جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people would like to experience the same things while the other prefer to experience changes in their lives …discuss both view and say your opinion and example When it comes to changes in our lives, there are two groups of people available. The first group do not think about changes and would like to experience the same things. Meanwhile, the other group are willing to have changes in their daily routine whenever possible and I myself prefer to support this group of people . There are some reasons about why a group of individuals are keen on keeping their day to day activities without even small changes. The first and foremost issue is the fear of the unknown which is reflecteds in their lives as phobia. A case in point , technophobes people whose understanding about cutting edge technologies modernities is linked with a huge amount of fear . furthermore, they would like to be sure about the way they live. From a psychological point of view, when they experience their lives without significant problems and also they are used to their lifestyle, they find it difficult to change their trends./complacency On the other hand, for many good reasons, change is an integral part of life for a significant number of people. According to their point of view a large number of inventions and innovations have been caused by risk propensity/risk-taking. As figures show almost all of break throughs during humans's life are derived by the change attitude which is manifested effectively done by in scientists' risks as risk takers. Secondly, as the statistics show, there are five groups of risk propensity which are respectively financial, health and safety , recreational , ethical , social . In each one of the groups , individuals follow their goal for the greater opportunity which ranges from investment to absorbing attention of the others . last but not least, on the scale of certain aspects such as humor , outgoingness and even adventure can be incentive factors to experience risk in each new phase of life humans enter. For example, moving to a the new city, wearing unconventional clothes, changing career and even the sexual aspect in charming to charm the opposite sex /other gender. Thrill seekers find it easy to use the change to achieve their goal when they strongly believe that people only regret the chances they did not take. In conclusion, although both of the groups discussed above have reasonable reasons to continue their trend, I would like to support the risk takers where when the meaning of life is linked with the change. VAHID TAVAZOEI

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many countries the level of crime is increasing and crimes are becoming more violent. Why do you think this is and what can be done about it? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience. Unfortunately, we are the witness to of an increase in commission of committing crimes and breaking rules in modern societiesy. Studying about the measures to reasons which can combat crimes seems to be necessary for each society to keep itself safe. Lack Lake of attention to people who live below the poverty line, introducing wrong laws and taking advantages of youth cause an increasing trend of committing crimes. There are a lot of people who every day break the law to earn money just to afford the basic needs necessity of for their family. to be alive. Moreover, income inequality is one of the main motivations to perpetrate wrongdoing. Indeed, as the gap between the poor and the rich is widening, not only are the crime esthetics statistics increasing getting increased, but also the crimes themselves are getting/becoming more violation violent. It is also the responsibility of the governments to introduce some suitable laws to combat crimes. In On the other words, passing and abolishing some laws by administrative authorities are very effective to make people obey the laws. Introducing the laws which be applicable for the officers to enforce them is another Achilles' heel of governments which has very significant effect on our society. Because youth will be the vulnerable time for every person, there are a lot of people who want to take advantage of them. In fact, shortage of the knowledge of crimes and the consequences of committing crimes causes young people are at the risk of breaking laws. So, just with by spending some portion of the money to increase the knowledge instead of building the prison, it is possible to decrease the vast majority of non-violent and drug-related crimes. The increase in committing crimes/crime surge will undoubtedly threaten the safeness/safety of the society. In my opinion, just by application of some solutions, including improving the economic situation, introducing applicable laws and raisinge the criminal knowledge of young people, most of the crimes are preventable.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. While there are advantages to both classes which where the professor talks all of the time and classes that where/in which students get cooperate with the professor., I completely agree that classes with open discussion are more beneficial due to the fact that students could learn a lesson much easier and it would help them to develop their social skills. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay. To begin with, classes where students would get involved, could help them to improve their intellectual abilities. It has been said that "repeating what others have said requires education, to challenge it requires brain". Students who participate in classes got get a higher score than those who do not participate in discussion. In addition, the more you teach others, the more you learn. As an illustration, recently, I tooktake a mathematical class. The professor wants some students, myself included, me not only to solve the problems, but also try to explain the process of solving. At first, I surely know knew the problem but, after a few steps I realized that I've I had missed missing a good point. Then, the professor tries tried to clarify the point with association of the other students. Furthermore, classes in which there is has a lot of discussion can help pupils develop the skills necessary to work well in groups. Many freshman students go to universities each year. They are usually shy and can't communicate well. These discussions could help them to develop their gregarious skills. Moreover, they would work in groups. My younger brother's experience demonstrates this point. When he started university, he was quite a very reticent person. After a while, he tried to join discussions along with others. The professor defined an assignment that students should do in pair. Since he was joining discussions, everyone had known him and he had found a classmate very easily. In conclusion, I strongly believe that classes (which are )have more concentrated on in discussion are more useful than those classes in which professors take give lectures all of the time. This is because students take advantage of (engagement) being involved and ready for their future especially in their career.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many countries the problem of drug-taking is increasing. Governments and the general public are particularly concerned about young people using illegal drugs such as marijuana, ecstasy and heroine. What methods could be used to prevent young people from taking drugs? Is it appropriate to send young drug-users to prison? Give reasons for your answer. Throughout the world the number of young drug-users is rising constantly. Societies are anguished about young drug-users. There are various methods to prevent them from using drug or help them after they got involved with it. but in my opinion, prison is not a beneficial approach manner. Unfortunately, the first way that comes to mind of many persons to prevent drug abuse /young people from using drugs is to send them to prison which . Which, I think is a very inappropriate and even unfair solution. Firstly, detention is for criminals and we have to be aware that addiction is not a felony and the addicted person is not a felon but we should know them as patients/ill persons. secondly, they will be in touch with numerous villains that can have negative effects on their mind and even put their lives in danger or even learn the leatest methods of crime commission. Instead, there are more efficient measures to help young drug users. With some methods we can prevent them from becoming an addict such as . Such as family support., parents should know the fact that one of the most common reasons of addiction has roots in family. Therefore, they have to assign lots of their attention, support and time to their children especially once they are at the age of reason. it is a very important stage in a child's mental growth and they are so extremely sensitive. thus, they might take wrong decisions which that finally leads to addiction. There are also some ways to help them quit like counselling sessions, occupational therapy and medical treatment. in my estimation, most of these follow one goal to give them motivation because without a good reason they won't do away with drugs which has been a sedative for them for a long time.In conclusion, we have to try to preserve ourselves and beloved ones from this misery at first place and if we didn't succeed then we have to use suitable manners to recover them and arresting should be our last option.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays managers and team leaders in different organizations are much younger compared to the past. What are the reasons for it? Is it a positive or negative development? Recently a new approach of people management has risen, in a way that young presidents in critical positions are seen in parts of the world. This has become a controversial issue, and some people claim that directing a large group of people or decision making for big companies demands years of experience, and it should be carriedy out on by experienced people. With the rise of advances in science and technology new demands in managements seems inevitable. In other words, a new wave of young managers are is replacing the previous generation and from the perspective of a large group of people it is a positive change. It goes without saying that cutting edge technology demands energetically young managers who accelerate the movement while most aged managers prefer conservative movesments. Many people are clearly against the recent changes in management and are strongly against the young managers reasoning that management is a not like other sciences that everyone can gain it by reading management text books. They believe decision making is a skill that takes time so to that most young people suffer lack of this skill. This view point suggests a professionally expert management system which is a combination of aged managers with several young skilled fullskillful deputies to work and decide all together. In conclusion, I believe that regardless of the reason behind this new wave of change we have to modify it in a way that previous managers tend to transfer their knowledge to their young counterparts, and this does not happen unless we praise their efforts and do not set them aside.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that the main factors influencing a child's development these days are things such as television, friends, and music. Others believe that the family still remains more important. Discuss both opinions and give your opinion. Parents play a vital role in the way that their child grows up. However, many people believe that social factors outside of the family influence on children much more. This essay will examine both sides of the argument. It is undeniable that children are very easy to be impacted by what they watch and see. For example, if children watch a movie on TV, they might be deeply influenced by the main characters, and they would easily imitate those actions. In addition, they /children have access to the Internet compared with the past, and they play online computer games. Most of such games contain many images of kicking and killing that could impact on children's mind when they play with these kinds of video games. Furthermore, friends have an important influence on their peers so that they copy from their friends. They could have a positive or negative impression on children's behavior. On the other hand, families have the most important impact in the development of children. In early ages, children spend nearly all their time with their families at home. Therefore, parents play a significant roles in their nurture, confidence, skills and morals. In other words, parents have very important influence on the formation of personality of their children. From my point of view, both of these factors them are important. however, whereas today due to the advancements in the field technology, children spend a lot of time using them it because they are it is so attractive that they are be entertained by themwith. Moreover, these days most of parents both of them go to work, and they do not have enough time to spend time with their children. To As a result of escape from loneliness, they take refuge in other things/hobbies like the Internet and TV. In conclusion, although both social factors and the family have a certain influence on a child's progress, the effect of computer games and friends on children is serious, and should be considered.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Music There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? People love to listen to music on in all occasions, some or at all. As for the group who listens to music of any kind, there must be a reason why they do so. This may bring us to the answer to another question as to what type of music better aims for the goals of its audience, the native or the international one. On one hand, listening to music per se could be considered a goal. A majority of people listen to music simply to hear it. The melodic content of a piece of music, the rhythm changing every once a second, the crescendo and decrescendo tones as well as the tempo at which the piece is played, affects the emotions and feelings of the audience, excites and inspires them. As a scientific document, psychologists acknowledge the effects of what we hear on how we feel. On the other, music can provide people with a pleasant atmosphere whether or not they are listening to it. That's why people listen to music when they are sedentary or while doing any activities imaginable that can be imagined, namely doing exercises or even studying. Nostalgia fills people when they hear a song or a piece of music they used to listen to. Seemingly, non-native music cannot entertain people like this. Yet, there are things that exotic music can do, functions that the national music of a state cannot perform. There comes the exotic music to play its role just as you want to do something at a high tempo, for example, or where someone tends to feel entirely different than the character of the place they need to be in. This way, both types of music seem to be of significant use. Reasons for which people listen to music differ from spending time hearing what they are fond of to changing their feelings as a therapy to providing themselves and those around with a better atmosphere. To aim for all these goals, people might need both national and international music.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The older generations tend to have more traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? The role of senior individuals in young generations' life has sparked a heated debate between among people. Some researchers believe that these old people might be completely effective in society and their outlook at on life is really beneficial to their young relatives as opposed to/as against . As opposed to others who assume that the elderly members of the public think traditionally and could not be respectful to younger people. Proponents opine that the experienced people have managed a variety kind of challenging situations that might happened to young people too, hence they can provide their charges with their approaches easily. In addition, due to the fact that most of the old people are much more patient and reliable to others, they can affect individuals in a positive way. For example, students look forward to up their grand parents' advices more than their classmates'. On the other hand, opponents assert that not only do older people think in an out of dated way, but also young inhabitants cannot get along well with them. In other words, they are not familiar with some newly established facilities and can notcannot understand them. Furthermore, more, the senior citizens claim that young people follow some priceless worthless hobbies that are not acceptable to them. For example, they pay a lot of attention to being happy in life which/that might leads aged individuals to look down on at these generations. To put it in a nutshell, I personally believe that the more consulting with older inhabitantsindividuals, the better off the less aged are. For instance, we can adapt the grand parents' idea that is traditional with to the new situation and take advantages of from them.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cites in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'. How true do you think this statement is? What measurements can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? Having Increased an ever-increasing the number of cars owned by people people having cars, many cities throughout the world have had traffic congestion over the past several decades /thirty years. I personally subscribe to the view that the high rate of car use in several cities leads to traffic jams. The First and possibly the most important reason why I believe a multitude of cars in cities contribute to traffic jams is that most people aspire to commute by in their cars. In fact, it is considered that if private cars are used, people can save their time and reach their destination swiftly. As a result, the more cars are used, the more clogged many streets are the streets.more clogged. Moreover, many cars are annually made in factories. Car manufacturers are keen on persuading people to buy their products by suggesting special offers such as discounts to their customers. In this way, many people are attracted to havinge their own cars. Consequently, it can be seen that the number of cars in streets is soaredsoaring. If produced cars are not sold, many people who are working in factories would lose their job and car plants become shut down.bankrupt. There are numerous actions that governments can take to encourage people against using their own cars . One of the measurementsone of which is imposing tax on gas that people use as fuels. Imposing tax on gas makes discourages people from using not use private transport/their own car in extreme. In this way, the higher more the price of petrol is, the fewer less cars are used. Another effective way to tackle this issue is improving the public transportation system. Using public transportation system not only brings about traffic jam reduction but also people spend less time getting stuck in traffic jams/congestions. In conclusion, the number of cars in streets has boosted dramatically over the period given. If governments improved the infrastructure of transportation systems and considered gas tax, many people would prefer not to not use their own cars.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make ? has is become a positive or negative development ? As one of the most effective impacts of technology, revolution in individuals' way of communication can be mentioned. People are not interacting with each other the way they used to. They communicate through different applications on their mobile phones and see each other online. This development can be considered both negative and positive. To begin with, I prefer to start with the positive impact of technology in communication. These days people can easily get in touch with friends and family who live miles apart which was so different in the past. The only way they could contact their loved ones in foreign countries, was to send letters , while nowadays thanks to Face time and other mobile phone applications, they can easily video chat with each other. Therefore, people feel close to each other despite the distance. Furthermore, communication has become much faster and easier. Text messages, voice messages, photos and videos could be transferred in less than a minute. On the other hand, some people believe that this technological development has made relationships colder. For instance, people do not miss each other that much as they are in touch with each other through social networks. They see each other's photos and chat online, so the need of face to face communication will be reduced/hence the reduction in face to face communication. Moreover, individuals have become so too obsessed with technology that they even miss the time they are physically with each other. To conclude, in my opinion, technology must be used in its best way. Although it makes us closer to the ones who are far away, it could make us far apart from the ones who are next to us.