Fridays

Ageing Population

2017-06-30T11:37:23+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing . what problems will this cause for individuals and society ? suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. These days, as a result of medical advances people can live longer. this new situation can pose fundamental troubles for society which we are supposed to address those and also offer some solutions for them as below. There are numerous problems about prolonging longevity in societies. First and foremost is over population which lies in the shrinking rate of death in countries. what can be significant in this regard are problems which caused by overpopulation. A case in point is , the per-capita income for individuals in a the society which goes down. The more population there is, the less fewer facilities there are. Also, the composition of the society is going to be old, so these countries are entering an uncharted territory where some demographic problems are inevitable. Furthermore, in case of job opportunities, when the old take the jobs , the existing effective workforce potential is not completely used in societies which can lead to unemployment for young people and consequently marriage problems and juvenile delinquency can be highlighted. Last but not least, the mounting costs of these countries should be allocated for pension, healthcare and social service of the elderly which can affect the GDP of countries negatively and ends up in economic recession. In terms of solution, some fundamental measures should be taken by governments. Firstly, by increasing the age of the retirement, the old people are paid as a result of their productions and services. Relatively and from a psychological point of view, they feel influential and useful in the society which can be a positive point for them. On the other hand, states can use their taxes and services for more time. Secondly, from an economic point of view, immigration of skilled workers plays the major role in of economic prosperity, especially when there is shortage of off-the-shelf young job seekers and the trend toward ageing is accelerating, hence paying enough attention to this solution can be an important point for governments. For example, the situation of Japan can be addressed since the government of this country is criticized owing to their policy against professional immigrants and the problem can be intensified when a major part of the Japanese population is the geriatric generation. A problematic point in this issue is that instead of using the tax payment of foreigners the government should pay for its elderly people.In conclusion, while the ageing problem is going to be widespread in the years to come, this it is incumbent on governments to take steps in order to minimize the negative consequences of this phenomenon by using the impressive policies and it seems to me that the social policy should be even more radical than the economic one. Vahid tavazoei

Language, Amir Gilani

2017-06-30T11:36:57+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

As languages such as English, Spanish and Mandarin become more widely spoken, there is a fear that many minority languages may die out. Some countries have taken steps to protect minority languages. What is your view of this practice? Hundreds of languages are teetering on the brink of extinction, and as researchers discover, we may lose more than just words if we allow them to die out. Major speaking languages like English, Spanish and Mandarin are becoming dominant while the minor languages speaked spoken by locals are in danger of becoming extinct. Many people along with officials are trying to prevent dying out of minority languages. The question is if language diversity can be preserved, or are we on the a path to becominge a monolingual species? There are some famous cases of languages dying out a language such as Asghar Agha's story in Iran who passed away in Save, a town south of Tehran, in 2010, taking the Saveie language with him. The smaller the number of the speakers, the harder it is to get an accurate headcount. I think we do not have any other option than preserving languages because languages they are conduits of human heritage, community songs, stories and poems. In other words, languages convey unique cultures and if we are to survive, to continue on and to exist as people with a distinct and unique culture, then we have to have a language. Languages are ways of interpreting the world, and no two are the same. As such, they can provide insight into neurology, psychology and the linguistic capacities of our species. Different languages provide distinct pathways of thought and frameworks for thinking and solving problems. In many local languages the speaker can express natural -related phenomenaon which than majority language speaking languages cannot. For example, English speakers are never exposed to a certain mood of a local animal, and consequently do did not need to have a word for it/that.For the abovementioned reasons and many others I could not mentioned here I strongly hold the idea of preserving minority languages. To me losing such languages means losing a culture, way of living and part of human history. I think not only is it on international organizations like UNESCO but every individual have has to do his best to prevent preserve/protect local languages.

Problems, Morteza

2017-06-30T11:36:44+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Morteza Nemti Writing Task II #3-Problems Nowadays most of the urgent problems can only be solved through international cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? We all do agree that on its every corner our world is facing troubles some of which would naturally be pressing, but as for who must tackle them, it might depend on where they have occurred. Some occur right on some neighboring countries' borderlines which leads them to be considered a multinational issue, Some over international seas or off all states, far beyond any, where no man has ever lived, that is to say on the South Pole or in an orbit around Earth, and still, not local. Even though, obviously, in such cases, worldwide measures should be taken to approach matters, what if one happens within a country? Followed from the above, many of the internationally well-meant actions have been pessimistically considered interference in other nations' affairs. Fervently devoted to this belief, governments and sometimes citizens would rather decide on what has to be done alone and independently. Meanwhile, foreigners are expected to wisely stay away. Not long ago, a Russian submarine sadly started to sink. Russians might have been too arrogant to confess this incident, such a scandal, or too obsessed about their military secrets to let anyone there. Late enough they realized it was something they could not deal with on their own, and once announced, barely did anyone trouble themselves to go that late to help whereas submariners, humans like usmen, could have been saved. Therefore, I'd say a universal aid should be warmly welcomed without a second thought at least when severely crisis-stricken. From another perspective, countries must take/shoulder responsibility for any human or environmental situation the world would face. We are all in the same boatone ship, spaceship Earth, which we should care for, for ourselves, animals and nature. We must employ every resource, skill, and opportunity aggregated/accumulated to help each other and to enhance our home, the universe. Considering nations' right to be independent and free along withMorteza Nemti Writing Task II #3-Problems borderless responsibilities we must take, I gather that people of the world must unify whenever need be.

Punishment and Children, Melika Nafar

2017-06-30T11:36:30+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children? Parents always play a key role in their children's lives while/because they kids are constantly exposed to danger. Admittedly, the toddler age is a training period when the environment has have effects on their beahaviours. Thus, teaching them to assess right and wrong is a primary duty which parents should be aware of when punishment is necessary. First of all, from my point of view, although parents must have a great regard for the child's individuality, they should let them experiment with different challenging situations dare him/her to be in danger which causes/encourages them making to make a progress. As a result, a child may get effected by their surroundings. in addition, punishment is necessary but the corporal or emotional ones lead to irreparable damages such as isolation/: hermitic, nervous disorders, releasing their stress and of course spoiling the relationship between family and kids. Hence, it can be beneficial and helpful to decrease the criminal situations in the future. Therefore, not only would it not be cannot be dangerous but also it would be efficient. Further, it is mandatory that parents should be taught what kind of punishment they are allowed to use let them use. In my estimation, one of the useful methods which could be handled is that not to admire children for their wrong decisions. In another words, we should be aware of the fact that, the way in which children are raised raising/nurtured/reared/brought up shouldn't be as the same way as we were brought up and generations are all different with each other. To conclude, children need to learn the difference between positive and negative and parents should discipline them by the various methods cause to show them the right path. Melika Nafar

Stress

2017-06-30T11:36:16+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

More and more people claim that modern life is a source of stress. What do you think are the cause of this? Can you suggest some possible solutions? Our forefathers had always been imagining that their next generations would have more life and would live in higher-level standard situations. However, unfortunately, it seems that the vast majority of people live under stress. Psychologists and neurologists have conducted a large number of studies about the reasons of stress. Paying attention to money and our goal excessively, having fruitless foods and fruits and having the unsuitable lifestyle are some factors which have the effect on our minds and bodies which makes create/cause stress in the course of our life. These days, people always made make their effort to earn money and it is conceivable that some parts of it will never be spentd to make themselves happy. Moreover, the people just allocate all their time for reaching their goals, including the education, the job promotion and their family accommodation. Consequently, they work all their time which makes them not only do not they not only feel satisfied, but also they feel that life flows rapidly, and gets them stressed. Paying attention to all the moments of life and enjoy it instead of working is one of the solutions which is advantageous. Unsuitable diet and futile foods and fruits such as some kinds of fast foods and inorganic fruits, which are very convenient today in our society, makes creates shortage of the necessary ingredients in our body which hurts our brain and physic. As a result, one of the effective consequents of it is that the people feel stressed. Having organic fruit regularly and useful foods, and in addition, using dietitians' advice to have a the balanced diet absolutely helps the people who suffer it. Our lifestyle, also, has the influence on our physical and mental health. It is proven that both lack of enough exercise and sitting behind the desk table(sedentary lifestyle) for working, studying, gaming or other activities are related to getting stressed. In other words, while technology is providing a lot ofbenefits for men, and improves the medicine medical level, it is has caused us to meet some problems like atrophying the mussels which is the source of stress. As long as we revise our lifestyle and have the physical exercise, the body reforms itself and it makes us feel better,. moreover, the stress rate will be reduced combated. The people absolutely are able to improve/enhance get their life better just by living in the moment and paying attention to their life, having worthwhile nutrition and exercising every day. These aforementioned sources of stress will be managed day by day, provided that a balance between work and life is made.

University and Sports Activities, Arsalan

2017-06-30T11:36:04+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should give the same amount of money to their students' sports activities as they give to their university libraries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. Funding for the athletic programs at colleges and universities is a very controversial issue these days. While some people believe that universities and colleges should spend their money on students' sports activities, others feel that universities should spend their money on libraries. In my opinion, I completely agree that universities should spend their money on libraries instead of sports activities. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay. To begin with, libraries in universities are the most crucial places where the student could study. The main goal of the universities is that students should prepare for their career. It has been stated that "good for the boy, good for the brain", but the main reason that pupils should enroll in colleges and universities is to gain knowledge for their future work. Students could do sports after their classes. There are a lot of gyms and sports clubs where that you can go and do sports but, there are few places that have nice libraries. Thus, the student should study in places where they feel comfortable and relaxeding. As an illustration, my university has a very beautiful library. Not only does it have the Internet, but also it is connected to the databases such as IEEE and Springer in which student could search papers and journals, and . It has a good air conditioner, so you don't feel tired. It has a beautiful view to Municipal Park. As such, in this environment, you always feel fresh. Furthermore, the budget of some universities depends on their educational activities. Especially in the United States of America, there are many colleges which have an annual budget for their academic research. If they do not have good facilities such as libraries and computer bases, how will they will do research and publish a paper?. In addition, universities should spend their money in order to build some labs for their distinguished department. Publishing some papers without having good laboratories are is impossible. For instance, my university has two labs in my field. I recently, published the a paper which uses the laser to measure some distance. It has quite the an expensive device that is only found finds in our labs. If I didn't have the device, how I could I finish my paper and measure my distances?. In conclusion, I strongly believe that colleges and universities should provide some modern good facilities rather than spending their budget on/for sports activities because there are lots of sports clubs and facilities which have good sports programs and the budget of many universities are depends on their research work.

Vegetarians, Boshra

2017-06-30T11:35:51+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Everyone should follow a vegetarian diet because it is not necessary to eat meat to be healthy. Do you agree or disagree? Due to technological progress in the world, researchers' achievements have gotten to an advanced level recently, hence their breakthroughs have changed some of their beliefs. For example, these days researchers assume that human beings had better eat just vegetables and avoid consuming meat as opposed to some others who assert that ordinary eating habits are much more beneficial and healthy. That eating vegetables is necessary for our body is an undeniable fact. It could be helpful for moving materials through intestines. In addition, not only does this eating habit reduce the likelihood of getting some diseases such as blood pressure and heart attack, but also it causes weight loss loosing weight among obese people. In this way, individuals feel better and would be more energetic, and besides their life expectancy is increased. On the other hand, some others opine that there are is no logical reason to impose/introduce/place make these kinds of limitations for ourselves. People can eat meat or other kinds of animals productsion such as milk and eggs and still remain healthy. What is more, vegetables are not capable of providing all the necessary elements in our body which that could result in diverse kinds of deficiency in the human bodyhumans' body. Considering our physical structure like the length of intestines scientifically reveals that our body can digest both meat and vegetables. That is why there is not need to eliminate either/one of them. Furthermore more, some people choose being vegetarian because they tend to be more fashionable in society, but as time goes they become bored and give up their diet. This undeniably has numerous detrimental effects on their gastrointestinal system. On the whole, I, personally, believe that people had better strike a balance between these two ingredients in their meals and neither meat nor vegetables should be eliminated.