for work places. Having said that, a developmental way will be introduced at the time they are starting to nurture their talents. Thus, spending class valuable time on learning past events would be futile. On the flip side, others believe that studding through historical stories would bring about some merits to our children. To exemplify, by studding history our children are able to distinguish the proper approaches for being a white collar or blue collar. In other words, these subjects are known as fundamentals of education. Above all, history can illustrate a better understanding of future. As an old saying goes, history is repetitive. Therefore, these studies can educate children how to calculate risks in their future job. To put it in a nutshell, there are strong arguments on both sides of the debate. After analyzing I opine that keeping balance between traditional knowledge and technical one is needed in order for children to be successful because this is exact the time of students' executing, and knowledge in both of them can give pupils a peripheral vision.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many of the diseases which afflict people who do office jobs are the direct result of a sedentary lifestyle. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer. In these previous decades, the rate of inflation are obviously increasing. Providing the welfare, people restrain themselves to do any jobs which causes to fatal diseases. I deem that the huge numbers of traumas have certainly stemmed from a sedentary lifestyle. First of all, the more monetary needs, the more requirement to work hourly. Nowadays, employees do not pay sufficient attention to how their body is in danger. They opt for desk-bound for 9 hours daily cause to feel the backache rather than spending their time for inner satisfaction as well as their healthiness. Not only does steady workplace affect the muscles and bones, but also it takes up most of the time. For instance, I as an employee who spend the majority of time at work suffer from severe pain on my hand which results from working nonstop with mouse and keyboard. Further, I always loss the opportunity of stretching out my arms and legs. Second of all, as such, stationary workplace decreases our energy to do any exercises but we can have a daily schedule for preventing these ailments. Furthermore, we can require any helps from orthopedist to do several motions between our hard work. In addition, there is the fact that doing yoga regularly leads to a painless lifestyle in terms of psychological or physical. This clearly debunks the idea that people need to uplift their spirits instantly. Hence, doing exercises increase the passion of life. To sum it up, in my estimation, there is no doubt that majority of people afflicting diseases are those who have a sedentary lifestyle and they should not loss their worthwhile seconds to care for themselves. Melika Nafare

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. For too many years, watching battles between two individuals or two groups of them has been one of the most favorite amusements for lots of nations around the world. This favorite enjoyment changed its shape into various sport matches in recent centuries. Accordingly constructing related basements for sports and providing facilities for training athletes have become a profitable field of investment for individuals or even governments. It is obvious that a part of these investments income which mostly comes from advertisements belongs to sport professionals as their salary which . Some people believe that this salary is too much in contrast with many other professions. Someone wishing to become a well-paid athlete must be extraordinary talented and should make lots of efforts. Regarding their biographies most of the sport professionals have started trainings from childhood and moreover, sense of ambition and mental condition play an important role in their success. As a consequence, becoming a globally well-known athlete is an arduous progress and only a limited number of individuals can nail it. However, if one tries to calculate amount of income according to hours of working, would conclude that sport professionals are earning too much. Furthermore, some people believe that their profession is not productive as much as scientists', teachers' or lots of others' occupations. In conclusion, chance of becoming a sport professional between too many rivals is very low and the more they wish to earn money, the more they should win competitions, it means that they are accepting too much risk because if they can't become a unique champion they will earn no money. Therefore, I believe they deserve what they achieve.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

TOPIC: It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Different children have different talents for various activities. One child may have fantastic talents for sports and someone may have more potential to become a musician or an artist. A growing number of people believe that genetic inheritance is essential to achieve success, while others argue that any child can be taught particular skills. To begin with, every child reflects their abilities at the infant stage. It paves the way for parents deciding their life path. For instance, playing piano like a professional, a two years old child among the siblings with the same cares proves that people have inborn talent which is undeniable. Confidently, a child cannot learn such a skill at the age of two. On the contrary, most of the children do not have outstanding inborn talents. They might have potentials but that cannot be explored until they are engaged in a certain field. To make the word more beautiful and enriched, it is incumbent on parents to promote different innate abilities of their offspring and assist them making their future more prosperous. Neither does is it beneficial to children themselves nor to the parents and the country if the natural talents of a particular field get ruined. To conclude, talent makes many people stand out of others. However, training, dedication and the environment are also required to be really good in areas such as sports or art. In my opinion, nature and nurture both have the equal role to play for a child to become a successful professional and there is fine line between these two phenomena.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

While more and more people read news on the internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news. Do u agree or disagree? Although reading news on the internet is getting more and more common among people, some say that newspapers are is still the most important and reliable source of news access, which I think is not true. digital sources of news have a couple of advantages in comparison with the traditional ones. for example, reading news on the internet allows u to be aware of things happening right in the moment, while newspapers are only capable of covering news occurred occurring before they are published. Also having access to the internet is much more easier than newspapers and can save a great deal of time for us to do other activities such as working or entertainment. digital sources of news allows us to get informed of news in a certain field which we prefer, while newspapers cover a variety of news fields that most of which them seem to be unimportant for us and even paying attention to them can waste a considerable amount of time. Newspapers usually include some irrelevant columns, such as advertisements, which we might not want to read and thiswhich can make individuals feel uncomfortable. So even in this case, reading news on the internet is much more convenient. Another reason that makes digital news sources more beneficial is that the process of publishing newspapers has a harmful impact on the environment because of the trees which are cut in order to provide papers. Although this might not to be a major concern now, but people cannot ignore the negative impact of these in future.In conclusion, while newspapers can be beneficial for to some extent, It seems that reading online news via the internet is much more advantageous.