Fridays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/152-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-10 2024-05-04T13:29:55+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management What are the Main Tasks of Universities, Majid Talebzadeh 2016-04-30T05:04:32+00:00 2016-04-30T05:04:32+00:00 http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/152-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-10/754-what-are-the-main-tasks-of-universities-majid-talebzadeh <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/What are the Main Tasks of Universities, Majid Talebzadeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">What are the main tasks of universities: to offer students’ knowledge and skills essential for their career, or to provide students with access to knowledge itself? What do you think university education should contain? Fast‐Changing world nowadays requires societies to been adapted to modern technologies. It is undeniable that universities play a vital role in this manner. Indeed, universities are not only improving youth’s academic knowledge, but they are it is also developing the culture of the community. I personally, believe that the universities are duty‐ bound to provide students to be successful in their both personal and professional lives. Obviously, modern economies place a premium on educated work forces. In other words, employees who obtain higher education will be given priority over those who are skilled just only based biased on experience. The most important cause is that these days workers are highly demanded to have the on ability to operateing high tech equipment. Thus, they should possess good enough knowledge in a wide range of information. However, the university is the best place to keep abreast of high standard occupations. Evidence From official statistics indicates that job seekers who have been passed extra training courses have more chances to obtain better job positions. Sometimes we might we find university’s courses a bit boring, or probably it seems that basic sciences like mathematics, physics, statistics and others are not useful for our future. But in reality, these are not only the best training for students' mind to make it sharply, but also it is also will help them to solve their complicatedconfuse upcoming their real life problems in the future. Also, besides basic sciences, it should be very useful to possess professional trainings, ranging from those learnt in their field to those in other relevant subjects. Furthermore, it is undeniable that higher education is really mandatory to keep yourself in a high‐ quality standard of life. In conclusion, university is the best place for promoting community members to acquire higher levels of life quality standards. Likewise, In comparison with the others who do not have academic education, university‐educated skilled workers, have a good chance of better opportunities.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/What are the Main Tasks of Universities, Majid Talebzadeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">What are the main tasks of universities: to offer students’ knowledge and skills essential for their career, or to provide students with access to knowledge itself? What do you think university education should contain? Fast‐Changing world nowadays requires societies to been adapted to modern technologies. It is undeniable that universities play a vital role in this manner. Indeed, universities are not only improving youth’s academic knowledge, but they are it is also developing the culture of the community. I personally, believe that the universities are duty‐ bound to provide students to be successful in their both personal and professional lives. Obviously, modern economies place a premium on educated work forces. In other words, employees who obtain higher education will be given priority over those who are skilled just only based biased on experience. The most important cause is that these days workers are highly demanded to have the on ability to operateing high tech equipment. Thus, they should possess good enough knowledge in a wide range of information. However, the university is the best place to keep abreast of high standard occupations. Evidence From official statistics indicates that job seekers who have been passed extra training courses have more chances to obtain better job positions. Sometimes we might we find university’s courses a bit boring, or probably it seems that basic sciences like mathematics, physics, statistics and others are not useful for our future. But in reality, these are not only the best training for students' mind to make it sharply, but also it is also will help them to solve their complicatedconfuse upcoming their real life problems in the future. Also, besides basic sciences, it should be very useful to possess professional trainings, ranging from those learnt in their field to those in other relevant subjects. Furthermore, it is undeniable that higher education is really mandatory to keep yourself in a high‐ quality standard of life. In conclusion, university is the best place for promoting community members to acquire higher levels of life quality standards. Likewise, In comparison with the others who do not have academic education, university‐educated skilled workers, have a good chance of better opportunities.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Vahid Ghobadi 2016-04-30T05:04:11+00:00 2016-04-30T05:04:11+00:00 http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/152-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-10/753-vahid-ghobadi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/Vahid Ghobadi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people are of the opinion that prisons are basically universities of crime, fostering the kind of behaviour they aim to eradicate, and are, therefore, not effective. Others feel that prison life is not hard enough. Discuss the arguments on both sides of the issue . what is own opinion on the matter ? In every society there are many people with different treatments . The people who act according to their needs and situations .Some choose societie's acceptable ways some other choose wrong way . The jail houses came to punish people with rude manners . Some people believe the prisons' atmosphere can affect prisoners and change them to professional crime criminals ,. therefore , living with criminals for a while can have an awful influence on a prisoner's perspective onof crime .Not only Listening and talking about killing , swindling , stealing and other kinds of illegal manners can change everyone to a criminal but also can make fade the sense of guilty of committing a crime in prisoners fade. In the other side on the other hand, there are people who believe prisons are useful places for criminals to correct their illicit/unlawful/illegal offensive behaviors . They're not disgusting as claimed known because of free food , not responsibility about tax and tasks and no need to work for money. Also people who choose legal/decent/lawabiding ligal life can live in a safer and more convenient easer society . In my opinion , both two groups are right. we can leave criminals to live in society with another people and prisons' influences on them are peritectable predictable too .We should create a new generation of prisons .The new places where offenders are taught teach and improve new skills and their ability .Instead of wasting time in prisons for their punishments , goverments can engage participate them in for labour intensive tasks .For instance they can help for constructing roads ,building schools and hospitals .Another subject I'd like to reflect is the period when prisoners come out of the jail . Without supporting and helping them to find a job and gaining money they turn into their crime life again and we can notcannot suppose they live in a ligal way.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/Vahid Ghobadi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people are of the opinion that prisons are basically universities of crime, fostering the kind of behaviour they aim to eradicate, and are, therefore, not effective. Others feel that prison life is not hard enough. Discuss the arguments on both sides of the issue . what is own opinion on the matter ? In every society there are many people with different treatments . The people who act according to their needs and situations .Some choose societie's acceptable ways some other choose wrong way . The jail houses came to punish people with rude manners . Some people believe the prisons' atmosphere can affect prisoners and change them to professional crime criminals ,. therefore , living with criminals for a while can have an awful influence on a prisoner's perspective onof crime .Not only Listening and talking about killing , swindling , stealing and other kinds of illegal manners can change everyone to a criminal but also can make fade the sense of guilty of committing a crime in prisoners fade. In the other side on the other hand, there are people who believe prisons are useful places for criminals to correct their illicit/unlawful/illegal offensive behaviors . They're not disgusting as claimed known because of free food , not responsibility about tax and tasks and no need to work for money. Also people who choose legal/decent/lawabiding ligal life can live in a safer and more convenient easer society . In my opinion , both two groups are right. we can leave criminals to live in society with another people and prisons' influences on them are peritectable predictable too .We should create a new generation of prisons .The new places where offenders are taught teach and improve new skills and their ability .Instead of wasting time in prisons for their punishments , goverments can engage participate them in for labour intensive tasks .For instance they can help for constructing roads ,building schools and hospitals .Another subject I'd like to reflect is the period when prisoners come out of the jail . Without supporting and helping them to find a job and gaining money they turn into their crime life again and we can notcannot suppose they live in a ligal way.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Some Say that Young and Energetic Employees are the More Valuable for the Company 2016-04-30T05:03:53+00:00 2016-04-30T05:03:53+00:00 http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/152-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-10/752-some-say-that-young-and-energetic-employees-are-the-more-valuable-for-the-company <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/Some Say that Young and Energetic Employees are the More Valuable for the Company.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some say that young and energetic employees are the more valuable for the company, others argue that older employees have more experience and knowledge. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples, based on you own experience. A typical organization usually employs both young and old people. It is hard to say whether young employees are more valuable than old employees or vice‐versa, because both of them have their pluses and minuses. Start‐ups tend to hire young people, because they are almost energetic people who have lots of innovativeon ideas. They can come up with interesting and unique ideas that have the potential to become successful services or products. It is not hard to see that most startups are founded by young men or women. A remarkable feature about young people is that they are well‐versed in new technologies. For more advantages about youngsters, we should notice that they are unmarried, hence they are not only free from domestic duties and liabilities but also can work long hours during the day. They are less expensive and are paid less than older employee. Moreover, they are quite flexible and adaptable. Because of these benefits, may young people may be hired more. (employable) On the flip side, youngsters lack experience. They are bustling with ideas but they lack the skills and experience required to implement those ideas. They also tend to act rashly. In this way the older employees with years of experience can aid and guide the younger folk. They have years of experience. They have seen the ups and downs of the business so they can foresee trends. With these functions they are assets for the organization. After analyzing the situation it is not hard to see that having the right mix of fresh and experienced employees is necessary for organizations. Businesses have already recognized the benefits of hiring people of different age groups and don’t this trend is not expected to change any time soon.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/Some Say that Young and Energetic Employees are the More Valuable for the Company.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some say that young and energetic employees are the more valuable for the company, others argue that older employees have more experience and knowledge. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples, based on you own experience. A typical organization usually employs both young and old people. It is hard to say whether young employees are more valuable than old employees or vice‐versa, because both of them have their pluses and minuses. Start‐ups tend to hire young people, because they are almost energetic people who have lots of innovativeon ideas. They can come up with interesting and unique ideas that have the potential to become successful services or products. It is not hard to see that most startups are founded by young men or women. A remarkable feature about young people is that they are well‐versed in new technologies. For more advantages about youngsters, we should notice that they are unmarried, hence they are not only free from domestic duties and liabilities but also can work long hours during the day. They are less expensive and are paid less than older employee. Moreover, they are quite flexible and adaptable. Because of these benefits, may young people may be hired more. (employable) On the flip side, youngsters lack experience. They are bustling with ideas but they lack the skills and experience required to implement those ideas. They also tend to act rashly. In this way the older employees with years of experience can aid and guide the younger folk. They have years of experience. They have seen the ups and downs of the business so they can foresee trends. With these functions they are assets for the organization. After analyzing the situation it is not hard to see that having the right mix of fresh and experienced employees is necessary for organizations. Businesses have already recognized the benefits of hiring people of different age groups and don’t this trend is not expected to change any time soon.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Some People Claim that not Enough of the Waste from Homes is Recycled, Sarang Rose 2016-04-30T05:03:33+00:00 2016-04-30T05:03:33+00:00 http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/152-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-10/751-some-people-claim-that-not-enough-of-the-waste-from-homes-is-recycled-sarang-rose <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/Some People Claim that not Enough of the Waste from Homes is Recycled, Sarang Rose.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Task: some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it as legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? Nowadays, due to life style changes we have more waste in comparison with the past. One of the best methods to manage waste is recycling. Some people assert that the only way to increase recycling is to make regulations, but I suppose this is a mutual responsibility., In other words, both people and governments are responsible in this regard. Firstly, I think we can increase recycling by raising making people's well awareness about the adverse effects of wastes to nature and the wild life. For example, there are many documentaries which show that how marine animals suffer from plastics waste. Also, we can increase the proportion of recycling by encouraging people to sort out their litters from the source. Also, in Germany in every house we can find diverse bins each of which in each house. Each of these bins is allocated to a special type of waste;, one for wet ones, and the other for dry ones and one for glasses. In addition, I think governments play a vital role in recycling. They should make/introduce the rules to oblige industries to produce recyclable products. For example, in many developed countries manufacturers should be committed that their products have the capability to be reused, otherwise they don't will not be allowed to produce and sell them. In addition, in some European countries there are some regulations which make people responsible about their wastes. For instance, in Finland people are responsible till their waste is recycled. In conclusion, I strongly believe that both governments and people should assume responsibility to address the waste recycling issue, so we extremely require to develop the culture of recycling besides making strict rules. In other words, the more cooperation between governments and people, the less wastes.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/Some People Claim that not Enough of the Waste from Homes is Recycled, Sarang Rose.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Task: some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it as legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? Nowadays, due to life style changes we have more waste in comparison with the past. One of the best methods to manage waste is recycling. Some people assert that the only way to increase recycling is to make regulations, but I suppose this is a mutual responsibility., In other words, both people and governments are responsible in this regard. Firstly, I think we can increase recycling by raising making people's well awareness about the adverse effects of wastes to nature and the wild life. For example, there are many documentaries which show that how marine animals suffer from plastics waste. Also, we can increase the proportion of recycling by encouraging people to sort out their litters from the source. Also, in Germany in every house we can find diverse bins each of which in each house. Each of these bins is allocated to a special type of waste;, one for wet ones, and the other for dry ones and one for glasses. In addition, I think governments play a vital role in recycling. They should make/introduce the rules to oblige industries to produce recyclable products. For example, in many developed countries manufacturers should be committed that their products have the capability to be reused, otherwise they don't will not be allowed to produce and sell them. In addition, in some European countries there are some regulations which make people responsible about their wastes. For instance, in Finland people are responsible till their waste is recycled. In conclusion, I strongly believe that both governments and people should assume responsibility to address the waste recycling issue, so we extremely require to develop the culture of recycling besides making strict rules. In other words, the more cooperation between governments and people, the less wastes.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Separation or Mix 2016-04-30T05:03:13+00:00 2016-04-30T05:03:13+00:00 http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/152-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-10/750-separation-or-mix <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/Separation or Mix.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Others, however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. The matter of sexuality has been a controversial issue almost in any subject title, education included. Although most successful schools are the separate, ones some people, myself included, believe that in this era there it will be advantageous for children to participate in mixed educational places. The oldest facts about school regulations’ goes back to middle ages, showing that students were studying at single sex schools due to social and religious contracts. Boys and girls were taught though for different targets because of holding special duties and there was were no chance of in breaking the rules, in contrast with our perspective toward education in this era. Although this trend continues by theby means of mines of educating more successful and worthy students, giving reasons such as more concentration on lessons and more friendly and calm atmosphere not considering the deep consequences of this attitude. For instance, it is a the fact that sexual discrimination was the first reason behind of this method, the perspective which we are trying to pale the significance of it now. On the other hand, not only is school not the place for education, but also the first place for studying social activities, hence being in contact with the opposite sex gives them the opportunity of figuring out each other’s way of thinking. Moreover, if there is a problem based on sexuality, it would be wise to addressing it at school time, otherwise its consequences will be devastating. The less contact, the less information and the more immature perspective toward the opposite sex at the first sight and the issue of humanity in general. All in all, while there are prosps and cons for the outlook in both single sex and unisex schools, it is worth considering the societies' convictions in toward this issue at the first step because whatever is the family’s way of thinking, children are living under the umbrella of social contracts. Nasim 301 Words</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/Separation or Mix.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Others, however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. The matter of sexuality has been a controversial issue almost in any subject title, education included. Although most successful schools are the separate, ones some people, myself included, believe that in this era there it will be advantageous for children to participate in mixed educational places. The oldest facts about school regulations’ goes back to middle ages, showing that students were studying at single sex schools due to social and religious contracts. Boys and girls were taught though for different targets because of holding special duties and there was were no chance of in breaking the rules, in contrast with our perspective toward education in this era. Although this trend continues by theby means of mines of educating more successful and worthy students, giving reasons such as more concentration on lessons and more friendly and calm atmosphere not considering the deep consequences of this attitude. For instance, it is a the fact that sexual discrimination was the first reason behind of this method, the perspective which we are trying to pale the significance of it now. On the other hand, not only is school not the place for education, but also the first place for studying social activities, hence being in contact with the opposite sex gives them the opportunity of figuring out each other’s way of thinking. Moreover, if there is a problem based on sexuality, it would be wise to addressing it at school time, otherwise its consequences will be devastating. The less contact, the less information and the more immature perspective toward the opposite sex at the first sight and the issue of humanity in general. All in all, while there are prosps and cons for the outlook in both single sex and unisex schools, it is worth considering the societies' convictions in toward this issue at the first step because whatever is the family’s way of thinking, children are living under the umbrella of social contracts. Nasim 301 Words</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> In Some Countries, Hanieh Eftekhari 2016-04-30T05:02:51+00:00 2016-04-30T05:02:51+00:00 http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/152-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-10/749-in-some-countries-hanieh-eftekhari <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/In Some Countries, Hanieh Eftekhari.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? In this rapidly changing world, we have witnessed that a vast variety of industries and companies have been developed in large cities. Although this trend could bring lots of advantages for modern life, many drawbacks would break out such as pollution and population explosion. many authorities suggest some resolution such as relocating industry plants or businesses from urban regions to the countysides which will reduce disadvantages of this new phenomenon. Some experts believe that this solution might aggravate enhance the problems in that rural areas are of limited facilities and infrastructure rather than big cities. Therefore, the owners and managers would be confronted with serious problems with corresponding and connecting with different companies for their routine tasks .besides, not only might commuting be time‐consuming for both either employees and or workers who live in cities to get to their workplaces, but also, they would be prone to more car accidents on the roads. In addition, the companies were more likely to recruit local‐workers which would raise the incidence of laying off approach in urban regions. On the other hand, decentralization plays a vital role in decreasing pollution and contamination from urban areas which have an important impact on improving citizens’ condition lifestyles. in other words, tremendous terminal diseases such as heart attack and lung cancers which are cited as a result of weather pollution, would be considerably managed/controlled lessened.in addition, while transferring industries might give rise to joblessness in big cities, it could increase job vacancy for rural workers. Last but not least, this approach would pave the way for developing areas which were poverty‐stricken and abandoned. In conclusion, many people maintain that reorganizing plants in rural areas would take a lot of energy and finance and is not sensible, whereas some others believe that benefits outweigh its cons. I, myself, believe that decentralization would be an essential step that should be encouraged to spread technologies and progress to in all points of a country and prevent from unwillingly immigration to larger cities.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/In Some Countries, Hanieh Eftekhari.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? In this rapidly changing world, we have witnessed that a vast variety of industries and companies have been developed in large cities. Although this trend could bring lots of advantages for modern life, many drawbacks would break out such as pollution and population explosion. many authorities suggest some resolution such as relocating industry plants or businesses from urban regions to the countysides which will reduce disadvantages of this new phenomenon. Some experts believe that this solution might aggravate enhance the problems in that rural areas are of limited facilities and infrastructure rather than big cities. Therefore, the owners and managers would be confronted with serious problems with corresponding and connecting with different companies for their routine tasks .besides, not only might commuting be time‐consuming for both either employees and or workers who live in cities to get to their workplaces, but also, they would be prone to more car accidents on the roads. In addition, the companies were more likely to recruit local‐workers which would raise the incidence of laying off approach in urban regions. On the other hand, decentralization plays a vital role in decreasing pollution and contamination from urban areas which have an important impact on improving citizens’ condition lifestyles. in other words, tremendous terminal diseases such as heart attack and lung cancers which are cited as a result of weather pollution, would be considerably managed/controlled lessened.in addition, while transferring industries might give rise to joblessness in big cities, it could increase job vacancy for rural workers. Last but not least, this approach would pave the way for developing areas which were poverty‐stricken and abandoned. In conclusion, many people maintain that reorganizing plants in rural areas would take a lot of energy and finance and is not sensible, whereas some others believe that benefits outweigh its cons. I, myself, believe that decentralization would be an essential step that should be encouraged to spread technologies and progress to in all points of a country and prevent from unwillingly immigration to larger cities.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Children Paid Work, Jalal Asghari 2016-04-30T05:02:28+00:00 2016-04-30T05:02:28+00:00 http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/152-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-10/748-children-paid-work-jalal-asghari <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/Children Paid Work, Jalal Asghari.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work, some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for experience and responsibility. What are your opinions on this? Children’s work for income is a complex issue, and it is difficult to say that this type of work is fair or injustice so that some believe working of children is not acceptable and some others say that it can be a part of individuals’ experiment experience and which causes them to be more responsible. In from my point of view, children can work in a part time or time‐free job, but in specific and special conditions which is are controlled by parents or family. Immature people’s working for income has its own difficulties and drawbacks and maybe they be exploited by job owners for a little money and in a harmful situation which harm damages their body and soul. Because of low amount of experience and physical power, these children mostly are employed in boring and repetitive jobs, for instance, in some cases they are used in dumping yards to collect and recycle materials, and what they can learn and experience in these jobs to assess them in the future. In some developed countries such as Japan, parents learn teach their children to contribute to household chores or their teachers ask them to clean classes and or toilets to learn teach them a sense of contribution and hard work hard working to use in the future and to decrease the amount of school’s costs, and then students will pay less than before. Working in families’ workshops or farm at leisure times can be another useful activity for children to improve their abilities and apply them. Although working under parents’s control has its own advantages, but children should have a sufficient amount of free time to play games and rest and enjoy their childhood and with these games they can improve their basic mental abilities such as imagination. Consequently, children’s work is a very complicated issue which has many factors and should be applied in a proper time and place under legal/tight/strict scientific inspections to avoid its drawbacks. Word count = 318</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/Children Paid Work, Jalal Asghari.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work, some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for experience and responsibility. What are your opinions on this? Children’s work for income is a complex issue, and it is difficult to say that this type of work is fair or injustice so that some believe working of children is not acceptable and some others say that it can be a part of individuals’ experiment experience and which causes them to be more responsible. In from my point of view, children can work in a part time or time‐free job, but in specific and special conditions which is are controlled by parents or family. Immature people’s working for income has its own difficulties and drawbacks and maybe they be exploited by job owners for a little money and in a harmful situation which harm damages their body and soul. Because of low amount of experience and physical power, these children mostly are employed in boring and repetitive jobs, for instance, in some cases they are used in dumping yards to collect and recycle materials, and what they can learn and experience in these jobs to assess them in the future. In some developed countries such as Japan, parents learn teach their children to contribute to household chores or their teachers ask them to clean classes and or toilets to learn teach them a sense of contribution and hard work hard working to use in the future and to decrease the amount of school’s costs, and then students will pay less than before. Working in families’ workshops or farm at leisure times can be another useful activity for children to improve their abilities and apply them. Although working under parents’s control has its own advantages, but children should have a sufficient amount of free time to play games and rest and enjoy their childhood and with these games they can improve their basic mental abilities such as imagination. Consequently, children’s work is a very complicated issue which has many factors and should be applied in a proper time and place under legal/tight/strict scientific inspections to avoid its drawbacks. Word count = 318</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Automobile, Nassim 2016-04-30T05:02:06+00:00 2016-04-30T05:02:06+00:00 http://sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/152-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-10/747-automobile-nassim <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/Automobile, Nassim.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">70‐ some people think that the automobile has improved modern life. Others think that the automobile has caused serious problems. What is your opinion? 1‐ Agree: 1‐ can go fast to other place 2‐ even transmition of culture, habits and ritual and language 3‐ although As of industrial revolution the humanity’s society has changed and progressed significantly. Nowadays, automobiles and robots have become our ordinary machines and we have improved our life condition better with the aid aim of these technologies. It is a common knowledge that invention of automobile has its own pluses and minuses, but it does not mean that involve its advantages pale into insignificance. First and foremost, who can deny the noticeable effect of automobiles in faster commutingcommunication? Furthermore, it is not too distant future that new generations of cars can do some unbelievable assignments like flying and take the place of most of the aircrafts. Take travelling before the invention of cars as an example. It took takes a number of days to for shuttleing between two cities, not to mention the fact that there were various menaces like animal attacks assailing of animals and thefts. Secondly, I maintain that automobiles make the world smaller and interaction has boosted significantly. Therefore, diverse characteristics of different provinces in a country and even nations have become closer and more similar. In other words, not only can people promote transmit their culture, folklore and rituals, but also authorities and statesmen can have more reciprocal relationships and even become political alliances and help each other more than before. Last but not least, though the automobile has improved the quality of our life, it has some disadvantages like environmental pollution and inspiring people to have a sedentary lifestyle. I believe that we ourselves can suppress these side effects. Using automobiles excessively, individuals are prone to some diseases such as obesity and heart attack. Thereby, we should strike a balance between usage of private transportation and other transportation vehicles like buses and bicycles or and even hiking. To put it in a nutshell, I will vote in favor of the pivotal role of automobiles in peoples’ life, since it makes communication more expeditiously than before. Moreover, cross‐cultural exchanges has have increased. It is worth bearing in mind that one of the important factors of using cars is that we should not employ it extravagantly.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.10/Automobile, Nassim.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">70‐ some people think that the automobile has improved modern life. Others think that the automobile has caused serious problems. What is your opinion? 1‐ Agree: 1‐ can go fast to other place 2‐ even transmition of culture, habits and ritual and language 3‐ although As of industrial revolution the humanity’s society has changed and progressed significantly. Nowadays, automobiles and robots have become our ordinary machines and we have improved our life condition better with the aid aim of these technologies. It is a common knowledge that invention of automobile has its own pluses and minuses, but it does not mean that involve its advantages pale into insignificance. First and foremost, who can deny the noticeable effect of automobiles in faster commutingcommunication? Furthermore, it is not too distant future that new generations of cars can do some unbelievable assignments like flying and take the place of most of the aircrafts. Take travelling before the invention of cars as an example. It took takes a number of days to for shuttleing between two cities, not to mention the fact that there were various menaces like animal attacks assailing of animals and thefts. Secondly, I maintain that automobiles make the world smaller and interaction has boosted significantly. Therefore, diverse characteristics of different provinces in a country and even nations have become closer and more similar. In other words, not only can people promote transmit their culture, folklore and rituals, but also authorities and statesmen can have more reciprocal relationships and even become political alliances and help each other more than before. Last but not least, though the automobile has improved the quality of our life, it has some disadvantages like environmental pollution and inspiring people to have a sedentary lifestyle. I believe that we ourselves can suppress these side effects. Using automobiles excessively, individuals are prone to some diseases such as obesity and heart attack. Thereby, we should strike a balance between usage of private transportation and other transportation vehicles like buses and bicycles or and even hiking. To put it in a nutshell, I will vote in favor of the pivotal role of automobiles in peoples’ life, since it makes communication more expeditiously than before. Moreover, cross‐cultural exchanges has have increased. It is worth bearing in mind that one of the important factors of using cars is that we should not employ it extravagantly.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>