جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

TOPIC: Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Over the last half century the pace of change in the life of human beings has increased beyond our wildest expectations. Change is not always a personal option, but an inescapable fact of life and we need to adapt to keep pace with it. There is a heated argument whether people must remain loyal to the conservative ways of life or to resort to modern trends. It can never be denied that some people may become comfortable with to the routine practices in life, which they are more accustomed to. By remaining on the in a safe side while missing many opportunities, people, generally the old generation, avoid major changes. Under no circumstances do they want to step outside their comfort zone and prefer following their daily habits as they are not keen on being surprised. In their estimation staying secure and maintaining the status quo is the best way to live safer. However, it can be argued that the life of people will become more adventurous if they opt for new trends and experiences. As well as making life more fun and interesting, new experiences can be good for their physical and mental health. Furthermore, Changes create new opportunities which make them to leap forward. A new job, for instance, might present challenges that push people to acquire new knowledge or develop their skills in which case it can make them more experienced and valuable. To put in a nutnot shell, both sides seem to have their own merits although I would argue that alterations in some activities and practices are essential to achieve progress and success.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Task: Children nowadays have fewer responsibilities compared to the past. Some people say that it is beneficial for children. Others claim it is not a good approach. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Due to extreme changes in life styles life style changing (Changing in life style) we observe that children have fewer/less duties in comparison to the last decades. While there are persuasive arguments in favor of this trend others claim it is not a proper development/ approach. In this essay we will discuss both views and finally the author's point of view. From proponents' point of view duties can cause mental stresses and strains, so not only is it is not (isn't it) beneficial, but rather also harmful for children. Simply put, every individual who is responsible for a task requires a strong mind to be successful. However, children do not have not such an ability, thus it can have adverse effect on their daily life. Moreover, champions assert children are in their formative years which is a the great time for learning, so it would be extremely wrong to waste their time by giving responsibilities. On the other hand, it is believed that every individual should have a sense of responsibility which is a must to have a stunning future. From opponents' perspective this sense should be nurtured and the childhood is the appropriate time in this case. In addition, assuming duties is a proper way to hone skills which is are a necessity in everybody's life. For instance, many social and practical skills can be enhanced by shouldering responsibilities such as small shopping, helping parents in gardening or repairing some instruments. In conclusion, my personal conviction is that taking responsibilities would be a proper idea in bringing up a child, if parents could strike a balance in this case. Thus, parents should give responsibilities which are not stressful or have detrimental effects on their mental health.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Each year, the crime rate increases. What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. The Staggering Increase in the crime rate causes more difficulties for societies, then of course we feel society has let us down. That is why governments are determined to tackle crime and make every effort their efforts for either preventing or reducing it to have a safe and law-abiding legal environment. To this end, we should notice this issue from different aspects. First of all we should consider our children. Not only should are they be knowledgeable person, but also we should educate them to be honest, respectful to others especially if their opinions ' are opposite to have responsible manners with others and behave kindly in social sociable positions and more importantly being lawful legal people person in all situations. Furthermore, Cultural measures such as strengthening family values have an effective impact in nurturing children. In the next level, although convicted criminals should serve a sentence of years in prison, we should treat them fairly. It means that, we should eliminate any kind of discrimination and provide equal opportunities for all people who require either a job or social participation. Committing crimes usually happens because of family breakdown, deprived families and in countryside. The more miserable lethargic the family life, the more serious crimes will happen.higher committed serious offences/hardened criminal. Another important social issue that governments are faced with is helping people who live in suburbs or providing facilities or places for them not to waste their times or being in streets aimlessly, or even disturbing people. In a nut shell, governments should do everything in their power to combat crime, whether it is petty crime or more serious offences. If governments invest in education, educating system or provide ing facilities or create ing counselling consultant centers, the crime rate will be reduced dramatically and all of us know prevention is better than cure. easier and better than treatment.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject .To what extent do you agree or disagree. The importance of equal numbers of male and female students has become a big topic of debates these days. Many believe by providing considerable educational opportunities for men countries will have made been make significant progress in future. In my opinion in this rapidly changing world discrimination has no place. Although , today the number of women who engage in educational systems has been increasing in some countries, still the truth is both women and men have great capability to do their best while they take part in educational activities.to my mind not only is being a qualified person not related to gender differences but rather it is also about reasonable levels of intelligence as well as how likewise put their ideas are put into practice. Governments should pave the way for people to participate in every activity regardless of gender segregation to strike a balance in societies inasmuch as some countries are in the middle of recession and along with this crisis the pressing need for finding suitable jobs and the need to make making an adequate amount of money may have risen been enhance more and more. In conclusion , I think universities instead of imposing restrictions should have been accept equal numbers of male and female students. However impossible However it would be impossible for some conventional cultures but it's certainly worth a try to enhance the quality of life for people.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Morteza Nemti Writing Task II #18 Some people say children no longer need to develop handwriting skills. Others believe that handwriting is still important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Even though nobody can question the influence and therefore the importance of a legible longhand, regarding the pace of writing in shorthand compared with that of writing in hand and more importantly and obviously the amount of time and attempt that mastery in either of them takes, it goes without saying that people have understandably lost their interest in writing since its priority has become lower and lower. The question here is whether that if it is still rational to allocate children's time to this subject. Stunned by the beauty of a script, the audience of the letter would think of a writer as someone highly educated and of a high social level. This is the reason why as to why people become convinced to dedicate grant their children's time to improving their handwriting. The better a handwriting in a letter, the faster and more desirable the response, the advocates of the importance of a good handwriting do claim. Even those of them, who agree that rarely would one's handwriting be seen due to the recently immense popularity of typing, argue that, for instance, a congratulatory note ion lyric in an eye-catching script on a, for example, gift can impress someone in ways so greatly that hardly would anything else do, but is it merely to be written by the giver/sender or anybody can have someone do that for them? According to opponents, an impressive handwriting used to be worth the time and energy that was spent on it, though not now that not although/of course now that everyone lacks time and energy to allot to doing many other things, which these people believe, are of higher importance. They frankly assert that the priority of writing attractively and neatly is the lowest and consequently not reason enough to convince them or even put them in a dilemma of whether or not children should, they say, waste time improving their handwriting that seldom would it be of any help to them, but they must be asked if they would rather be embarrassed because of their spidery handwriting than spending an objectively adequate time practicing it.Morteza Nemti Writing Task II #18 Followed from the above, the advocates' claim is not compelling, nor is that of the critics. Yet, I agree with them both, but with both either to some extent. Children must have a limited number of courses on which they practice their longhand skills inasmuch as to have enough remaining time to be spent on more important things, namely studying and enjoying free time.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard? In times of high unemployment, employers do not need to give much in order to encourage their staff stuff to work hard. Although, job vacancies are scarce, they have to find an effective way for rewarding their meritorious workforce to preventing them from going elsewhere. One of the obvious ways to doing this matter is to offer employees extra money when they are seen to be working hard. This is done by companies which are selling products. For instance, real estate agents or department stores are able to offer little commission on sales that fire worker's enthusiasmt to do their utmost. This kind of managing is just enjoyed by people who can demonstrate their contribution through sales figures, but does not favoured people who works behind the scene and have no contact with clients directly. A proper approach might be that management offering bonuses to all the staff stuff at the end of the year. However, management cannot target individuals who had worked genuinely harder than others. In addition, bonuses are is an unreliable source of money, so this method is not preferred by most workers. Another way as to identifying excellent staff stuff is to have a monthly or weekly scheme for example, "employee of the month" or "worker of the week" to make individuals feel recognized. Admittedly, employees want to be known for their endeavor, whether through receiving financial rewards or simply encouraging words. They also need to feel that their contribution to the organization is worthwhile. A skilled manager discovers ed outstanding/efficient/effective/conscientious personnel esteemed stuff and compensates them appropriately.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Page 190 of Saadaat Jozveh: Some businesses now say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer. It is an abominable truth that smoking has become an unhealthy habit among youths and adults nowadays. Although, considered a soft drug abuse, smoking may lead people to tons of respiratory diseases and it plays absolutely a major part in lung cancer based on scientific researches. As a result, I totally agree with placing some strict restrictions on smoking, avoiding preventing non-smokers suffering from the unhealthy lifestyle choices of the others. Although, the destructive effects of smoking are obvious, complaints are always arising from a few chain-smokers that smoke-free zones have taken away their freedom. In this case, if giving the nicotine addicts the allowance of smoking in public places were could have been possible, would it not threaten others' freedom likewise? In other words, not only does smoking cause health issues for smokers themselves, but it affects also the second-hand smokers as well. Moreover, observing a smoker's gesture posture might lead adolescents and juveniles to develop a sudden appreciation for this toxic habit. Another reason why we should limit the locations of this activity is that passive smoking is as poisonous as smoking itself. By this which I mean, I believe that the inhalation of tobacco smoke from a nearby cigarettes may increase the risk risks of getting a respiratory disease. Nevertheless, imposing restrictions on smoking does not help the issue to a great extent, since second-hand smokers frequently live with their smoking partners in the same environments. To sum up, not letting people smoke everywhere they desire somehow takes away smokers' freedom. By the same token, the violation of none-smokers' freedom by the tobacco use is irrational. However, in my view the latter is a much more severe violation of human rights. Dear Sir/Madam, I am particularly interested in the course which is being offered at your college. I noticed that the enrollment is available just for those who have studied computing at a college or university. Unfortunately, I have not studied computing at college, yet computer programming is my passion and I always buy computer magazines to learn just a little bit further and update my knowledge. I am writing to ask if you could make an exception to your course enrollment requirements based on my background level of computing. I have taught myself major computer languages including FORTRAN, HTTPS, C++, C# and QBasic. Currently I design web pages and this has been my job over the past three years. I am available for an interview, as well as a placement test so that I can demonstrate both my knowledge and skills. I hope you consider my request favorably. Yours faithfully. Saeed Shokravi

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person's culture and character from their choice of clothes. Do you agree or disagree? It has been argued that people's appearance is a factor by which their attitudes can be interpreted. According to this, some of the society members assert that individuals' personalities and cultures can be understood by their way of clothing. However, it is disagreed that clothes are reliable trustful indicators of people's way of thinking. The impact of globalization on the resemblance of fashion styles and individuals' s different priorities to present themselves in social interactions are two main reasons to reject this argument. First, nowadays, with the ubiquity of international markets on the rise, the variety of products has been diminished. This leads to the similarity of people's way of dressing. For instance, it is conspicuous that articles of clothing in South Africa and Brazil are alike, although the nations do not share the same culture. Therefore, regarding the growth of similarity, people's outfits fail to reveal their culture and ethnicity. Secondly, a certain number amount of people do not make their appearance a priority. However, it does not mean that they are characteristically inferior to the others. For instance, according to a the recent survey, which has been conducted recently by a Ph.D. student, %38 of the aspiring students of the Art University of Tehran do not follow fashion and are less well-dressed compared with others. Nonetheless, they all come from the cultured families. It could be deducted conducted that there are other contributory factors indicating people's characters, and ostensible details are not sufficient for prediction of people's personalities, as the adage goes "you cannot judge a book by its cover". In conclusion, fast-growing globalization and individuals' different preferences lead to inability of their clothing to indicate their cultures and characters, thereby considering other factors for making a possibly thorough deduction about their morality and family roots.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? In some universities courses are allocated to students according to gender there is a sex assessment about some subject. Based on this rule, the authorities, for example, accept twice as many men as women men twice as much women or vice versa, while some educationalists believe that universities should accept equal numbers of both genders in every subject. They have convincing reasons in this regard. These universities, which assert that there should be differences between men and women for attending every subject, believe that these two sexes are very different in many ways. They think men are have cut out for strength-related areas as opposed to their female counterparts who are much more suitable for art subjects or every other skill which is related to emotional perception. Although this approach in some ways can be acceptable according to their nature and character, it is one-sided argument. Not only can does this point of view can be biased, but also that is an overgeneralization because there are always exceptions to every rule. If deprived of going to a one specific subject, one gender it may develop some complexes. to them. Furthermore, it might lead to society losing some talented individuals who are intelligent in some majors. Moreover, it brings about ignoring human rightrights. In another words, it is making discriminations among females and males. In conclusion, I would argue that if authorities pave the way for accepting both sexes with at the same portion in every educational branch, it would be a brilliant opportunity to discover some talents who can serve society and the community. On the other hand, throughout the history we have had men and women who have achieved goals in what might have seemed far-fetched to many at the time.some strange fields which were apparently against their genders. Arefeh

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Generally speaking the concept of violence is going to be prevalent such that it is routine enough to be regarded as regular occurrence among people .some people believe that there must be some solution for demolishing the rate of violence even by using dead penalty .however ,the others say said that it could be as violence too hence it is not fair. I am one of the supporters of the idea of halting capital punishment which could be addressed as below while some meaning such as justice and human rights are bold to be as influential factors in this essay. First of all , by considering consideration some moral concept ,it is really vital to be witness of the feeling of respect among people while there are variety verity of culture and types of rearing methods among people who live in society. Hence, it is inevitable while speaking about the intensity and amount of conflict about today's nowadays individuals and what could be coped with in this part is getting common, questions as to whether punishment such as dead death penalty could be a deterrent decreasing factor while this method itself is a as cruel manner and these days the concept understanding of "an eye for an against eye" is not fair when there are lots of campaigns in which people are fanatical about of human rights and any concept of violence even in conducting justice could be offensive no matter how inhumane the crime is especially because this could be as a prevalent trick for governors to use against their oppositions in such society with political problems. On the other hand there must be some sympathetic feelings about the grieving graved families and moreover the misconception of committing a crime readily in society .therefore, sometimes some politicians are in this idea that there must be some red-district in committing a crime with invasion beyond it could be responded by capital penalty because of this transforms the ambience of society really dark and there must be some preventive measures solving regardless of how cruel this solution could be such as death penalty. To sum up ,it is incumbent on governments governors to decreaseing the rate of violence by using cultural solutions and much more besides ,although it might be necessary to maybe it is needed to consider some monetary capital fine in some cases against some crimes depending on however effective the crime is .I am of the opinion that attitude in which replacement of community service instead of capital punishment/execution penalty is recommended.