جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people feel that entertainers (e.g. film stars, pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? Which other types of job should be highly paid? I concur with this view saying stars are paid too much money. Especially in comparison with many other occupations that need either profession, knowledge or ability like nursing, teaching or judgment which both work hardly and have major main influeances on human society. On the other hand, there are many people saying stars' the career period of stars professional career is too short and they pale with time by time when younger and far more attractive stars appear. Although it's totally true, this reason cannot justify their super/hugeunreachable salaries. How many years must a nurse must work to gain money that is are paid to an actor for a fifteen minutes role played in a movie? Moreover, the most celebrities are famous because of their appearance. They neither have an especial ability nor admirable adorable profession and in fact they are paid for their face and their body style. Hence, they are fantastic goals for beauty products factories who . The factories spend huge budgets to using use stars in their commercial and then they pretend everyone one can be famous and rich by with using their products. It is one of the most important reasons for stars' high paymentso mush pay. In spite of this, we cannot ignore stars' influences on business that they are involved in. For instance, playing a role by a specific celebrity can make a movie successful with a huge box office. So many fans and audiences who follow their stars and spend so much money for watching them can enrich every producer. Thus, It's needless to say, the stars suppose higher wage. In conclusion, I think, it's not fair that some people are paid so much and some others must work hardly for their life time and in the end there isn't enough money even for a middle quality life. Some professionals making significant contributions to society should be better paid and much appreciated.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

What are the benefits and drawbacks of tourism? In the past couple of decades, the tourism industry has emerged as one of the important ones in the world. The number of visitors and businessmen traveling abroad has been increased in recent years. There has been positive and negative consequences associated with this phenomenon. We can look at the advantages of tourism from different perspectives. Firstly economic aspect, increasing the number of the tourists can help creating jobs. Travelers come to the country, stay at hotels, use transportation vehicles, buy souvenirs and also they need tour leaders. There would be lots of job opportunity for unemployed persons. Consequently, we will have an economic development in society. Secondly we discuss personal effects. Travelers also benefit from visiting new cities and countries. They can learn about new languages and cultures. In addition, interacting with local residents and observing various lifestyles can help them to broaden their horizons. In other words, the barriers between nations break down which cause a stable communication between countries in spite of cultural diversity. On the other hand, it has some detrimental effects on nature such as pollution or destroying the natural habitats. Other than that, sometimes we find a sudden cost increase in tourism locations that have been crowded recently which could be like a repellent. If the living cost and expenditures of food or services were too high to afford, they would prefer not to visit them. To conclude, although tourism can be a way that people from different lands can socialize and relate with each other regardless of religions an politics, the lack of consideration can make many problems for the host country or the tourists.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Stress is one of the main causes in decreasing the efficiency of our performance in daily life. Stress may lead to bad health and mental depression. In order to overcome the stress, it is necessary to investigate how it is created primarily. According to many studies in this context, the first cause is the additional secretion of a steroid hormone named Cortisol. Cortisol this substance is produced from two glands locateding on the top of each kidney and it plays an essential role in body metabolism. There are some habits like drinking alcohol or coffee and eating sweet foods that stimulate secretion of this hormone. These harmful habits must be abandoned as muchfar as possible. From another aspect, one should consider psychological circumstances since they are very important especially if we study stress as a mental case. For instance, you might feel better if you talk with your friends or spending time with them. There are a number of things such as reading, painting, watching movies and so on that you can do to reduce your stress. Furthermore, I believe that you must take a trip from time to time. Visiting new landscapes, facing new cultures and finding new friends are a few some of the examples among many which make you feel better through traveling. So, it seems that for the reduction of stress we should change meal plans, exercise regularly and do something interesting for us. If we can manage our stress effectively, it will be possible to increase our performance level and reinforce our role in the society.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

How do movies or television influence people`s behavior? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. Movies are popular because people are great watchers. There is no doubt that movies and television play a major role in getting tiredness away from us. In my opinion, the media has deep influence in different forms like the general attitude, the view of eating and food and beauty. First of all, humans are emotional. All of them likes to laugh or cry. For example, a group of people prefer watching comedy movies and laugh at night after a hard day work with their family. In addition, some people expect that their heroes and heroines to achieve great success in their careers, in love or other aspects of life when watching a movie and they can imagine it can happens in their lives. Second, most women like watching cooking or beauty programs to learn how to cook new food or how to wear. Also, after watching these programs they take care to eat the right kind of food such as pasta and vegetables that will not increase the fat in body. Furthermore, some young girls and women usually pay attention to actresses' `s make up or their clothes. Often, they wear similar clothes or make up to play as a model to follow in their footsteps in society. On the other hand, many movies and programs are violent. The more we see violence, the less sensitive we become. Actors can be killed in a movie, news shows war, horrible accidents. Moreover, watching television make us less active. The time spent When we spend in front of the television is when time that we are not playing sport, walking and often we are eating junk food. To wrap it up, Television is an important influence in modern life and it can be a valuable, educational tool. The influence can be in the form of learning new subjects, whether wither it is good or bad. I believe that people have to a plan for watching their favorite programs.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health, but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. Food and people’s eating habits are certainly effective in every person’s health status. However, when it comes to daily meals, controversies about their ingredients arise (are starting). In this day and age, due to people’s sedentary jobs and lives with less physical activities it is recommended by some food specialists that people should ban meat and fish from in their daily meals. They cite that today’s meat and fish have high levels of fat as a consequence of uncontrolled production. Therefore, using them would result in heart correlated illnesses and has become more disadvantageous than beneficial. Besides, each person’s high levels of healthiness would lead to a healthy society and eventually a healthier world as a whole. On the contrary, many others claim that certain ratios of ingredients would make a complete meal and lack of some specific components of food ultimately will lead to/result in/end in proceed in general weakness and some diseases. Meat and fish are known as rich sources of proteins and our body needs specific portions of them and other elements in daily dishes. Therefore, owed because of/due to/owing to nutritional value the significant worth of proteins in every meal nobody neither either could nor might cut meat or fish from their his or her cooking plan. I certainly believe despite the fact that a reduction in the quality of meat products is obvious, because of the need that body has to such foods, we cannot delete them completely from our dietrecipes. In fact, a healthy food consists of meat, Fish, vegetables, bread and water. All these parts together on a specific balance would be called as a complete and healthy food. In addition, a society of good health as a whole, consistsed of its vigorous building bricks which are individuals. In conclusion, choosing not to to not eat meat and fish would not seem as a wise decision, while maintaining a balance in foods ingredients is a known benefitcial for every person and all human kinds.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some believe buildings should be built in a way that serves their purpose rather than just look beautiful. Others, however, say buildings should represent art too. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. The significant growth of metropolitan areas in the most major cities around the world has provoked various debates. Thus, you may frequently face a very simple yet fundamental question about the true purpose of housing. Some people believe that buildings should serve the most as a habitat while the others reckon that it should be artistic too. On the one hand, those who are proponents of the functional point of view in regard to buildings reason that a house should bring comfort and ease for those who settle in. otherwise it is no thing just a combination of nonsense materials substances such as soil and concrete. Suppose you have an office with a magnificent façade and a floor covered with stunning marble stones but without proper access stairs which makes all these beauties absolutely worthless. On the other hand, those who opt for artistic ideas in regard to properties usually mention that art brings spirit and joy to our life. Therefore, a place that where we live our life should represent one of the most unique aspects of the human culture which is art. Imagine how dispiriting a series of solid cubic concrete as a neighborhood is. It definitely has a huge adverse impact on life satisfaction as well as the general public happiness. Hence, artistic elements should be considered as a crucial consideration/assumption while initiating a construction project. I, personally, maintain that a building is not either a solid component of different materials or an art piece solely but rather both function and artistic appearance are necessary and inseparable for obtaining a cohesive concept called "a building". There are innumerous cases throughout history we can use to draw sound inferences supporting the mentioned statement from luxury palaces where great rulers used to have lived many years ago to incredible brand new skyscrapers representing multinational business firms. To sum up, I think function and art together in a building or in other words architecture could be the best approach to provide people with a roof over their head where they feel happy and safe or work and enjoy both.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

when people move to another country, they should adopt the customs and lifestyles of the new country to succeed. Do you agree or disagree with the statement above? Argue your position to convince an American reader by using strategies that you think are appropriate. 92222091 male In my opinion, there are three levels in which someone can adopt the lifestyle and customs of their destination. The first one is what I call the superficial level., These these are things like legal rules and obligations (e.g. How to drive, laws regarding trading, the dress code and so on). Secondly, we have the cultural level like the holidays we celebrate, the table manners or the way we dress. The third one is called the deep level, things like personal beliefs and the personal ethics or morality. Each one has a deeper impression on our personality than the former and thus its adoption is harder. When someone migrates to another country depending on their age and the communities they join they will inevitably adopt some parts of their lifestyle. The question is, "should they try to do this willingly?" I will answer the question separately for each different level. The superficial level is what we have no choice but to adopt. these are the laws a country is run by and any disobedience can cause imprisonment or deporting from the country. for example, in countries like the UK or SA you should always drive in the left side of the street, or in my country you are not legally allowed to consume alcoholic drinks. The cultural level is the level we have the most exposure to. this makes it harder not to adopt. its adoption is also affected by the communities we are in. like university, school, workplace, group of friends, and family. the first three are always in favor of /for the target country’s customs, the family always acts according to your culture, the group of friends is dependent on the person’s choice but again is usually for the country. in my opinion, adopting the culture of the target country in this level is a crucial factor in blending in with the society and communicating better and easier with the people of the respective that country but this does not mean throwing away one's own culture. The deep level is what defines who we are and is the most important part of a person’s personality. we usually do not get into contact with this level in on a daily basis, but when we do, its impression can be profound. talking about adopting the migration destination’s deep level lifestyle is nonsensical, not to mention actually adopting it! this level should only be changed according to logical arguments and personal experience in life and not just because people around us believe in it or not. the final point I want to make is that, depending on the level of lifestyle we are discussing the question can be answered quite differently. In general, as well as accepting some aspects of the target countries lifestyle (for the reasons mentioned above) we should try not to alienate ourselves with ourselves in the process of a migration, and we should bear in mind people may look different in their appearance, but they are not that different deep inside.