جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Euthanasia, or mercy killing, has been in the news more and more recently. Many people are strongly against such a practice, but there is a growing demand to have it legalized. How far do you agree with euthanasia being made legal? Euthanasia is a serious political, moral and ethical subject in today's society. In other words, mercy killing is a highly contentious issue. In both sides of the debate people giving strong emotion reasons on this matter. Some people are of the opinion that ending the suffering life of a fellow human is an act of mercy and it should be enshrined in the law. Admittedly, there are several instances where people who are experiencing with appalling suffering and, the only way out is to end their life. However, there is a question as to whether that, as a humans do we have the right to decide when the life of another person should be ended? That would be presumptuous in the extreme. And who can guarantee that people will not be murdered in the name of euthanasia in order to abuseing the victim's position. On the other hand, it is totally unacceptable to take a life. Doctors are bound by oath to preserve the life of their patients and they should not be forced into a situation where they are have to decideing to terminate a life. In addition, there have always been been the probability of human's error. It could be possible to kill the a wrong person and there is no warranty that this will not happen, because there is a vast number of man-made problems during history for example babies have been switched or wrong limbs removed. The list is endless. Above all, there is also the possibility of finding the cure for the illness after the person has been killed. To put it in a nutshell, I argue that we are not allowed to decide about the human's lifespan morally. Who knows where it might lead to. There are some things in life that are best to be left them alone.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that playing and spending time on video game are very enjoyable specially for teenagers who are the greatest number of players in all around the world. Contrary, to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that not only is one way for squandering time is to play with the computer, smart cellphones, and etc., but also the investment in video games is are not essential and children should be banned or curbed. I, to a great extent, agree with the idea that the computer games stimulate adolescents's ability to be more creative and boost their intelligence. First and foremost, although some the video games are proper for children, the companies establish and attach some labels introducing standards for games which indicate the appropriate age group for a special game,. it means on the back of behind of the pack of the CDs or DVDs of games there is the label, distinguishing the peculiar age range for this game. Therefore, the misconception of detrimental effect of games for children will be responded. So each kid can choose an adequate game for himself and get pleased with playing. Another significant fact which should be taken into consideration is that playing and spending time is are not wasting time because when a person looks at the old generation all almost all of them have difficulties tackling technological work and cannot handle the routine works such as surfing the internet or search on the internet, but why the new generation does do not have these struggles? to answer this question a person has to look at/into the background of working with the computer. Since Forasmuch as, today's recent kids get accustomed to with computers due to spending lots of time playing, they professionally know how to cope with technical problems. Therefore, the academic, scholastic and governmental perspectives to playing with computers have changed,. consequently, they encourage parents to provide the fundamental infrastructure for their children owing to the significant role of computer games in children's future. Finally, playing games is the best way to keep children busy, so families use this trick to fill their children's free time of their children and prevent their disruption in their necessary works, such as reading or working on a projects. although, children fill their free time, they boost their initiative and intuition owing to interaction with the game's characters they learn how to resolve the issues and how to manage their feeling due to their inspired sentiments by games. On the basis of the facts mentioned above, I am convinced that the misconception of this fact, that the games are not proper for children due to guided labels, is solved and the parents can solve to this dilemma. Playing video games is helpful for children because of owing to conveying knowledge to them to be more informed in comparison with the old generation. The video games can accompany children and fill their time and teach learn them productive instructors.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Individuals can do nothing to change society. Any new developments can only be brought about by governments and large institutions. How far do you agree or disagree. As a matter of fact, people mostly blame governments for the lack of social security and low standards of living; nevertheless, people know deep inside that they themselves play a key role in all kinds of developments of their nation. Furthermore, governments are shaped by the individuals. As a result, both individuals and governments should accompany each other in order to prepare a healthier community conditions. On one hand, individuals occasionally find it impossible to bring about any developments to society which is on the contrary absolutely detrimental to the society. For instance, the Azadi tower, formerly known as Shahyad, was designed by the architect Hosein Amanat about half a century ago. Afterwards, the government provided funds to build it and now the whole country benefits from an individual's one's idea. In fact, neither do individuals benefit from just nagging about the problems, nor do governments achieve any functional ideas. On the other hand, by the same token, governments play a tremendous part in due to dealing with social problems. Therefore, large institutions which are owning the implements should spare no efforts protecting people from social issues. For instance, steps to address the issue such as setting up counselling sessions designed to increase people's awareness and to promote moral values must be taken by these huge organizations which are again valueless/worthless if they these are not taken seriously by people. Although, both governments and people have made progresses in social developments separately, bringing about beneficial changes is not feasible if individuals and governments do not cooperate in from my perspective.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

TOPIC: It is generally believed that the Internet is an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not be the best place to find information. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. The Internet is the most important technological development. Nowadays almost everyone in the world has access to the internet. It has significant changes in all aspects of family life and education. Some of these changes have been positive while others have been negative. This essay will discuss both sides of this issue. Using the internet has become a normal part of everyday life for many people in this rapidly changing world and no sensible person will deny that it has various uses. The convenience and speed of the internet enables people of all ages to form communities in new and unique relationships. For instance, in discussion forums, people can easily communicate and share their ideas. It is a great tool for interacting around the world at a relatively low cost. Not only does the internet provide provides the internet many learning opportunities, but also facilitates research activities. When it comes to finding out information, the internet helps people gain access to all sorts of information although it has more drawbacks than the advantages. There are several possible reasons why it can happen. Firstly, some data may be unverifiable. There would be lots of choices which appear on the screen while searching for a specific topic which people would not be sure whether the information is accurate or not. Secondly, some sites may be unreliable, so it is important to check where information which originated from before using it. And finally, not everything is available through the net. To sum up, whilst I am prepared to admit that there are strong positive effects to of the internet in terms of its educational role, but it has in many ways altered people and families in a negative sense.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many people decide on a career path in their lives and keep to it. This, they argue ,leads to a more satisfying working life. What other things can people do to try and have a satisfying working life? One of the most important considerations in a job is satisfactory the level of interest in it which has different meanings for each person depending on his characteristics. I believe to achieve this, we should change whenever we find us ourselves out of the road. On the one hand, some people do not tend to change their current career which had been opted for in a very long time ago in school years. These groups are a big fan of having a calm life with a normal trend in a routine rate,. consequently, they do not have any expectations from life, since they believe every changes might trigger the stress and would have adverse effect on their future. For example, a cautious employee, whose responsibility is always the same without any risks in his duties at any no time, and he gets his salary at the end of the month in a routine way would probably like to stay in this position until retirement. On the other hand, the other groups who constantly applying for new vacancies are not delighted with their current job, so they are looking for a better situation in other places. These people have the ability to accept any risks which are leaded led by the changes and they are likely more talented to adapt themselves to in the new environments,. Therefore, they use all their efforts (they will spare no effort) to benefit from all the best possibilities and when they achieve to their targets they feel a sense of accomplishment for a period of time. In my view, first of all we should have a clear definition of satisfaction in a job, and then we can define our path to reach the goal. There are many factors which play a principal role in finding to find a proper working life such as salary, improvement and the working place. For example, if we earn a higher wage, we would be able to provide all our needs to have a high quality life, hence it contributes happiness as a part of satisfaction. In addition, when an improvement in our professional work has always been important in our mind, we would be definitely more delighted with a promotion in that position. In conclusion, it is not important to remain in a job or change our position in our life span. Being happy/contentment with what we are doing is the main and principal factor which is contributes to contributing satisfaction and it helps us to achieve this. hence, we should firstly know our capabilities and finally to define our expectations from the job.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Morteza Nemti Writing Task II #16 People should keep all the money they earn and should not pay taxes to the state. Do you agree or disagree? Excessively exhausted due to daily hard work, many people would ask why they are paying a painfully considerable proportion of their income as tax. Although it is totally understandable, what they are obliged to know is that this process do that they may not naturally like is absolutely in their own favor despite being unpleasant. The reason why people are paying taxes of different kinds is no longer pleasing the government which might have been a hateful common reason hundreds of years ago. In other words, the whole tax collected throughout the country nowadays goes directly to the treasury of the government where the budget it is kept safely to be planned to be spent on or invested in what, the government hopefully objectively believes, benefits the community most. Safety of people, their properties, the community and the competitive business atmosphere, regulatory in the state's affairs and convenience of the many facilities people need to use to play their role in society are what those plans are concerning. Regardless of people's tendency and strongest beliefs which could be entirely in contrast, what people earn through the jobs they hold is not all theirs to independently and individually decide on its whole as to that how and on what it ought to be spent. Society has a share in that which makes a certain part of it a public asset/possession. There are definitely critics to the idea that has been discussed, so far. They may argue that all people do something that the state benefits from and they claim that people have done what is incumbent upon them, which they think exempts them from taxes. Yet, seemingly it is not reason enough to support their claim. Still, in sociologists' opinion, citizens they need to pay taxes to the community, providing them with highly important means of success, namely opportunities, justice, security and safety, insurance and many other needs/things without any of which they were not even able to keep doing their own jobs. This payment is not a way to show their gratefulness, but to let this trend permanently continue, in fact.Morteza Nemti Writing Task II #16 Followed from the above, my personal belief is that what people pay in this regard, is not a waste of money they have earned and hardly would this be considered a loss. Rather, It is a responsibility they should eagerly assume to guarantee their country's future as well as theirs.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree? The configuration and constituents of the education system have sparked a debate among people. Some groups of people argue that the majority of the schooling has been dedicated to theoretical issues rather than hands-on skills. From my standpoint, nowadays, despite the several psychological types of research, the pedagogical system has failed to strike a balance between teaching pure facts and life skills for the students. Life skills refer to the qualifications, which are critical for the future employability and guaranteeing sustainable development. School-leavers, especially in developing countries, do not possess a deep insight into their own abilities and the social needs. Not only do the high schools and secondary education not pave the way for them to get familiar with their capabilities, but also afterwards, they do not support graduates in a break, through which young individuals could broaden their social and personal perspectives. For instance, job or travel opportunities for high school graduates, from my point of view, are pressing needs, which in most cases have been neglected to be offered by the people in charge. Tertiary education, also, is degree-oriented and stresses achieving certificates rather than learning practical proficiencies, which are considered job preconditions. Critical thinking, as a case in point, should be taught to the youth in universities, as this power contributes to an individual's high efficiency in a real life. Not to mention that optimum problem solving is another essential aptitude, which is the case of the education oversight. In this regard, we are witnessing of the increasing unemployment rate and incompetency in different workplaces. In a nutshell, there should be a balance between theoretical knowledge and life skills. Our education policies have to be revised an immense amount to provide both groups, either children in schools and adults in the universities, with the capabilities which could be put into practice in society.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Tourism has increased so much over the last 50 years that it is having a mainly negative on local inhabitants and the environment. However, others claim that is good for the economy. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of tourism and give your own opinion. Although the tourism industry has had a significant growth in recent years, some people believe that it causes deprivation of the host country whilst we could not ignore that they provide extreme benefits for us. It is obvious that a large number of countries are dependent ed on tourism for much of their incomes. In other words, tourism plays a key role in economic growth by providing job opportunities for the workforces. Countries which have been appealing/attractive breeding ground to attract tourists, such as a have safe and pleasant environments, could have succeeded and they were able to could have enhanced higher standards of living for their inhabitants. Furthermore, foreign people/foreigners who visit our country bring foreign currency to us which that causes us to have we have an increase ing in foreign exchange earnings. Another idea is opposed to advocates which states that many countries are is using up/draining natural resources to support the tourism industry which can deprive local population from their natural rights to use these resources. Not only do not they not like this, but also they keep guard against over tourists because . Because they think that holiday-makers are more valuable than their own citizens and the government care about tourists. Moreover, another problem associated with this industry is cultural debasement. In other words, it leads local populations to forget their traditions while host countries' traditions/customs is one of the most important tourist appeal trap. In conclusion, with all of these advantages and disadvantages, we should provide situations and facilities so that our country will be one of the important/prominent tourist destinations and we it needed to we carry out a major review on in our social behaviors.